Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

michigandem58

(1,044 posts)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:33 PM Dec 2012

Allen West to NPR: ‘Abraham Lincoln only served one term in Congress, too’

Source: http://www.postonpolitics.com/2012/12/allen-west-t

Defeated freshman U.S. Rep. Allen West, R-Palm Beach Gardens, discussed his two years in Washington in an exit interview to National Public Radio’s Michel Martin.

“And always remember, Abraham Lincoln only served one term in Congress, too,” West said toward the end of the interview.


Read more: PostOnPolitics

98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Allen West to NPR: ‘Abraham Lincoln only served one term in Congress, too’ (Original Post) michigandem58 Dec 2012 OP
What an idiot. milestogo Dec 2012 #1
You took the words out of my mouth. hrmjustin Dec 2012 #5
Now he thinks he's Lincoln? lsewpershad Dec 2012 #53
Remember Lincoln Logs???? Plucketeer Dec 2012 #77
This is an honestly creepy delusional person. efhmc Dec 2012 #2
I think west believed his own b.s. caveat_imperator Dec 2012 #64
Don't.... Aviation Pro Dec 2012 #3
Lincoln didn't lose re-election Lithos Dec 2012 #4
Ok Flatpicker Dec 2012 #6
he is the tea party darling tj_crackersnatch Dec 2012 #7
Welcome to DU! JimDandy Dec 2012 #35
Um...wow. Double stupid. Lincoln was re-elected in 1864, so even though his second term... Moonwalk Dec 2012 #8
(um, to Congress.) lastlib Dec 2012 #10
Lincoln lost quite a few elections and suffered 2 nervous breakdowns before becoming president Heather MC Dec 2012 #21
They booted Steele as soon as they could... Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #51
He didn't do his job SummerSnow Dec 2012 #56
He was fired after the 2010 elections... Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #57
Triple stupid. Lincoln was a progressive, not a regressive. Major Nikon Dec 2012 #27
Mr. West, I read about Abraham Lincoln... lastlib Dec 2012 #9
He also wasn't a racist asshole Fearless Dec 2012 #11
Although, to be fair . . . MrModerate Dec 2012 #25
Lincoln was racist BainsBane Dec 2012 #45
Does what one initially believes Fearless Dec 2012 #46
I don't think that is the relevant question BainsBane Dec 2012 #48
What do you base your assertions on Fearless Dec 2012 #67
I didn't say he detested blacks BainsBane Dec 2012 #69
No such wikipedia page exists. Looks like if it did, it wasn't exactly credible. Fearless Dec 2012 #78
Here it is BainsBane Dec 2012 #80
Your own source suggests that Fearless Dec 2012 #82
This is what it says BainsBane Dec 2012 #89
Also see Views on African Americans BainsBane Dec 2012 #71
Three days before his death Fearless Dec 2012 #83
absolutely BainsBane Dec 2012 #90
So? Fearless Dec 2012 #93
So? BainsBane Dec 2012 #94
There is a vast difference between "conflicted" and racist. Fearless Dec 2012 #95
See my other post to you BainsBane Dec 2012 #96
IIRC, Lincoln didn't end slavery SemperEadem Dec 2012 #59
Revisionist history (aka "lying") at its worst! tabasco Dec 2012 #63
Indeed. Fearless Dec 2012 #66
Why must you ignore part of Lincoln's record BainsBane Dec 2012 #70
ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzz ...... tabasco Dec 2012 #73
Which is why you refuse to read the link BainsBane Dec 2012 #79
lots of educated fools out there, too SemperEadem Dec 2012 #87
I do believe I prefaced my post with SemperEadem Dec 2012 #85
Also see BainsBane Dec 2012 #72
I don't care about Lincoln SemperEadem Dec 2012 #86
actually it was lincoln's father who was against slavery newspeak Dec 2012 #97
CBS "takes a closer look" 99th_Monkey Dec 2012 #12
"And Abraham Lincoln tortured people, too..." Ken Burch Dec 2012 #13
Yes. And far more single-term congresscritters have slipped into obscurity or irrelevance. . . Journeyman Dec 2012 #14
Shut up already! radicalliberal Dec 2012 #15
As The Firesign Theatre once put it... Ken Burch Dec 2012 #16
Delusions of grandeur. :rolleyes: Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2012 #17
How many war crimes did Lincoln commit when he was in the Army? jmowreader Dec 2012 #18
The difference is.... NickP Dec 2012 #19
Colonel, I knew Abe Lincoln. Arkana Dec 2012 #20
+1 aaaaaa5a Dec 2012 #29
The President only served one term in the senate LadyHawkAZ Dec 2012 #22
Same as obama Garion_55 Dec 2012 #23
There ya go repugs donco Dec 2012 #24
You mean Vice President of Toilet Bowl Inspections for W. Palm Beach Left Coast2020 Dec 2012 #42
Davy Crockett only served one term then promptly left the country Brother Buzz Dec 2012 #26
Flat out delusional. nt aaaaaa5a Dec 2012 #28
and if the R's keep coming up with these T-bagger candidates, they'll all be one-term wonders wordpix Dec 2012 #30
'cuse me while I get this out and use it.... 47of74 Dec 2012 #31
Phail. Jamaal510 Dec 2012 #32
Allen West injured a prisoner. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #33
when equating oneself to Lincoln, that's the equivalent of naming... Javaman Dec 2012 #34
Lincoln killed zombies, too. SomeGuyInEagan Dec 2012 #36
Please run for president! Renew Deal Dec 2012 #37
What a jerk racer_tim Dec 2012 #38
Welcome to DU! hrmjustin Dec 2012 #68
I knew Abraham Lincoln. Tab Dec 2012 #39
Looks like... SoapBox Dec 2012 #40
Yeah, and what a difference 165 years makes. Loser. n/t jtuck004 Dec 2012 #41
So this nut Third Doctor Dec 2012 #43
For this statement mzteaze Dec 2012 #44
>facepalm< chef jeff Dec 2012 #47
Lamestream Media Continues to Iggy Dec 2012 #49
Has he congratulated Patrick Murphy yet? jopacaco Dec 2012 #50
geesh! heaven05 Dec 2012 #52
I think West is confusing Napoleon with Lincoln. no_hypocrisy Dec 2012 #54
Which way to go on this: 1) Run, WEST, run!1 or, 2) You, Rep., are NO Abe LINCOLN!1 n/t UTUSN Dec 2012 #55
first he made Harriet Tubman roll over in her grave Enrique Dec 2012 #58
Seems that Rethugs,,,, Cryptoad Dec 2012 #60
sounds like a threat to me. mzteris Dec 2012 #61
Reminds me of what Carl Sagan said: NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #62
He is needs professional help... and-justice-for-all Dec 2012 #65
So Allen West is the new Abraham Lincoln just as Rick Santorum is the new George Washington? Douglas Carpenter Dec 2012 #74
But Lincoln was an intelligent man... lin_e65 Dec 2012 #75
LOL. At least he's an AMUSING jackass. NC_Nurse Dec 2012 #76
No, that was Herman Cain... teknomanzer Dec 2012 #88
Hey, Allen MurrayDelph Dec 2012 #81
Remember the old urban legend Lincoln /Kennedy coincidences?? PossumSqueezins Dec 2012 #84
Lincoln will be forever remembered as one of our greatest presidents BainsBane Dec 2012 #91
This message was self-deleted by its author freethought Dec 2012 #92
Yeah, but Lincoln wasn't a nutcase. n/t freethought Dec 2012 #98

Aviation Pro

(12,219 posts)
3. Don't....
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:40 PM
Dec 2012

...you're not Abraham Lincoln just another former LTC who abused his soldiers.

Did I mention go fuck yourself?

Go fuck yourself.

Flatpicker

(894 posts)
6. Ok
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:42 PM
Dec 2012

But you will never become President, so don't think that your story will have a 2nd chapter.

Your actions in delaying your concession have shown you are of poor character. Not to mention your actions in uniform.

Moonwalk

(2,322 posts)
8. Um...wow. Double stupid. Lincoln was re-elected in 1864, so even though his second term...
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:47 PM
Dec 2012

...was cut short, he did get re-elected. Unlike Mr. West there.

 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
21. Lincoln lost quite a few elections and suffered 2 nervous breakdowns before becoming president
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:29 PM
Dec 2012

but he still was not as crazy as Allen West.

Nothing to worry about the republicans would never let one of their black or female props make it to the white house LOL. but he can dream
They keep Allen and Steele around to appear less racist
there is a reason the word "Token" was invented

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
56. He didn't do his job
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 11:32 AM
Dec 2012

His job was to bring more African Americans into the GOP.So when they saw those numbers not changing he had to go.Steele was also hired to trash Obama without looking racist.lol I even believe that if those numbers had not changed and Romney had won they would have fired him anyway

lastlib

(23,352 posts)
9. Mr. West, I read about Abraham Lincoln...
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:51 PM
Dec 2012

Abe Lincoln is a hero of mine. Mr. West, You're no Abraham Lincoln.

Abe Lincoln wasn't a colossal asshole, either, dipshit.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
11. He also wasn't a racist asshole
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:03 PM
Dec 2012

In a time when it was pretty damn easy to be a racist asshole. What's your excuse?

 

MrModerate

(9,753 posts)
25. Although, to be fair . . .
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:42 PM
Dec 2012

Today we'd call him a white supremacist. (Presuming we had no sense of history)

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
45. Lincoln was racist
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 01:50 AM
Dec 2012

Very few white people of his era were not. He initialized believed in what they then called colonization: sending the freed slaves to Liberia.

But Lincoln's--and the Republican party's--commitment to stopping the spread of slavery into the new territories acquired by the Mexican War would eventual evolve into abolitionism, due in so no small part to Frederick Douglass and other African Americans who insisted that abolition should be the end result of the war.

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
48. I don't think that is the relevant question
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 03:10 AM
Dec 2012

Lincoln was a great president, ahead of his time but still of his time. I don't know if he ever came to see blacks as equal. I suspect he did not. But that in no way negates the crucial role in American history. The paradox of race is part of that history. One need not pretend that Lincoln saw race as we do today to recognize his greatness.

Racism was rampant among Northerners who opposed slavery, and in fact played a role in the Republican commitment to Free Soil (stopping the expansion of slavery). But Free Soil eventually led to abolition and paved the way for legal equality a century later. All that is part of the history of ending slavery and Lincoln's central role in that process.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
67. What do you base your assertions on
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 02:52 PM
Dec 2012

You say you "think" and cite Northerners as an example of Lincoln likely being racist. The fact is that his actions as president and his words before and during his presidency show a different set of beliefs. For instance during the war he would meet with Black regiments when touring the battlefield. Why would he go out of his way if he detested them?

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
69. I didn't say he detested blacks
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 04:34 PM
Dec 2012

Last edited Mon Dec 3, 2012, 01:53 AM - Edit history (1)

Lincoln's own writings speak on his belief that blacks and whites could never live amicably in the US. Look for the section on colonization in this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln_and_slavery

The wide-spread racism in the North is evident in newspapers from the time. The Nativist and Know-Nothing parties eventually became part of the Republican Party.
My point is that Lincoln was not a 21st century American. He was a product of his time, and racism was central to 19th century culture. One need not pretend he was not strongly influenced by cultural assumptions of his time to recognize his important role in American history. The tension between equality and Racism is a great paradox in American history. The contradictions involving race and some of our great political figures--like Lincoln and Jefferson-- are far more interesting and instructive than pretending these men were somehow uniquely free of racial prejudice.

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
80. Here it is
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 01:51 AM
Dec 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln_and_slavery

What I have recounted is basic college intro level US history. There is nothing controversial about it.
Pick up any recent US History survey textbook, the kind they assign in college courses, and verify the information there.

The responses by you and the other poster have given me some insight into why high-school level and popular representations of history are so simplistic. I find it odd people are so resistant to basic information. You seem to have a great deal of difficulty understanding that important men in history were human beings and products of their era. Why you think it should be otherwise befuddles me.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
82. Your own source suggests that
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:05 AM
Dec 2012

(1) it is unknown if Lincoln actually supported colonization except to aid the passage of the 13th Amendment and the acceptance of the Emancipation Proclamation

and (2) that in the two years before his death, Lincoln had conducted an investigation of these said colonies and then subsequently pulled all federal funding for the projects. They were only revived after his death.

Additionally, I will kindly inform you of my credentials. I have a BA in history and a Masters in Education. I have picked up more than my share of history texts, not the least of which is a wikipedia page. I also understand the struggle faced by abolitionists and those who were anti-slavery in the 1860's and that it is far far more nuanced than just pro or anti-slavery. For a good example of this go see the movie Lincoln and focus on Tommy Lee Jones' character and the struggle to pass the 13th Amendment in particular. It may give you some perspective on the general idea of what I'm talking about here. The fact that a seated president would bother to attempt to pass the 13th Amendment at all is telling of his motives. It was politically unpopular. It was not necessary in 1864 to end the war. The war was already basically won.

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
89. This is what it says
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:03 PM
Dec 2012

One of President Abraham Lincoln's policies during his administration was the voluntary colonization of African American Freedmen. Historians have debated and have remained divided over whether Lincoln's racial views (or merely his acceptance of the political reality) included that African Americans could not live in the same society as white Americans . . .Since the 1840s Lincoln had been an advocate of the American Colonization Society program of colonizing blacks in Liberia. In an October 16, 1854,[26]:a speech at Peoria, Illinois[27] (transcribed after the fact by Lincoln himself),[26]:b Lincoln points out the immense difficulties of such a task are an obstacle to finding an easy way to quickly end slavery. . . .Lincoln mentioned colonization favorably in his first Emancipation Proclamation, and continued to support efforts at colonization throughout his presidency"

I look forward to seeing the Lincoln film, but you must realize that a Hollywood movie is not a historical source. It is, however, meant to be based on Doris Kearns Goodwin's book.

I am well aware that the entire issue of slavery and race was nuanced. That has been the thrust of my posts. Lincoln's views of race were conflicted, like all white men of his era.

Since people are anxious to share credentials, I have a PhD in history with a research field in slavery. My primary field is not the US, but my minor field, and one in which I passed comprehensive exams, is US slavery. I was also a teaching assistant for US history surveys for many semesters during graduate school. I am not an expert on this matter, but I know something about it.

I would typically not use the term racist to describe Lincoln or anyone of the nineteenth century. Firstly, labels serve no purpose. The point is to understand the contradictions between slavery, liberty, and race in American society. However, I would also not call Alan West racist. I would call him a lunatic, a teabagger, dangerous, and all kinds of other things, but the man is African-American are surely knows far more about the experience of racism than any white person.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
83. Three days before his death
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:17 AM
Dec 2012

Lincoln gave a speech from the White House declaring his support of what would be the 14th Amendment. The right to vote for all men.

W.E.B. Du Bois spoke of Lincoln of as a man of evolving views whose life was cut short before the evolution would bear fruit (i.e. pre-14th and 15th Amendments).

Likewise, Lincoln invited Fredrick Douglass to the White House multiple times for discussion. Historical record shows that he enjoyed the meetings greatly and always treated Douglass as an equal. He was the first president to do so for a Black man in the White House.

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
90. absolutely
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:07 PM
Dec 2012

and Douglass was essential in convincing Lincoln to make abolition an end result of the war.

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
94. So?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:30 PM
Dec 2012

My point is that Lincoln was conflicted on race, like all men of his era. And that those very contradictions between slavery, liberty, and race tell us a great deal about our historical past and who we are as a people. Lincoln did not despise blacks, but nor did he imagine racial harmony. He couldn't have dreamed of a black president, even though his leadership would contribute to that eventual result.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
95. There is a vast difference between "conflicted" and racist.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 11:37 AM
Dec 2012

Not everyone was "conflicted". Most people detested Black people, North and South. How on Earth could Lincoln in his own time believe that racial harmony is possible. It's been almost 160 years since then and there still isn't total racial harmony. There is a strong allusion to Barack Obama today and his own evolving position on LGBT rights. To which I also don't believe he was ever a bigot.

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
96. See my other post to you
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:09 PM
Dec 2012

I acknowledge racist isn't the best word, and of course it depends on what one means by that. I don't think it's accurate that most Americans of the time detested blacks either. The pro-slavery discourse on race was paternalistic, portraying them as children unable to survive without a master.

What disturbs me is the tendency to make historical leaders into ideal caricatures because we miss what is most interesting and instructive about history in doing so.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
59. IIRC, Lincoln didn't end slavery
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 11:52 AM
Dec 2012

because he empathized with the plight of the slave... he ended it to cut off the money train their labor provided to the confederacy. Big huge difference. From that position, he never wavered, even though what he did eventually did emancipate the slave.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
63. Revisionist history (aka "lying") at its worst!
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 01:09 PM
Dec 2012

Lincoln found slavery abhorrent. As President, he lacked the authority and support to outlaw slavery. If you remember from civics class, Congress makes laws. However, Lincoln used his constitutional powers as Commander In Chief to outlaw slavery in slave states, which was within his authority.

You said: "From that position, he never wavered..." LOL. Stop spreading falsehoods and pick up a book sometime.

Here are some Lincoln quotes:

"Whenever I hear any one arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume VIII, "Speech to One Hundred Fortieth Indiana Regiment" (March 17, 1865), p. 361.

"What I do say is, that no man is good enough to govern another man, without that other's consent. I say this is the leading principle - the sheet anchor of American republicanism." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume II, "Speech at Peoria, Illinois" (October 16, 1854), p. 266.

"We think slavery a great moral wrong, and while we do not claim the right to touch it where it exists, we wish to treat it as a wrong in the territories, where our votes will reach it." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume IV, "Speech at New Haven, Connecticut" (March 6, 1860), p. 16.

"In 1841 you and I had together a tedious low-water trip, on a Steam Boat from Louisville to St. Louis. You may remember, as I well do, that from Louisville to the mouth of the Ohio there were, on board, ten or a dozen slaves, shackled together with irons. That sight was a continual torment to me; and I see something like it every time I touch the Ohio, or any other slave-border." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume II, "Letter to Joshua F. Speed" (August 24, 1855), p. 320.

"I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume VII, "Letter to Albert G. Hodges" (April 4, 1864), p. 281.

"I think slavery is wrong, morally, and politically. I desire that it should be no further spread in these United States, and I should not object if it should gradually terminate in the whole Union." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, "Speech at Cincinnati, Ohio" (September 17, 1859), p. 440.

"In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free - honorable alike in what we give, and what we preserve. We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth. Other means may succeed; this could not fail. The way is plain, peaceful, generous, just - a way which, if followed, the world will forever applaud, and God must forever bless." Lincoln's Second Annual Message to Congress, December 1, 1862.


http://rogerjnorton.com/Lincoln95.html

When the American Civil War (1861-65) began, President Abraham Lincoln carefully framed the conflict as concerning the preservation of the Union rather than the abolition of slavery. Although he personally found the practice of slavery abhorrent, he knew that neither Northerners nor the residents of the border slave states would support abolition as a war aim. But by mid-1862, as thousands of slaves fled to join the invading Northern armies, Lincoln was convinced that abolition had become a sound military strategy, as well as the morally correct path. On September 22, soon after the Union victory at Antietam, he issued a preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, declaring that as of January 1, 1863, all slaves in the rebellious states "shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free." While the Emancipation Proclamation did not free a single slave, it was an important turning point in the war, transforming the fight to preserve the nation into a battle for human freedom.


http://www.history.com/topics/emancipation-proclamation

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
70. Why must you ignore part of Lincoln's record
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 04:55 PM
Dec 2012

To hold him in esteem? You post reads like a grade-school version of history. Firstly, history is constantly in the process of revision. If it weren't, we would never have gotten beyond learning about kings and presidents. All history is revisionist. To hold political leaders to a 21st century standard does them a disservice. It not only ignores much of who they were, but it dismisses the difficult cultural context that they operated in. If Lincoln had thought as we do, ending slavery would have been an easy decision. His path was far more conflicted. His ability to resolve those contradicts in favor of freedom is precisely what made him such a great President.

Lincoln was NOT an abolitionist. He was a proponent of Free Soil. They were distinct movements. William Lloyd Garrison, Theodore Weld, The Grimkes, Frederick Douglass, and Sojourner Truth were abolitionists. Lincoln was far more pragmatic in seeking to stop the spread of slavery into the new territories. Yet it was Free Soil rather than abolitionism that succeeded in persuading Americans to vote to limit slavery, and that eventually let to it's end.

Lincoln was a active supporter of colonization. Read that section in The following link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln_and_slavery

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
73. ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzz ......
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 07:41 PM
Dec 2012

I have a masters degree in history and really don't care about your uninformed opinion. I am more concerned with facts.

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
79. Which is why you refuse to read the link
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 01:47 AM
Dec 2012

Since you are so concerned with facts, how do you reconcile Lincoln's in involvement with colonization? How do you reconcile his comments about black inequality in his debates with Douglass? How is it that your positivist view of history leads you to ignore so many facts?

It makes sense you stopped after an MA. Anyone who refuses to consider evidence is not suited to be a historian. You don't have the slightest understanding of historical analysis.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
87. lots of educated fools out there, too
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:28 PM
Dec 2012

having a masters means nothing except you're financially in hock for that piece of paper.

I prefaced what I said with "If I recall correctly". If you can't inform without being nasty about it, then keep your "education" to yourself.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
85. I do believe I prefaced my post with
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:21 PM
Dec 2012

If I recall correctly--meaning that there was some doubt in what I was recalling...

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
86. I don't care about Lincoln
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:23 PM
Dec 2012

I'll let you get your blood pressure up throwing punches at the air over it...

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
97. actually it was lincoln's father who was against slavery
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 11:53 PM
Dec 2012

because the simple farmer couldn't compete with the big plantations and their slave labor. lincoln states that his father was against slavery for that reason and that's why they moved from kentucky. but, that wasn't lincoln's stance.

it's actually very enlightening looking back to a time where the "radical republicans" were the abolitionists; and the "conservative" republicans were the remnants of the whig party.

by the 1860s, many european countries, along with, great britain had already outlawed slavery. how enlightened is the us, really?

lincoln, to me, was against slavery, not like his father for economic purposes, but for moral reasons. and yes, there were racists even in the north, but the abolitionist movement was no small thing at the time.



Journeyman

(15,042 posts)
14. Yes. And far more single-term congresscritters have slipped into obscurity or irrelevance. . .
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:12 PM
Dec 2012

Any bets on which category Allen West has the greatest opportunity to join?

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
16. As The Firesign Theatre once put it...
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:13 PM
Dec 2012

"And remember, Mr. and Mrs. America...Abraham Lincoln didn't die in vain...he died in Washington, D.C.".

NickP

(50 posts)
19. The difference is....
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:27 PM
Dec 2012

that Abraham Lincoln grew into something productive and into a leader, not a washed up has-been. Poor sod, I almost feel sorry for him......no, never mind, I don't.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
22. The President only served one term in the senate
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:30 PM
Dec 2012

but wait! He was too inexperienced to be President! Right, Mr. West? I mean, that's what all your (R) buddies were saying in 2008.

Don't go away mad, Allen, just go away. And good riddance.

donco

(1,548 posts)
24. There ya go repugs
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:38 PM
Dec 2012

Your 2016 presidential candidate...might I add that Todd Akin would be superb candidate for the vice presidential slot as well.

Brother Buzz

(36,487 posts)
26. Davy Crockett only served one term then promptly left the country
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:46 PM
Dec 2012

"I told the people of my district that I would serve them as faithfully as I had done; but if not ... you may all go to hell, and I will go to Texas." Following his defeat, he did just that.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
30. and if the R's keep coming up with these T-bagger candidates, they'll all be one-term wonders
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:59 PM
Dec 2012
this guy's ties with Dimson for stoooopid

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
33. Allen West injured a prisoner.
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 11:21 PM
Dec 2012

He was no fucking Abraham Lincoln.


"One popularly repeated story from Lincoln's Black Hawk War service illustrates Lincoln's qualities of honesty, and courageous, competent leadership. It involved a Potawotami who wandered into Captain Lincoln's camp and Lincoln's men assumed him a spy and wanted to kill him. The story goes that Lincoln threw himself between the Native American and the men's muskets, knocking their weapons upward. The militia men backed down after a few heated seconds."

Javaman

(62,534 posts)
34. when equating oneself to Lincoln, that's the equivalent of naming...
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 11:28 PM
Dec 2012

your D & D toon Conan.

There was only one Lincoln, everyone else are wannabes and usually fail before a live audience.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
40. Looks like...
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 12:05 AM
Dec 2012

ya'all have said about all that needs to be said about Mr. Loser.

So...I'll just add...fuck off asshole...and BUH-BYE!

Third Doctor

(1,574 posts)
43. So this nut
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 01:28 AM
Dec 2012

is comparing himself to one of the greatest politicians this country has produced? Allen, is insane and should never hold public office again.

mzteaze

(448 posts)
44. For this statement
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 01:46 AM
Dec 2012

he should AUTOMATICALLY win the RNC nod.

His VP picks should be:

-Todd Akin
- Crazy Eyes Bachmann
- Mr 999 (this would really shake up the 'diversity problem' for the GOP)

Shoot, his campaign should dare to be different and run the VP position as a share program.

chef jeff

(6 posts)
47. >facepalm<
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 02:27 AM
Dec 2012

Comparing yourself to Abe Lincoln? Really?

Fine.
Someone please give Allen West a stovepipe hat and tickets for balcony seating at Ford's Theater. I'd be happy to play the role of John Wilkes Booth.

 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
49. Lamestream Media Continues to
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 09:04 AM
Dec 2012

give the microphone to the losers, the arrogant loudmouths, the ciphers. that's why I ignore lamestream media and their sponsors.

all I need to know about West to know he's a huge, worthless arsehole is the fact while in the military he shot a gun off near a prisoner's head, probably causing that unfortunate person to go deaf.

Fair to assume West wishes he was at abu Ghraib so he could "get in on the action there".

jopacaco

(133 posts)
50. Has he congratulated Patrick Murphy yet?
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:14 AM
Dec 2012

I heard an interview with Patrick Murphy earlier in the week and he said that Allen West had yet to call and congratulate him on his win. Absolutely no class, even Mitt managed to do that.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
52. geesh!
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:26 AM
Dec 2012
I gave up on NPR after their proIraq war drumbeat. Interviewing this mistake of a human being proves I was not wrong in my assessment. I guess faux noise is next.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
58. first he made Harriet Tubman roll over in her grave
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 11:48 AM
Dec 2012

now Abe Lincoln. Why won't he let these people rest in peace?

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
61. sounds like a threat to me.
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 12:22 PM
Dec 2012

I think the Secret Service should pay a visit to Mr. West and do a very thorough investigation of him and all of his associates.

NYC Liberal

(20,138 posts)
62. Reminds me of what Carl Sagan said:
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 12:25 PM
Dec 2012
But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.

MurrayDelph

(5,302 posts)
81. Hey, Allen
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 02:46 AM
Dec 2012

George Nicholas Eckert was also a one-term Whig congressman from the same Congress as Lincoln.

(And to anyone who says "who?" My point, exactly).

PossumSqueezins

(184 posts)
84. Remember the old urban legend Lincoln /Kennedy coincidences??
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:53 AM
Dec 2012

Things like: "Lincoln was shot by John Wilkes Booth at Ford's Theatre; Kennedy was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald in a Lincoln automobile, made by Ford.
Lincoln had a secretary named Kennedy who told him not to go to the theatre; Kennedy had a secretary named Evelyn Lincoln who warned him not to go to Dallas.
Both presidents' last names have 7 letters.
Both presidents have five syllables in their full name (which counts Kennedy's middle initial).
Booth ran from a theatre to a warehouse; Oswald ran from a warehouse to a theatre."

We need to start that with Lincoln/Alan West similarities.

OK. I'll start.

1) Lincoln freed the slaves. Alan West got mad at a hooker one night and beat her with a car antenna.

2) Lincoln was the 16th President. Alan West is a misogynistic homophobic miscreant.

3) Lincoln was shot in the head. Alan West is delusional.

OK. Carry on.

BainsBane

(53,093 posts)
91. Lincoln will be forever remembered as one of our greatest presidents
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:30 PM
Dec 2012

no one will remember who Alan West is in a few years time.

Response to michigandem58 (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Allen West to NPR: ‘Abrah...