Report Says State Department Lacks Proper Files For More Than $6 Billion In Contracts
Source: Associated Press
Updated: April 5, 2014 - 4:30 PM
WASHINGTON A government investigation has found that the State Department has incomplete files or is missing files for more than $6 billion in contracts over the last six years.
In one case involving State Department operations in Iraq, officials couldn't provide 33 of the 115 contract files requested. Those missing files were for contracts worth $2.1 billion.
A State Department spokeswoman, Marie Harf, says that the $6 billion hasn't gone missing and calls it a "bureaucratic issue" that's being addressed.
The report by the State Department's Office of Inspector General recommends establishing a centralized system for maintaining, tracking and retaining files. Other recommendations include random checks of contract files and holding accountable those responsible for maintaining files.
Read more: http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/254048531.html
2banon
(7,321 posts)What about during Bush/Cheney administration?
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Do you want to bet articles will speak of Secretaries Kerry and Clinton - ignoring that 6 years ago goes back to 2008 - and the Secretary was Rice?
eppur_se_muova
(36,262 posts)Of course BushCheney would never let anyone in that position do his job, and Repubs have blocked attempts by Obama to appoint a successor. Congresscritters are paid to give unrestricted access to the cookie jar to KRB, Halliburton, Blackwater etc.
2banon
(7,321 posts)I'm no apologist for any administration.. I want accountability and I don't want to see our tax dollars going to private contractors for all sorts of nefarious purposes such as we've witnessed over the past decades, most notably during the Bush/Cheney regime.
All these elements however were left out of this story, words fail me in describing the media's outrageous duplicity in all manner of revisionism, omissions, misleading points of fact. Just outrageous.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)And pretty soon you're talking a bureaucratic error.
2banon
(7,321 posts)seems about right...
2banon
(7,321 posts)I know it says Office of Inspector General, I'm a bit confused which Gov't office this came from, and wonder if the it's tied with the Congressional Budget Office, isn't that the "agency" that should be generating these reports? Or perhaps this is an internal office over seeing State Dept. In either case, what the hell took so long? Talking billions of dollars if not more from Bush/Cheney, do we have those reports from the same office?
karynnj
(59,503 posts)The Washington Post has a more detailed article and notes that the State Department has accepted the recommendations the IG made. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/state-department-inspector-general-issues-alert-over-6-billion-in-contracting-money/2014/04/03/8ebf465c-bb73-11e3-9a05-c739f29ccb08_story.html
Not surprisingly, the Washington Times has the headline as "$6 billion lost under Hillary Clinton"
2banon
(7,321 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)His - from the OIG's State Department page are Kerry's statement after he was confirmed:
"
I recently had the pleasure of swearing in Steve A. Linick as our new Inspector General, following his confirmation by the United States Senate.
As you know, The Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducts and supervises audits, inspections, evaluations, reviews and investigations of the programs and operations of the Department of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
I wanted to share with you a bit about Steves background. He begins his work with deep experience both as an Inspector General and as a federal prosecutor. For the past three years, he served as the Inspector General of the Federal Housing Financial Agency, a newly-created OIG specifically focused on the 2008 financial and housing crises and their after-effects. Before that, he spent 16 years in the Department of Justice, including four years leading the National Procurement Fraud Task Force and as an Assistant United States Attorney first in Los Angeles and then in Alexandria, Virginia.
I also want to take this opportunity to again reiterate my and the Departments support for the mission, oversight work, and independence of the OIG, as set forth in the Inspector General Act of 1978 and section 209 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980. The OIG performs an important role in recommending policies to promote the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of, as well as in preventing and detecting fraud and abuse in, our programs and operations.
As employees of the Department of State, we all share a responsibility to hold ourselves to the highest standards of conduct and integrity. We also share an obligation to report to the OIG known or suspected waste, fraud, abuse, false certifications, and corruption involving Department programs or operations (including by contractors and grantees). The OIG hotline number is 800-409-9926.
I know all of us will provide requested assistance and information to the OIG in accordance with the applicable regulations, including prompt access to all records and other materials which relate to programs and operations with respect to which the OIG has responsibilities, subject of course to applicable rules regarding the handling of classified information. In addition, I know all Department employees will cooperate fully by disclosing complete and accurate information pertaining to matters under OIG investigation and review and by honoring OIG requests for interviews in a timely manner.
I am confident that Steve and his OIG team will continue to be of great assistance to the Department and that you will strongly support their oversight efforts which benefit us all."
http://oig.state.gov/aboutoig/offices/cpa/press/218123.htm
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Near the beginning, there was a thank you to the man who had been the acting IG for a long time. While it is better to have someone confirmed and in the position, it does mean that someone was - at least to some degree doing the job.
He then goes through the new IG's background and argues why he is an excellent choice.
Near the end - in what is obviously a message to State Department employees - he says.
"What that tells me is that he takes the role of IG seriously. He knows how to make tough
decisions, and he doesnt shy away from getting his hands dirty in the process of working hard to
produce results. And thats the kind of person that we need in this role.
After spending 28 years in the United States Senatewhere I led investigative oversight
committee efforts for everything from money-laundering in Latin America that exposed Manual
Noriega and his engagement in narcotics rings, to the illicit dealings of the BCCI Bank, where
we first uncovered the name of Osama Bin Laden and other criminal networksit is something
that I understand, this whole effort of working toward transparency of things like foreign aid,
climate change policies, and other things. And I appreciate how difficult implementing oversight
can be. Its less daunting when you have cooperation from the parties.
And I want to be clear to the Department when I say today: Steve, you will always have my
cooperation and the cooperation of my team. The Office of Inspector General is not, in my
judgment, a thorn in the side of the Department. And there were some who felt that we could do
fine without an Inspector General; there are many people who fear the appointment of an
inspector general. I dont. I welcome it. I believe it is a very important part of our efforts. In
fact, I view the presence of a good inspector general not as a thorn in our side, but as the ace up
our sleeve. This will help us be a better Department. It will help us be able to deliver better for
the American people, and one of the things Ive asked Steve in joining in this effort is, well be
there to cooperate. We want the accountability, we want the transparency, we want to work
cooperatively. We dont want to add to the great game of gotcha in Washington. We want to
do what makes governing effective, and Steve will have a willing partner in that effort.'
http://oig.state.gov/documents/organization/219065.pdf
2banon
(7,321 posts)thanks for providing that background introduction.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)The General Accounting Office tried to audit the Pentagon. After three years, they gave up, saying that it was impossible.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)wouldn't that be criminal? Even just that level of incompetence deserves some heads rolling, but the perps were probably promoted or retired to the MIC board rooms.
FreedRadical
(518 posts)This number down from ten years ago, and still falling.