Sony Music Warns Companies to Stop Training AI on Its Artists' Content
Source: Bloomberg
Sony Music Group, one of the worlds biggest record labels, warned artificial intelligence companies and music streaming platforms not to use the companys content without explicit permission.
Sony, whose artists include Lil Nas X and Celine Dion, sent letters to more than 700 companies in an effort to protect its intellectual property, which includes album cover art, metadata, musical compositions and lyrics, from being used for training AI models.
Unauthorized use of Sonys content in the training, development or commercialization of AI systems deprives the company and its artists of control and compensation for those works, according to the letter, which was obtained by Bloomberg News.
Copyright infringement has become a major battleground issue for generative AI, which is being used to produce all kinds of content from text to images and video. While Hollywood actors and writers went on strike last year to protect their craft from AI, a new crop of startups is churning out entire albums of AI-generated music, heightening worries over artists livelihoods and rekindling tensions with streaming platforms.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-16/sony-music-warns-companies-to-stop-training-ai-on-its-artists-content
More, from different sources:
https://www.billboard.com/business/tech/sony-music-artificial-intelligence-training-opt-out-1235684192/
The pointed letter notes that unauthorized use of SMG Content in the training, development or commercialization of AI systems deprives SMG Companies and SMG Talent of control over and appropriate compensation for the uses of SMG Content, conflicts with the normal exploitation of those works, unreasonably prejudices our legitimate interests, and infringes our intellectual property and other rights.
-snip-
Whether a company needs permission before undertaking the training process on copyrighted works is already the subject of a fierce debate, leading to lawsuits in several industries. In October, Universal Music Group (UMG) was among the music companies that sued AI startup Anthropic, alleging that in the process of building and operating AI models, [the company] unlawfully copies and disseminates vast amounts of copyrighted works.
Although these cases will likely set precedent for AI training practices in the U.S., the courts typically move at a glacial pace. In the meantime, some technology companies seem set on training their genAI tools on large troves of recordings without permission.
Based on recent Copyright Office filings it is clear that the technology industry and speculative financial investors would like governments to believe in a very distorted view of copyright, Dennis Kooker, Sony Musics president of global digital business, said during the Artificial Intelligence Insight Forum in Washington, D.C. in November. One in which music is considered fair use for training purposes and in which certain companies are permitted to appropriate the entire value produced by the creative sector without permission, and to build huge businesses based on it without paying anything to the creators concerned.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0434yx8vgxo.amp
Details of songs it owns that were used to train AI systems
How the songs were accessed - e.g. through online streaming services
The number of copies made of the songs, whether the copies still exist, and how long they existed for
Why it was necessary for such copies to exist for the amount of time they did - assuming they existed in the first place
It said in the letter that a copy could consist of just a portion of a song - and it was willing to come to terms on licensing agreements for future use.
Sony Music's public Declaration of AI Training Opt Out:
https://www.sonymusic.com/sonymusic/declaration-of-ai-training-opt-out/
However, that innovation must ensure that songwriters and recording artists rights, including copyrights, are respected. For that reason, SMGs affiliates, Sony Music Publishing (SMP) and Sony Music Entertainment (SME), on behalf of themselves and their wholly owned or controlled affiliates, are making this affirmative, public declaration confirming that, except as specifically and explicitly authorized by either SME or SMP, as the case may be, each of them expressly prohibits and opts out of any text or data mining, web scraping or similar reproductions, extractions or uses (TDM) of any SME and/or SMP content (including, without limitation, musical compositions, lyrics, audio recordings, audiovisual recordings, artwork, images, data, etc.) for any purposes, including in relation to training, developing or commercializing any AI system, and by any means, including by bots, scrapers or other automated processes, in each case to the full extent permitted by applicable law in all relevant jurisdictions. This declaration reaffirms and is without prejudice to all of SMPs and/or SMEs prior rights reservations and their respective legal rights, all of which are expressly reserved. SMEs and SMPs rights reservations apply to all existing and future SME and SMP content, including those creative works that may be identified through publicly available means or listed from time to time in databases such as those maintained by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and the [International Confederation of Music Publishers (ICMP).]
-snip-
John Shaft
(364 posts)cat's out of the bag Sony, get a clue and get a grip.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,494 posts)companies I don't particularly like get into a legal knife fight over this issue. Although, I am on Sony's side for this one, I am sure that if they win they will not compensate the original artists one penny.
As I said recently elsewhere, US. corporations are rapidly becoming litigation proof, as they have so much money that they are impossible to sue, and beyond the reach on the law, as they pretty much own politicians and judges outright.
cstanleytech
(26,411 posts)After all the student does retain memories of what they heard.
cstanleytech
(26,411 posts)Why? Because they don't seem to create any actual new content and getting them to create character dialogue was a chore and what little they created didn't really read as anything new. So from a content perspective I just don't see any real threat to artists.
Now the medical and legal area for jobs might be in trouble as the AI should be able to compare current legal cases to past ones as those are rather dry without need to create truly new characters dialogue or unique songs. The medical field might be in trouble a bit as well as a robotic AI medical robot could be used to treat patients for a number of medical issues though of course your still going to more likely or not still need a number of people in that field as robots are still rather limited though that's advancing as well.
AnrothElf
(792 posts)Several things this tech is NOT:
* It's not "AI". Words have meanings and the misuse of words has an AGENDA. LLMs are ML (machine learning). Not "artificial intelligence".
* It's not "creative". It has no intelligence, no mind, no thought at all. It's 100% computer programming doing mashups on an astronomical scale. Mashups of... lots of copyrighted work.
* It's not "inevitable". People were saying crypto was inevitable, and anyone with any computer science expertise (I'm lead software engineer at a global enterprise company) KNEW IT, and SAID IT... Over and over and over and over again. But the MBAs and suckers ignored us, just like they're ignoring us now.
Honestly? I hope these corporations' foolish use of copyrighted materials utterly demolishes the entire "AI" industry.
Pop that balloon sooner rather than later, after it's done extensive damage... LIKE CRYPTO DID.