Federal judge halts John Doe probe into Walker recall
Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
A federal judge ordered a halt to the controversial John Doe investigation into campaign spending and fundraising by Gov. Scott Walker's campaign and other conservative groups during the high-profile recall elections.
U.S. District Judge Rudolph Randa issued the 26-page decision late Tuesday, calling on prosecutors to immediately stop the long-running, five-county investigation into possible illegal coordination between the various groups.
"The Defendants must cease all activities related to the investigation, return all property seized in the investigation from any individual or organization, and permanently destroy all copies of information and other materials obtained through the investigation," Randa wrote.
"Plaintiffs and others are herby relieved of any and every duty under Wisconsin law to cooperate further with Defendants' investigation," he wrote.
Special prosecutor Francis Schmitz said late Tuesday he expects to appeal to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago. "I'm virtually assured we will appeal this decision. I have to consult with the others and my attorney."
Read more: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-judge-halts-john-doe-probe-into-walker-recall-b99264341z1-258209431.html
Donald Downs, a professor of political science and law at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said he would need to read the ruling before giving full comments. But the news of the ruling stunned him.
"Wow. This goes beyond anything I expected," Downs said.
Newsjock
(11,733 posts)He joined the court in 1992 after being nominated by President George H.W. Bush.
Randa was in the same graduating class as former governor of Wisconsin, Tommy G. Thompson.
In 1995, Judge Randa ruled that the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinics Entrances Act was unconstitutional in banning "nonviolent, physical obstruction of reproductive health services clinics." Judge Randa ruled that Congress could not use its constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause to regulate abortion protests
riversedge
(70,204 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)In 1992, Randa was appointed by President George H. W. Bush to become a federal district judge in the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
James48
(4,435 posts)Republicans try to cover up the crimes of their own.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Blue Owl
(50,356 posts)n/t
Judi Lynn
(160,527 posts)Any chance to introduce justice to their frenzy to claim total power seems to get crushed.
They are not going to win, in the end. They are doomed to utter failure. They have no reason to exist. Greed and hatred just aren't enough.
[center]
U.S. District Judge Rudolph Randa[/center]
hue
(4,949 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)......with wispy hair...sitting in Grandma's chair...worried that he sat on his colostomy bag's tube.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Has he been kissing too much ass?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)was very well spent.
hue
(4,949 posts)Botany
(70,501 posts)The #s on the voting day never made any sense to me and Walker's anti recall
rallies prior to the vote pulled pitifull turnouts but the story that "people were mad
about the recall and so they voted for Walker" got legs. Republicans in many
cases have to cheat to win.
The Koch Brothers bought that vote.
LeftOfWest
(482 posts)School Boards, City Councils, Judges.
Stacked since Nixon and probably before on the right wing hate side.
riversedge
(70,204 posts)am stunned.
Javaman
(62,521 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)but a lot of them do go insane. Sane does overcome.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Aren't Republicans the ones who are always complaining about things like that?
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Constitution of the United States.
I wonder what kind of pretzel Scalia is going to have to twist himself into to claim the Founders would have approved of this.
I also wonder which parts of the Bill of Rights are not dead letters anymore.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)returning and destruction of evidence as well as calling for non-cooperation. That's crazy.
merrily
(45,251 posts)hue
(4,949 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Rudolph Randa appears to be on the take.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Or maybe he is just corrupt because he is that partisan, like Scalia. (Or is that Scalia is on the take, like Randa? Who knows?)
Thing is, what do we, the people, who are in theory supposed to have the ultimate power in this country, going to do about it?
For one thing, I think we should start calling for impeachments. We may not get them, but maybe some of the more partisan judges and Justices will get nervous. For example, FDR never got his plan to enlarge the SCOTUS passed by Congress, but the Justices got the message anyway.
Ellipsis
(9,124 posts)The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)'"The ( Wisconsin Club for Growth and its treasurer ) have found a way to circumvent campaign finance laws, and that circumvention should not and cannot be condemned or restricted. Instead, it should be recognized as promoting political speech, an activity that is 'ingrained in our culture,'" Randa wrote, quoting from a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision.'
When one 'circumvents' the law, one breaks it, and commits a crime....
malthaussen
(17,193 posts)Where do these people learn this stuff? Seriously, it seems like they're all reading from the same catechism.
-- Mal
Bonduel
(96 posts)You are breaking the law. You might be.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)A subtle as stake through the heart.
PumpkinAle
(1,210 posts)"The plaintiffs have found a way to circumvent campaign finance laws, and that circumvention should not and cannot be condemned or restricted," Randa wrote. "Instead, it should be recognized as promoting political speech, an activity that is 'ingrained in our culture.' "
http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/a-federal-judge-just-called-an-end-to-scott-walker-s-recall-probe-20140507
Bonduel
(96 posts)And the ones to blame are the incompetent people who ran this investigation. Don't get me wrong, walker should be nailed, but I don't like these open ended on going investigations. I wouldn't like it against a democrat so I don't like it against them either.
I read somewhere that when they were searching for evidence, they had a warrant but the defendants were held and not allowed to contact their attorneys. If that is true then that is wrong.
They could have busted Walker and his cronies. Their is evidence I'm sure. This type of behavior creates sympathy for these people. Not by the Democratic base but by independents and middle of the road people.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)Well, I guess that settles it, then.
Bonduel
(96 posts)So if he is lying I'm sure the prosecutors will be able to prove it. If the judge is correct then shame on the prosecutors. They have mishandled this whole investigation. The public does not like an open ended case against anyone that drags on. It always looks like you don't have any real evidence against them. You just keep tossing things out hoping something will stick.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Gothmog
(145,176 posts)This is a very partisan ruling by a GOP judge. It should be appealed.
hue
(4,949 posts)Special Prosecutor Francis Schmitz, a Republican assigned to the investigation said he plans on appealing to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago.
Gothmog
(145,176 posts)The judge's ruling was stayed and the investigation can continue http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/halt-to-john-doe-probe-lifts-obstacle-to-scott-walker-re-election-bid-b99264574z1-258293621.html
Less than 24 hours after a federal judge halted a probe into conservative groups and the campaign of Gov. Scott Walker, an appeals court blocked that ruling allowing prosecutors to keep material they have gathered in the case.
The three-judge panel of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago provided a means for U.S. District Rudolph Randa in Milwaukee to reissue his preliminary injunction stopping the investigation, but it said he cannot order prosecutors to destroy evidence they have collected so far.
Also Wednesday, Randa ruled a coalition of five media groups could intervene in the case in its attempt to unseal hundreds of pages of court filings that have been blacked out. He gave all sides a week to object to making that material public
Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/halt-to-john-doe-probe-lifts-obstacle-to-scott-walker-re-election-bid-b99264574z1-258293621.html#ixzz314aNogsR
Follow us: @JournalSentinel on Twitter
This litigation is far from over but this appears to be good news
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)Action was taken, and quick-like...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014799203