Jury finds George Zimmerman not guilty
Source: MSNBC
A Florida jury finds George Zimmerman not guilty.
Zimmerman, 29, said he was acting in self-defense when he shot the unarmed Trayvon Martin, 17, in the chest during an altercation in a gated community of Sanford, Fla., on Feb. 26. 2012.
He was not charged for 44 tumultuous days in which the case generated large protests in several cities, turned a hooded sweatshirt like the one Martin wore into a symbol of solidarity, and drew the attention of President Obama, who said, If I had a son, hed look like Trayvon.
As debate over race, guns and Floridas Stand Your Ground law swirled, a special prosecutor appointed by the governor announced April 11, 2012 that Zimmerman was being charged with second-degree murder a move that his supporters said was meant to quell the public outcry.
Read more: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/13/19441838-jury-finds-george-zimmerman-not-guilty?lite
His shysters are grinning like hyenas.
Gun Nuts Have A New God!
My wife and I have been thinking of selling our Florida timeshare.
Decision made.
Update: I just contacted a reputable reseller via email.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)jessie04
(1,528 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)but, not a surprise.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Nobody listened to me.
Kennah
(14,265 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)go figure.
OnlinePoker
(5,719 posts)I would have thought that would favor at least a manslaughter conviction.
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)The 6th juror was a minority, but the race was not disclosed.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the 6th juror is Hispanic.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)People who serve on jury duty should be allowed to have their privacy. It is a duty they upheld, regardless of the disappointment most of us feel about the verdict.
John2
(2,730 posts)suspicious of that jury from the beginning. You got to admit it. five white women and one mixed women. No Black on the jury out of 20 percent of Sanford being Black. The Defense was allowed to strike every Black person but the judge allowed some questionable jurors on that jury, just like she allowed other things in the case for the defense.
I felt people were trying to give her cover and that jury because they were female. We do have women in this country with children like Sarah Palin. Just because you are a woman doesn't mean you are race neutral. Some women can be more racist than men. That is the real world. As far as I'm concerned, that verdict was a travesty of justice no matter their supporters claim. I'll never forget it as long as I live. I didn't believe for one moment the bullshit story the defense put out and only racists would believe that crap. I suggest Black people start carrying more guns. There is no justice in this dam country. You can't trust the police either as far as I'm concerned or certain judges. That is just how it is in this country.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)It would be helpful if they did that here even if they don't show their faces or state their names.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Also what they say could inflame things even more.
BigD_95
(911 posts)The defended was not white. Why is everything about race
ChazII
(6,205 posts)Good question though. I fear our country will never reach Dr. King's goal of judging by character.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)Oh puhleeze, if you can't see that Trayvon was racially profiled and then further vilified by being depicted as a menacing black thug while the real thug was painted as a helpless innocent defending his mostly white neighborhood where black punks were frequent marauders and then that real thug was acquitted by whites and likely a "white Hispanic"... then you're just willfully blind
think we can no longer look the other way. Peopler who excuse what happened last night can play it off all they want but this was about race and the jury wasn't race neutral. Somebody call them a bunch of teabaggers and they were right on.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and it's people, have a long history with respect to race and justice denied.
Flatulo
(5,005 posts)If it was a white kid passing through, he wouldn't have given him a second look.
joesdaughter
(243 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)gopiscrap
(23,760 posts)Marthe48
(16,958 posts)If Zimmerman hadn't got out of the car, young Trevon Martin wouldn't be dead. What a freaking travesty of justice, again.
Is the law going to change because the DA didn't do a good job?. I think he his guilty but in reality there were more opinions than actual evidence.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)A fool eould think that and would find himself in hot water quickly....the law has not changed.
Marthe48
(16,958 posts)The law won't change, but I bet people who are ok with this verdict don't much care about the law.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,289 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Shrek
(3,979 posts)Apparently they thought the state failed to meet its burden.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)but fear and ignorance trumps justice
MuseRider
(34,109 posts)very sad.
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)This is the new normal
heaven05
(18,124 posts)I said he would walk.
SamKnause
(13,104 posts)Pitiful, absolutely pitiful.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... but I hope everyone can remain peaceful. When I heard the verdict, I turned the TV and computer off. I blame the prosecution and the Sanford PD. GZ got away with murder, got rich and became an idol for American vigilante-ism. What more can I say....
truth2power
(8,219 posts)I agree..he got away with murder. I don't blame the prosecution but I do blame the Sanford PD because this would never have come to trial at all but for the public outcry.
I'm sure GZ is now very wealthy because of those who donated to his cause (that of profiting from the death of an innocent boy).
And yes, vigilante-ism has been made acceptable to some elements of the American population. Heaven help us all!
As to why I don't blame the prosecution, I'm still struggling with WTH everyone else saw that I didn't. I watched the trial from about day 8 to the end (don't ask why I didn't realize it was being live-streamed before that).
IMO, the prosecution did an admirable job with what they had. The defense, OTOH, had GZ's mother (what was she going to say, that her son was a loser?), his uncle peddling some cockamamie story about hearing Georgie scream, and Mr. West prancing around with a chunk of concrete. Bleh!
I am absolutely dumbfounded by all of this.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)at the very least, I don't know.
I predict we will hear more from Zimmerman in the future. Just like with OJ.
NotThisTime
(3,657 posts)truth2power
(8,219 posts)thinking of some overriding reason.
ET Awful
(24,753 posts)truth2power
(8,219 posts)a different trial than I was.
ET Awful
(24,753 posts)their case, the verdict would have been very different.
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)The prosecution in the CA case didn't even know how Caylee died. How in the hell COULD the jury convict in that case?
Here it was obvious what happened. Zimmerman was guilty, and the verdict was wrong.
raccoon
(31,110 posts)again and next time won't be able to beat the rap, I hope.
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)If it were me, I would have hammed home every single, damned day of the trial that Zimmerman created the situation that led to Trayvon defending himself. If anyone had a right to "stand your ground," it was Trayvon. Not some wanna-be pretend cop who wanted to be a hero and who instigated a situation that DID NOT have to end with a dead kid.
How long will it be before George is back out at the condos protecting residents from teenagers and others who are armed with a can of Arizona Iced Tea and a bag of Skittles?
Just fucking fucked up, is what this bullshit is.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)with "Stand Your Ground" and other "Self Defense" laws. They blur the line between the assailant and the victim.
If I understand the reasoning, Zimmerman is allowed to use deadly force if he feels his life is in danger, even if he's the one who instigated to confrontation. Martin was kicking Zimmerman's ass in the fight he himself started, and so Zimmerman fell back on superior firepower.
Interesting....
So I'm robbing a convenience store. I've taken the cash and I'm attempting to leave the premises when the clerk reaches under the counter for a .38 and starts blazing away at me. I return fire because it's either him or me. I kill the clerk.
I can't think of a jurisdiction where I would be charged with aggravated homicide (or whatever the local equivalent would be). But the Zimmerman acquittal seems to say that it doesn't make any difference who did what to whom. As long as my life is in danger, I can kill the other person. I didn't go into the store intending to kill the clerk, and I only fired back because he shot at me first.
So I'm a rapist and the woman I attempted to assault has either a) and gun in her purse or b) a black belt. And now I feel threatened....
We've just opened an interesting can or worms.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)We've not got the offense of 2nd degree murder so here so charges would've been either murder or manslaughter and possibly other charges too such as inflicting grievous bodily harm aka GBH , inflicting grievous bodily injury etc. The fact remains the lad died so here I'm guessing manslaughter at least would've have been a given. That's obviously aside from illegal possession of a firearm and the separate offense of discharging one.
When I saw the headline I thought it was a sadly misplaced sick joke : our juries here don't sit at weekends.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)come to this? very disappointed.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)white on black crimes are not judged the same way black on white crimes are.
NotThisTime
(3,657 posts)before people wake up to it.
MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)SO WRONG
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)rurallib
(62,415 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Legally sanctioned lynching... How anyone could say this was not about race is beyond me.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)But the prosecution didn't do well.
complain jane
(4,302 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)I see that is not the case.
Look what they have delivered to Trayvon's mother and father.
ileus
(15,396 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)This woman with pearls is disgusting.
She should shut up. Her smiles and pontificating is unbelievable.
Quit grandstanding and shut up whoever you are lady.
What a patronizing woman!
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)24601
(3,962 posts)facing a post-trial sanctions hearing, accused of not complying with discovery rules and not being truthful with the judge.
I should point out that they also have a presumption of innocence.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)And that applies to both men and women. Frankly, I always thought there needed to be at least one male on the jury so grappling could be explained and understood. Perhaps they need to go back to 12 person juries so there is greater diversity of life experiences to help sort out various issues.
marshall
(6,665 posts)He said the jury was not composed of peers because the victim and suspect are both male, suggesting that a jury of women, and mostly white women, is somehow innately inadequate to the task.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)This is so horribly wrong. The kid did nothing wrong and that bastard killed him in cold blood - and he got away with it. His poor parents.
I'm in tears... what have we become?
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)The fish rots from the top.
Igel
(35,309 posts)It doesn't rot from the top.
Actually, it doesn't much rot from the head, either, if it's not cleaned, but that's the proverb. If it's not cleaned it rots from the guts.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)adirondacker
(2,921 posts)alp227
(32,024 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Another shocking verdict.
I think Florida hates children. I believed that for years.
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)lancer78
(1,495 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)legalized modern day lynching for WWB. America, I give up on your ignorance and stupidity. This is shameful. 5 white women and one hispanic all gave a license to kill again to this zimpig POS.
OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)Capt.Rocky300
(1,005 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)just florida.
Capt.Rocky300
(1,005 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)am truly enraged at this travesty. Well zimpig got his day in court and murder was legalized. Trayvon Martin has been insulted and lynched again-twice. This country is for the birds. RW birds of prey.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Perhaps a mirror would be helpful.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Great graphic Onehandle
Fuck that state!
kylie5432
(34 posts)You are fucking kidding me? This country is going backwards when a black boy cannot even walk to the store.....
I teach in an inner city area and am wondering what the reaction will be on Monday at summer school.
I thought the prosecution did a great job- especially the closing statement. The fix was in,
zonkers
(5,865 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)How can that not have some impact?
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)Jury
On June 20, 2013 jury selection was completed. Six jurors and four alternates were selected. All six of the jurors are female, two of the alternate jurors are male and two female. Five of the jurors are white, one is black or Hispanic. All of the alternates are white (one male alternate has been described as possibly Hispanic).[69] The jury was sworn in, and all remaining potential jurors were dismissed.
sorefeet
(1,241 posts)He will have to move and watch his back the rest of his life. Unless some Ted Nugent protects him.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Which is weird considering the NSA flap.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)On edit: Going back to (and piggybacking off) the OP, I've never been overwhelmed by the desire or interest in visiting Florida. Now I know I never will.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Meanwhile I bet on FOX "News" they're calling upon MSNBC to fire Sharpton claiming this case is like Tawana Brawley all over again.
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)and those posts will probably be popping up here.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)I refuse to let them bother me.
Let America watch them be total assholes dancing on Trayvon's grave. They act like the parents aren't going to get sympathy as they rub their faces in their dead kid's blood and elevate his killer to the status of hero.
You KNOW it will happen. They have no shame.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)And he'll probably win, its so blatant. But if the Martin family sues HIM and wins, he wont see any of it.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)The whole NBC thing shouldve cost somebody their job. How could they think they wouldnt get caught?
I dont know what he could sue the NAACP FOR; they have only asked for investigations, etc.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)It did.
7962
(11,841 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)And hot, swampy climate.
I can't stand the place. Breaks my heart that my niece and her husband are there. And it scares me, because he is a dark-skinned South Asian.
alp227
(32,024 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)That only works if it is someone working as a government official in some sort.
Morganfleeman
(117 posts)Rodney King was completely different. Those officers were charged with a Section 1983 violation which is where a government agent acts under the color of law to infringe someone's constitutational rights. The only possible law that may remotely apply is the Sheperd Byrd hate crimes law. That has rarely been used and there is a high threshold for a successful prosecution as you have to prove racial animus beyond a reasonable doubt.
pasto76
(1,589 posts)what is he doing right now? sleeping in his bed. Probably gonna eat mcdonalds hotcakes (like 6 orders) tomorrow morning.
if he is killed within a week, I'll come back and say I was wrong. My money is that we never hear much from him again nor will anyone else.
tell us that isnt freedom. "he'll have to watch his back". please. spare us the drama. He'll move to the southwest and live another 50 years.
tblue
(16,350 posts)Oh how awful.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Take a shot at a civil suit for unlawful death. Drag him through it all over again. There was a strong manslaughter case here. Obviously they bought the self defense argument. Too bad.
Kennah
(14,265 posts)His legal bills get paid for the criminal trial, and no civil suit will be permitted.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.032.html
FS 776.032 Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force
truth2power
(8,219 posts)SunSeeker
(51,555 posts)Florida law that says you can't be civilly liable if you are found not guilty based on self defense.
http://blogs.findlaw.com/injured/2012/03/can-trayvons-family-sue-zimmerman-in-civil-court.html
However, they may be able to sue the Homeowners' Association.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/09/1081839/-Trayvon-Martin-s-parents-could-potentially-sue-homeowners-association#
premium
(3,731 posts)blkbear
(25 posts)George Zimmerman lost a fist fight and then he went ghetto, pulled out his gun to get even.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)Kennah
(14,265 posts)Danmel
(4,915 posts)How are you defending yourself when you instigate the contact? Of course. It is totally rational to be so afraid of a black kid in a hoodie that you
have to shoot him. Depressing. I have a 19 year old son, but we are white, so I don't have to worry that he will get shot or frisked or just stopped. My African American friends always have to worry about their sons. It is just so totally wrong. Some stupid crazy wanna be cop can get away with murder. awful.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)what I can say is that disgusting sickening indefensible doesn't begin to cover it
rpannier
(24,329 posts)But the question is, "Did teh prosecution make their case?"
If they didn't, then not guilty
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)Folks, this isn't over. Acquitting a killer of innocent black people in the South is nothing new. Now it's up to the Justice Department to see that justice is finally done.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)George Zimmerman deserves to own nothing. Strip him of his assets.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)Because of the Fucked Up Laws in Florida, his parents are forever barred from suing him.
I wonder: because of the things Zimmerman said to the dispatcher, are there grounds for a federal hate crime prosecution?
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)I hope the parents can pursue a federal hate crime case, but I don't really know.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)for a federal prosecution of some kind. But then what do I know? I predicted a conviction.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)"these assholes, they always get away" said at 7:09 pm, when it was light enough outside to see what color Trayvon Martin was, looks to me like justification for a hate-crimes prosecution.
George II
(67,782 posts)bossy22
(3,547 posts)according to our system, there was no crime committed. Hate crime is sort of an interesting legal term- essentially it is a secondary crime- you are charging someone for why they committed the crime- if they did not commit any crime, the reason is a moot point
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)observers are asking why he showed no emotion when hearing the verdict. It's probably because he knows that this is not over.
George II
(67,782 posts)I agree. I was trying to post to the OP, the system is acting crazy tonight.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)I don't think so. stop grasping at straws.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)would not be a sure thing. Excuse me for "grasping at straws" in an attempt to get some kind of justice for Trayvon. Oh silly me.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I was hoping for at least a manslaughter verdict. However, I am not too surprised.
BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)A jury found OJ innocent too! This isn't over for Georgy boy. There will be a wrong full death suit among others. It's only just begun~
premium
(3,731 posts)He's immune from civil suits because he was acquitted of murder on self defense.
FS 776.032 Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force
George II
(67,782 posts)adirondacker
(2,921 posts)Response to onehandle (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Carolina
(6,960 posts)your comments are not appreciated here... go to freeperville and join your ilk who favored this verdict
Beacool
(30,247 posts)They bowed to pressure and overcharged Zimmerman. He should have been charged with manslaughter from the beginning, it was not a second degree murder. They were not able to prove their case and now Zimmerman is free.
Shrek
(3,979 posts)They acquitted anyway.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)They must have thought that it was a gimmick.
24601
(3,962 posts)lessor-included offense to the charge of 2nd degree murder.
Before closing statements, the State's Attorneys asked the judge for jury instructions that would including considering 3rd degree murder based on child-abuse.
Per (11 July) Florida Today:
"Judge Debra Nelson denied the third-degree murder instruction, saying she was exercising caution since she was unsure if prosecutors could prove intent."
I just dont think the evidence supports that, Nelson said.
[link:http://www.floridatoday.com/viewart/20130711/NEWS01/307110042/Judge-denies-3rd-degree-murder-charge-Zimmerman-case|
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I blame the prosecution more than the jurors for the verdict. If they had charged him with manslaughter for the onset, I think that the verdict would have been guilty as charged.
24601
(3,962 posts)manslaughter charge and the 4th District's State's Attorney took over the case in a highly-charged environment with all sorts of pressure. Following the Sanford PD's recommendation would have been immediately denounced as a sell-out.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)That's why when cases become a circus justice is not achieved. Case in point, OJ, Casey Anthony and now Zimmerman. Cool heads should have prevailed, instead of emotion.
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)I guess this means, legally, if I pick a fight with someone who I cannot take, instead of having my ass handed to me because my mouth wrote a check I can't cash, I can just shoot the guy and it's cool. Something to remember for the next bar fight.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)It's late tonight and I'll probably have more to say tomorrow -
I'm listening to the press conf. as I'm typing and the woman (is she the DA?) just said this was a case about boundaries and George Zimmerman <crossed over> those boundaries.
True, and I think what you said is correct. Someone can just start a fight and then blow the other guy away. Sad.
Straw Man
(6,624 posts)I guess this means, legally, if I pick a fight with someone who I cannot take, instead of having my ass handed to me because my mouth wrote a check I can't cash, I can just shoot the guy and it's cool. Something to remember for the next bar fight.
Read the statute:
(1)?He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2)?Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.
(1)?Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2)?Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/0776.html
In other words, "Stand Your Ground" doesn't apply when you have initiated the fight. The initial aggressor has a duty to retreat before he or she is legally justified in using deadly force.
Stay out of bar fights.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Talk Left has a very good archive that will explain why. The Youtube channel "thecount" has a complete archive the the trial and hearings if you want to see for yourself.
At the end of the day, the State could not prove its case. They decided on the evidence and law given to them.
Given the number of reversible errors and the prosecutors playing hide and go seek with evidence, a conviction wouldn't have mattered.
It sucks, but that is the reality. Not a right or left reality, not a gun humper or gun grabber reality, just the only reality.
michigandem58
(1,044 posts)n/t
Response to onehandle (Original post)
Post removed
mstinamotorcity2
(1,451 posts)in America. fuck George Zimmerman I shed tears for Trayvon and his Parents. this was the most blatant form of racist bullshit. He Murdered a child. And I don't give a fuck what a jury full of no nothing broads who don't give a damn about anyone child but their own.. Now Mr. Zimmerman and Sanford Florida will always be a Racist town with racist people. I am done it will take a lot for this one to wash. Kiss my Ass defense team we got you we know you were going to get off. but you keep on fucking with people's children and sooner or later you will meet their parents.
Response to onehandle (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
aintitfunny
(1,421 posts)Unbelievable.
Mr.Bill
(24,289 posts)That's how I felt when he was not charged with first degree murder. When they didn't do that, I saw this coming.
littlewolf
(3,813 posts)what makes you think they would get 1st degree ?
Mr.Bill
(24,289 posts)without going into minute detail, that if all the evidence was allowed in court, things would have been different.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)what evidence was there that zimmerman planned martin's death?
Me thinks you don't have a good understanding of the law. In fact the opposite of what you say is more plausible. I'd think that they would go for the charge with the highest amount of burden on the prosecution if they wanted to get zimmerman to walk away free- not the lesser charge.
Mr.Bill
(24,289 posts)Not this time though, right, George?
Mr.Bill
(24,289 posts)Not letting this one get away. Fucking punks. Used in the opening arguments, should have been used in the closing arguments. Of course the wild card we are not privy to is the composition of the jury, so it's all speculation.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)appacom
(296 posts)This is one fucked up country, and I am so very, very angry.
mbee
(1,140 posts)Boycott Florida!
KarenS
(4,075 posts)2000,,,, not a dime goes there from us (directly, anyway),,,,
The boycott will continue from our household until the day I die.
on edit: changed the subject from I to "we".
truth2power
(8,219 posts)24601
(3,962 posts)to boycott the USSC - although I don't believe there are Supreme Court timeshares.
you beat me to the punch, but that was exactly what I was thinking.
Response to onehandle (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Caretha
(2,737 posts)where the sun don't shine
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)Message received.
We can go totin' our guns & shoot anyone who we think looks like they "don't belong", even kids, then claim self-defense.
Sounds like an open season....
This country is over-saturated w/ignorant, racist, misogynist, morons.
What's a thinking person to do? Where can we go?
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)It's what they've always wanted, anyway. Then the South can have its own little all-white Republican Jesusland, where it's open season on gays, lations, blacks, atheists, libruls, women, education, & peace.
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)The South is some of the best land/climate in the country. I want to take it back, not give it up. But, the hill seems long & hard at this point. Not sure I can stand the fight at my age. Need to find bluer pastures. Repukes made a good lick when they infiltrated the churches to gain control of the Southern states. And you are correct, the South never fully-recovered from the Civil War, but it is time to move on and get over it!
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Pretty much unless you record microwaving and eating your kid, or state "I'm going to get out of my car and execute a "n*****" and record it, you will get away with anything down there.
Botany
(70,504 posts)If riots happen I can understand .... sorry .... but this 100% bullshit
Zimmerman's gun was in a holster behind his back so how the
f*** could he have reached behind him to pull out the gun when
he was on the ground?
24601
(3,962 posts)with whom Zimmerman spoke was not a police officer. That individual testified several things:
That not being a police officer, but rather a civilian dispatcher (Sean Noffke) who send officers out on calls, that they have no authority to give orders to callers. He testified specifically that he was not authorized to tell Zimmerman not to follow Martin.
That the words he used were "OK, we don't need you to do that", which even if the dispatcher could give enforceable orders) would have been different than an order for Zimmerman to remain in, or return to, his car.
From LA Times Coverage:
"In his testimony, Noffke said he didnt order Zimmerman to stop. Dispatchers dont issue such orders because of liability issues, he said."
How come you didnt
say dont follow'? the prosecutor asked him.
"Noffke explained that for legal reasons, 911 operators may not give such orders. Were directly liable if we give a direct order, he said. We always try to give general basic
not commands, just suggestions.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-george-zimmerman-trial-20130624,0,5743016.story
Good that you brought it up because it's important to distinguish facts, especially those clarified in sworn testimony, as opposed to the inaccurate statements that contribute to the polarizations of this case and may incite further violence.
And I certainly don't blame you - what you post has been said by no shortage of people who had easy access to the true statements.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)My sympathies to all people of color living in Florida...half of their white neighbors are going to take this verdict as a license to kill.
Resistance to the coming white supremacist payback campaign must be organized immediately.
Mr.Bill
(24,289 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)To which God's kid will reply:
Of course, when he says that, JC will probably look more like THIS:
PuffedMica
(1,061 posts)FAUX NUZ commentary slot
Guest appearance at the Republican National Convention
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)Especially if you're a minority.
Man confronts a kid who was doing absolutely nothing wrong and shoots him dead. The man walks.
That is some fucked up justice.
lynne
(3,118 posts)- that ballistics showed Zimmerman on the bottom when the shot was fired, I figured it would go this way.
According to the law, he's innocent. The only way around that is to change the law.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)operator tells you to stay in your car and you disobey them and pursue someone after being told to wait for the police and you kill them that its at the least manslaughter.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)a 911 operator isn't there with you, they don't know the entire situation. To have a law on the books like that would put an unreasonable burden on an operator and would have alot of negative unintended consequences. Not to mention, the operator isn't even a trained law enforcement officer, is their advice really worth more than someone else's? It's something to think about
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)They arent telling you dont defend yourself if the person comes to you but rather the law would only apply if they tell you not to approach and or follow and if you disobey then if anything happens alot of the burden for it is your our doing .
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)It means you can pick a fight with someone and blow their head off and walk away not guilty.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)Shameful, shameful day for this country.
johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)Absolutely outrageous.
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)There is no way I thought he would walk.
Loki
(3,825 posts)because they just put a target on all our children. I hope George Zimmerman never has peace.
Aristus
(66,361 posts)Way to go, Florida!
Cha
(297,220 posts)Nerdy Wonka @NerdyWonka
The jury in Florida just announced to the world that in America, it is perfectly okay by them to kill innocent young black men.
http://theobamadiary.com/2013/07/13/our-hearts-are-broken/#comments
Response to onehandle (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
PaulKersey
(59 posts)Loryn
(944 posts)I just feel sick for his Trayvon's loved ones.
What a sad day.
dawn frenzy adams
(429 posts)A Closer Look At George Zimmerman
Annemarie Rush
Thursday, March 29th, 2012
Zimmerman relocated to Lake Mary, Florida in 2002. In 2004, Robert and Gladys Zimmerman had Georges name removed from the deed to a house in Lake Mary.
In early 2005, he was arrested outside of a bar and charged with resisting a police officer with violence. Ordinarily, this would have resulted in jail time and a felony, however the charges were reduced to resisting an officer without violence, and Zimmerman avoided conviction by entering a pre-trial diversion program of alcohol education. In the state of Florida, pre-trial diversion programs are generally only available to first time offenders charged with misdemeanors or nonviolent felonies.
Later in 2005, Zimmermans ex-fiance, Veronica Zuaco filed a civil motion for a restraining order alleging domestic violence. Zimmerman later counter filed for a restraining order against Zuaco, both orders were granted.
Beginning in 2004, and ending with the 911 call the night of Trayvon Martins death, George Zimmerman placed at least 47 publicly documented complaints to police. Two of these calls, made while Zimmerman resided in Lake Mary, were placed in reference to an ex-roommate who was allowing people Zimmerman did not like into his apartment. Zimmermnan also called to report people throwing items at his truck.
In 2004, Zimmerman called the police reporting having seen a man steal a television, and remained on the line while following the purported thief until police arrived to handle the situation. In the same year, Zimmerman again pursued an individual whom he claimed had spit on him, after having called the police to report the offense. There are no records of arrests made in either case. In addition to the reports stated above, Zimmerman made several calls about open garage doors, unattended dogs, and suspicious vehicles in his community in Lake Mary.
George Zimmerman was married in 2007, to cosmetologist Shellie Nicole Dean, and in 2009 the couple moved to a gated community named The Retreat At Twin Lakes in Sanford, Florida, located a few miles from their previous residence. He began taking classes in law enforcement at Seminole State University, and took charge of his new communitys neighborhood watch program. He arranged neighborhood watch and safety trainings for the community which were conducted by members of the Sanford Police Department.
con't
http://www.insightoutnews.org/readings/a-closer-look-at-george-zimmerman/
truth2power
(8,219 posts)golfguru
(4,987 posts)I don't think it was the right verdict. However I respect our justice system where both the accused and the victim get a fair shake in a court of law and the verdict comes from a jury of ordinary citizens. No one else has a better system.
dawn frenzy adams
(429 posts)If you're white with money, it's a good system
golfguru
(4,987 posts)dawn frenzy adams
(429 posts)If it's rigged, it doesn't matter where it is. I know what China and Russia are. But America hides behind a cloak of democracy when it has never been one.
golfguru
(4,987 posts)Realize it, tolerate it or emigrate from it. It won't change in our
lifetimes.
marble falls
(57,081 posts)I pray not but the little tweek will screw up again. I pray again he doesn't kill anyone when the inevitable happens in the future.
I thought racism was dying. It only got calmer, but is as cold blooded as ever.
littlewolf
(3,813 posts)since it was self defense, i do not think they can sue.
someone talked about it higher up.
marble falls
(57,081 posts)"Thank goodness for Florida."
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,574 posts)I can't see it any other way.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)West is a prick. Sorry.
O'mara painting Zimmy as some sort of public servant. Ugh! Being his defense attys. I guess that's to be expected, though.
drynberg
(1,648 posts)ANSWER: Wadda U think? Welcome to the new barbarism...
mvd
(65,173 posts)I can't believe he didn't get at least manslaughter. How can it be self defense when he followed Trayvon for no good reason and fired a gun at someone armed with tea and Skittles? It's Zimmerman's own fault if he was confronted. Really think the stand your ground laws have to go. They could open things up for more excused murder. Really feel bad for Trayvon and his family, and also for our justice system. Hopefully there is a civil suit.
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)At the crime scene and the following couple of days. The absence of evidence is not the same as the presence of evidence and that absence is a direct result of the most rotten police work I have ever seen and it worked heavily in Zimmerman's favor.
The circumstantial evidence in this case pointed strongly to Zimmerman being guilty of 2nd degree murder but the only hard evidence was the scream on the 911 call and the very high likelihood that the scream belonged to Martin. But for this Jury they could not come to that conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt. In a he said/she said case one person is lying and the other is telling the truth and sometimes the liar wins. I don't think that there is any doubt but what that is the case here.
The next hurdle that has to be grappled with is whether this case represents a blueprint for someone to be able to commit murder with impunity and what the changes are that need to be made in order to correct the glaring deficiency.
Lastly, the comments by O'Mara and particularly Don West are ungrateful and disgusting. May they rot in hell.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)It's all I can say. The jury had to follow the laws, so we are told.
THE LAWS SUCK!
Floridians only you can change the laws.
broadcaster75201
(387 posts)I am not at all surprised by NG on 2nd. But I am STUNNED by NG on MS. Stunned.
littlewolf
(3,813 posts)I thought 2nd degree murder was a reach. and when
the jury asked for more info on MS. I was pretty sure
that is were it was going.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)without lawful justification."
How the hell is stalking and shooting someone unarmed justified?
bossy22
(3,547 posts)that is the issue. If martin's through the first punch and Zimmerman had no intention of harming him before the altercation he would not be found guilty of even manslaughter. There just wasn't enough evidence...
They might have been able to get him for negligent homicide.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)bossy22
(3,547 posts)but you know as well as i know that this was much more complicated than how you put it.
First off, when did the altercation start, what are we defining as the starting point? Who escalated the altercation? Did Zimmerman have the intention of starting and altercation so he could shoot martin?
These are a few of the questions that have to be answered. The problem is we don't have solid answers for them, we have theories, but no hard evidence. IIRC to prove manslaughter they had to prove that Zimmerman acted with depraved indifference to human life- they didn't really prove that. They proved that Zimmerman made some stupid decisions, but stupid decisions that lead to someone deaths doesn't necessarily equal manslaughter.
At best, this was a case of negligent homicide
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)bossy22
(3,547 posts)IMHO Zimmerman is guilty of negligent homicide- he should have stayed in his car and left it to the police. He decided instead to confront martin, which is stupid to say the least. I don't think zimmerman had any intention to hurt martin- there was def. very little evidence to contradict that.
The prosecution just aimed too high.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)purpose. Basically to exonerate the guilty at will. There's a reason wealthy people can get away with far more than the average Joe on the street. There are frequently more loopholes for those that can afford them.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Maybe the jurors thought that it was a gimmick of a failing prosecution.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)How can you be stunned when it was TM who committed the first illegal act by jumping GZ? And before anyone says anything different, do you think GZ would have not drawn his handgun first if TM had just turned around and confronted him?
Carolina
(6,960 posts)fuck away, you troll
Skittles
(153,160 posts)NO WAY IN HELL
meanit
(455 posts)Some people may now purchase guns who otherwise would not, just to protect themselves from the newly empowered "Zimmermans" out there now.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)The obvious lesson I am taking away from all this is that if a gun comes out in a fight I am in, the person carrying it has to die... for my legal protection.
boguspotus
(286 posts)Can't wait for Zimmy to kill again. Sorry, our country is fucked. I'm glad I don't have kids. Fuck It.
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)He was asked if things would be different if GZ was black. His response was yes, it never would have gone to trial. He reasoned that Sharpton, etc would never have gotten involved. Just wow.
If a 28 year old black guy killed a 17 year old white kid in Sanford FL he would have been arrested immediately and charged with something. It would be different becuase we'd never have heard about it.
Plaxico Burris served more time for shooting himself in the leg.
Never going to FL again. Never.
Igel
(35,309 posts)If GZ were black, I doubt it would have gone to trial. There wasn't any strong motivation to take GZ to trial. You can assume that was because they didn't want to prosecute a white guy. Or because the case would be weak. In hindsight ...
But that's a different thing from "If GZ were black and TM were white would things be different?" Quite possibly. But he wasn't asked that.
Both of them are reasonable questions. And the answers that are offered to both of them say something about attitudes towards race.
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)He's saying a black killer wouldn't have stood trial, and GZ was singled out for prosecution because he was white. In other words, black people need to STFU because they got MORE justice than any white person would get.
I could buy some of what you are saying if US jails weren't and haven't been filled with black men found guilty on much less evidence. If GZ were black, he would not recieve the money, support, interview offers, etc that GZ does.
marshall
(6,665 posts)The case has many layers of racial interplay.
lexington filly
(239 posts)and I think, the prosecution's strategy and much of the time passiveness, freed the killer.
Nevertheless, I feel stunned he didn't get convicted of manslaughter. Just 6 on a jury doesn't allow enough diversity of gender, race, intellect, background of experience in my opinion. They have 12 in FL to send someone to Death Row and get that wrong too much of the time---so divide that by half and call it justice?
I feel so unsettled by this verdict. Sad for Trevon's folks.
We've become so primitive in this country, carrying guns on our hips just to go to Target for God's sake! If the verdict didn't honor this kid, then I could by working to change the laws and helping elect those who pervert the 2nd Amendment.
mountain grammy
(26,621 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,083 posts)When I heard that the jury was made up of a bunch of middle-aged white teabagger women, I figured it would turn out this way. Sickening. Just sickening.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Just because they were white?
GoCubsGo
(32,083 posts)Sanford is full of Teabaggers. And, because Zimmerman's lawyer was spouting all kinds of Tea Party buzzwords in his closing address to them. Just assuming...
Beacool
(30,247 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)I haven't been so disgusted with 12 jurors since the LA cops walked after beating Rodney King or when O. J. walked. Before that it was Dan White being convicted on a lesser charge after killing Mayor Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk in San Francisco.
I hope Zimmerman makes a lot of money. He'll need to hire body guards for the rest of his life.
Justice was not served tonight.
premium
(3,731 posts)it was 6 women and 4 alternates.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Another example of the failure of austerity. Florida did this to save money. Also, the prosecution didn't have the money for sufficient discovery then they were denied their expert witnesses on voice analysis. It is impossible in the digital age not to have the technology that could prove who's voice it was not (or was). It should be far less complicated than matching DNA.
premium
(3,731 posts)but 1 small correction, their so called "expert witnesses on voice analysis"? Every reputable voice analysis expert in the country called their methods junk science, that's why the judge disallowed their testimony.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)The prosecution did not look hard enough for newer technology which is not junk science and that may go to lack of funding for discovery. That said, there may not yet be enough demand for the technology on voice analysis so it may not yet be available but it makes no sense that the digital blueprint for voice cannot be matched against a second sample and come back either positive or negative every time (provided the samples are of a sufficient duration).
premium
(3,731 posts)We've reached an agreement.
Igel
(35,309 posts)It passed through too many filters whose properties weren't known.
It wasn't loud. You'd have to amplify it. All the noise in the signal gets amplified. You want details. You get noise. I've transcribed 911 recordings. Sometimes all you get is noise and it's hard to tell if there's even a signal.
Assume you can get around that. Having a long enough sample would help. They didn't. Short sample, short amoung of crap. Assume you can get around *that*.
The mode of phonation was non-standard. That means you'd need a sample of that kind of phonation, and you'd need it from both of them. TM was in no position to provide a sample.
Digital blueprints look at details in formant structure, details in coarticulation, idiosyncrasies in modal phonation. No formants. No coarticulation. Modal phonation, to be sure, but the spectral tilt would be a killer (so to speak).
Sorry. Did too much linguistics in grad school, hung out with far too many linguists, and then had the lack of common sense to marry a phonologist/phonetician who spent a decade doing fairly low level acoustic analysis as a post-doc then as faculty at a Tier 1 university.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)If it is not then no dice. If it is digital then why can't they filter out the extraneous sound bits and have something pretty darn pure to work with. Is it because the software is not yet mature enough to make this possible. I presume you are saying that you cannot compare a normal voice with a scream and I can see where that would make it an extra challenge. Maybe I'm too optimistic that some programmer could make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)I was wondering, during the trial, why there couldn't have been some way to tell just who was screaming, even tho' I can't imagine that hulk, GZ, screaming in high C.
Also, I guess that's why those speeches by Anonymous are always filtered thru an artificial voice technique - so they can't be identified. Yes?
alp227
(32,024 posts)So he may need witness protection for life like a new name/SSN/other records. The boys who killed james Bulger did after leaving prison.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)It is not available under stand your ground and since this was self defense with a backdrop of stand your ground it may be an unresolved legal issue. O'Mara announced tonight he will fight all attempts to bring Zimmerman before a civil court. My guess is that this case is now closed.
alp227
(32,024 posts)(1) A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, the term criminal prosecution includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting the defendant.
But Zimmerman never had immunity from prosecution and in fact has already gone through prosecution, so I am doubtful he can use this law. If anything, Zimmerman will probably want to put this case behind him and prefer a quiet, confidential, speedy settlement of any civil suit.
hack89
(39,171 posts)TM's parent's could attempt to sue, in which case Z would request an immunity hearing. Considering he was found not guilty by a jury, it is likely that the judge would grant him immunity.
NickB79
(19,243 posts)Per Florida's laws. If found to have killed in self-defense, he can't be civilly sued in court.
BlueManFan
(256 posts)Between the 2000 election, choosing a medicare fraud/thief for governor, and declaring open season on black kids--they are too fucked up to be allowed to govern themselves. And I live in shithole texas so ai know what living in tea bag hell is
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)maybe not in our lifetimes, but it's coming.
BlueManFan
(256 posts)but they will when Miami Looks Like Venice
Bette Noir
(3,581 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)an unarmed American citizen.
...sickening.
mike dub
(541 posts)But may Trayvon Martin rest in peace, and may his family and friends help one another through this
Vattel
(9,289 posts)There was reasonable doubt. The jury made the right decision.
GReedDiamond
(5,312 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)How can justice prevail when a teenager who was unarmed is dead, and no one is held responsible?
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)But the system worked.
The prosecution brought a weak case to trial, and presented what they had very poorly.
I have been saying that here over and over, and nobody believed me.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)and now - we have open season - with a precedent....
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)They brought M2 when they were nowhere near able to prove, and by overreaching trying to get it didn't make a good enough case for manslaughter over self defense.
walkerbait41
(302 posts)For Justice and a sad day for America
Alan M
(22 posts)I am sure I am in the minority here, but it was the right verdict given Florida law. If you pass a law written by the NRA that encourages people not just to defend themselves and their homes, but to take up arms and patrol public places bad things are going to happen and they did. To me the real villains in this are the Florida Legislature the NRA, ALEC and the companies that gave ALEC the funds to get this legislation passed. The ought to be very ashamed.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)The defense only had to prove that Zimmerman "reasonably believes" he faced great bodily harm while the prosecution has to "prove beyond a reasonable doubt" that he did not face great bodily harm. Once Martin threw a punch to defend himself it subjected him to the use of deadly force. That is how the Florida law is written. Cause someone to take a punch at you and you have a free card to kill. It sucks.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)as long as there aren't witnesses to contradict him.
Since a mugger would be engaging in a felony no. The problem with the law is mistaken perceptions. That is why you really can't trust the general public to go on armed patrol they have no training to ascertain what is really going on.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)IIRC it wasn't even raised as a defense.
This case has brought out the most disgusting side of the left. We've turned it into a proxy war for every other issue- guns, race, etc...
It really isn't- its a tragic story of a deadly confrontation and an overzealous prosecutor
tpsbmam
(3,927 posts)It doesn't generalize to whites killing whites, etc. It's those African Amerkins who are so fucking threatening & understandably terrifying!
(Sarcasm only on the very last.bit. The rest is my damn opinion of these racist United States.)
Alan M
(22 posts)It is the nature of our justice system. However, if there is evidence that someone was engaged in felony it is unlikely that they would prevail on a claim of self-defense.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)he would have been found not guilty even if it wasn't on the books. The defense argued that zimmerman was underneath martin and could not retreat. SYG is meaningless at this point
Alan M
(22 posts)but even though it wasn't invoked it made Zimmerman's behavior lawful under Florida's self-defense law. If SYG hadn't passed the prosecution could have argued that Zimmerman was acting recklessly when he decided to patrol the neighborhood with a firearm, and they would have had a much better chance of getting a manslaughter conviction. I.e Stand Your Ground made armed untrained citizens patrolling a public place lawful conduct and therefore it can't be reckless or even negligent. Furthermore, I have no doubt if SYG had never passed Zimmerman wouldnt have been patrolling his neighborhood with a firearm in the first place.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)so political but it has... can we at least rally to end stand your ground laws?
Alan M
(22 posts)But in my mind the trial was a distraction to take the heat off the legislature, and for the most part it worked.
This is going to happen over and over again as long as this law is on the books.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)even if it didnt exist zimmerman would be found not guilty
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)demonstration of injustice. I had hope since it was brought into the limelight, that this would not happen.
Truly a sad night in America.
lucca18
(1,241 posts)I feel such an overwhelming sadness. Such utter injustice that it is sickening.......
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Just don't understand.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)that he was guilty of the charges
There was reasonable doubt. IMHO Zimmerman should have been charged with negligent homicide- in the end that is all the prosecution really proved.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)who never wanted to prosecute in the first place, deliberately botched the courtroom case.
It was monkeywrenched by internal saboteurs, IMHO.
20score
(4,769 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Fucking outrageous. Time to get the fuck outta here.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)are two entirely different things. I am more ready to fault the prosecution than the jury. The jury had a very narrow set of instructions to follow and were told that if there is any doubt whatsoever they must acquit. The prosecution was incompetent and inept and that fact is an outrage.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)I figured that the fix was in on this, but it's still stunning to think that this guy walked after murdering this kid.
shall_not_tell
(7 posts)I am SOOOO pissed off at Zimmerman. I hope he punches himself in the nose until it breaks and bashes his own head into the pavement, again.
[link:http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRMZ3O8CMl2HTDO5Ci_i1tE1OS6KPDS2885Z2X4ppzuzC2lnuVgxQ|
miked62916
(51 posts)How can that scumbag Zimmerman be found not guilty?! Absolutely mind-boggling.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Back when I first heard the make-up of the Jury. It should be illegal to have so much homogeneity.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)died again today.
ThenWhatTheFis
(1 post)Democratic Underground I can see here has normal people and was nothing to sign up. Over at HLNTV you could go crazy trying to sign up, no privacy, bigot city.
To draw a wild card:
Big Shooter George Zimmerman could even be just some stupid patsy for the Bad old conservative reactionaries who want to go back to pre-civil rights days. Why didn't the cops take action, especially the (fired) chief. And the Judge. If people had brand names, they would be a generic equivalent of the KKK.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)please reconsider the use of the word "shyster"- it has anti-semitic connotations.
nakocal
(552 posts)The Judge in this case also made a serious legal mistake by allowing the computer animation of how Zimmerman claims the murder took place. The only way that the animation should have been allowed was to have it followed immediately by George Zimmerman on the witness stand being cross examined. The animation allowed Zimmerman to testify without the fear of his lies being exposed under cross examination.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Opening and closing arguments aren't testimony or evidence and a defense attorney can
make claims as to what the defendant did or didn't do without the defendant having to testify.
nakocal
(552 posts)The animation goes beyond making a claim as to what the defendant said and did.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)To defend this verdict. As I read it they must have decided that with so much conflicting testimony that they would ignore it all and that worked hugely in Zimmerman's favor. That took the many demonstrated lies of Zimmerman out of the picture and the 911 call with the scream since both families said it was their relative screaming but that is taking a short cut that cannot be defended. How can they have a doubt about it being Martin doing the screaming since it stopped the millisecond the shot was fired. To me that easily passes the test of beyond a reasonable doubt and is a smoking gun the jury must explain and be convincing -- something I don't see how they can do.
But under my scenario they looked at Zimmerman's bloody nose and concluded it was self defense. Nothing else much mattered. The DNA did not support a not guilty verdict but perhaps the absence of DNA from where you would expect it doesn't matter in their mind. But much of that lack of evidence goes straight back to the rotten job the police did in the collection and perseveration of evidence.
While the law says that Zimmerman only has to "reasonably believe" his life is threatening while the prosecution has the higher standard of proving "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Zimmerman could not reasonably believe his life is threatened. That double standard is a blueprint for legalized murder. When Martin defended himself with less than deadly force it opened up the opportunity for Zimmerman to use deadly force. Now something is wrong with that picture.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)and now I want to see gestapo zimmy charged in Federal Court.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)is a glaring fault in the law in my opinion.
pettypace
(744 posts)Congrats to the defense team.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)How revolting.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)just because of how the trial went. It really sucks. The manslaughter would have been an alternative, but they apparently thought even that was too much.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)If I was a juror, and knew the prosecution introduced the manslaughter possibility, I'd interpret that as a sign that the prosecution knew they had a weak case.
I think the prosecutor erred by deviating from the original charge. Or maybe erred by over-charging in the first place.
The manslaughter alternative just confused things.
Morganfleeman
(117 posts)Though I agree it is confusing because no one ever argued manslaughter. Not to mention the jury instructions are not entirely clear
http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/07/12/Zimmerman_Final_Jury_Instructions.pdf
As a lawyer myself i could see how any jury would be confused by these instructions but they are standard instructions in Florida for manslaughter. I'm not surprised the jury had questions about manslaughter because it talks about things like negligence, excusable homicide, justifiable homicide etc., and then SEPARATELY it talks about justifiable use of deadly force. It's a lot for a lay person to digest and frankly it's disgraceful that in this day we cant provide juries with better instructions.
That said, the prosecution also bears a burden because they put their eggs into the second degree murder basket. Had this been a manslaughter case from the beginning they would have significantly improved their odds of a conviction. Arguing in the alternative is something lawyers do all the time and its perfectly acceptable legal practice, but it could very well have been seen as a "kitchen sink" charge by the jury and indicative of a weaker case as no one specifically articulated the manslaughter argument. Closing argument was all about ill will, hatred and depravity.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)It was confusing that the charge of manslaughter was dropped in at the end, with neither side presenting a case for or against that charge.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)otherone
(973 posts)LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)But I'm utterly disgusted at the verdict.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)I guess it's OK to follow a kid, scare him and then shoot him
Duckwraps
(206 posts)hue
(4,949 posts)rdking647
(5,113 posts)i didnt follow it closely because i have a real life. just liek the casey anthony case the wall to wall cnn,msnbc,faux news coverage was ludicrous
but from what i did see there did exist a reasonable doubt as to what happened. I wasnt there,you werent there,there are no eye witnesses so there is no direct evidence as to what really happened.
and that creates reasonable doubt. which is the standard for acquittal.
you can cry about the injustice of it and that may be true but under out system of government its not a level playing field. the prosecution has a tougher case than the defendant. reasonable doubt is a high standard. and yes it does sometime result in the guilty going free but that is a better outcome than imprisoning the innocent
Bragi
(7,650 posts)Without America's insane gun culture, this would not have been a lethal incident.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Owl
(3,642 posts)Initech
(100,075 posts)publicdefender76
(9 posts)Would someone with thread-starting privileges be willing to post this Huffington Post story as a new thread?
It's a story in THE HUFFINGTON POST entitled "Zimmerman Case Proves That Left Was Right on Crime" and I think it's worth reading. It's not like any other article on the Zimmerman case I've seen thus far, as you'll see if you check it out. (I am its author, FWIW, so I'm biased, but I think the article confirms what I've said here.)
Many, many thanks for the help. I used to post regularly on DU in the mid-aughts (I was the Editor of The Nashua Advocate), and it's been a long time since I've been here. I miss it.
S.
Kali
(55,008 posts)Kali
(55,008 posts)you seem to still be in good standing if you still have log in info, otherwise go post a dozen or so replies around the site and you should be good to go.
FlaGranny
(8,361 posts)if you act recklessly and irresponsibly and cause a death you will get at least a manslaughter conviction, but because the victim fought back the perpetrator gets to cry self defense.