Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,630 posts)
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 08:07 PM Dec 2014

Justices weigh bias claim of pregnant UPS driver

Source: AP-Excite

By MARK SHERMAN

WASHINGTON (AP) — Two of the three women on the Supreme Court vigorously questioned a UPS lawyer Wednesday over the company's refusal to give lighter duty to a pregnant worker, a closely watched case with potentially broad impact for female workers and their employers.

Questions from several justices during arguments suggested the court could be searching for a middle ground in the dispute between United Parcel Service and former driver Peggy Young.

UPS declined to give the woman temporary light-duty work so she could avoid lifting heavy packages after she became pregnant in 2006.

Young was in the courtroom Wednesday to hear the justices talk about employers' responsibilities under the 36-year-old Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

FULL story at link.



Peggy Young, a Virginia woman who lost her UPS job because she became pregnant, carries a bouquet of flowers as she leaves the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 3, 2014. The Supreme Court is weighing how much employers must do to accommodate pregnant workers under a federal law aimed at combating discrimination against them. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141203/us--supreme_court-pregnancy_discrimination-e2f6efa1ab.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justices weigh bias claim of pregnant UPS driver (Original Post) Omaha Steve Dec 2014 OP
I thought UPS were all Teamsters? Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #1
The union doesn't own the company. Kingofalldems Dec 2014 #2
No, I meant the union lobbying on her behalf... Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #5
I'm sure they did. But if there was no Kingofalldems Dec 2014 #7
This story is fucking ridiculous. Indydem Dec 2014 #3
UPS is our area sucks.. INdemo Dec 2014 #8
They're also shitty ALEC supporters bloomington-lib Dec 2014 #4
UPS is a terrible company and I refuse to use them if at all possible. This case is the last straw. greatlaurel Dec 2014 #6
Yep.... USPS all the way groundloop Dec 2014 #9

Kingofalldems

(38,456 posts)
7. I'm sure they did. But if there was no
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 09:24 PM
Dec 2014

actual contract violation, there is little they can do. Don't know what kind of grievance procedure they have.

 

Indydem

(2,642 posts)
3. This story is fucking ridiculous.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 08:28 PM
Dec 2014

They gave non-driving work to people who had DUI's, and light duty work to people who had strokes.

But fuck her for daring to get pregnant, because it was an off work disability.

I love UPS, but fuck them in the ear.

They have since changed their policy.

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
6. UPS is a terrible company and I refuse to use them if at all possible. This case is the last straw.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 09:19 PM
Dec 2014

Here in my rural area, they drop all their packages at the post office for the USPS to deliver for them. They charge ridiculous rates and force the Post Office to deliver the packages, while UPS makes ridiculous profits and treat their employees like this. Disgusting.

groundloop

(11,519 posts)
9. Yep.... USPS all the way
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:13 AM
Dec 2014

USPS has better rates, treats employees better, and are more reliable to boot. Anyone remember last Christmas season, UPS and FedEx couldn't get packages delivered on time because they didn't hire enough seasonal help, but USPS never had so much as a hiccup?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justices weigh bias claim...