Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,663 posts)
Tue May 12, 2020, 08:53 PM May 2020

Opinions Trump's lawyers just made appalling arguments to the Supreme Court

When Donald Trump ran for president and claimed he’d release his tax returns as soon as the IRS was done auditing them, it was an obvious lie. Since then, he has taken extraordinary steps to conceal what every president and party nominee in almost half a century has gladly offered to the public.

But his desperate attempts to keep the public from understanding his finances may finally be reaching their end — though how long it will take to actually see the documents, or if we will at all, is far from clear.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in three separate lawsuits Trump has filed to stop officials from seeing those returns. The first two concern congressional subpoenas given to Mazars (his accounting firm) and Deutsche Bank (his bank). The third concerns an investigation by the district attorney of Manhattan.

It was hard to tell how the justices might rule. But what the arguments did reveal is the almost limitless scope of immunity he seeks. Trump believes he should be excused not just from congressional oversight, not just from criminal investigation, not just from questioning by the press, but even from politics itself.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/opinions-trump-s-lawyers-just-made-appalling-arguments-to-the-supreme-court/ar-BB13ZbbW?ocid=hplocalnews

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinions Trump's lawyers just made appalling arguments to the Supreme Court (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2020 OP
They could have gone there and did this Eliot Rosewater May 2020 #1
I Heard The NY DA Was Brilliant Me. May 2020 #2
Mazars is a piece of work underpants May 2020 #3
Sekulow seemed like a loudmouthed empty suit C_U_L8R May 2020 #4

C_U_L8R

(45,054 posts)
4. Sekulow seemed like a loudmouthed empty suit
Tue May 12, 2020, 09:11 PM
May 2020

Spewing nothing convincing - more like fox news talking points designed for dopes. I hope the justices rolled their eyes at that over-reaching nonsense.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Opinions Trump's lawyers...