Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:17 PM
FreakinDJ (17,644 posts)
US fast food workers walk out in organised strike against low wages
Source: Guardian News and Media
New York City-based campaign spreads around the country as workers unite to demand minimum $15 per hour wage Thousands of fast food workers went on strike in cities across the US on Monday as part of a campaign for better wages. Employees of selected branches of McDonald's, Burger King, KFC and Wendy's walked off their shifts at various points throughout the day. In New York City more than a hundred workers marched to a McDonald's in Union Square, chanting for the restaurant to "supersize" their wages. The Fast Food Forward campaign is calling for workers to receive a minimum of $15 per hour, more than double the federal minimum wage. "A lot of the workers are living in poverty, you know, not being able to afford to put food on the table or take the train to work," Jonathan Westin, director of Fast Food Forward, told New York's 1010 WINS radio station. Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/29/fast-food-workers-strike-wages Bout Time
|
70 replies, 7567 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
FreakinDJ | Jul 2013 | OP |
rpannier | Jul 2013 | #1 | |
Llewlladdwr | Jul 2013 | #2 | |
FreakinDJ | Jul 2013 | #3 | |
Llewlladdwr | Jul 2013 | #10 | |
daleanime | Jul 2013 | #30 | |
CreekDog | Jul 2013 | #52 | |
Major Nikon | Jul 2013 | #4 | |
Llewlladdwr | Jul 2013 | #11 | |
alp227 | Jul 2013 | #15 | |
Major Nikon | Jul 2013 | #21 | |
Name removed | Jul 2013 | #41 | |
Major Nikon | Jul 2013 | #42 | |
Name removed | Jul 2013 | #43 | |
Major Nikon | Jul 2013 | #44 | |
Name removed | Jul 2013 | #48 | |
Major Nikon | Jul 2013 | #66 | |
Scootaloo | Jul 2013 | #22 | |
Systematic Chaos | Jul 2013 | #7 | |
Llewlladdwr | Jul 2013 | #13 | |
alp227 | Jul 2013 | #16 | |
Llewlladdwr | Jul 2013 | #18 | |
ChazInAz | Jul 2013 | #23 | |
limpyhobbler | Jul 2013 | #25 | |
SunSeeker | Jul 2013 | #28 | |
bread_and_roses | Jul 2013 | #36 | |
bread_and_roses | Jul 2013 | #38 | |
CreekDog | Jul 2013 | #55 | |
Niceguy1 | Jul 2013 | #26 | |
daleanime | Jul 2013 | #31 | |
alp227 | Jul 2013 | #33 | |
Systematic Chaos | Jul 2013 | #20 | |
ForgoTheConsequence | Jul 2013 | #39 | |
UglyGreed | Jul 2013 | #63 | |
Omaha Steve | Jul 2013 | #12 | |
Ash_F | Jul 2013 | #34 | |
CreekDog | Jul 2013 | #50 | |
Socal31 | Jul 2013 | #5 | |
FreakinDJ | Jul 2013 | #6 | |
Socal31 | Jul 2013 | #8 | |
strategery blunder | Jul 2013 | #17 | |
Socal31 | Jul 2013 | #24 | |
PoliticAverse | Jul 2013 | #29 | |
reformist2 | Jul 2013 | #9 | |
Trillo | Jul 2013 | #27 | |
limpyhobbler | Jul 2013 | #32 | |
ForgoTheConsequence | Jul 2013 | #64 | |
usGovOwesUs3Trillion | Jul 2013 | #14 | |
mindwalker_i | Jul 2013 | #19 | |
FreakinDJ | Jul 2013 | #35 | |
ForgoTheConsequence | Jul 2013 | #40 | |
Blasphemer | Jul 2013 | #68 | |
One_Life_To_Give | Jul 2013 | #37 | |
wordpix | Jul 2013 | #67 | |
Brigid | Jul 2013 | #45 | |
AngryOldDem | Jul 2013 | #46 | |
Name removed | Jul 2013 | #47 | |
Brigid | Jul 2013 | #49 | |
Name removed | Jul 2013 | #53 | |
Brigid | Jul 2013 | #56 | |
AngryOldDem | Jul 2013 | #62 | |
FreakinDJ | Jul 2013 | #51 | |
Newest Reality | Jul 2013 | #54 | |
Name removed | Jul 2013 | #57 | |
Newest Reality | Jul 2013 | #58 | |
Comrade Grumpy | Jul 2013 | #59 | |
Comrade Grumpy | Jul 2013 | #60 | |
Post removed | Jul 2013 | #61 | |
UglyGreed | Jul 2013 | #65 | |
ConcernedCanuk | Aug 2013 | #69 | |
FreakinDJ | Aug 2013 | #70 |
Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:20 PM
rpannier (23,958 posts)
1. Bout time Agreed 100%
rec
|
Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:26 PM
Llewlladdwr (2,165 posts)
2. I'm not sure I understand what's going on here.
Is it the position of these workers that they should be able to support a family by working part-time at MacDonald's? If so that seems unrealistic.
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #2)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:28 PM
FreakinDJ (17,644 posts)
3. .... ^^^ Face Palm ^^^
If we had to explain I'm sure you wouldn't understand
|
Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #3)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:01 AM
Llewlladdwr (2,165 posts)
10. Thank you so very much!
That was so very helpful! I'm so glad there are smart folks like you around!
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #10)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 02:23 AM
daleanime (17,796 posts)
30. Smart enough to realize....
there's no sense in discussing it with you.
Are they wrong? |
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #10)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 04:40 PM
CreekDog (46,192 posts)
52. you're a resident conservative who posts a conservative opinion on it
were you expecting congratulations?
Llewlladdwr (1,877 posts)
60. Do people living in public housing have a right to privacy? nt |
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #2)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:34 PM
Major Nikon (36,200 posts)
4. That's why they are going on strike
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #4)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:04 AM
Llewlladdwr (2,165 posts)
11. So, they do believe that they should be able to support a family on a part-time job?
I'm just trying to understand why a person working the fry machine part-time at MacDonald's rates $15.00 an hour. That just doesn't seem realistic to me.
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #11)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:16 AM
alp227 (31,593 posts)
15. Do you realize some work those jobs FULL TIME now?
Even seniors who should have retired but lost all their savings?
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #11)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 01:09 AM
Major Nikon (36,200 posts)
21. Are you OK with the government subsidizing cheap labor via the social safety net?
If you want realism, figure out how much an employer needs to pay it's employees to keep them off the government dime. Then you'll have a realistic figure regarding how much these employees should be paid.
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #21)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #41)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 03:07 PM
Major Nikon (36,200 posts)
42. So what do you think unemployment insurance is for?
And the employer's share of FICA?
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #42)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #43)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 03:38 PM
Major Nikon (36,200 posts)
44. Actually it wasn't where I was going
Where I was going was simply to give you the opportunity to get both feet in the bowl before I pulled the chain.
Cheers! |
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #44)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #44)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 11:08 PM
Major Nikon (36,200 posts)
66. I hate to say I told you so
At Tue Jul 30, 2013, 03:39 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
They are taxes that only serve to drive down wages, increase unemployment, and http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=552494 REASON FOR ALERT: This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.) YOUR COMMENTS: Wingnut troll begone! JURY RESULTS A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Tue Jul 30, 2013, 03:54 PM, and voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE. Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Smells like a wingnut to me. Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Troll. Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Not a progressive position and I disagree but it doesn't appear to be a violation of TOS. Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Need an open debate - this comment needs response, not censorship. Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given |
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #11)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 01:09 AM
Scootaloo (25,699 posts)
22. You should be able to support yourself from your work, yes.
Is this hard to understand?
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #2)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:49 PM
Systematic Chaos (8,601 posts)
7. They they should all just borrow their way through college, to get professional careers?
Never mind that they can barely afford to live as it is, and may end up missing half their classes due to the crazy schedules these McJobs force you to work.
We'll just make them debt slaves on top of wage slaves, and then they'll slide right into some professional job which likely won't even fucking exist anyway. ![]() |
Response to Systematic Chaos (Reply #7)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:10 AM
Llewlladdwr (2,165 posts)
13. Perhaps they could learn a trade?
Carpentry, plumbing, electrical all pay good money. Training for these jobs is much cheaper than college. Or join the military, they'll pay you while they teach you a trade.
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #13)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:18 AM
alp227 (31,593 posts)
16. Not everyone is capable of that.
Different people, different mindsets, different skill abilities.
|
Response to alp227 (Reply #16)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:21 AM
Llewlladdwr (2,165 posts)
18. I understand that.
But almost everyone can do better than minimum wage, especially once they've established a work history. If you are physically unable to work then that's a whole different situation.
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #18)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 01:12 AM
ChazInAz (2,233 posts)
23. Not at all.
You've never been to a "Right To Work" state, such as Arizona, have you?
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #18)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 01:34 AM
limpyhobbler (8,244 posts)
25. But somebody has to serve food. Somebody has to mop floors, stock shelves, answer phones,
run a cash register, wash dishes, wait tables, pick tomatoes, etc.
People who do these jobs deserve a decent life. These are the jobs that need to be done. So then when people do them they should get paid enough to live decently. Because they are doing something that is needed. |
Response to limpyhobbler (Reply #25)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 10:18 AM
bread_and_roses (6,335 posts)
36. + 1000's (n/t)
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #18)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 10:27 AM
bread_and_roses (6,335 posts)
38. Have you noticed the unemployment rate lately?
Are you aware of the numbers of "discouraged" workers - etc - who are not even included? Are you totally unaware of the data on inequality in US and the disconnect between workers' productivity and wages? Of wage stagnation over - oh, what is it? last thirty years or so?
I can't believe anyone even marginally informed about conditions in US today for workers could write the post you did. |
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #18)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 04:45 PM
CreekDog (46,192 posts)
55. how does one get ahead if they are making a wage they can't live on?
a minimum wage job not only lacks resources to properly take care of oneself, if you can't take care of yourself, it will be very difficult if not impossible to find other work that pays better if 1) you have to work 2nd and 3rd jobs to make ends meet and 2) your health fails because you can't afford to eat properly, lack health care, etc.
but of course as a resident apologist for the status quo of poverty, this all has to be explained to you and you won't bother supporting a higher minimum wage even after the explanations are provided. because philosophically, you are to the right of nearly all of us. you even use the term 'Democrat' instead of "Democratic". |
Response to alp227 (Reply #16)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 01:43 AM
Niceguy1 (2,467 posts)
26. aren't wages determined
Capabilities????? How would you merge an communistic system with one that pays based on skill? Pay so much over skill would upset the Apple cart and result in an utter failure. As attractice as it sounds paying $15 hour for part time no skill jobs is not sustainable.
|
Response to Niceguy1 (Reply #26)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 02:28 AM
daleanime (17,796 posts)
31. And CEO wages are?
![]() |
Response to Niceguy1 (Reply #26)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 03:49 AM
alp227 (31,593 posts)
33. Did you just say communist?
Are you sure you are on the right message board?
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #13)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:35 AM
Systematic Chaos (8,601 posts)
20. That would be all well and good, except for...
...the facts that it is possible to have gluts of tradespeople; many trades pay rather low now due to influxes of Mexican immigrants which were hired into a lot of positions for less than American citizens would take; and finally many of these people are in their 40s and up and working fast food because it's all they can find so they're too old for the military.
These problems will only be solved when we do two things. First and foremost we have got to re-work a huge percentage of the nation's infrastructure (which, for a time at least, would relieve any gluts of tradespeople). Second, our manufacturing base needs to be restored. Good luck with either of these. ![]() |
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #13)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 10:42 AM
ForgoTheConsequence (4,758 posts)
39. Good idea.
The poor should all just go join the military and fight wars for the rich. How progressive of you.
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #13)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 06:02 PM
UglyGreed (7,661 posts)
63. LOL those jobs are
going down in pay due to undocumented workers. Or risk your life to serve corporate interests abroad, nice. I don't mind paying 68 cents more for a burger and I'm a crippled former Carpenter....
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #2)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:07 AM
Omaha Steve (92,544 posts)
12. McDonald's doesn't hire many FULL timers
Benefits like Obamacare etc. kick in for FULL timers. Need I say more? Power to the workers! OS |
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #2)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 05:29 AM
Ash_F (5,861 posts)
34. "Part time" <-----WHAT?!
You really should explain where you got this from.
|
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #2)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 04:36 PM
CreekDog (46,192 posts)
50. you post conservative talking points and expect congratulations
please.
![]() |
Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:38 PM
Socal31 (2,481 posts)
5. Part time fast-food labor is not meant to support a family.
It is meant as a stepping-stone to something more.
I'd rather see the money be put into educational programs to teach these workers a skill that is worth $15 per hour. On a side note, In-N-Out (West coast burger chain) was paying $10/hr 7+ years ago. However, I don't think they offer as many opportunities to people who did not learn English as their first language, if you get my drift. Anyone who has been inside one would understand. I was a cashier at McDonalds @ 15. Had to get a worker's permit....I believe I earned 5.75/hr, which was a very progressive minimum wage (1999). That bought the weed that I would smoke in the walk-in freezer. ![]() |
Response to Socal31 (Reply #5)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:43 PM
FreakinDJ (17,644 posts)
6. $15 per hour is a stepping stone
You ideals of worth seem fairly antiquated.
20hrs a week at $7.50 won't even afford the food to feed these workers. So some one some where is subsidizing the low wages the employer pays to feed these workers so the can keep working for THE CHEAP FUCKING SON OF A BITCH Make sense now |
Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #6)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:54 PM
Socal31 (2,481 posts)
8. So what should they make?
What should someone who makes $15/hr currently make?
I know a couple Yum! Brand franchise owners, and they are not swimming in their gold coins at night, believe me. If the theory is that it should be a requirement that any employee you hire should be able to afford an apartment, transportation, etc, then say goodbye to how much goods and services cost currently. I know it would get more of a *hoorumph hoorumph* if I said everyone should make $30/hr, but in reality I have seen in both fast-food and full-serve restaurants just how tight they run, and how labor effects the bottom line in an extreme way. |
Response to Socal31 (Reply #8)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:21 AM
strategery blunder (4,225 posts)
17. Fast food places survived and expanded in the 1960s
back when the minimum wage (in today's inflation-adjusted dollars) was somewhere around...
...surprise! $15 an hour |
Response to strategery blunder (Reply #17)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 01:32 AM
Socal31 (2,481 posts)
24. ..
Nearly 3,000 cars are crushed each year at monster truck events. Full sized steel-bodied cars from the 1970's and early 1980's are the ones most typically used.
|
Response to strategery blunder (Reply #17)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 02:01 AM
PoliticAverse (26,366 posts)
29. The Federal minimum wage in 1968 was $1.60. This translates to $10.74 in 2013.
Historical minimum wage rates:
http://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/chart.htm $1.60 in 1968 converted to 2013: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=1.60&year1=1968&year2=2013 |
Response to Socal31 (Reply #5)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:00 AM
reformist2 (9,841 posts)
9. OK, but 40 hours of "part-time" labor per week had damned well better add up to a living wage.
And by that, I do mean enough to support one person and one child.
|
Response to Socal31 (Reply #5)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 01:47 AM
Trillo (9,154 posts)
27. Stepping stones are mostly just corporate BS
They are mere carrots held in front of our noses to make us work longer and harder for less.
Almost any person with a grounding in reality knows that a promise is worth the paper it isn't usually written on. Stepping stones are mostly just corporate BS. There may be a very small, microscopic sliver of truth to the idea of working your way up a career ladder, one that works for a very small percentage of the total employed, of those employees are perfect, and only if they're willing to get educated and remain in continuing education and various job trainings for the rest of their lives. For the rest of us, if we don't get paid today, not two weeks from now, but for today's labor, there ain't gonna be any more coming down the payment pike. In fact, I'm thinking that given the lack of honesty in most employers, the employees should be paid before they do any work. Otherwise, the employer might take the money and run. |
Response to Trillo (Reply #27)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 03:38 AM
limpyhobbler (8,244 posts)
32. Career Opportunities!!
Not so much.
All workplaces are shaped like pyramids. Not everybody can move up the pyramid. That's a myth. Most people get stuck towards the bottom. The people at the bottom of the pile deserve a decent life. |
Response to Socal31 (Reply #5)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 06:10 PM
ForgoTheConsequence (4,758 posts)
64. "Meant to be"?
"Meant to be" by who? Do you believe in the trickle down fairy too?
"Worth 15 dollars an hour" disgusting. |
Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:12 AM
usGovOwesUs3Trillion (2,022 posts)
14. Good! I think they should get $20 an hour
if they are full-time
![]() |
Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 12:22 AM
mindwalker_i (4,407 posts)
19. The Great Burger Strike
People shouldn't go to McD's though. That place is awful.
|
Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 10:00 AM
FreakinDJ (17,644 posts)
35. Look at all the sock puppets advocating starvation wages
Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #35)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 10:45 AM
ForgoTheConsequence (4,758 posts)
40. Its no wonder.
The Republicans have moved to the far right and the Democrats (some still think they're "liberal"
![]() |
Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #40)
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 02:04 AM
Blasphemer (3,261 posts)
68. Compare DU circa 2001 to DU today and it's a startling and depressing shift... nt
Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 10:27 AM
One_Life_To_Give (6,036 posts)
37. Good $20/hr employees might boost profits
Having worked in a local fast food place years ago. The difference between a compliant employee and a motivated employee in that environment can make a world of difference. If $20/hr gets you motivated employees. The rise in productivity is likely to offset the increase in cost IMO.
|
Response to One_Life_To_Give (Reply #37)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 11:13 PM
wordpix (18,652 posts)
67. $20/hr. employees still does not give a customer good fast food
It is the same old poor quality everything.
|
Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 03:46 PM
Brigid (17,621 posts)
45. For the naysayers, let me try putting it this way:
Part-time or not, these workers bust their butts, and they deserve better than minimum wage and all the respect that implies. Does that help?
|
Response to Brigid (Reply #45)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 03:55 PM
AngryOldDem (14,006 posts)
46. Sadly, I don't think it will.
Some of these comments are absolutely jaw-dropping, especially the suggestion that under/unemployed workers join the military to learn a trade.
Excuse me while I double-check to make sure what site I'm on.... Unbelievable. |
Response to Brigid (Reply #45)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #47)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 04:33 PM
Brigid (17,621 posts)
49. Shitting all over low-wage workers.
Great idea.
![]() |
Response to Brigid (Reply #49)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #53)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 04:51 PM
Brigid (17,621 posts)
56. "Multitude of opportunities?" Really?
Where have you been for the past several years?
![]() |
Response to Name removed (Reply #53)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 05:49 PM
AngryOldDem (14,006 posts)
62. In most cases, those are the only jobs out there.
Sure, keep striving for something better. But in the meantime, you have to put food in your mouth (or your family's mouth), clothes on your back, and a roof over your head. Health insurance -- or insurance of any kind -- is a luxury. Tell me, how do you do that on what fast food workers currently get paid?
You're right -- these jobs are not meant to be long term careers but in this economy -- if you are being completely honest with yourself -- that is exactly what they have become. For too many, this is the best the can do, through no fault of their own. All they want is a fair wage for flipping burgers and frying potatoes around hot grease, mopping floors, putting up with sometimes rude and abusive customers, and mucking out restrooms that are more like horse stalls, most often thanks to said rude and abusive customers. And given the profits most companies pull in, it CAN be easily done, but the "I got mine, fuck everyone else" mindset (also known as the Horatio Alger Story) is just too strong. I'd rather see a huge pay raise go to the person behind the counter, rather than the CEO that is getting fat and happy off that worker's efforts. Because, unlike some people, I recognized a long time ago that the American Dream is dead and those who want to foist that myth on the rest of us are just as much a part of the problem as below-subsistence level wages. |
Response to Name removed (Reply #47)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 04:39 PM
FreakinDJ (17,644 posts)
51. Maybe if you paid them right they get the order right
Its not Rocket Science even you should understand
|
Response to Name removed (Reply #47)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 04:44 PM
Newest Reality (12,712 posts)
54. Don't you think your leanings are
just too obvious? That is, for being at DU?
Welcome and good luck with that. |
Response to Newest Reality (Reply #54)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #57)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 05:18 PM
Newest Reality (12,712 posts)
58. Ah!
A sense of humor.
|
Response to Name removed (Reply #47)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 05:26 PM
Comrade Grumpy (13,184 posts)
59. You are obviously lost. You meant to take a right turn somewhere back there.
On your way to Palin campaign headquarters.
Take your anti-worker shit and go away. |
Response to Name removed (Reply #47)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 05:27 PM
Comrade Grumpy (13,184 posts)
60. For you, worker would do more than screw up your order. You'd get the special sauce. And deserve it.
Response to Comrade Grumpy (Reply #60)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Comrade Grumpy (Reply #60)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 06:10 PM
UglyGreed (7,661 posts)
65. LMFAO
Spot on Grumpy spot on!!!!
![]() |
Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 12:09 PM
ConcernedCanuk (13,509 posts)
69. Gonna be quite a few fast-food workers with NO income shortly.
.
. . These workers are not unionized, so nothing stops the companies from starting to hire and fire right away. Besides, expecting, or even just demanding double their wages is unrealistic. I have been a Union rep in he past, as well as Chair on health and Safety Committees on the employee side. It's hard enough to maintain employment even in some Unionized employments. Minimum wage in Ontario is 10.25/hr - that's over 21k/year. I survived, not comfortably mind you on 7k a year for quite some time, now up to 16k. Many workers that do not particularly get along with their management will be most likely be hitting the Welfare rolls shortly. AND - many future employers require previous work history, including why they lost their previous employment(s). Although I empathize with people on low income, - I suspect the end result is gonna hurt quite a few - at least for the short term. I suspect those in government may make moves to raise the minimum wage as a result, but more like 9 - 10/hr. Meanwhile - the big companies like McDuck are gonna cull their work force. When I worked for McD's in the 80's, they had 1200 stores/franchises. And we had a rule book given to each one of us before employment - and it had to be followed to a tee. There is no way McDs gonna allow a massive wage increase - and they have the power to prevent it. It ain't right, it's just the way it is. (sigh) CC |
Response to ConcernedCanuk (Reply #69)
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 12:53 PM
FreakinDJ (17,644 posts)
70. I know the drill - I'm Union earning +100K
And some jobs you leave for Greener Pastures
In a strong ProUnion town such as New York, MickyDs will feel some pain over using tactics like that. |