Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,228 posts)
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 05:23 AM Apr 18

Mar-a-Lago judge issues rare denial to potential legal arguments about 'tyrannical repression'

Source: Law & Crime

Apr 17th, 2024, 5:41 pm


The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago classified documents case issued a rare denial to a man seeking to file a pretrial brief as a would-be amicus curiae, or friend of the court.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has been mostly permissive when it comes to pretrial briefs, including friend of court briefs, in the case — only denying one other prior attempt in early March from a man serving a lengthy federal prison sentence for mail and wire fraud.

On Tuesday, the court declined to allow another such nonparty filing. The rejected brief was submitted by Darryl B. Phillips, a pro se litigant who describes himself as “a private citizen and retired Electrical Engineer” with “experience analyzing complex systems, software and semiconductors” and the author of “many technical reports.”

“Amici’s interest in this case arises from observations as a donor in the 1980s to a charity providing humanitarian aid to brutally repressed minorities in Soviet Russia,” the brief reads. “Tyrannical repression was implemented through various means that included weaponization of the criminal justice system. Amici is concerned about trends towards similar tyranny in the United States and fears for the future.”

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/mar-a-lago-judge-issues-rare-denial-to-potential-legal-arguments-about-tyrannical-repression-and-the-presidential-records-act-in-trumps-classified-documents-case/



Full headline: Mar-a-Lago judge issues rare denial to potential legal arguments about ‘tyrannical repression’ and the Presidential Records Act in Trump’s classified documents case
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mar-a-Lago judge issues rare denial to potential legal arguments about 'tyrannical repression' (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Apr 18 OP
"Wah, the person I worship is being treated unfairly!" OldBaldy1701E Apr 18 #1
Jeebus save us from self-proclaimed experts Novara Apr 18 #2
A distraction so blatant The Wizard Apr 18 #3

OldBaldy1701E

(5,138 posts)
1. "Wah, the person I worship is being treated unfairly!"
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 07:38 AM
Apr 18

No, he isn't. He is being treated as he should have been a LONG time ago. But, since we all worship the rich to some degree (per design), he has been allowed to continue to be a criminal without consequence. Now, things may change.

Novara

(5,845 posts)
2. Jeebus save us from self-proclaimed experts
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 07:44 AM
Apr 18

Everybody knows everything these days. Or thinks they do.

You're not a lawyer, moron.

And this:

That group, the America First Legal Foundation (AFL) claims it has “expertise” on both the PRA and the National Archives (NARA).


You're not the National Archives and Records Administration, morons.

Jeebus save us from self-proclaimed experts. Step aside and let the grown-ups do their jobs.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mar-a-Lago judge issues r...