Former Trump prosecutor mostly mum before Congress on details of hush-money investigation
Last edited Fri May 12, 2023, 06:45 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: AP
WASHINGTON (AP) An ex-prosecutor who once oversaw Manhattans investigation of former President Donald Trump declined to substantively answer questions at a closed-door deposition Friday of the House Judiciary Committee, according to a Republican lawmaker in the meeting. The prosecutor and his boss said he was merely abiding by grand jury rules.
Rep. Darrell Issa, a California Republican, exited the meeting after roughly one hour and said Mark Pomerantz, the former prosecutor, repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment that protects people from providing self-incriminating testimony. Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a scheme to bury allegations of extramarital affairs that arose during his 2016 White House campaign. GOP lawmakers have decried the investigation as a political persecution and launched an oversight probe.
Pomerantz in a written opening statement called the committees inquiry itself an act of political theater. He also explained he was invoking the Fifth Amendment because the Manhattan District Attorneys office had previously warned him before he published a book on the investigation that he could face criminal liability if he revealed grand jury material or violated a provision of the New York City Charter dealing with misuse of confidential information.
Pomerantz, who left Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Braggs office after disagreements over the direction of the Trump investigation, was subpoenaed by the Republican-controlled House committee. The panel, chaired by GOP Rep. Jim Jordan, is probing how Bragg handled Trumps historic indictment. This deposition is for show, Pomerantz also said in prepared remarks. I do not believe for a moment that I am here to assist a genuine effort to enact legislation or conduct legislative oversight.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-bragg-jordan-pomerantz-house-investigation-50ffeb205c50dab473153d8de1db3e7f
Updated article contains a mic drop statement.
Article updated.
Original article/headline -
WASHINGTON (AP) An ex-prosecutor who once oversaw Manhattans yearslong investigation of former President Donald Trump repeatedly declined to substantively answer questions at a closed-door deposition Friday of the House Judiciary Committee, according to a Republican lawmaker in the meeting.
Rep. Darrell Issa, a California Republican, exited the meeting after roughly one hour and said Mark Pomerantz, the former prosecutor, repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment that protects people from providing self-incriminating testimony. I think its very appropriate to say this is an obstructing witness who has no intention of answering any questions, Issa told reporters. Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz, another Republican on the committee, also said lawmakers were not getting many answers.
Pomerantz, who left Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Braggs office after disagreements over the direction of the Trump investigation, was subpoenaed by the Republican-controlled House committee. The panel, chaired by GOP Rep. Jim Jordan, is probing how Bragg handled Trumps historic indictment.
Bragg had sued to halt Jordans subpoena of Pomerantz, but last month agreed to Pomerantzs testimony after a delay and a condition that lawyers from the prosecutors office be present. The committee has said it would have allowed the district attorneys lawyers even without the agreement. Pomerantz had argued in court papers that the subpoena left him in an impossible position and would potentially require him to violate his ethical obligations.
In response to this (from original article excerpt) -
TRANSLATION - You didn't give us the FABRICATED answers that we WANTED you to say!!!11!1!!11!!!!
emulatorloo
(44,274 posts)Glad to hear Pomerantz stood up to them.
MOMFUDSKI
(5,811 posts)to watch gymmy get his dick stepped on over and over.
Raven123
(4,937 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)The remarks are wonderful..talk about bringing down Jordan and this whole political theater..
BumRushDaShow
(130,043 posts)This story seemed to get buried under so much other news and I hadn't really heard any updates.
Raven123
(4,937 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,866 posts)I thought that criminal had been voted out.
BumRushDaShow
(130,043 posts)When they redistricted, he ran in a different district that had mostly been represented by the criminal Duncan Hunter.
Marthe48
(17,129 posts)can be shoved right up issa's nose. And you're welcome to share a lower opinion.
GB_RN
(2,430 posts)IIRC, he was suspected of being involved in an insurance scam: A fire in one of his companys ware houses.
I could be wrong, though. Its been a while.