Chinese passenger jet to make inaugural commercial flight Sunday
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: UPI
The first large passenger jet domestically-produced in China, is set to make its inaugural commercial flight this weekend.
China Eastern Airlines is expected to fly the narrow-body Comac C919 plane from Shanghai to Beijing Sunday afternoon on what is the busiest domestic route in the country.
The company updated its schedule to reflect the aircraft being assigned to the route and said it will use a lottery system to award seats to those who applied for tickets.
Sunday's flight will mark the culmination of years of research and development by the state-run Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, Ltd. The plane's first test flight took place almost exactly six years ago as China looks to compete with Boeing and Airbus in the commercial aviation space.
Read more: https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2023/05/26/commercial-jet-debut-shanghai-beijing/2861685113777/
rsdsharp
(9,170 posts)CAAC used to stand for China Air Always Cancels.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)I've had nothing but good experiences with China Air. Never flown China Eastern.
C Moon
(12,212 posts)xocetaceans
(3,871 posts)That part of the sentence seems like it probably should be adjusted to read "...years of hacking and intellectual property theft by China...." The following article has a truly nice graphic that shows from whom China stole to get various systems for "their" C919.
Building China's Comac C919 airplane involved a lot of hacking, report says
One of China's most brazen hacking sprees involved intelligence officers, hackers, security researchers, and company insiders.
Written by Catalin Cimpanu, Contributor on Oct. 14, 2019
A report published today shines a light on one of China's most ambitious hacking operations known to date, one that involved Ministry of State Security officers, the country's underground hacking scene, legitimate security researchers, and insiders at companies all over the world.
The aim of this hacking operation was to acquire intellectual property to narrow China's technological gap in the aviation industry, and especially to help Comac, a Chinese state-owned aerospace manufacturer, build its own airliner, the C919 airplane, to compete with industry rivals like Airbus and Boeing.
A Crowdstrike report published today shows how this coordinated multi-year hacking campaign systematically went after the foreign companies that supplied components for the C919 airplane.
The end goal, Crowdstrike claims, was to acquire the needed intellectual property to manufacture all of the C919's components inside China.
...
https://www.zdnet.com/article/building-chinas-comac-c919-airplane-involved-a-lot-of-hacking-report-says/
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Produced with stolen tech. So essentially the Chinese managed to steal enough intellectual property that they were able to produce a 30 year old aircraft design at a cost similar to producing the Airbus A320. I just don't see anyone other than Chinese airlines using them, although Russia might be interested if they ever recover from the financial disaster Putin created.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Also all their EV companies? All the technology and amazing array of consumer goods?
China makes what the World wants to buy, isnt that obvious?
Not just the former colonialists or white folk know stuff.
Mostly its all western corporate jealously and western military angst.
xocetaceans
(3,871 posts)Yes, the Chinese hacked and stole quite a lot to make "their" airplane. (Why you would choose to paint it otherwise is a bit weird to put it mildly.)
So, yes, if one counts theft as "research", then the Chinese did superior "research". Does that statement satisfy your need to recharacterize things - if you get it?
Also, Chinese spacecraft of late also seem commonly to end up dangerously falling back to Earth in an uncontrolled manner - like their recent spy ( however, you might want to read the word "research" for "spy" ) balloon did, but not because they had been shot down. Instead, they fall back to Earth dangerously, because the Chinese cannot be bothered to care about where their lower stages crash or develop the engineering to take care of the problem - if they can. Let them put their money and engineering technology where you mouth is and I'll adjust my statements as necessary as the data comes in, but not until then.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)paleotn
(17,912 posts)and a lot of help from the west, specifically Bombardier. Will be interesting to see how this competes with the Airbus A320neo and Boeing 737 MAX (post software glitch.)
Omaha Steve
(99,613 posts)Hosts feel this belongs in GD.
Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.