Florida to allow doctors to perform C-sections outside hospitals
Source: NBC News
May 26, 2024, 7:00 AM EDT
Florida has become the first state to allow doctors to perform cesarean sections outside of hospitals, siding with a private equity-owned physicians group that says the change will lower costs and give pregnant women the homier birthing atmosphere that many desire.
But the hospital industry and the nations leading obstetricians association say that even though some Florida hospitals have closed their maternity wards in recent years, performing C-sections in doctor-run clinics will increase the risks for women and babies when complications arise.
A pregnant patient that is considered low-risk in one moment can suddenly need lifesaving care in the next, Cole Greves, an Orlando perinatologist who chairs the Florida chapter of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said in an email to KFF Health News. The new birth clinics, even with increased regulation, cannot guarantee the level of safety patients would receive within a hospital.
The Florida Legislature this spring passed a law allowing advanced birth centers, where physicians can deliver babies vaginally or by C-section to women deemed at low risk of complications. Women would be able to stay overnight at the clinics. Womens Care Enterprises, a private equity-owned physicians group with locations mostly in Florida along with California and Kentucky, lobbied the state legislature to make the change. BC Partners, a London-based investment firm, bought Womens Care in 2020.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/womens-health/florida-allow-doctors-perform-c-sections-hospitals-rcna153903
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Tetrachloride
(8,067 posts)Cherokee100
(285 posts)That way, Big Medical could start laying odds, on whether the mother and baby survive. It would give them another revenue stream. Got to love the Capitalistic system(sarcasm).
SoFlaBro
(2,331 posts)sakabatou
(42,377 posts)RandomNumbers
(17,732 posts)It's not like they care one whit what happens to the person giving birth to that baby.
Warpy
(111,873 posts)She hemorrhaged and needs massive transfusion? Well, I guess it sucks to be her, at least we kept the costs down.
Tansy_Gold
(17,937 posts)As soon as you see the words "private equity," you know it's gonna be about nothing but the bottom line. Nothing else matters. N O T H I N G.
And if anything goes wrong, it will be the pregnant person's fault. . . . . . . .
MOMFUDSKI
(6,428 posts)Lets use our imagination here.
marble falls
(58,993 posts)... unobstructed view. It's was the best "special effect" I've ever seen before or since. There was team of five or six working together. This was in the mid eighties. I've had out patient procedures for my cancer I'd never have believed did not require staying a couple of days.
But, I just can't believe caesareans are so perfected that it would be an outpatient procedure outside a hospital. Especially since a huge proportion of them are an effort to prevent liability in a difficult natural delivery. But what do I know? I'm wrong a lot. And I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
Sailingdiver
(152 posts)You can bet no one invested in these clinics will avail themselves or their families to the services.
marble falls
(58,993 posts)LeftInTX
(26,337 posts)I was a newborn nurse and we would go catch a few deliveries now and then. I don't know why they made me feel like that....
LudwigPastorius
(9,535 posts)the Florida legislature has just passed a law declaring that women shall be known henceforth as "Fetal Incubation Units".
Scrivener7
(51,244 posts)proposed law called the "Women are just rib growths anyway, and shouldn't be taking up hospital resources" Act.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,904 posts)My niece required multiple transfusions after heavy bleeding during a C-section. Would they have adequate blood on hand for emergencies like this?
sop
(10,673 posts)Turbineguy
(37,585 posts)Be sure to duck out and feed the parking meter!
dembotoz
(16,917 posts)I think it still works
better add this or i will get in trouble
erronis
(15,855 posts)Of course with his pea-brain, I think just a 3" circular would do wonders.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,290 posts)GB_RN
(2,555 posts)Last edited Mon May 27, 2024, 05:31 AM - Edit history (3)
Fucks sake. 🤦?♂️
OK, as a healthcare professional, Im going to tackle this one piece at a time.
First, when has private equity EVER been good for the consumer? Bottom line, profits, which have to be increasing year over year, are ALL that fucking well matter to investment buzzards and bean counters. Patients and employees are dead fucking last and its a competition to see who these guys hate more. As a close example for what these for-profit bastards will do, look at the Medicare fraud committed by Columbia/HCA when Rick Scott (Q-Dickhead) was running the show. And here are stories about a hospital that HCA purchased in western NC just a few years ago: HCA pruned staff, reaped profits. The feds have popped HCAs Mission Hospital for violating emergency treatment standards (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act). This happens at many other hospitals they own, too. And the NC Attorney General has been joined by Buncombe County in his lawsuit against HCA Mission Health for failure to meet quality and access agreements it made with the North Carolina in order to secure its (no bid) purchase in 2019.
Second, this is asking
no
begging for patient disasters and deaths. When some incompetent fuckstick screws up and a woman bleeds to death or is severely injured, who pays? Not the company. I guarantee you they will have, buried somewhere in the paperwork you sign, a max liability (this happened to my uncle and private orthopedic surgery outfit. Hes crippled and all he got, after fees is about $1.5 million. That wont cover his medical expenses going forward, lost income, etc.). No lawyer can help you because you signed the paperwork acknowledging the max liability payout and youll be told that its not the fault of the medical provider that you didnt read all 9000 lines of legalese that are printed in a 1 point* size font. Not that youd have even understood the legalese even if it was printed in an 84 point, though.
Goddamn, this is stupid.
*Im being sarcastic here
but only slightly.
pnwmom
(109,069 posts)How many deaths at home, from things like strokes and bleeding out, will they require before they decide that women need to be cared for after a c-section after all?
"The average hospital stay after a C-section is 2 to 4 days, and keep in mind recovery often takes longer than it would from a vaginal birth."
https://www.mountsinai.org/health-library/discharge-instructions/going-home-after-a-c-section#:~:text=The%20average%20hospital%20stay%20after,too%20as%20recovery%20takes%20place
pnwmom
(109,069 posts)as the presumably uncomplicated C-sections get sucked into the "homey" for-profit birthing centers.
surrealAmerican
(11,387 posts)?
erronis
(15,855 posts)And if the patient doesn't survive the slip of the scalpel while lying in his home bed, doubt that the patient will sue.
Old lawyers joke: If you run over someone and don't kill them, back up and make sure they're gone. Won't sue.
elias7
(4,087 posts)Small independent doctor groups or hospital employee doctor groups for the most part have been overtaken by these for profit financial groups.
Maximizing billing and collections is inherent to their business model and they are able to be ruthless because they're not local.
Some legislatures have worked to prevent "surprise billing", where you're in network hospital charges you out of network fees because the ER doc that treated you was from out of the area.
Wonder Why
(3,676 posts)sop
(10,673 posts)erronis
(15,855 posts)And I don't trust most/any of them any more than I'll trust an ambulance chaser.
ZonkerHarris
(24,484 posts)flashman13
(768 posts)likesmountains 52
(4,108 posts)Aside from all the possible complications, please consider the poor patient. She has been pregnant for 9 months, probably exhausted, maybe just had a long unsuccessful labor and winds up with an emergency C-Section. Then, she (lucky her!) gets to spend one night in the birth center and get sent home with a newborn to take care of while recovering from surgery and sudden hormonal shifts. On top of that, she's going to be sleep deprived. The whole system sucks and does nothing to support new families.
littlemissmartypants
(23,254 posts)Child care costs now are commensurate with the cost of college. People working two and three jobs to survive while the children may or may not be cared for if you can find childcare.
And it's clearly just going to get worse if we don't do more as citizens to identify solutions, educate voters and make corrections through legislation.
No wonder our young people don't want to start families. Can we blame them?
It makes me sad every damn day.
Traurigkeit
(990 posts)All due to our friendly neighborhood bastards, The Republican Party.
Time to kill off these scumbags
Lonestarblue
(10,575 posts)Their business model is to strip assets, have minimal staff to control costs, and when the profits are not outrageous enough sell what is left.
A private equity hospital chain is being kicked out of Massachusetts because the owners bought expensive jet planes to ferry investors and top managers all over the world instead of paying their bills. The state finally learned about the lack of equipment in the hospitals when a pregnant patient died after delivery because the equipment needed to save her life had been repossessed for nonpayment of the lease. Hers was a normal delivery but complications got serious very quickly, and she died. Private equity is just another form of rapacious capitalism, but one where people can die.
Bristlecone
(10,225 posts)littlemissmartypants
(23,254 posts)Greed kills.
SunSeeker
(52,219 posts)As of November 2023, Florida's maternal mortality rate is 23.5 deaths per 100,000 births. https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-have-the-highest-maternal-mortality-rates/#:~:text=Mississippi%20had%20the%20highest%20maternal%20mortality%20rate%20in%202021%2C%20with,not%20available%20for%20all%20states.
littlemissmartypants
(23,254 posts)I haven't looked. Probably won't. I'm already too depressed right now. I wouldn't be doing myself any favors.
But thanks for your reply, SunSeeker.
❤️
Raven123
(5,142 posts)Traurigkeit
(990 posts)GreenWave
(7,332 posts)Nothing like placental mass to perk up their appetites.
Dem2theMax
(9,740 posts)That's all you need to know. Profit. It's probably trickling upwards, towards those who voted for this.
Traurigkeit
(990 posts)usaf-vet
(6,419 posts)...of one a month. That does not make me an expert, but I know this suggestion is f***ing nuts.
All the C-sections that went well without a hitch for the mother or the baby were a pleasure for staff and patients to experience. Everyone in the room had a job to do and no spare time to take on other responsibilities. Most, if not all, were "emergency" C-sections. Most of those were after hours, often late into the night. By definition, it was the call-back staff that was often limited in numbers.
Scheduled C-sections were performed during the daytime hours if and when an emergency occurred; other doctors, nurses, and scrub staff were always a call away.
But at night, with limited staff, when one went wrong, it was often "touch and go"; there was never enough staff to tend to the mother and the baby when those emergencies occurred. Never enough blood and other needed supplies were often at the tipping point, with no one to spare to run for help or supplies.
These political nut jobs who are given the job to solve a complex problem rarely have the expertise to consider the consequences of their decisions. In this political environment, their one and only concern is party loyalty, followed by how we can enrich ourselves.
lark
(23,405 posts)I nearly died with my 1st pregnancy, and coded on the table the 2nd time and had to rescuittated (sp?) so this really freaks me out.
I hate death sentence and hope karma will take care of him. At least he is term limited for governor and don't think he would challenge either Rubio or Scott for Senator.
littlemissmartypants
(23,254 posts)https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-have-the-highest-maternal-mortality-rates/#:~:text=Mississippi%20had%20the%20highest%20maternal%20mortality%20rate%20in%202021%2C%20with,not%20available%20for%20all%20states.
Hat Tip
![](/emoticons/hattip.gif)
SunSeeker
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3246611