Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Problem of 'Stupid' in Economics
by Dean Baker | November 18, 2014M.I.T. Professor Jonathan Gruber has inadvertently become a YouTube celebrity as a result of a video of him referring to the public as "stupid." The immediate point of reference was the complexity of the design of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which Gruber was describing as being necessary politically in order to deceive the public. With the right-wing now in a state of near frenzy after the Republican election victories, the Gruber comment was fresh meat in their attack on the ACA.
Apart from merits of the ACA, there is something grating about seeing a prominent economist refer to the American public as "stupid." After all, the country and the world have suffered enormously over the last seven years because the leading lights of the economic profession were almost completely oblivious to the largest asset bubble in the history of the world.
While it should have been easy to recognize an $8 trillion housing bubble in the United States, prices had diverged sharply from their long-term trend with no plausible basis in the fundamentals of the housing market. In particular, rents had only risen in step with inflation, indicating there had not been a sudden upturn in the demand for housing.
It also should not have been surprising that the loss of this wealth when the bubble burst would lead to a severe economic downturn and have a major impact on the financial sector. After all, it was easy to see that the bubble was driving the economy in the last business cycle. Residential construction had hit a record as a share of GDP and the ephemeral bubble wealth led to an unprecedented boom in consumption.
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/dean-baker/59637/the-problem-of-stupid-in-economics
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1110 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Problem of 'Stupid' in Economics (Original Post)
Crewleader
Nov 2014
OP
on point
(2,506 posts)1. And the new bubble is Asset price inflation for 'wealthy' things as the rich have too much money
Stocks, expensive art, mansions, property, yachts. All those things the wealthy buy are in an asset price bubble because there is too much money at the top. It is a new price bubble and is where all the inflation is. It needs, and will have a correction.
Crewleader
(17,005 posts)2. well said on point
Here's Robert Reich latest article
And Now the Richest .01 Percent
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/111660931
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)3. He didn't mean "stupid" like can't understand world macro-economics
He meant stupid like trusting our "representatives" to do sane, moral things on our behalf. And on this point he's correct.
Crewleader
(17,005 posts)4. You said it Doctor_J