Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,608 posts)
Fri Apr 26, 2024, 07:19 PM Apr 26

Maine Democrats threaten to switch to winner-take-all delegate system

Source: ABC News

April 26, 2024, 5:41 PM


Democratic leaders in Maine are threatening to eliminate the state's split-vote system for allocating Electoral College delegates if Nebraska Republicans move forward with their plan to do the same.

The two states are the only ones in the country to allocate some delegates proportionally by congressional district, which in 2020 allowed President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump to each secure one delegate in states that were otherwise won by the other – Biden in Nebraska and Trump in Maine.

But in early April, Trump, Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen and other prominent Republicans endorsed a legislative measure that would change Nebraska's allocation of Electoral College votes to a Trump-favorable, winner-take-all system. The state currently awards one vote for each of the state's three congressional districts and then two for the overall winner of the state.

Now, Democratic leaders in Maine, the only other state in the nation that awards electoral votes by congressional district, are indicating they'd make a similar change -- effectively negating any advantage Trump would gain under the proposed reform in Nebraska.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/maine-democrats-threaten-switch-winner-delegate-system/story?id=109703620

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maine Democrats threaten to switch to winner-take-all delegate system (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Apr 26 OP
Wow. Good thinking Raven123 Apr 26 #1
Both states were dumb to do it in the first place. jimfields33 Apr 26 #2
Doing the vote by congressional district nationally Metaphorical Apr 26 #3
If that were true, we wouldn't have a republican house majority now PSPS Apr 26 #4
So doing it by district in each state would benefit jimfields33 Apr 26 #5

Metaphorical

(1,604 posts)
3. Doing the vote by congressional district nationally
Fri Apr 26, 2024, 08:02 PM
Apr 26

would actually be a significant boon to Democrats, as such districts are ordinarily tied to population - this means that the 538 delegates would be more representative of the population overall (which favors Democrats when turnout is high enough to be representative). As it is right now, there are actually only fifty "real" voters because of winner-take-all style voting. It's no surprise that the US has been sliding into authoritarianism.

PSPS

(13,620 posts)
4. If that were true, we wouldn't have a republican house majority now
Fri Apr 26, 2024, 08:17 PM
Apr 26

Basing anything on house district results makes it subject to gerrymandering.

jimfields33

(16,006 posts)
5. So doing it by district in each state would benefit
Fri Apr 26, 2024, 08:52 PM
Apr 26

us? I guess we should do if in all 50 states. I was just pointing out that only two districts seemed dumb because nobody gained from it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Maine Democrats threaten ...