Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Kuttner: Are the Dems Being Sucker-Punched on Trade?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/are-the-dems-being-sucker-punched-on-trade_b_7632996.htmlIn the meantime, trade deals have become less about trade barriers and more about corporate wish-lists and the use of back-door trade provisions to dismantle a regulated form of capitalism. Workers have lost out not just from direct job displacement, but from the broad assault on an array of safeguards. The proposed Pacific trade deal would intensify the trend.
The current brand of trade adjustment assistance is even weaker than its counterparts a generation ago. And since it is targeted only at workers who can show direct displacement, it does nothing to offset the broader damage of the deal. Backers of the deal claim (somewhat implausibly) that it will produce hundreds of billions of dollars in economic benefits yet the TAA part of the deal would provide displaced workers with just $300 million. So even in its own terms, this is one lousy deal.
Republicans have tried to frame the legislative situation as a fair trade-off: if they can get their reluctant caucus to vote for adjustment assistance, Democrats are somehow honor-bound to support the whole package. (Republicans don't like TAA both because of its budget impact and their ideological belief that the free market will take care of displaced workers.)
But if Democrats fall for this ploy, they are dupes. For starters, the money in TAA is a pittance, compare to the direct damage that this deal will do to American workers. And it does nothing to protect consumers and citizens from the other elements of the deal that weaken regulatory standards.
Trade Adjustment Assistance is not really about doing much for workers. Mainly, it's about giving Democrats who are in bed with corporate elites some political cover. The cover is pretty threadbare.
The current brand of trade adjustment assistance is even weaker than its counterparts a generation ago. And since it is targeted only at workers who can show direct displacement, it does nothing to offset the broader damage of the deal. Backers of the deal claim (somewhat implausibly) that it will produce hundreds of billions of dollars in economic benefits yet the TAA part of the deal would provide displaced workers with just $300 million. So even in its own terms, this is one lousy deal.
Republicans have tried to frame the legislative situation as a fair trade-off: if they can get their reluctant caucus to vote for adjustment assistance, Democrats are somehow honor-bound to support the whole package. (Republicans don't like TAA both because of its budget impact and their ideological belief that the free market will take care of displaced workers.)
But if Democrats fall for this ploy, they are dupes. For starters, the money in TAA is a pittance, compare to the direct damage that this deal will do to American workers. And it does nothing to protect consumers and citizens from the other elements of the deal that weaken regulatory standards.
Trade Adjustment Assistance is not really about doing much for workers. Mainly, it's about giving Democrats who are in bed with corporate elites some political cover. The cover is pretty threadbare.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1163 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kuttner: Are the Dems Being Sucker-Punched on Trade? (Original Post)
antigop
Jun 2015
OP
What the Hell else would you expect 600 from corporate lobbyists & attorneys?
99th_Monkey
Jun 2015
#5
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)1. If this trade agreement is soooo good for the USA, why is there a need for
"trade adjustment assistance"?
doc03
(35,332 posts)2. We are not supposed to ask that question
SamKnause
(13,103 posts)3. Yes, they have repeatedly been
sucker-punched by many of president Obama's
policies and appointments.
They have been marginalized and insulted.
This will continue if a corporate worshiping president is elected.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)4. Maybe, just maybe the Democrats are smarter than you give them credit for.
They are not being duped, but they are being bought.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)5. What the Hell else would you expect 600 from corporate lobbyists & attorneys?
You know, they guys that wrote this piece of shit "trade" deal.
duh.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)6. HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!!
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)7. none are being duped. some are rightly outraged, like Sanders, the others are crooked
like the republicans