Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(130,113 posts)
Wed Jan 11, 2023, 12:20 PM Jan 2023

Supreme Court allows New York gun law placing restrictions on concealed firearms to remain in effect

Source: CNN Politics

CNN — The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed a New York gun law that places restrictions on carrying a concealed firearm to remain in effect while legal challenges play out.

In a brief order, the justices rebuffed an emergency request from challengers to the law who say it violates their constitutional right to keep and bear arms. They asked the justices to lift a federal appeals court order that froze a district court decision that invalidated key provisions.

The justices declined to do so. Justice Samuel Alito wrote, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, to say they agreed with their colleagues but stressed they were not ruling on the merits of the law, but simply declining to intervene in the dispute at this juncture. The case is currently before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

“I understand the court’s denial today to reflect respect for the Second Circuit’s procedures in managing its own docket, rather than expressing any view in the merits of the case,” Alito wrote. He urged the lower court to continue to “expedite” the appeal. The court’s order marks the first Second Amendment case to reach the high court since a major Second Amendment decision last summer that expanded gun rights nationwide.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/11/politics/supreme-court-new-york-gun-law



Full headline: Supreme Court allows New York gun law placing restrictions on concealed firearms to remain in effect pending legal challenges
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court allows New York gun law placing restrictions on concealed firearms to remain in effect (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 OP
Some hope? question everything Jan 2023 #1
Some... but not much FBaggins Jan 2023 #4
Once again cnn gets it wrong...the decision did not expand gun rights. JT45242 Jan 2023 #2
Supreme's decision in Heller threw out 'well-regulated.' elleng Jan 2023 #5
and Heller also validated melm00se Jan 2023 #11
Yes. elleng Jan 2023 #13
This makes me smile LetMyPeopleVote Jan 2023 #3
"Pending legal challenges"...man...I hate that headlines get cut off! LeftInTX Jan 2023 #6
Too long to fit! BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #7
I know...Been there..Done that! LeftInTX Jan 2023 #9
Some of these news sources BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #10
The largest objections are to the disclosure requirements... MayReasonRule Jan 2023 #8
You prepared to have your social media melm00se Jan 2023 #12
Yep, it's a broad brush... MayReasonRule Jan 2023 #14
CNN should have named it "The U.S. Supreme Court" n/t msfiddlestix Jan 2023 #15
Twitter is making this seem as if The U.S. Supreme Court has suddenly reversed it's previous ruling. msfiddlestix Jan 2023 #16

FBaggins

(26,795 posts)
4. Some... but not much
Wed Jan 11, 2023, 01:12 PM
Jan 2023

The 2nd circuit appears to be acting pretty quickly and there isn't much need for an emergency vacate of their order since the status-quo leans in that direction.

JT45242

(2,320 posts)
2. Once again cnn gets it wrong...the decision did not expand gun rights.
Wed Jan 11, 2023, 12:45 PM
Jan 2023

The decision threw out "well regulated" and common sense regulations.

Cars, well regulated. Schools, well regulated. Food, well regulated in theory.

But an object designed for killing things that the founders included well regulated in the document, not so much according to Alito and the other whack job 'originalists.'

melm00se

(4,998 posts)
11. and Heller also validated
Wed Jan 11, 2023, 04:29 PM
Jan 2023

that (local) prohibitions on concealed carry.

Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues.


melm00se

(4,998 posts)
12. You prepared to have your social media
Wed Jan 11, 2023, 04:31 PM
Jan 2023

presence scrutinized?

Once it becomes fair game for one thing, it is not a leap that it will be applied to others.

MayReasonRule

(1,463 posts)
14. Yep, it's a broad brush...
Wed Jan 11, 2023, 10:00 PM
Jan 2023

The lack be of precise definition makes the potential for rampant abuse long, broad and deep.

More than slightly reminiscent of the Patriot Act to this casual everyday observer.

msfiddlestix

(7,289 posts)
16. Twitter is making this seem as if The U.S. Supreme Court has suddenly reversed it's previous ruling.
Fri Jan 13, 2023, 10:03 AM
Jan 2023

based on the appeal filing to be heard before them.

It's always interesting to me SCOTUS ruling doesn't seem too concerned about firearms in their Court.

Oh. Wait. Can't get past Security carrying firearms? Isn't that a violation of 2nd A. according to their rationalization?









Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court allows New ...