Charging a Smartphone While Driving Isn't as Free as You Think
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-12/charging-a-smartphone-while-driving-isn-t-as-free-as-you-thinkIts not just using a handheld phone while driving thats a menace to society. It turns out that charging it in the car has consequences too.
Thats because a phone drawing electricity from a USB port cuts 0.03 miles from each gallon of gasoline in a tank. Across the fleet of vehicles in the U.S., that would mean about 970,000 tons of extra planet-warming carbon dioxide a year, according to calculations by Jon Bereisa, a retired General Motors Co. engineering executive who studies vehicle power usage. With a race under way to see how many charging ports automakers can cram into a car, the increased pollution is only going to get worse.
Do I think were at peak USB? No, said Mary Gustanski, vice president of engineering and program management at Delphi Automotive Plc, which makes wiring and USB ports for vehicles. Well get more and more creative to not only allow you to connect with USB but also to connect wireless. Consumers want their car to be just like their home.
Its not just an environmental issue, either. The proliferation of consumer devices, the growth of dashboard touch screens and other technology, and the shrinking size of engines to meet fuel-economy mandates mean the 12-volt automobile electrical system is just about tapped out. Some automakers are already turning to supplemental 48-volt systems in future models.
more
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Don't blame the consumer. If you don't want carbon fix the USB to not make carbon. Until then. What?
Wilms
(26,795 posts)And I'm totally bummed about it.
I would have thought the idea was to help the general public recognize what's going on with the things they use daily. Perhaps they failed.
If everyone with a solar panel on their home used it to charge their phone...rather than their car...there would be a substantial reduction in pollutants expelled.
THAT would be sacred.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)My car gives me 30-35mpg, well over the averages, so I assume it would cost me less than .03mpg to charge my phone. Of course, since I also charge my TomTom, Nook e-reader, another tablet, and two laptops in the car, the phone means little added stress. And, I haven't checked, but running the A/c would use a lot more, and getting stuck in traffic adds even more than that.
All of these have to be charged somewhere, and the car is convenient when I'm working and probably cheaper than the 27cents per KWh I pay the electric company.
I could, of course, put one of those little generators on my bicycle and fly down the road charging everything for free.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)..and our rate is just under 7 cents a kwh
Location, locaton.
eppur_se_muova
(36,289 posts)Only one reason I detest those losermobile "boom box" cars/trucks.
bvf
(6,604 posts)would be free?
Think I'll start that perpetual motion machine business after all.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)It's charged off my computer USB and it lasts for months for the occasional time I need to use my portable gadgets longer than the internal battery will carry them. Really handy when you get stuck somewhere you can't charge otherwise.
The overall charge/discharge efficiency of a lithium cell is 99% or so, not much transfer loss so it's almost like charging your phone at home in terms of energy usage. I just put it in my case with all my other gear.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00JM59JPG?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o07_s00
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Not to mentioned poorly timed stoplights and drive through restaurants?
Warming up the car? What about the heater fan?
A/C uses gas, and so does lowering aerodynamics by lowering the windows.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,337 posts)just in case
Proserpina
(2,352 posts)especially about over population and other calamities...as if something slightly less drastic wouldn't do the job than just cowering.
Mosby
(16,350 posts)Using more electricity means the alternator will need to charge the battery a bit more but the load the alternator places on the engine is the same regardless.