Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Say No to Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Mr. Trump - by the NYT Editorial Board
-snip-
The Constitution gives the president nearly unlimited power to grant clemency to people convicted of federal offenses, so Mr. Trump can pardon Mr. Arpaio. But Mr. Arpaio was an elected official who defied a federal courts order that he stop violating peoples constitutional rights. He was found in contempt of that court. By pardoning him, Mr. Trump would show his contempt for the American court system and its only means of enforcing the law, since he would be sending a message to other officials that they may flout court orders also.
Mr. Arpaio could not be less deserving of mercy. In addition to the dragnets of Hispanic-looking people that ultimately led to his contempt conviction, he racked up a record of harassment, neglect, mistreatment and other flagrant abuses of office that should have ended his career years ago. But he was in power in 2015, when Mr. Trump entered the presidential race. He soon won Mr. Trumps abiding affection and returned the love, calling Mr. Trump a great patriot and supporting him throughout the campaign. (Both also spent years promoting the lie that President Barack Obama was born outside the United States.)
The bromance between Americas toughest sheriff, as Mr. Arpaio liked to call himself, and Americas toughest-talking presidential candidate should have surprised no one. Both men built their brands by exploiting racial resentments of white Americans. While Mr. Trump was beginning his revanchist run for the White House on the backs of Mexican rapists, Mr. Arpaio was terrorizing brown-skinned people across southern Arizona, sweeping them up in saturation patrols and holding them in what he referred to as a concentration camp for months at a time.
It was this behavior that a federal judge in 2011 found to be unconstitutional and ordered Mr. Arpaio to stop. He refused, placing himself above the law and the Constitution that he had sworn to uphold.
That alone would be reason enough to deny him a pardon. But a grant of mercy from Mr. Trump would also go against longstanding Justice Department policy, which calls for a waiting period of at least five years before the consideration of a pardon application and some expression of regret or remorse by the applicant. Mr. Arpaio shows no sign of remorse; to the contrary, he sees himself as the victim. If they can go after me, they can go after anyone in this country, he told Fox News on Wednesday. Hes right in a nation based on the rule of law, anyone who ignores a court order, or otherwise breaks the law, may be prosecuted and convicted.
more
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/24/opinion/joe-arpaio-trump-pardon.html?emc=edit_th_20170825&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=57435284
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 2001 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Say No to Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Mr. Trump - by the NYT Editorial Board (Original Post)
DonViejo
Aug 2017
OP
dalton99a
(81,656 posts)1. He will pardon Arpaio
Rules and policies mean nothing to Trump
Stuart G
(38,454 posts)2. And of course, you are correct..he did pardon Arpaio....no text..