House Judiciary chair threatens to hold Google in contempt of Congress for failing to produce
Last edited Mon May 8, 2023, 01:35 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: CNBC
House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, threatened enforcement action against Google that could include holding the company in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents the committee subpoenaed to learn about communications between tech companies and the Biden administration.
In a letter to a lawyer for Google shared exclusively with CNBC, Jordan called the companys compliance so far insufficient and demanded it hand over more information. If the company fails to comply fully by its new May 22 deadline, Jordan warned, the Committee may be forced to consider the use of one or more enforcement mechanisms.
Jordan issued subpoenas to the CEOs of Google parent Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta and Microsoft in February, demanding they hand over communication with the U.S. government to understand how and to what extent the Executive Branch coerced and colluded with companies and other intermediaries to censor speech. Jordan requested the companies comply by March 23. He made the request after initially asking the companies to hand over the information voluntarily, but said they had not sufficiently complied.
While several other tech giants were subpoenaed in connection with the committees investigation, the other companies have so far appeared more responsive than Google to the demands, according to a source familiar with the matter who declined to be named in order to speak freely.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/08/jordan-threatens-action-against-google-for-not-complying-with-subpoena.html
Full headline: House Judiciary chair threatens to hold Google in contempt of Congress for failing to produce subpoenaed documents
Article updated.
Original article -
In a letter to a lawyer for Google shared exclusively with CNBC, Jordan called the companys compliance so far insufficient and demanded it hand over more information. If the company fails to comply fully by its new May 22 deadline, Jordan warned, the Committee may be forced to consider the use of one or more enforcement mechanisms.
Jordan issued subpoenas to the CEOs of Google parent Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta and Microsoft in February, demanding they hand over communication with the U.S. government to understand how and to what extent the Executive Branch coerced and colluded with companies and other intermediaries to censor speech. Jordan requested the companies comply by March 23. He made the request after initially asking the companies to hand over the information voluntarily, but said they had not sufficiently complied.
While several other tech giants were subpoenaed in connection with the committees investigation, the other companies have so far appeared more responsive than Google to the demands, according to a source familiar with the matter.
dchill
(38,626 posts)groundloop
(11,537 posts)And for nothing more than political theatre.
TeamProg
(6,364 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,078 posts)in order to get to the bottom of why people see the GOP as a crew of fascist, bigoted fuckwits.
Hekate
(91,047 posts)Happy Hoosier
(7,485 posts)is shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that others are ignoring him. Actions... meet consequences.
KS Toronado
(17,474 posts)Need at least 2 brain cells to see it.
Happy Hoosier
(7,485 posts)...but here we are. About half the country wants dumbasses governing. Just as long as they hate the right people.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,416 posts)If past experience is anything to go by, they'll have tried far more to get Google to change something than a Democratic administration has. I hope Google has all that lined up and ready to send to the Democrats on the committee if it looks like there's anything else to come from Google.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)If I were Google, I don't know if I could resist the urge to send back a letter stating, "We'll honor a congressional subpoena when you do, traitor trash."
I suspect that Google has lawyers good enough to send that response in legalese, if they feel like going there.
IbogaProject
(2,860 posts)Didn't the T45 and the GOP do numerous things to dodge and even ignore lawful Congressional Subpoenas? So I assume they are optional until we can agree on enforcement.
hueymahl
(2,515 posts)If for no other reason than to put this talking points to test that there was a conspiracy to censor republicans