Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,284 posts)
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 02:01 PM Sep 2018

The Female Face of Men's Misogyny

The Female Face of Men’s Misogyny


In 1991, Ricky Silberman, Anita Blair and Barbara Kay Bracher formed a group called “Women for Judge Thomas” that led the fight to discredit and silence Anita Hill. The organization, which went on to become the Independent Women’s Forum (IWF), is now one of the right-wing groups rallying support for the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court—even in the midst of his own #MeToo moment.



Feminists protest in support of reproductive rights at the Supreme Court. IWF opposes reproductive justice policies, and Brett Kavanaugh has a record of voting against them. (Victoria Pickering / Creative Commons)

During the confirmation process for then-nominee and now-Justice Clarence Thomas, Silberman, Blair and Bracher released a list of women who affirmed they had never been assaulted by him. “They ran the original playbook of giving Clarence Thomas cover by having women stand behind him and argue for him,” Lisa Graves, who has done in-depth research on IWF with the Center for Media and Democracy, which she formerly headed, told Ms. The strategy, Graves says, “boiled down to denying [Hill’s] experience as inauthentic and deceitful because Thomas had not sexually harassed [other women].” Supporters of Kavanaugh are now employing this tactic against Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who earlier this month alleged that he attempted to rape her in high school, and will likely be used against Deborah Ramirez, who just this week claimed he once exposed himself to her without her consent in college. But the assertion that Kavanaugh did not rape some women, of course, should not excuse him from the sexual assault of Blasey Ford, Ramirez or others. “The idea that you get a freebie because it was a long time ago is morally repugnant,” says Graves. “We need to slow down and find out what happened, because it matters whether you put an attempted rapist on the Supreme Court. It would matter if you put an attempted bank robber on the Supreme Court. You wouldn’t hear people say: well, he only robbed one bank and it was a long time ago; he didn’t rob every bank, just that one, so how do we know he’s really a bank robber. The argument in any other context besides sexual assault is absurd on its face.”

IWF and its 501(c)(4) affiliate, Independent Women’s Voice (IWV), claim to be independent and to speak for women—but in fact, they are a female front for rich, white men like the Koch brothers to sell misogynist policies and candidates to women under the guise of non-partisanship and neutrality. The Koch network of billionaires has given IWF more than $5 million between 2001 and 2014, and many IWF employees come from Koch-controlled or funded groups. IWF has also received donations from Exxon Mobil and Rush Limbaugh. Ironically, the overwhelming majority of known donors to Independent Women’s Voice are men. Not surprisingly, IWF and IWV’s policy positions reflect the views of those male supporters. Graves, who has called IWF “an ultra reactionary women’s group opposing women’s rights,” observed that the group has “provided Republicans in Congress with women’s voices to testify against affirmative action, social safety net programs and gun violence mitigation measures,” giving a “female face and voice to opposing almost every mainstream and common sense protection for equality that’s been advanced.”

IWF helps Republican lawmakers try to appeal to women—despite their misogynist positions. The group has consistently opposed policies that would advance equal pay, earned sick leave and paid parental leave; increase the minimum wage; and secure and uphold women’s reproductive privacy and freedom. IWF’s leaders lobbied against the Violence Against Women Act, falsely declaring in the process that “wives instigate violence, including severe violence, against husbands more often than husbands do against wives,” and have argued that the problem of sexual assault on college campuses is overblown. They have attacked Title IX protections for female athletes and claimed that integrating the Virginia Military Institute would cripple national defense.

. . . .

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2018/09/25/female-face-mens-misogyny/

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hedda_foil

(16,373 posts)
1. Thanks, niyad, this is incredibly important information.
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 02:50 PM
Sep 2018

This independent women's forum has always come across as hinky.

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
4. TY,niyad, Incredibly important, hope it goes to The Left Column &sticks out for awhile
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 05:50 PM
Sep 2018

Everybody needs to see and read this.

P.S. Always the Filthy Koch Bros and their poison,pollution Infrastructure.

niyad

(113,284 posts)
14. such women feel comfortable in the power structure, feel they HAVE power under the
Fri Sep 28, 2018, 12:12 PM
Sep 2018

present system, and don't want to rock the boat.

there is also religious and political brainwashing to consider.

potone

(1,701 posts)
18. Yes, you are right.
Sat Sep 29, 2018, 04:04 PM
Sep 2018

I think many of them think that they are protected, and that nothing bad will ever happen to them.

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
7. Vital for more voters to understand about their agenda.
Thu Sep 27, 2018, 07:32 AM
Sep 2018

Excerpt: they are a female front for rich, white men like the Koch brothers to sell misogynist policies and candidates to women under the guise of non-partisanship and neutrality.

Disgusting.

The group has consistently opposed policies that would advance equal pay, earned sick leave and paid parental leave; increase the minimum wage; and secure and uphold women’s reproductive privacy and freedom. IWF’s leaders lobbied against the Violence Against Women Act, falsely declaring in the process that “wives instigate violence, including severe violence, against husbands more often than husbands do against wives,” and have argued that the problem of sexual assault on college campuses is overblown. They have attacked Title IX protections for female athletes and claimed that integrating the Virginia Military Institute would cripple national defense.

Nitram

(22,794 posts)
8. Thank you for the reminder. Some women fight against women's rights as hard as any male misogyninst.
Thu Sep 27, 2018, 09:28 AM
Sep 2018
 

Novembrist

(35 posts)
9. Wanna bring down a woman in America? Enlist another woman.
Fri Sep 28, 2018, 03:02 AM
Sep 2018

Same tactic used against blacks, Hispanics, Asians, etc. Too bad for the GOP Rachel Mitchell totally botched her assigned hit job on Ford!

 

Novembrist

(35 posts)
17. Maddow ALWAYS Gets It
Sat Sep 29, 2018, 06:46 AM
Sep 2018

As for Mitchell, I quite honestly have never heard of her. And, based on the job she did with Ford, I expect I shall never hear of her again!

Almost forgot: Thank you for the welcome, Good Sir!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Female Face of Men's ...