Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 09:59 PM Jul 2013

Jury finds George Zimmerman not guilty

Source: MSNBC

A Florida jury finds George Zimmerman not guilty.

Zimmerman, 29, said he was acting in self-defense when he shot the unarmed Trayvon Martin, 17, in the chest during an altercation in a gated community of Sanford, Fla., on Feb. 26. 2012.

He was not charged for 44 tumultuous days in which the case generated large protests in several cities, turned a hooded sweatshirt like the one Martin wore into a symbol of solidarity, and drew the attention of President Obama, who said, “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

As debate over race, guns and Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law swirled, a special prosecutor appointed by the governor announced April 11, 2012 that Zimmerman was being charged with second-degree murder – a move that his supporters said was meant to quell the public outcry.

Read more: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/13/19441838-jury-finds-george-zimmerman-not-guilty?lite



His shysters are grinning like hyenas.

Gun Nuts Have A New God!

My wife and I have been thinking of selling our Florida timeshare.

Decision made.

Update: I just contacted a reputable reseller via email.

342 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jury finds George Zimmerman not guilty (Original Post) onehandle Jul 2013 OP
I don't feel so good LiberalElite Jul 2013 #1
Neither do I - it is a sad day for America - and its lost sense of justice. laserhaas Jul 2013 #191
Total bullshit!!! jessie04 Jul 2013 #2
disappointing NewJeffCT Jul 2013 #3
I predicted this Travis_0004 Jul 2013 #4
I think a lot of us had a sick feeling it would happen. Kennah Jul 2013 #45
it was an all white jury PatrynXX Jul 2013 #71
All female, including, if I recall, 5 mothers. OnlinePoker Jul 2013 #79
It was a predominantly white jury meow2u3 Jul 2013 #80
From what I understand ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #291
I hope the media accosts those women and gives them a difficult next few weeks. Kablooie Jul 2013 #200
No, we really don't want that davidpdx Jul 2013 #265
People were John2 Jul 2013 #297
Members of the OJ jury spoke up and explained their verdict. JDPriestly Jul 2013 #330
I totally agree davidpdx Jul 2013 #331
Who gives a shit BigD_95 Jul 2013 #207
The media called him White Hispanic. ChazII Jul 2013 #210
"Why is everything about race.." Carolina Jul 2013 #285
I don't John2 Jul 2013 #299
Because this country ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #293
George Zimmerman made it about race when he decided to follow Trayvon. Flatulo Jul 2013 #321
Sad n/t joesdaughter Jul 2013 #5
This is going to get ugly around here. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #6
That is so fucked up gopiscrap Jul 2013 #7
Open season on unarmed pedestrians Marthe48 Jul 2013 #8
how? Niceguy1 Jul 2013 #34
If you walk on a sidewalk, you are a potential threat to someone. nt killbotfactory Jul 2013 #42
only Niceguy1 Jul 2013 #51
He just got away with murder Marthe48 Jul 2013 #77
+1. "The people who are ok with this verdict don't much care about the law..' blkmusclmachine Jul 2013 #178
A travesty--but not surprised given the trial. book_worm Jul 2013 #9
Was the jury intellectually handicapped? WTF is wrong with them? nt valerief Jul 2013 #10
The prosecution was. Mr.Bill Jul 2013 #17
Certainly not a jury "of their peers" - either for the victim or the perpetrator George II Jul 2013 #78
Reasonable doubt Shrek Jul 2013 #121
no, he is guilty Skittles Jul 2013 #11
Very sad, MuseRider Jul 2013 #12
A loss for America. B Stieg Jul 2013 #13
I feel so angry right now AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #14
shit heaven05 Jul 2013 #15
Verdict SamKnause Jul 2013 #16
Wonder what is going on outside the courthouse now? n/t ReRe Jul 2013 #18
Just showed a few people chanting "No justice, no peace." nt Common Sense Party Jul 2013 #32
I didn't agree with the verdict... ReRe Jul 2013 #204
About the points you made... truth2power Jul 2013 #302
How in God's name they could have found him not guilty of manslaughter truth2power Jul 2013 #19
For the same reason they couldn't find Casey Anthony guilty of parental neglect NotThisTime Jul 2013 #27
I don't remember enough of the details of Casey Anthony to compare, but maybe you're truth2power Jul 2013 #52
Prosecutorial incompetence. n/t ET Awful Jul 2013 #64
I do not mean this to be a snark, but you must have been watching truth2power Jul 2013 #89
In both this and the Anthony case, had the prosecution better prepared and presented ET Awful Jul 2013 #142
Not the same thing. duffyduff Jul 2013 #197
I was thinking that too. I bet just like OJ he'll get himself into trouble raccoon Jul 2013 #30
The prosecutors apparently had a different approach to the evidence that we did. AngryOldDem Jul 2013 #112
I can't say it any better than you did. truth2power Jul 2013 #134
This is (among) the problems... Jeff In Milwaukee Jul 2013 #336
I'm UK - extremely hard for me to understand too. dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #272
why is it I thought it would AsahinaKimi Jul 2013 #20
Because, unfortunately... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2013 #47
The legal system is a complete sham in this Country, how many sham trials is Florida going to have NotThisTime Jul 2013 #21
fuck fuck FUCK MirrorAshes Jul 2013 #22
I am truly ashamed of a part of America BlueJazz Jul 2013 #23
just got away with murder rurallib Jul 2013 #24
^^^THIS^^^ valerief Jul 2013 #35
Yep Carolina Jul 2013 #133
I'm a little surprised they didn't rule for manslaughter Common Sense Party Jul 2013 #25
I'm very surprised. complain jane Jul 2013 #148
6 female jury, I never imagined that would be the verdict. ileus Jul 2013 #26
I figured at least a hung jury. nt awoke_in_2003 Jul 2013 #50
My hope was that women could be more compassionate and thoughtful too. avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #56
That was my thoughts exactly. ileus Jul 2013 #63
This press conference is a joke and very insensitive. avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #84
Who is the awful garish woman grandstanding, smiling and conducting this press conference? avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #105
I believe you were seeing the State's Attorney from the 4th District. She and her team are still 24601 Jul 2013 #158
The Whole Culture Of The South Is Different DallasNE Jul 2013 #163
I found Jesse Jackson's comment very insightful marshall Jul 2013 #295
Oh my god MissDeeds Jul 2013 #28
The quality of justice is extremely poor in Florida. avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #29
Just look at the criminal governor. nt valerief Jul 2013 #38
Yes. avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #61
Sorry, that's "The fish rots from the head." Igel Jul 2013 #245
Gee, thanks for clearing that up tabasco Jul 2013 #287
I'm fairly certain Florida isn't an exception in this country. nt adirondacker Jul 2013 #157
Yep. Remember Casey Anthony? N/t alp227 Jul 2013 #170
I was j u s t thinking about that case. avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #173
Lots of reasonable doubt there. The jury was correct in that case. n/t duffyduff Jul 2013 #199
Lots of reasonable doubt here as well lancer78 Jul 2013 #234
just heaven05 Jul 2013 #31
Open season on young black men wearing hoodies OldRedneck Jul 2013 #33
Hunting season is now open on African Americans in Florida. Capt.Rocky300 Jul 2013 #36
not heaven05 Jul 2013 #46
You're right. I stand corrected. Sad Capt.Rocky300 Jul 2013 #66
I heaven05 Jul 2013 #90
Hopefully he will eventually find the real killer oberliner Jul 2013 #37
Just another town where it's not illegal to kill a black person. n/t jtuck004 Jul 2013 #39
Right wing whites win again SCVDem Jul 2013 #40
The fix was in kylie5432 Jul 2013 #41
My heart goes out the Martin family. zonkers Jul 2013 #43
Not a single African-American on the jury oberliner Jul 2013 #44
One of them may have been African American. Pterodactyl Jul 2013 #306
He is far from a free man sorefeet Jul 2013 #48
The feds can step in on a "denial of constitutional rights" basis like they did with the KKK... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #67
Yes, they'll come in with both feet, like they did with Goldman Sachs, right? hatrack Jul 2013 #101
Yeah,...Al Sharpton just started going on about that.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #109
Wait a little while SwankyXomb Jul 2013 #153
Yeah,...we'll see videos of the clowns at FOX "News" gloating with their usual smug superiority.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #164
+1. "They have no shame." blkmusclmachine Jul 2013 #185
And now Zimmerman sues NBC: 7962 Jul 2013 #324
I expect his lawyers to sue the NAACP next. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #332
I don't know, NAACP hasnt done what NBC did 7962 Jul 2013 #337
"The whole NBC thing shouldve cost somebody their job" Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #339
Good. Thanks for the update! 7962 Jul 2013 #340
Figured it would be easy to find. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #341
You're not missing much. Endless same-same tract homes surrounded by endless palmettos. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #327
Same went for the Rodney King case after the officers were acquitted in state court. alp227 Jul 2013 #176
Right. It's also how the feds got involved in KKK cases as murder is a state matter. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #180
No Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #273
Exactly Morganfleeman Jul 2013 #282
bullshit. bullshit BULLSHIT pasto76 Jul 2013 #230
If I had one, I'd sell it too. tblue Jul 2013 #49
Sue him for unlawful death. RBInMaine Jul 2013 #53
Florida has immunity from civil and criminal prosecution for self defense Kennah Jul 2013 #72
He should definitely be sued for wrongful death. truth2power Jul 2013 #75
Well they could if this happened in California, but not in Florida. SunSeeker Jul 2013 #107
They've already sued the HOA and settled out of court. nt. premium Jul 2013 #168
What happens when you lose a fist fight ? blkbear Jul 2013 #54
Bad decision imo. nt cstanleytech Jul 2013 #55
Do Not Pass Jail. Go Directly To Fox News. Dear Gaia. Kennah Jul 2013 #57
how disturbing Danmel Jul 2013 #58
I wish I could say this was unexpected but I can not azurnoir Jul 2013 #59
I think he was guilty rpannier Jul 2013 #60
I call upon the Justice Department to indict Zimmerman for a civil rights violation. totodeinhere Jul 2013 #62
I hope the Trayvon's mother and father plan their own civil suit. avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #70
They can't jmowreader Jul 2013 #91
Florida forbids civil suits in cases like these? avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #99
Oh I didn't know that. Thanks. But yes I think there are grounds totodeinhere Jul 2013 #100
Assuming the feds want to get involved... jmowreader Jul 2013 #266
Screw Florida laws...there are FEDERAL laws too! George II Jul 2013 #127
I don't think so bossy22 Jul 2013 #235
I'm sure that that will also happen. And Zimmerman's lawyers have probably told him that. Some totodeinhere Jul 2013 #96
Thank GOD for the Civil Rights Act of 1964...this isn't over yet! George II Jul 2013 #125
do you think you could prove this beyond a reasonable doubt? bossy22 Jul 2013 #233
I am not a lawyer but a good Justice Department lawyer might. Yes it totodeinhere Jul 2013 #310
Sad erpowers Jul 2013 #65
Remember BobbyBoring Jul 2013 #68
The Martin's can't civily sue Zimmerman, in FL. premium Jul 2013 #179
They used to say "Only in America", tonight it's "Only in Florida" - disgusting. George II Jul 2013 #69
WTF! Not guilty of manslaughter? What a fucked up system of law we have in this country. nt adirondacker Jul 2013 #73
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2013 #74
go away Carolina Jul 2013 #147
It's the prosecution's fault. Beacool Jul 2013 #76
The jury had the option to convict on manslaughter Shrek Jul 2013 #113
That charge was added at the last minute. Beacool Jul 2013 #162
My understanding is different than what you said. Manslaughter was always on the table as a 24601 Jul 2013 #301
Maybe so, but the perception was that it was M2. Beacool Jul 2013 #315
That would have been awkward & difficult. The Sanford Police Department was recommending the 24601 Jul 2013 #316
Yes, but the prosecutors were experienced enough to have known that M2 would not stick. Beacool Jul 2013 #318
Interesting point. Pterodactyl Jul 2013 #307
A boon for bar fighters! Shadowflash Jul 2013 #81
I am thinking that this is EXACTLY what the jury has said... truth2power Jul 2013 #130
Not exactly. Straw Man Jul 2013 #333
The legal blog talk left gejohnston Jul 2013 #82
Prosecution kissing the jury's ass?? WTF?? michigandem58 Jul 2013 #83
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #85
My sons will never be safe mstinamotorcity2 Jul 2013 #86
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #87
So incredibly stupid. aintitfunny Jul 2013 #88
You know how you all feel right now? Mr.Bill Jul 2013 #92
if they could not get 2nd degree murder littlewolf Jul 2013 #114
I am of the opinion Mr.Bill Jul 2013 #117
1st degree murder is essentially pre-meditated bossy22 Jul 2013 #246
"They always get away" Mr.Bill Jul 2013 #248
huh? bossy22 Jul 2013 #250
Premeditation. Mr.Bill Jul 2013 #251
Exactly. IMHO there was racially-motivated premeditation. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #328
This is a rallying call. No justice, no peace. appacom Jul 2013 #93
Two words - mbee Jul 2013 #94
+1000. nt raccoon Jul 2013 #110
We have been boycotting Florida since KarenS Jul 2013 #129
Why 2000? 24601 Jul 2013 #286
I think she was referring to the 2000 election theft. eom truth2power Jul 2013 #303
I was wondering it it was that, but posters don't blame Florida. The acceptable DU response is 24601 Jul 2013 #305
i agree Carolina Jul 2013 #151
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #95
Stick it Caretha Jul 2013 #118
So. Vigilante Justice for All! southerncrone Jul 2013 #97
Let the South secede from the Union. blkmusclmachine Jul 2013 #189
Being a daughter of the South, I sure don't want to give it up to A..holes! southerncrone Jul 2013 #201
Not surprised. Floriduh has lived up to their rep once again. ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2013 #98
the police told him to stay in his car Botany Jul 2013 #102
It's appropriate you brought this up. The words you suggest are not accurate. The individual 24601 Jul 2013 #292
They'll probably elect him to the state Senate, now. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #103
I see him with his own show on Fox. n/t Mr.Bill Jul 2013 #120
And either way, he'll say "It was part of God's plan". Ken Burch Jul 2013 #175
Book deal, movie residuals PuffedMica Jul 2013 #275
A bad precedent was set tonight. AngryOldDem Jul 2013 #104
The minute the ballistics guy testified - lynne Jul 2013 #106
Agreed. They need to write into law that if you call in and a 911 cstanleytech Jul 2013 #122
you can't do that bossy22 Jul 2013 #240
I believe it would work. cstanleytech Jul 2013 #317
Good point! Pterodactyl Jul 2013 #308
Sad day for justice. DCBob Jul 2013 #108
Understatment. nt cstanleytech Jul 2013 #124
I wish I could say I am surprised. Brigid Jul 2013 #111
Crying shame. Wtf is wrong with Florida!!!!! johnnyrocket Jul 2013 #115
Didn't think I could be shocked anymore damnedifIknow Jul 2013 #116
I hope those mother's never have to lose a child like this, Loki Jul 2013 #119
I guess it's open season on unarmed black teenagers now. Aristus Jul 2013 #123
Tweet with the same feeling.. Cha Jul 2013 #206
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #126
wow PaulKersey Jul 2013 #136
This is awful. Loryn Jul 2013 #128
REMEMBER THIS WHEN YOU THINK OF THE VERDICT. dawn frenzy adams Jul 2013 #131
Which is why he'll be in the news again. Wait and see. truth2power Jul 2013 #169
Zimmerman walks free after killing a 17 year old unarmed youth golfguru Jul 2013 #132
Ha! dawn frenzy adams Jul 2013 #135
Try getting this type of public trial in China, Russia, Cuba, etc n/t golfguru Jul 2013 #150
Ha. dawn frenzy adams Jul 2013 #257
Everything in North America is about $$$$$$$ golfguru Jul 2013 #259
I am shocked. I hope the Martins take the little tweek to civil court..... marble falls Jul 2013 #137
I believe fl law prevents civil suit. littlewolf Jul 2013 #145
No justice available in Florida. What a state motto. I have a new motto for my own Texas.... marble falls Jul 2013 #152
What about a lawsuit via federal court? Is that possible? cstanleytech Jul 2013 #165
The fix was in.... Dyedinthewoolliberal Jul 2013 #138
O'mara and West talking now (press conference)... truth2power Jul 2013 #139
QUESTION: ARE WE A NATION OF LAWS? drynberg Jul 2013 #140
Very, very disappointed in this! mvd Jul 2013 #141
fuck kinda bullshit is this? fuck florida craigmatic Jul 2013 #143
This Verdict Was Destined By The Rotten Police Work DallasNE Jul 2013 #144
Awful. Cleita Jul 2013 #146
As a Prosecutor of 25 years ... broadcaster75201 Jul 2013 #149
me too ... based upon what I saw littlewolf Jul 2013 #156
"To win a manslaughter conviction, prosecutors had to convince the jury only that Zimmerman killed.. adirondacker Jul 2013 #160
because we don't know who through the first punch bossy22 Jul 2013 #216
So, someone can provoke an altercation with an unarmed individual and shoot him? nt adirondacker Jul 2013 #225
No bossy22 Jul 2013 #231
Thanks for the clarification. I'm still pretty leary of how justice was served here. nt adirondacker Jul 2013 #247
it was technically...not so much in reality bossy22 Jul 2013 #249
Right. Sometimes I think the technicalities of the law in this country are written exactly for this adirondacker Jul 2013 #260
They added that charge at the last minute. Beacool Jul 2013 #171
Really? lancer78 Jul 2013 #238
Go the Carolina Jul 2013 #289
there is no WAY that gun humping paranoid coward approached Martin without displaying his gun Skittles Jul 2013 #334
The NRA should be happy meanit Jul 2013 #154
I don't know.... sofa king Jul 2013 #312
Wow, so now it's so extra easy to kill black folks with no repercussions? Fucking bull shit! boguspotus Jul 2013 #155
O'Mara making me sick Deny and Shred Jul 2013 #159
I think he answered the question correctly. Igel Jul 2013 #252
I think it goes beyond that. Deny and Shred Jul 2013 #283
What if Zimmerman were Hispanic instead of white? marshall Jul 2013 #294
The laws, too few on a jury, lexington filly Jul 2013 #161
sickening. mountain grammy Jul 2013 #166
I wish I could say I was surprised. GoCubsGo Jul 2013 #167
How do you know that they were Teabaggers? Beacool Jul 2013 #172
Mostly because of where the live. GoCubsGo Jul 2013 #187
OK, I lived in FL but I've never been to Sanford. nt Beacool Jul 2013 #209
Get the hell out of FL. blkmusclmachine Jul 2013 #174
That is disgusting Jack Rabbit Jul 2013 #177
It wasn't 12 Jurors, premium Jul 2013 #186
Thank you for that information Jack Rabbit Jul 2013 #208
So Right, Lack Of Diversity DallasNE Jul 2013 #213
I mostly agree with you, premium Jul 2013 #215
Mostly Agree DallasNE Jul 2013 #224
Good points. premium Jul 2013 #226
It was crap data. Igel Jul 2013 #255
I Made The Assumption The Recording Was Digital DallasNE Jul 2013 #268
Re: voice analysis... Your post and those above are enlightening.. truth2power Jul 2013 #304
Once Z settles the Martin family CIVIL case that money is out the window. alp227 Jul 2013 #192
Not Sure Civil Recourse Is Available In Florida DallasNE Jul 2013 #227
Shiiiiiit...you may be right alp227 Jul 2013 #243
He could have requested immunity but choose not to hack89 Jul 2013 #284
No civil case to settle, he's immune NickB79 Jul 2013 #229
That's It!!!!! I Believe Florida should Be under a provisional federal governor! BlueManFan Jul 2013 #181
the ocean will soon swallow Florida, and it will be forgotten. Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #237
Those hillbilly teabag Floridians don't believe in global warming BlueManFan Jul 2013 #319
The verdict makes me inexpressibly sad. Bette Noir Jul 2013 #182
He stalked and murdered SoapBox Jul 2013 #183
bull fucking shit verdict mike dub Jul 2013 #184
Justice prevailed. Vattel Jul 2013 #188
Injustice Prevailed...you are wrong...eom GReedDiamond Jul 2013 #193
Let me guess...white?....middle class?...... ForgoTheConsequence Jul 2013 #211
+1 Puzzledtraveller Jul 2013 #269
Justice didn't prevail Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #274
Prosecutors frk'd this one up BIG TIME! laserhaas Jul 2013 #190
They did Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #277
Its a sad day walkerbait41 Jul 2013 #194
Lets not loose sight of the real villains Alan M Jul 2013 #195
The Law Has A Double Standard DallasNE Jul 2013 #263
So now a mugger can claim self defense in Florida after he shoots a victim. Kablooie Jul 2013 #196
No Alan M Jul 2013 #202
this does not have much to do with SYG laws bossy22 Jul 2013 #228
No. A WHITE mugger can claim self defense after he shoots a BLACK victim. tpsbmam Jul 2013 #221
Anybody can claim whatever they want Alan M Jul 2013 #232
SYG wasn't raised as a defense bossy22 Jul 2013 #236
I agree up to a point Alan M Jul 2013 #256
Yes. No witnesses, so he isn't a mugger. nt onehandle Jul 2013 #241
I really don't know how this has become humbled_opinion Jul 2013 #198
I would hope so Alan M Jul 2013 #205
SYG Wasn't used as a defense bossy22 Jul 2013 #242
Unbelievable felix_numinous Jul 2013 #203
A very sad day....... lucca18 Jul 2013 #212
How could they return this verdict? SammyWinstonJack Jul 2013 #214
because the prosecution could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt bossy22 Jul 2013 #218
Because the police deliberately botched the investigation and then the prosecutors, kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #329
I don't understand how this can happen. It disgusts me. 20score Jul 2013 #217
American idiots now think it's ok to stalk and kill unarmed black kids walking in the neighborhood. lonestarnot Jul 2013 #219
If you are referring to the jury, finding him not guilty and thinking what he did was OK totodeinhere Jul 2013 #311
Un-fucking believable. blackspade Jul 2013 #220
I am super mad shall_not_tell Jul 2013 #222
I can't believe this miked62916 Jul 2013 #223
Saw that coming. Ash_F Jul 2013 #239
The United States of America defacto7 Jul 2013 #244
better blog ThenWhatTheFis Jul 2013 #253
while I severely disagree with the judgement... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2013 #254
Judge also erred nakocal Jul 2013 #258
The animation was only allowed to be used in the defense's closing argument. PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #270
Which meant that Zimmerman could testify without being cross-examined nakocal Jul 2013 #342
I Wonder What The Jury Members Will Say DallasNE Jul 2013 #261
This is sick cosmicone Jul 2013 #271
Proving he did not "reasonably believe" his life was being threatend.. DCBob Jul 2013 #278
Objectively I agree with the verdict pettypace Jul 2013 #262
"congrats"? ForgoTheConsequence Jul 2013 #267
I had a feeling he was going to get off davidpdx Jul 2013 #264
Did the jury know which side introduced the Manslaughter alternative? JustABozoOnThisBus Jul 2013 #276
They are not aware who requests the lesser included Morganfleeman Jul 2013 #280
Thanks for the coherent explanation JustABozoOnThisBus Jul 2013 #290
maybe the 1 room, 2 man, 9-5pm stamford police dept. will hire George for their night patrol. Sunlei Jul 2013 #279
too bad otherone Jul 2013 #281
I'm not surprised; this is Florida, after all LiberalEsto Jul 2013 #288
geesh, not even a manslaughter conviction wordpix Jul 2013 #296
Too bad. I'm sure many here are very disappointed. Duckwraps Jul 2013 #298
Horrible!! Terrible!!!! Soo sickening!!! NO JUSTICE!!!!!! hue Jul 2013 #300
unlike a lot of america i wasnt riveted by this case rdking647 Jul 2013 #309
This is about race AND GU NS Bragi Jul 2013 #313
Correct. nt onehandle Jul 2013 #314
Jury (of idiots) finds George Zimmerman not guilty Owl Jul 2013 #320
Fuck. Just.... fuck. Initech Jul 2013 #322
Zimmerman Case Proves That Left Was Right on Crime publicdefender76 Jul 2013 #323
what was your DU username? Kali Jul 2013 #325
is this you? Kali Jul 2013 #326
In any other situation FlaGranny Jul 2013 #335
Next he will write a book, sue the Media and then auction off the gun on E-Bay & Retire. olegramps Jul 2013 #338

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
79. All female, including, if I recall, 5 mothers.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:17 PM
Jul 2013

I would have thought that would favor at least a manslaughter conviction.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
265. No, we really don't want that
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:22 AM
Jul 2013

People who serve on jury duty should be allowed to have their privacy. It is a duty they upheld, regardless of the disappointment most of us feel about the verdict.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
297. People were
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:42 AM
Jul 2013

suspicious of that jury from the beginning. You got to admit it. five white women and one mixed women. No Black on the jury out of 20 percent of Sanford being Black. The Defense was allowed to strike every Black person but the judge allowed some questionable jurors on that jury, just like she allowed other things in the case for the defense.

I felt people were trying to give her cover and that jury because they were female. We do have women in this country with children like Sarah Palin. Just because you are a woman doesn't mean you are race neutral. Some women can be more racist than men. That is the real world. As far as I'm concerned, that verdict was a travesty of justice no matter their supporters claim. I'll never forget it as long as I live. I didn't believe for one moment the bullshit story the defense put out and only racists would believe that crap. I suggest Black people start carrying more guns. There is no justice in this dam country. You can't trust the police either as far as I'm concerned or certain judges. That is just how it is in this country.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
330. Members of the OJ jury spoke up and explained their verdict.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 11:34 PM
Jul 2013

It would be helpful if they did that here even if they don't show their faces or state their names.

ChazII

(6,205 posts)
210. The media called him White Hispanic.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:21 AM
Jul 2013

Good question though. I fear our country will never reach Dr. King's goal of judging by character.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
285. "Why is everything about race.."
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 08:35 AM
Jul 2013

Oh puhleeze, if you can't see that Trayvon was racially profiled and then further vilified by being depicted as a menacing black thug while the real thug was painted as a helpless innocent defending his mostly white neighborhood where black punks were frequent marauders and then that real thug was acquitted by whites and likely a "white Hispanic"... then you're just willfully blind

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
299. I don't
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:49 AM
Jul 2013

think we can no longer look the other way. Peopler who excuse what happened last night can play it off all they want but this was about race and the jury wasn't race neutral. Somebody call them a bunch of teabaggers and they were right on.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
293. Because this country ...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:29 AM
Jul 2013

and it's people, have a long history with respect to race and justice denied.

 

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)
321. George Zimmerman made it about race when he decided to follow Trayvon.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 06:48 PM
Jul 2013

If it was a white kid passing through, he wouldn't have given him a second look.

Marthe48

(16,958 posts)
8. Open season on unarmed pedestrians
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:01 PM
Jul 2013

If Zimmerman hadn't got out of the car, young Trevon Martin wouldn't be dead. What a freaking travesty of justice, again.

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
34. how?
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:06 PM
Jul 2013

Is the law going to change because the DA didn't do a good job?. I think he his guilty but in reality there were more opinions than actual evidence.

Marthe48

(16,958 posts)
77. He just got away with murder
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:17 PM
Jul 2013

The law won't change, but I bet people who are ok with this verdict don't much care about the law.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
204. I didn't agree with the verdict...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:01 AM
Jul 2013

... but I hope everyone can remain peaceful. When I heard the verdict, I turned the TV and computer off. I blame the prosecution and the Sanford PD. GZ got away with murder, got rich and became an idol for American vigilante-ism. What more can I say....

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
302. About the points you made...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 10:10 AM
Jul 2013

I agree..he got away with murder. I don't blame the prosecution but I do blame the Sanford PD because this would never have come to trial at all but for the public outcry.

I'm sure GZ is now very wealthy because of those who donated to his cause (that of profiting from the death of an innocent boy).

And yes, vigilante-ism has been made acceptable to some elements of the American population. Heaven help us all!

As to why I don't blame the prosecution, I'm still struggling with WTH everyone else saw that I didn't. I watched the trial from about day 8 to the end (don't ask why I didn't realize it was being live-streamed before that).

IMO, the prosecution did an admirable job with what they had. The defense, OTOH, had GZ's mother (what was she going to say, that her son was a loser?), his uncle peddling some cockamamie story about hearing Georgie scream, and Mr. West prancing around with a chunk of concrete. Bleh!

I am absolutely dumbfounded by all of this.


truth2power

(8,219 posts)
19. How in God's name they could have found him not guilty of manslaughter
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:04 PM
Jul 2013

at the very least, I don't know.

I predict we will hear more from Zimmerman in the future. Just like with OJ.

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
52. I don't remember enough of the details of Casey Anthony to compare, but maybe you're
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:11 PM
Jul 2013

thinking of some overriding reason.

ET Awful

(24,753 posts)
142. In both this and the Anthony case, had the prosecution better prepared and presented
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:47 PM
Jul 2013

their case, the verdict would have been very different.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
197. Not the same thing.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:46 PM
Jul 2013

The prosecution in the CA case didn't even know how Caylee died. How in the hell COULD the jury convict in that case?

Here it was obvious what happened. Zimmerman was guilty, and the verdict was wrong.

raccoon

(31,110 posts)
30. I was thinking that too. I bet just like OJ he'll get himself into trouble
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:06 PM
Jul 2013

again and next time won't be able to beat the rap, I hope.





AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
112. The prosecutors apparently had a different approach to the evidence that we did.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:29 PM
Jul 2013

If it were me, I would have hammed home every single, damned day of the trial that Zimmerman created the situation that led to Trayvon defending himself. If anyone had a right to "stand your ground," it was Trayvon. Not some wanna-be pretend cop who wanted to be a hero and who instigated a situation that DID NOT have to end with a dead kid.

How long will it be before George is back out at the condos protecting residents from teenagers and others who are armed with a can of Arizona Iced Tea and a bag of Skittles?

Just fucking fucked up, is what this bullshit is.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
336. This is (among) the problems...
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 09:11 AM
Jul 2013

with "Stand Your Ground" and other "Self Defense" laws. They blur the line between the assailant and the victim.

If I understand the reasoning, Zimmerman is allowed to use deadly force if he feels his life is in danger, even if he's the one who instigated to confrontation. Martin was kicking Zimmerman's ass in the fight he himself started, and so Zimmerman fell back on superior firepower.

Interesting....

So I'm robbing a convenience store. I've taken the cash and I'm attempting to leave the premises when the clerk reaches under the counter for a .38 and starts blazing away at me. I return fire because it's either him or me. I kill the clerk.

I can't think of a jurisdiction where I would be charged with aggravated homicide (or whatever the local equivalent would be). But the Zimmerman acquittal seems to say that it doesn't make any difference who did what to whom. As long as my life is in danger, I can kill the other person. I didn't go into the store intending to kill the clerk, and I only fired back because he shot at me first.

So I'm a rapist and the woman I attempted to assault has either a) and gun in her purse or b) a black belt. And now I feel threatened....

We've just opened an interesting can or worms.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
272. I'm UK - extremely hard for me to understand too.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 05:03 AM
Jul 2013

We've not got the offense of 2nd degree murder so here so charges would've been either murder or manslaughter and possibly other charges too such as inflicting grievous bodily harm aka GBH , inflicting grievous bodily injury etc. The fact remains the lad died so here I'm guessing manslaughter at least would've have been a given. That's obviously aside from illegal possession of a firearm and the separate offense of discharging one.

When I saw the headline I thought it was a sadly misplaced sick joke : our juries here don't sit at weekends.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
47. Because, unfortunately...
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:09 PM
Jul 2013

white on black crimes are not judged the same way black on white crimes are.

NotThisTime

(3,657 posts)
21. The legal system is a complete sham in this Country, how many sham trials is Florida going to have
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:04 PM
Jul 2013

before people wake up to it.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
56. My hope was that women could be more compassionate and thoughtful too.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:11 PM
Jul 2013

I see that is not the case.

Look what they have delivered to Trayvon's mother and father.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
84. This press conference is a joke and very insensitive.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:20 PM
Jul 2013

This woman with pearls is disgusting.

She should shut up. Her smiles and pontificating is unbelievable.

Quit grandstanding and shut up whoever you are lady.

What a patronizing woman!

24601

(3,962 posts)
158. I believe you were seeing the State's Attorney from the 4th District. She and her team are still
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:00 PM
Jul 2013

facing a post-trial sanctions hearing, accused of not complying with discovery rules and not being truthful with the judge.

I should point out that they also have a presumption of innocence.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
163. The Whole Culture Of The South Is Different
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:05 PM
Jul 2013

And that applies to both men and women. Frankly, I always thought there needed to be at least one male on the jury so grappling could be explained and understood. Perhaps they need to go back to 12 person juries so there is greater diversity of life experiences to help sort out various issues.

marshall

(6,665 posts)
295. I found Jesse Jackson's comment very insightful
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:36 AM
Jul 2013

He said the jury was not composed of peers because the victim and suspect are both male, suggesting that a jury of women, and mostly white women, is somehow innately inadequate to the task.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
28. Oh my god
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:05 PM
Jul 2013

This is so horribly wrong. The kid did nothing wrong and that bastard killed him in cold blood - and he got away with it. His poor parents.
I'm in tears... what have we become?

Igel

(35,309 posts)
245. Sorry, that's "The fish rots from the head."
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:35 AM
Jul 2013

It doesn't rot from the top.

Actually, it doesn't much rot from the head, either, if it's not cleaned, but that's the proverb. If it's not cleaned it rots from the guts.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
173. I was j u s t thinking about that case.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:17 PM
Jul 2013

Another shocking verdict.

I think Florida hates children. I believed that for years.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
31. just
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:06 PM
Jul 2013

legalized modern day lynching for WWB. America, I give up on your ignorance and stupidity. This is shameful. 5 white women and one hispanic all gave a license to kill again to this zimpig POS.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
90. I
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:21 PM
Jul 2013

am truly enraged at this travesty. Well zimpig got his day in court and murder was legalized. Trayvon Martin has been insulted and lynched again-twice. This country is for the birds. RW birds of prey.

 

kylie5432

(34 posts)
41. The fix was in
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:07 PM
Jul 2013

You are fucking kidding me? This country is going backwards when a black boy cannot even walk to the store.....

I teach in an inner city area and am wondering what the reaction will be on Monday at summer school.

I thought the prosecution did a great job- especially the closing statement. The fix was in,

Pterodactyl

(1,687 posts)
306. One of them may have been African American.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 11:01 AM
Jul 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Zimmerman_trial#Jury

Jury

On June 20, 2013 jury selection was completed. Six jurors and four alternates were selected. All six of the jurors are female, two of the alternate jurors are male and two female. Five of the jurors are white, one is black or Hispanic. All of the alternates are white (one male alternate has been described as possibly Hispanic).[69] The jury was sworn in, and all remaining potential jurors were dismissed.

sorefeet

(1,241 posts)
48. He is far from a free man
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:09 PM
Jul 2013

He will have to move and watch his back the rest of his life. Unless some Ted Nugent protects him.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
67. The feds can step in on a "denial of constitutional rights" basis like they did with the KKK...
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:15 PM
Jul 2013

Which is weird considering the NSA flap.

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
101. Yes, they'll come in with both feet, like they did with Goldman Sachs, right?
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jul 2013


On edit: Going back to (and piggybacking off) the OP, I've never been overwhelmed by the desire or interest in visiting Florida. Now I know I never will.
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
109. Yeah,...Al Sharpton just started going on about that....
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:28 PM
Jul 2013

Meanwhile I bet on FOX "News" they're calling upon MSNBC to fire Sharpton claiming this case is like Tawana Brawley all over again.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
164. Yeah,...we'll see videos of the clowns at FOX "News" gloating with their usual smug superiority....
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:05 PM
Jul 2013

I refuse to let them bother me.

Let America watch them be total assholes dancing on Trayvon's grave. They act like the parents aren't going to get sympathy as they rub their faces in their dead kid's blood and elevate his killer to the status of hero.

You KNOW it will happen. They have no shame.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
337. I don't know, NAACP hasnt done what NBC did
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 09:47 AM
Jul 2013

The whole NBC thing shouldve cost somebody their job. How could they think they wouldnt get caught?
I dont know what he could sue the NAACP FOR; they have only asked for investigations, etc.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
327. You're not missing much. Endless same-same tract homes surrounded by endless palmettos.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:24 PM
Jul 2013

And hot, swampy climate.

I can't stand the place. Breaks my heart that my niece and her husband are there. And it scares me, because he is a dark-skinned South Asian.

Morganfleeman

(117 posts)
282. Exactly
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 07:03 AM
Jul 2013

Rodney King was completely different. Those officers were charged with a Section 1983 violation which is where a government agent acts under the color of law to infringe someone's constitutational rights. The only possible law that may remotely apply is the Sheperd Byrd hate crimes law. That has rarely been used and there is a high threshold for a successful prosecution as you have to prove racial animus beyond a reasonable doubt.

pasto76

(1,589 posts)
230. bullshit. bullshit BULLSHIT
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:07 AM
Jul 2013

what is he doing right now? sleeping in his bed. Probably gonna eat mcdonalds hotcakes (like 6 orders) tomorrow morning.

if he is killed within a week, I'll come back and say I was wrong. My money is that we never hear much from him again nor will anyone else.

tell us that isnt freedom. "he'll have to watch his back". please. spare us the drama. He'll move to the southwest and live another 50 years.

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
53. Sue him for unlawful death.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:11 PM
Jul 2013

Take a shot at a civil suit for unlawful death. Drag him through it all over again. There was a strong manslaughter case here. Obviously they bought the self defense argument. Too bad.

Kennah

(14,265 posts)
72. Florida has immunity from civil and criminal prosecution for self defense
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:15 PM
Jul 2013

His legal bills get paid for the criminal trial, and no civil suit will be permitted.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.032.html

FS 776.032 Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force

blkbear

(25 posts)
54. What happens when you lose a fist fight ?
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:11 PM
Jul 2013

George Zimmerman lost a fist fight and then he went ghetto, pulled out his gun to get even.

Danmel

(4,915 posts)
58. how disturbing
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:11 PM
Jul 2013

How are you defending yourself when you instigate the contact? Of course. It is totally rational to be so afraid of a black kid in a hoodie that you
have to shoot him. Depressing. I have a 19 year old son, but we are white, so I don't have to worry that he will get shot or frisked or just stopped. My African American friends always have to worry about their sons. It is just so totally wrong. Some stupid crazy wanna be cop can get away with murder. awful.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
59. I wish I could say this was unexpected but I can not
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:12 PM
Jul 2013

what I can say is that disgusting sickening indefensible doesn't begin to cover it

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
60. I think he was guilty
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:12 PM
Jul 2013

But the question is, "Did teh prosecution make their case?"
If they didn't, then not guilty

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
62. I call upon the Justice Department to indict Zimmerman for a civil rights violation.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:13 PM
Jul 2013

Folks, this isn't over. Acquitting a killer of innocent black people in the South is nothing new. Now it's up to the Justice Department to see that justice is finally done.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
70. I hope the Trayvon's mother and father plan their own civil suit.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:15 PM
Jul 2013

George Zimmerman deserves to own nothing. Strip him of his assets.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
91. They can't
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:21 PM
Jul 2013

Because of the Fucked Up Laws in Florida, his parents are forever barred from suing him.

I wonder: because of the things Zimmerman said to the dispatcher, are there grounds for a federal hate crime prosecution?

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
99. Florida forbids civil suits in cases like these?
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:23 PM
Jul 2013

I hope the parents can pursue a federal hate crime case, but I don't really know.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
100. Oh I didn't know that. Thanks. But yes I think there are grounds
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:24 PM
Jul 2013

for a federal prosecution of some kind. But then what do I know? I predicted a conviction.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
266. Assuming the feds want to get involved...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:33 AM
Jul 2013

"these assholes, they always get away" said at 7:09 pm, when it was light enough outside to see what color Trayvon Martin was, looks to me like justification for a hate-crimes prosecution.

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
235. I don't think so
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:18 AM
Jul 2013

according to our system, there was no crime committed. Hate crime is sort of an interesting legal term- essentially it is a secondary crime- you are charging someone for why they committed the crime- if they did not commit any crime, the reason is a moot point

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
96. I'm sure that that will also happen. And Zimmerman's lawyers have probably told him that. Some
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:22 PM
Jul 2013

observers are asking why he showed no emotion when hearing the verdict. It's probably because he knows that this is not over.

George II

(67,782 posts)
125. Thank GOD for the Civil Rights Act of 1964...this isn't over yet!
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:35 PM
Jul 2013

I agree. I was trying to post to the OP, the system is acting crazy tonight.

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
233. do you think you could prove this beyond a reasonable doubt?
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:15 AM
Jul 2013

I don't think so. stop grasping at straws.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
310. I am not a lawyer but a good Justice Department lawyer might. Yes it
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 11:52 AM
Jul 2013

would not be a sure thing. Excuse me for "grasping at straws" in an attempt to get some kind of justice for Trayvon. Oh silly me.

BobbyBoring

(1,965 posts)
68. Remember
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:15 PM
Jul 2013

A jury found OJ innocent too! This isn't over for Georgy boy. There will be a wrong full death suit among others. It's only just begun~

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
179. The Martin's can't civily sue Zimmerman, in FL.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:20 PM
Jul 2013

He's immune from civil suits because he was acquitted of murder on self defense.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.032.html

FS 776.032 Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force

Response to onehandle (Original post)

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
147. go away
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:50 PM
Jul 2013

your comments are not appreciated here... go to freeperville and join your ilk who favored this verdict

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
76. It's the prosecution's fault.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:16 PM
Jul 2013

They bowed to pressure and overcharged Zimmerman. He should have been charged with manslaughter from the beginning, it was not a second degree murder. They were not able to prove their case and now Zimmerman is free.

24601

(3,962 posts)
301. My understanding is different than what you said. Manslaughter was always on the table as a
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 10:07 AM
Jul 2013

lessor-included offense to the charge of 2nd degree murder.

Before closing statements, the State's Attorneys asked the judge for jury instructions that would including considering 3rd degree murder based on child-abuse.

Per (11 July) Florida Today:

"Judge Debra Nelson denied the third-degree murder instruction, saying she was exercising caution since she was unsure if prosecutors could prove intent."

“I just don’t think the evidence supports that,” Nelson said.

[link:http://www.floridatoday.com/viewart/20130711/NEWS01/307110042/Judge-denies-3rd-degree-murder-charge-Zimmerman-case|

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
315. Maybe so, but the perception was that it was M2.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:31 PM
Jul 2013

I blame the prosecution more than the jurors for the verdict. If they had charged him with manslaughter for the onset, I think that the verdict would have been guilty as charged.

24601

(3,962 posts)
316. That would have been awkward & difficult. The Sanford Police Department was recommending the
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:19 PM
Jul 2013

manslaughter charge and the 4th District's State's Attorney took over the case in a highly-charged environment with all sorts of pressure. Following the Sanford PD's recommendation would have been immediately denounced as a sell-out.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
318. Yes, but the prosecutors were experienced enough to have known that M2 would not stick.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:38 PM
Jul 2013

That's why when cases become a circus justice is not achieved. Case in point, OJ, Casey Anthony and now Zimmerman. Cool heads should have prevailed, instead of emotion.

Shadowflash

(1,536 posts)
81. A boon for bar fighters!
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:18 PM
Jul 2013

I guess this means, legally, if I pick a fight with someone who I cannot take, instead of having my ass handed to me because my mouth wrote a check I can't cash, I can just shoot the guy and it's cool. Something to remember for the next bar fight.

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
130. I am thinking that this is EXACTLY what the jury has said...
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:38 PM
Jul 2013

It's late tonight and I'll probably have more to say tomorrow -

I'm listening to the press conf. as I'm typing and the woman (is she the DA?) just said this was a case about boundaries and George Zimmerman <crossed over> those boundaries.

True, and I think what you said is correct. Someone can just start a fight and then blow the other guy away. Sad.

Straw Man

(6,624 posts)
333. Not exactly.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:17 AM
Jul 2013

I guess this means, legally, if I pick a fight with someone who I cannot take, instead of having my ass handed to me because my mouth wrote a check I can't cash, I can just shoot the guy and it's cool. Something to remember for the next bar fight.

Read the statute:

776.012?Use of force in defense of person.—A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1)?He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2)?Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.


776.041?Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1)?Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2)?Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.


http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/0776.html

In other words, "Stand Your Ground" doesn't apply when you have initiated the fight. The initial aggressor has a duty to retreat before he or she is legally justified in using deadly force.

Stay out of bar fights.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
82. The legal blog talk left
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:19 PM
Jul 2013
http://www.talkleft.com/

Talk Left has a very good archive that will explain why. The Youtube channel "thecount" has a complete archive the the trial and hearings if you want to see for yourself.
At the end of the day, the State could not prove its case. They decided on the evidence and law given to them.

Given the number of reversible errors and the prosecutors playing hide and go seek with evidence, a conviction wouldn't have mattered.

It sucks, but that is the reality. Not a right or left reality, not a gun humper or gun grabber reality, just the only reality.

Response to onehandle (Original post)

mstinamotorcity2

(1,451 posts)
86. My sons will never be safe
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:20 PM
Jul 2013

in America. fuck George Zimmerman I shed tears for Trayvon and his Parents. this was the most blatant form of racist bullshit. He Murdered a child. And I don't give a fuck what a jury full of no nothing broads who don't give a damn about anyone child but their own.. Now Mr. Zimmerman and Sanford Florida will always be a Racist town with racist people. I am done it will take a lot for this one to wash. Kiss my Ass defense team we got you we know you were going to get off. but you keep on fucking with people's children and sooner or later you will meet their parents.

Response to onehandle (Original post)

Mr.Bill

(24,289 posts)
92. You know how you all feel right now?
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:21 PM
Jul 2013

That's how I felt when he was not charged with first degree murder. When they didn't do that, I saw this coming.

Mr.Bill

(24,289 posts)
117. I am of the opinion
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:32 PM
Jul 2013

without going into minute detail, that if all the evidence was allowed in court, things would have been different.

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
246. 1st degree murder is essentially pre-meditated
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:37 AM
Jul 2013

what evidence was there that zimmerman planned martin's death?

Me thinks you don't have a good understanding of the law. In fact the opposite of what you say is more plausible. I'd think that they would go for the charge with the highest amount of burden on the prosecution if they wanted to get zimmerman to walk away free- not the lesser charge.

Mr.Bill

(24,289 posts)
251. Premeditation.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:48 AM
Jul 2013

Not letting this one get away. Fucking punks. Used in the opening arguments, should have been used in the closing arguments. Of course the wild card we are not privy to is the composition of the jury, so it's all speculation.

appacom

(296 posts)
93. This is a rallying call. No justice, no peace.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:21 PM
Jul 2013

This is one fucked up country, and I am so very, very angry.

KarenS

(4,075 posts)
129. We have been boycotting Florida since
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:37 PM
Jul 2013

2000,,,, not a dime goes there from us (directly, anyway),,,,

The boycott will continue from our household until the day I die.

on edit: changed the subject from I to "we".

24601

(3,962 posts)
305. I was wondering it it was that, but posters don't blame Florida. The acceptable DU response is
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 10:37 AM
Jul 2013

to boycott the USSC - although I don't believe there are Supreme Court timeshares.

Response to onehandle (Original post)

southerncrone

(5,506 posts)
97. So. Vigilante Justice for All!
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:22 PM
Jul 2013

Message received.
We can go totin' our guns & shoot anyone who we think looks like they "don't belong", even kids, then claim self-defense.
Sounds like an open season....

This country is over-saturated w/ignorant, racist, misogynist, morons.
What's a thinking person to do? Where can we go?

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
189. Let the South secede from the Union.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:33 PM
Jul 2013

It's what they've always wanted, anyway. Then the South can have its own little all-white Republican Jesusland, where it's open season on gays, lations, blacks, atheists, libruls, women, education, & peace.

southerncrone

(5,506 posts)
201. Being a daughter of the South, I sure don't want to give it up to A..holes!
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:55 PM
Jul 2013

The South is some of the best land/climate in the country. I want to take it back, not give it up. But, the hill seems long & hard at this point. Not sure I can stand the fight at my age. Need to find bluer pastures. Repukes made a good lick when they infiltrated the churches to gain control of the Southern states. And you are correct, the South never fully-recovered from the Civil War, but it is time to move on and get over it!

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
98. Not surprised. Floriduh has lived up to their rep once again.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:23 PM
Jul 2013

Pretty much unless you record microwaving and eating your kid, or state "I'm going to get out of my car and execute a "n*****" and record it, you will get away with anything down there.

Botany

(70,504 posts)
102. the police told him to stay in his car
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jul 2013

If riots happen I can understand .... sorry .... but this 100% bullshit
Zimmerman's gun was in a holster behind his back so how the
f*** could he have reached behind him to pull out the gun when
he was on the ground?

24601

(3,962 posts)
292. It's appropriate you brought this up. The words you suggest are not accurate. The individual
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:27 AM
Jul 2013

with whom Zimmerman spoke was not a police officer. That individual testified several things:

That not being a police officer, but rather a civilian dispatcher (Sean Noffke) who send officers out on calls, that they have no authority to give orders to callers. He testified specifically that he was not authorized to tell Zimmerman not to follow Martin.

That the words he used were "OK, we don't need you to do that", which even if the dispatcher could give enforceable orders) would have been different than an order for Zimmerman to remain in, or return to, his car.

From LA Times Coverage:

"In his testimony, Noffke said he didn’t order Zimmerman to stop. Dispatchers don’t issue such orders because of liability issues, he said."

“How come you didn’t … say ‘don’t follow'?” the prosecutor asked him.

"Noffke explained that for legal reasons, 911 operators may not give such orders. “We’re directly liable if we give a direct order,” he said. “We always try to give general basic … not commands, just suggestions.”

http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-george-zimmerman-trial-20130624,0,5743016.story

Good that you brought it up because it's important to distinguish facts, especially those clarified in sworn testimony, as opposed to the inaccurate statements that contribute to the polarizations of this case and may incite further violence.

And I certainly don't blame you - what you post has been said by no shortage of people who had easy access to the true statements.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
103. They'll probably elect him to the state Senate, now.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jul 2013

My sympathies to all people of color living in Florida...half of their white neighbors are going to take this verdict as a license to kill.

Resistance to the coming white supremacist payback campaign must be organized immediately.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
175. And either way, he'll say "It was part of God's plan".
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:17 PM
Jul 2013

To which God's kid will reply:



Of course, when he says that, JC will probably look more like THIS:

PuffedMica

(1,061 posts)
275. Book deal, movie residuals
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 06:04 AM
Jul 2013

    FAUX NUZ commentary slot

    Guest appearance at the Republican National Convention

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
104. A bad precedent was set tonight.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:26 PM
Jul 2013

Especially if you're a minority.

Man confronts a kid who was doing absolutely nothing wrong and shoots him dead. The man walks.

That is some fucked up justice.

lynne

(3,118 posts)
106. The minute the ballistics guy testified -
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:26 PM
Jul 2013

- that ballistics showed Zimmerman on the bottom when the shot was fired, I figured it would go this way.

According to the law, he's innocent. The only way around that is to change the law.

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
122. Agreed. They need to write into law that if you call in and a 911
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:34 PM
Jul 2013

operator tells you to stay in your car and you disobey them and pursue someone after being told to wait for the police and you kill them that its at the least manslaughter.

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
240. you can't do that
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:25 AM
Jul 2013

a 911 operator isn't there with you, they don't know the entire situation. To have a law on the books like that would put an unreasonable burden on an operator and would have alot of negative unintended consequences. Not to mention, the operator isn't even a trained law enforcement officer, is their advice really worth more than someone else's? It's something to think about

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
317. I believe it would work.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:25 PM
Jul 2013

They arent telling you dont defend yourself if the person comes to you but rather the law would only apply if they tell you not to approach and or follow and if you disobey then if anything happens alot of the burden for it is your our doing .

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
108. Sad day for justice.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:27 PM
Jul 2013

It means you can pick a fight with someone and blow their head off and walk away not guilty.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
119. I hope those mother's never have to lose a child like this,
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:32 PM
Jul 2013

because they just put a target on all our children. I hope George Zimmerman never has peace.

Cha

(297,220 posts)
206. Tweet with the same feeling..
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:11 AM
Jul 2013

Nerdy Wonka @NerdyWonka

The jury in Florida just announced to the world that in America, it is perfectly okay by them to kill innocent young black men.

http://theobamadiary.com/2013/07/13/our-hearts-are-broken/#comments

Response to onehandle (Original post)

dawn frenzy adams

(429 posts)
131. REMEMBER THIS WHEN YOU THINK OF THE VERDICT.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:38 PM
Jul 2013

A Closer Look At George Zimmerman
Annemarie Rush
Thursday, March 29th, 2012





Zimmerman relocated to Lake Mary, Florida in 2002. In 2004, Robert and Gladys Zimmerman had George’s name removed from the deed to a house in Lake Mary.

In early 2005, he was arrested outside of a bar and charged with resisting a police officer with violence. Ordinarily, this would have resulted in jail time and a felony, however the charges were reduced to resisting an officer without violence, and Zimmerman avoided conviction by entering a pre-trial diversion program of alcohol education. In the state of Florida, pre-trial diversion programs are generally only available to first time offenders charged with misdemeanors or nonviolent felonies.


Later in 2005, Zimmerman’s ex-fiance, Veronica Zuaco filed a “civil motion for a restraining order alleging domestic violence”. Zimmerman later counter filed for a restraining order against Zuaco, both orders were granted.


Beginning in 2004, and ending with the 911 call the night of Trayvon Martin’s death, George Zimmerman placed at least 47 publicly documented complaints to police. Two of these calls, made while Zimmerman resided in Lake Mary, were placed in reference to an ex-roommate who was allowing people Zimmerman did not like into his apartment. Zimmermnan also called to report people throwing items at his truck.


In 2004, Zimmerman called the police reporting having seen a man steal a television, and remained on the line while following the purported thief until police arrived to handle the situation. In the same year, Zimmerman again pursued an individual whom he claimed had spit on him, after having called the police to report the offense. There are no records of arrests made in either case. In addition to the reports stated above, Zimmerman made several calls about open garage doors, unattended dogs, and suspicious vehicles in his community in Lake Mary.


George Zimmerman was married in 2007, to cosmetologist Shellie Nicole Dean, and in 2009 the couple moved to a gated community named “The Retreat At Twin Lakes” in Sanford, Florida, located a few miles from their previous residence. He began taking classes in law enforcement at Seminole State University, and took charge of his new community’s neighborhood watch program. He arranged neighborhood watch and safety trainings for the community which were conducted by members of the Sanford Police Department.

con't

http://www.insightoutnews.org/readings/a-closer-look-at-george-zimmerman/

 

golfguru

(4,987 posts)
132. Zimmerman walks free after killing a 17 year old unarmed youth
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:38 PM
Jul 2013

I don't think it was the right verdict. However I respect our justice system where both the accused and the victim get a fair shake in a court of law and the verdict comes from a jury of ordinary citizens. No one else has a better system.

dawn frenzy adams

(429 posts)
257. Ha.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 02:07 AM
Jul 2013

If it's rigged, it doesn't matter where it is. I know what China and Russia are. But America hides behind a cloak of democracy when it has never been one.

 

golfguru

(4,987 posts)
259. Everything in North America is about $$$$$$$
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 02:14 AM
Jul 2013

Realize it, tolerate it or emigrate from it. It won't change in our
lifetimes.

marble falls

(57,081 posts)
137. I am shocked. I hope the Martins take the little tweek to civil court.....
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:46 PM
Jul 2013

I pray not but the little tweek will screw up again. I pray again he doesn't kill anyone when the inevitable happens in the future.

I thought racism was dying. It only got calmer, but is as cold blooded as ever.

littlewolf

(3,813 posts)
145. I believe fl law prevents civil suit.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:48 PM
Jul 2013

since it was self defense, i do not think they can sue.
someone talked about it higher up.

marble falls

(57,081 posts)
152. No justice available in Florida. What a state motto. I have a new motto for my own Texas....
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:54 PM
Jul 2013

"Thank goodness for Florida."

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
139. O'mara and West talking now (press conference)...
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:46 PM
Jul 2013

West is a prick. Sorry.

O'mara painting Zimmy as some sort of public servant. Ugh! Being his defense attys. I guess that's to be expected, though.

mvd

(65,173 posts)
141. Very, very disappointed in this!
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:46 PM
Jul 2013

I can't believe he didn't get at least manslaughter. How can it be self defense when he followed Trayvon for no good reason and fired a gun at someone armed with tea and Skittles? It's Zimmerman's own fault if he was confronted. Really think the stand your ground laws have to go. They could open things up for more excused murder. Really feel bad for Trayvon and his family, and also for our justice system. Hopefully there is a civil suit.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
144. This Verdict Was Destined By The Rotten Police Work
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:48 PM
Jul 2013

At the crime scene and the following couple of days. The absence of evidence is not the same as the presence of evidence and that absence is a direct result of the most rotten police work I have ever seen and it worked heavily in Zimmerman's favor.

The circumstantial evidence in this case pointed strongly to Zimmerman being guilty of 2nd degree murder but the only hard evidence was the scream on the 911 call and the very high likelihood that the scream belonged to Martin. But for this Jury they could not come to that conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt. In a he said/she said case one person is lying and the other is telling the truth and sometimes the liar wins. I don't think that there is any doubt but what that is the case here.

The next hurdle that has to be grappled with is whether this case represents a blueprint for someone to be able to commit murder with impunity and what the changes are that need to be made in order to correct the glaring deficiency.

Lastly, the comments by O'Mara and particularly Don West are ungrateful and disgusting. May they rot in hell.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
146. Awful.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:50 PM
Jul 2013

It's all I can say. The jury had to follow the laws, so we are told.

THE LAWS SUCK!

Floridians only you can change the laws.

broadcaster75201

(387 posts)
149. As a Prosecutor of 25 years ...
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:51 PM
Jul 2013

I am not at all surprised by NG on 2nd. But I am STUNNED by NG on MS. Stunned.

littlewolf

(3,813 posts)
156. me too ... based upon what I saw
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:58 PM
Jul 2013

I thought 2nd degree murder was a reach. and when
the jury asked for more info on MS. I was pretty sure
that is were it was going.

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
160. "To win a manslaughter conviction, prosecutors had to convince the jury only that Zimmerman killed..
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:02 PM
Jul 2013

without lawful justification."

How the hell is stalking and shooting someone unarmed justified?

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
216. because we don't know who through the first punch
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:43 AM
Jul 2013

that is the issue. If martin's through the first punch and Zimmerman had no intention of harming him before the altercation he would not be found guilty of even manslaughter. There just wasn't enough evidence...

They might have been able to get him for negligent homicide.

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
231. No
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:12 AM
Jul 2013

but you know as well as i know that this was much more complicated than how you put it.

First off, when did the altercation start, what are we defining as the starting point? Who escalated the altercation? Did Zimmerman have the intention of starting and altercation so he could shoot martin?

These are a few of the questions that have to be answered. The problem is we don't have solid answers for them, we have theories, but no hard evidence. IIRC to prove manslaughter they had to prove that Zimmerman acted with depraved indifference to human life- they didn't really prove that. They proved that Zimmerman made some stupid decisions, but stupid decisions that lead to someone deaths doesn't necessarily equal manslaughter.

At best, this was a case of negligent homicide

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
249. it was technically...not so much in reality
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:42 AM
Jul 2013

IMHO Zimmerman is guilty of negligent homicide- he should have stayed in his car and left it to the police. He decided instead to confront martin, which is stupid to say the least. I don't think zimmerman had any intention to hurt martin- there was def. very little evidence to contradict that.

The prosecution just aimed too high.

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
260. Right. Sometimes I think the technicalities of the law in this country are written exactly for this
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 02:25 AM
Jul 2013

purpose. Basically to exonerate the guilty at will. There's a reason wealthy people can get away with far more than the average Joe on the street. There are frequently more loopholes for those that can afford them.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
171. They added that charge at the last minute.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:15 PM
Jul 2013

Maybe the jurors thought that it was a gimmick of a failing prosecution.

 

lancer78

(1,495 posts)
238. Really?
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:24 AM
Jul 2013

How can you be stunned when it was TM who committed the first illegal act by jumping GZ? And before anyone says anything different, do you think GZ would have not drawn his handgun first if TM had just turned around and confronted him?

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
334. there is no WAY that gun humping paranoid coward approached Martin without displaying his gun
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 03:06 AM
Jul 2013

NO WAY IN HELL

meanit

(455 posts)
154. The NRA should be happy
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:57 PM
Jul 2013

Some people may now purchase guns who otherwise would not, just to protect themselves from the newly empowered "Zimmermans" out there now.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
312. I don't know....
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:07 PM
Jul 2013

The obvious lesson I am taking away from all this is that if a gun comes out in a fight I am in, the person carrying it has to die... for my legal protection.

boguspotus

(286 posts)
155. Wow, so now it's so extra easy to kill black folks with no repercussions? Fucking bull shit!
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 10:58 PM
Jul 2013

Can't wait for Zimmy to kill again. Sorry, our country is fucked. I'm glad I don't have kids. Fuck It.

Deny and Shred

(1,061 posts)
159. O'Mara making me sick
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:00 PM
Jul 2013

He was asked if things would be different if GZ was black. His response was yes, it never would have gone to trial. He reasoned that Sharpton, etc would never have gotten involved. Just wow.

If a 28 year old black guy killed a 17 year old white kid in Sanford FL he would have been arrested immediately and charged with something. It would be different becuase we'd never have heard about it.

Plaxico Burris served more time for shooting himself in the leg.

Never going to FL again. Never.

Igel

(35,309 posts)
252. I think he answered the question correctly.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:49 AM
Jul 2013

If GZ were black, I doubt it would have gone to trial. There wasn't any strong motivation to take GZ to trial. You can assume that was because they didn't want to prosecute a white guy. Or because the case would be weak. In hindsight ...


But that's a different thing from "If GZ were black and TM were white would things be different?" Quite possibly. But he wasn't asked that.

Both of them are reasonable questions. And the answers that are offered to both of them say something about attitudes towards race.

Deny and Shred

(1,061 posts)
283. I think it goes beyond that.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 08:11 AM
Jul 2013

He's saying a black killer wouldn't have stood trial, and GZ was singled out for prosecution because he was white. In other words, black people need to STFU because they got MORE justice than any white person would get.

I could buy some of what you are saying if US jails weren't and haven't been filled with black men found guilty on much less evidence. If GZ were black, he would not recieve the money, support, interview offers, etc that GZ does.

lexington filly

(239 posts)
161. The laws, too few on a jury,
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:03 PM
Jul 2013

and I think, the prosecution's strategy and much of the time passiveness, freed the killer.
Nevertheless, I feel stunned he didn't get convicted of manslaughter. Just 6 on a jury doesn't allow enough diversity of gender, race, intellect, background of experience in my opinion. They have 12 in FL to send someone to Death Row and get that wrong too much of the time---so divide that by half and call it justice?
I feel so unsettled by this verdict. Sad for Trevon's folks.

We've become so primitive in this country, carrying guns on our hips just to go to Target for God's sake! If the verdict didn't honor this kid, then I could by working to change the laws and helping elect those who pervert the 2nd Amendment.

GoCubsGo

(32,083 posts)
167. I wish I could say I was surprised.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:12 PM
Jul 2013

When I heard that the jury was made up of a bunch of middle-aged white teabagger women, I figured it would turn out this way. Sickening. Just sickening.

GoCubsGo

(32,083 posts)
187. Mostly because of where the live.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:29 PM
Jul 2013

Sanford is full of Teabaggers. And, because Zimmerman's lawyer was spouting all kinds of Tea Party buzzwords in his closing address to them. Just assuming...

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
177. That is disgusting
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:18 PM
Jul 2013

I haven't been so disgusted with 12 jurors since the LA cops walked after beating Rodney King or when O. J. walked. Before that it was Dan White being convicted on a lesser charge after killing Mayor Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk in San Francisco.

I hope Zimmerman makes a lot of money. He'll need to hire body guards for the rest of his life.

Justice was not served tonight.


DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
213. So Right, Lack Of Diversity
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:30 AM
Jul 2013

Another example of the failure of austerity. Florida did this to save money. Also, the prosecution didn't have the money for sufficient discovery then they were denied their expert witnesses on voice analysis. It is impossible in the digital age not to have the technology that could prove who's voice it was not (or was). It should be far less complicated than matching DNA.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
215. I mostly agree with you,
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:35 AM
Jul 2013

but 1 small correction, their so called "expert witnesses on voice analysis"? Every reputable voice analysis expert in the country called their methods junk science, that's why the judge disallowed their testimony.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
224. Mostly Agree
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:50 AM
Jul 2013

The prosecution did not look hard enough for newer technology which is not junk science and that may go to lack of funding for discovery. That said, there may not yet be enough demand for the technology on voice analysis so it may not yet be available but it makes no sense that the digital blueprint for voice cannot be matched against a second sample and come back either positive or negative every time (provided the samples are of a sufficient duration).

Igel

(35,309 posts)
255. It was crap data.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:58 AM
Jul 2013

It passed through too many filters whose properties weren't known.

It wasn't loud. You'd have to amplify it. All the noise in the signal gets amplified. You want details. You get noise. I've transcribed 911 recordings. Sometimes all you get is noise and it's hard to tell if there's even a signal.

Assume you can get around that. Having a long enough sample would help. They didn't. Short sample, short amoung of crap. Assume you can get around *that*.

The mode of phonation was non-standard. That means you'd need a sample of that kind of phonation, and you'd need it from both of them. TM was in no position to provide a sample.

Digital blueprints look at details in formant structure, details in coarticulation, idiosyncrasies in modal phonation. No formants. No coarticulation. Modal phonation, to be sure, but the spectral tilt would be a killer (so to speak).

Sorry. Did too much linguistics in grad school, hung out with far too many linguists, and then had the lack of common sense to marry a phonologist/phonetician who spent a decade doing fairly low level acoustic analysis as a post-doc then as faculty at a Tier 1 university.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
268. I Made The Assumption The Recording Was Digital
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:41 AM
Jul 2013

If it is not then no dice. If it is digital then why can't they filter out the extraneous sound bits and have something pretty darn pure to work with. Is it because the software is not yet mature enough to make this possible. I presume you are saying that you cannot compare a normal voice with a scream and I can see where that would make it an extra challenge. Maybe I'm too optimistic that some programmer could make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
304. Re: voice analysis... Your post and those above are enlightening..
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 10:29 AM
Jul 2013

I was wondering, during the trial, why there couldn't have been some way to tell just who was screaming, even tho' I can't imagine that hulk, GZ, screaming in high C.

Also, I guess that's why those speeches by Anonymous are always filtered thru an artificial voice technique - so they can't be identified. Yes?

alp227

(32,024 posts)
192. Once Z settles the Martin family CIVIL case that money is out the window.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:39 PM
Jul 2013

So he may need witness protection for life like a new name/SSN/other records. The boys who killed james Bulger did after leaving prison.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
227. Not Sure Civil Recourse Is Available In Florida
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:59 AM
Jul 2013

It is not available under stand your ground and since this was self defense with a backdrop of stand your ground it may be an unresolved legal issue. O'Mara announced tonight he will fight all attempts to bring Zimmerman before a civil court. My guess is that this case is now closed.

alp227

(32,024 posts)
243. Shiiiiiit...you may be right
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:30 AM
Jul 2013
http://www.volokh.com/2012/03/27/floridas-self-defense-laws/

Fla. Stat. § 776.032. Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force

(1) A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, the term “criminal prosecution” includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting the defendant.


But Zimmerman never had immunity from prosecution and in fact has already gone through prosecution, so I am doubtful he can use this law. If anything, Zimmerman will probably want to put this case behind him and prefer a quiet, confidential, speedy settlement of any civil suit.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
284. He could have requested immunity but choose not to
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 08:23 AM
Jul 2013

TM's parent's could attempt to sue, in which case Z would request an immunity hearing. Considering he was found not guilty by a jury, it is likely that the judge would grant him immunity.

NickB79

(19,243 posts)
229. No civil case to settle, he's immune
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:05 AM
Jul 2013

Per Florida's laws. If found to have killed in self-defense, he can't be civilly sued in court.

BlueManFan

(256 posts)
181. That's It!!!!! I Believe Florida should Be under a provisional federal governor!
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:20 PM
Jul 2013

Between the 2000 election, choosing a medicare fraud/thief for governor, and declaring open season on black kids--they are too fucked up to be allowed to govern themselves. And I live in shithole texas so ai know what living in tea bag hell is

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
237. the ocean will soon swallow Florida, and it will be forgotten.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:21 AM
Jul 2013

maybe not in our lifetimes, but it's coming.

BlueManFan

(256 posts)
319. Those hillbilly teabag Floridians don't believe in global warming
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 05:58 PM
Jul 2013

but they will when Miami Looks Like Venice

mike dub

(541 posts)
184. bull fucking shit verdict
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:25 PM
Jul 2013

But may Trayvon Martin rest in peace, and may his family and friends help one another through this

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,868 posts)
211. Let me guess...white?....middle class?......
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:21 AM
Jul 2013

How can justice prevail when a teenager who was unarmed is dead, and no one is held responsible?

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
274. Justice didn't prevail
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 05:54 AM
Jul 2013

But the system worked.

The prosecution brought a weak case to trial, and presented what they had very poorly.

I have been saying that here over and over, and nobody believed me.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
277. They did
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 06:12 AM
Jul 2013

They brought M2 when they were nowhere near able to prove, and by overreaching trying to get it didn't make a good enough case for manslaughter over self defense.

Alan M

(22 posts)
195. Lets not loose sight of the real villains
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:42 PM
Jul 2013

I am sure I am in the minority here, but it was the right verdict given Florida law. If you pass a law written by the NRA that encourages people not just to defend themselves and their homes, but to take up arms and patrol public places bad things are going to happen and they did. To me the real villains in this are the Florida Legislature the NRA, ALEC and the companies that gave ALEC the funds to get this legislation passed. The ought to be very ashamed.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
263. The Law Has A Double Standard
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:01 AM
Jul 2013

The defense only had to prove that Zimmerman "reasonably believes" he faced great bodily harm while the prosecution has to "prove beyond a reasonable doubt" that he did not face great bodily harm. Once Martin threw a punch to defend himself it subjected him to the use of deadly force. That is how the Florida law is written. Cause someone to take a punch at you and you have a free card to kill. It sucks.

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
196. So now a mugger can claim self defense in Florida after he shoots a victim.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:42 PM
Jul 2013

as long as there aren't witnesses to contradict him.

Alan M

(22 posts)
202. No
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:58 PM
Jul 2013

Since a mugger would be engaging in a felony no. The problem with the law is mistaken perceptions. That is why you really can't trust the general public to go on armed patrol they have no training to ascertain what is really going on.

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
228. this does not have much to do with SYG laws
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:04 AM
Jul 2013

IIRC it wasn't even raised as a defense.

This case has brought out the most disgusting side of the left. We've turned it into a proxy war for every other issue- guns, race, etc...

It really isn't- its a tragic story of a deadly confrontation and an overzealous prosecutor

tpsbmam

(3,927 posts)
221. No. A WHITE mugger can claim self defense after he shoots a BLACK victim.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:47 AM
Jul 2013

It doesn't generalize to whites killing whites, etc. It's those African Amerkins who are so fucking threatening & understandably terrifying!



(Sarcasm only on the very last.bit. The rest is my damn opinion of these racist United States.)

Alan M

(22 posts)
232. Anybody can claim whatever they want
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:13 AM
Jul 2013

It is the nature of our justice system. However, if there is evidence that someone was engaged in felony it is unlikely that they would prevail on a claim of self-defense.


bossy22

(3,547 posts)
236. SYG wasn't raised as a defense
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:20 AM
Jul 2013

he would have been found not guilty even if it wasn't on the books. The defense argued that zimmerman was underneath martin and could not retreat. SYG is meaningless at this point

Alan M

(22 posts)
256. I agree up to a point
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 02:07 AM
Jul 2013

but even though it wasn't invoked it made Zimmerman's behavior “lawful” under Florida's self-defense law. If SYG hadn't passed the prosecution could have argued that Zimmerman was acting recklessly when he decided to patrol the neighborhood with a firearm, and they would have had a much better chance of getting a manslaughter conviction. I.e Stand Your Ground made armed untrained citizens patrolling a public place “lawful” conduct and therefore it can't be reckless or even negligent. Furthermore, I have no doubt if SYG had never passed Zimmerman wouldn’t have been patrolling his neighborhood with a firearm in the first place.

humbled_opinion

(4,423 posts)
198. I really don't know how this has become
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:46 PM
Jul 2013

so political but it has... can we at least rally to end stand your ground laws?

Alan M

(22 posts)
205. I would hope so
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:11 AM
Jul 2013

But in my mind the trial was a distraction to take the heat off the legislature, and for the most part it worked.
This is going to happen over and over again as long as this law is on the books.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
203. Unbelievable
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:00 AM
Jul 2013

demonstration of injustice. I had hope since it was brought into the limelight, that this would not happen.

Truly a sad night in America.

lucca18

(1,241 posts)
212. A very sad day.......
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:27 AM
Jul 2013

I feel such an overwhelming sadness. Such utter injustice that it is sickening.......

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
218. because the prosecution could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:46 AM
Jul 2013

that he was guilty of the charges

There was reasonable doubt. IMHO Zimmerman should have been charged with negligent homicide- in the end that is all the prosecution really proved.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
329. Because the police deliberately botched the investigation and then the prosecutors,
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 10:06 PM
Jul 2013

who never wanted to prosecute in the first place, deliberately botched the courtroom case.

It was monkeywrenched by internal saboteurs, IMHO.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
219. American idiots now think it's ok to stalk and kill unarmed black kids walking in the neighborhood.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:47 AM
Jul 2013

Fucking outrageous. Time to get the fuck outta here.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
311. If you are referring to the jury, finding him not guilty and thinking what he did was OK
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 11:57 AM
Jul 2013

are two entirely different things. I am more ready to fault the prosecution than the jury. The jury had a very narrow set of instructions to follow and were told that if there is any doubt whatsoever they must acquit. The prosecution was incompetent and inept and that fact is an outrage.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
220. Un-fucking believable.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:47 AM
Jul 2013

I figured that the fix was in on this, but it's still stunning to think that this guy walked after murdering this kid.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
239. Saw that coming.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:24 AM
Jul 2013

Back when I first heard the make-up of the Jury. It should be illegal to have so much homogeneity.

253. better blog
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:53 AM
Jul 2013

Democratic Underground I can see here has normal people and was nothing to sign up. Over at HLNTV you could go crazy trying to sign up, no privacy, bigot city.

To draw a wild card:
Big Shooter George Zimmerman could even be just some stupid patsy for the Bad old conservative reactionaries who want to go back to pre-civil rights days. Why didn't the cops take action, especially the (fired) chief. And the Judge. If people had brand names, they would be a generic equivalent of the KKK.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
254. while I severely disagree with the judgement...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:57 AM
Jul 2013

please reconsider the use of the word "shyster"- it has anti-semitic connotations.

nakocal

(552 posts)
258. Judge also erred
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 02:12 AM
Jul 2013

The Judge in this case also made a serious legal mistake by allowing the computer animation of how Zimmerman claims the murder took place. The only way that the animation should have been allowed was to have it followed immediately by George Zimmerman on the witness stand being cross examined. The animation allowed Zimmerman to testify without the fear of his lies being exposed under cross examination.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
270. The animation was only allowed to be used in the defense's closing argument.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 04:39 AM
Jul 2013

Opening and closing arguments aren't testimony or evidence and a defense attorney can
make claims as to what the defendant did or didn't do without the defendant having to testify.

nakocal

(552 posts)
342. Which meant that Zimmerman could testify without being cross-examined
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 07:11 PM
Jul 2013

The animation goes beyond making a claim as to what the defendant said and did.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
261. I Wonder What The Jury Members Will Say
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 02:47 AM
Jul 2013

To defend this verdict. As I read it they must have decided that with so much conflicting testimony that they would ignore it all and that worked hugely in Zimmerman's favor. That took the many demonstrated lies of Zimmerman out of the picture and the 911 call with the scream since both families said it was their relative screaming but that is taking a short cut that cannot be defended. How can they have a doubt about it being Martin doing the screaming since it stopped the millisecond the shot was fired. To me that easily passes the test of beyond a reasonable doubt and is a smoking gun the jury must explain and be convincing -- something I don't see how they can do.

But under my scenario they looked at Zimmerman's bloody nose and concluded it was self defense. Nothing else much mattered. The DNA did not support a not guilty verdict but perhaps the absence of DNA from where you would expect it doesn't matter in their mind. But much of that lack of evidence goes straight back to the rotten job the police did in the collection and perseveration of evidence.

While the law says that Zimmerman only has to "reasonably believe" his life is threatening while the prosecution has the higher standard of proving "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Zimmerman could not reasonably believe his life is threatened. That double standard is a blueprint for legalized murder. When Martin defended himself with less than deadly force it opened up the opportunity for Zimmerman to use deadly force. Now something is wrong with that picture.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
278. Proving he did not "reasonably believe" his life was being threatend..
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 06:12 AM
Jul 2013

is a glaring fault in the law in my opinion.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
264. I had a feeling he was going to get off
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:20 AM
Jul 2013

just because of how the trial went. It really sucks. The manslaughter would have been an alternative, but they apparently thought even that was too much.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
276. Did the jury know which side introduced the Manslaughter alternative?
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 06:12 AM
Jul 2013

If I was a juror, and knew the prosecution introduced the manslaughter possibility, I'd interpret that as a sign that the prosecution knew they had a weak case.

I think the prosecutor erred by deviating from the original charge. Or maybe erred by over-charging in the first place.

The manslaughter alternative just confused things.

Morganfleeman

(117 posts)
280. They are not aware who requests the lesser included
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 06:50 AM
Jul 2013

Though I agree it is confusing because no one ever argued manslaughter. Not to mention the jury instructions are not entirely clear

http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/07/12/Zimmerman_Final_Jury_Instructions.pdf

As a lawyer myself i could see how any jury would be confused by these instructions but they are standard instructions in Florida for manslaughter. I'm not surprised the jury had questions about manslaughter because it talks about things like negligence, excusable homicide, justifiable homicide etc., and then SEPARATELY it talks about justifiable use of deadly force. It's a lot for a lay person to digest and frankly it's disgraceful that in this day we cant provide juries with better instructions.

That said, the prosecution also bears a burden because they put their eggs into the second degree murder basket. Had this been a manslaughter case from the beginning they would have significantly improved their odds of a conviction. Arguing in the alternative is something lawyers do all the time and its perfectly acceptable legal practice, but it could very well have been seen as a "kitchen sink" charge by the jury and indicative of a weaker case as no one specifically articulated the manslaughter argument. Closing argument was all about ill will, hatred and depravity.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
290. Thanks for the coherent explanation
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:04 AM
Jul 2013

It was confusing that the charge of manslaughter was dropped in at the end, with neither side presenting a case for or against that charge.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
296. geesh, not even a manslaughter conviction
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:38 AM
Jul 2013

I guess it's OK to follow a kid, scare him and then shoot him

 

rdking647

(5,113 posts)
309. unlike a lot of america i wasnt riveted by this case
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 11:34 AM
Jul 2013

i didnt follow it closely because i have a real life. just liek the casey anthony case the wall to wall cnn,msnbc,faux news coverage was ludicrous

but from what i did see there did exist a reasonable doubt as to what happened. I wasnt there,you werent there,there are no eye witnesses so there is no direct evidence as to what really happened.
and that creates reasonable doubt. which is the standard for acquittal.
you can cry about the injustice of it and that may be true but under out system of government its not a level playing field. the prosecution has a tougher case than the defendant. reasonable doubt is a high standard. and yes it does sometime result in the guilty going free but that is a better outcome than imprisoning the innocent


Bragi

(7,650 posts)
313. This is about race AND GU NS
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jul 2013

Without America's insane gun culture, this would not have been a lethal incident.

323. Zimmerman Case Proves That Left Was Right on Crime
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 08:25 PM
Jul 2013

Would someone with thread-starting privileges be willing to post this Huffington Post story as a new thread?

It's a story in THE HUFFINGTON POST entitled "Zimmerman Case Proves That Left Was Right on Crime" and I think it's worth reading. It's not like any other article on the Zimmerman case I've seen thus far, as you'll see if you check it out. (I am its author, FWIW, so I'm biased, but I think the article confirms what I've said here.)

Many, many thanks for the help. I used to post regularly on DU in the mid-aughts (I was the Editor of The Nashua Advocate), and it's been a long time since I've been here. I miss it.

S.

Kali

(55,008 posts)
326. is this you?
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:23 PM
Jul 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=user_profiles&u_id=159869

you seem to still be in good standing if you still have log in info, otherwise go post a dozen or so replies around the site and you should be good to go.

FlaGranny

(8,361 posts)
335. In any other situation
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 06:51 AM
Jul 2013

if you act recklessly and irresponsibly and cause a death you will get at least a manslaughter conviction, but because the victim fought back the perpetrator gets to cry self defense.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jury finds George Zimmerm...