Nurse practitioner says CVS fired her for refusing to give abortion drugs
Source: Washington Post
Attorneys for Paige Casey said in a lawsuit filed in Prince William County Circuit Court that CVS, which owns MinuteClinic, exempted the nurse for more than 2½ years from prescribing certain contraceptive drugs or devices that cause an abortion. It specifically cited Plan B and Ella, which are commonly referred to as morning-after pills. Casey was granted the accommodation after she wrote a request to the company stating her Catholic beliefs, the lawsuit said.
That changed in August 2021, when the Rhode Island-based company announced that its employees could no longer avoid prescribing abortion-inducing drugs and other forms of birth control, the lawsuit said.
We are entering some dangerous territory if corporations can fire someone for exercising their religious beliefs, said Denise Harle, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian, conservative legal group representing Casey in the case. Tolerance goes two ways.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/09/01/cvs-nurse-fired-abortion-pills/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wp_main
DURHAM D
(32,634 posts)live love laugh
(13,373 posts)elleng
(132,151 posts)They would have been justified to not hire her initially.
IMO
brooklynite
(95,511 posts)Policies change frequently. We no longer accept cash. We're selling a new product. We have a new shelf stocking process. Unless the work tasks are specified by a collective bargaining agreement, the employee implements the new policy, quits or is fired.
Polybius
(15,701 posts)I was totally caught of guard when I went to Citi Field this Spring.
oldsoftie
(12,847 posts)riversedge
(70,928 posts)enshrined for all--like the anti-abortion decision. But this is probably the goal. \ I wonder who is paying for this.
Danascot
(4,721 posts)Go ahead SCOTUS, issue another ruling that proves you're the American Taliban. FAFO
Texin
(2,603 posts)organized and unionized, and are part of a collective bargaining agreement.
pnwmom
(109,056 posts)that VA has some law that protect pharma techs who don't want to sell drugs that cause abortions.
Preventing ovulation doesn't cause an abortion, but preventing implantation does -- for those who accept the Catholic definition of a pregnancy beginning when an egg is fertilized.
Turbineguy
(37,547 posts)don't know much about biology.
Orrex
(63,425 posts)And in every case, the initial paperwork, signed upon hiring (or orientation or whatever equivalent) stipulates that the employee will adhere to policy and to future policy changes.
I'm sure that there are jobs where that's not the case, but the current situation doesn't appear to be one of them.
is the weasel words "Abortion Causing Drugs"-- IOW, any drug that could even as a side effect, cause an abortion. And there are many life saving drugs that have that possible side effect. These hypocritical anti abortionists risk killing women who take these drugs, by denying them, for "religious reasons"
I am all for asking these nuts "are you Baptist? Then I refuse to be waited on by a Baptist, whose church is well know for racism,pro slavery, subjugation of women, and cherry picking Bible verses. It says clearly in the Bible to not eat pork, so unless this person proves to me they are not sinning by eating pork, then I do not even want to see their face."
SouthernDem4ever
(6,618 posts)She take religious crap elsewhere. Why not apply at Hobby Lobby?
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)Do your job, lady.
Abigail_Adams
(317 posts)for her or other pharmacists who try to impose their religion on patients. If you're not willing to do all the job requires, you picked the wrong career field.
cab67
(3,049 posts)Doodley
(9,260 posts)like animals. Don't get a job if you aren't willing to carry out the functions of that job. And stop being a whiny little bitch about it.
Mr.Bill
(24,438 posts)Amish cab drivers.
madinmaryland
(64,938 posts)crickets
(26,054 posts)Warpy
(111,772 posts)I don't have any sympathy at all for these people.
Besides, if she doesn't know how Plan B works, she shouldn't have been hired in the first place, she obviously slept through party of pharmy class while staying wide awake in church.
(Plan B: suppresses ovulation. No ovulation, no fertilization. No fertilization, no implantation. No implantation, no pregnancy. No pregnancy, NO ABORTION. This is not difficult to understand.)
Enter stage left
(3,434 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)If that were not true it would be a much less effective drug than it is*
Just sayin'
* per my PA girlfriend who's sitting right here
Warpy
(111,772 posts)Fertilized ova are flushed out fairly frequently, usually because the timing wasn't quite right or implantation just didn't occur.
It says right on the label that it won't interfere with an established pregnancy, meaning implantation has occurred at whatever stage it happens to be.
No matter how church men try to twist things around, they are on quicksand here.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)As that was suggested in the post I was replying to.
The fact that it inhibits implantation of fertilized egg is those peoples 'argument' against it.
And obviously we (like, everyone on DU) think it's a bullshit reason to be against it
Kenneth Almquist
(8 posts)According to this source, which appears to be reliable:
Most research suggests that Plan B does not cause changes in the endometrium, or lining of the uterus. Because of this, researchers have concluded it cannot prevent implantation of a fertilized egg.
The footnote for the passage quoted above cites a literature review whose abstract states that inserting a copper intrauterine device is the most effective emergency contraception method, probably because, unlike Plan B, it does act both to prevent fertilization in the first place and to inhibit implantation if fertilization does occur.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)First thing:
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/fdas-decision-regarding-plan-b-questions-and-answers
Warpy
(111,772 posts)It may prevent the union of sperm and egg (fertilization). If fertilization does occur, Plan B may prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the womb
IOW, "We've never actually observed this either in vitro or in vivo, but we're trying to cover all bases so we don't get excommunicated."
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)I don't generally assume the FDA is using weasel words, nor are they in danger of excommunication.
I'z just giving my source. If it's wrong, it's wrong. Whatever
Warpy
(111,772 posts)is how you need to start reading health pronouncements. There's a lot of junk information out there.
I expected better of the FDA but I guess they've still got TFG's foul smell hanging around.
niyad
(114,865 posts)little power-tripper.
RockRaven
(15,284 posts)Prescribing those medications (among many others, yes, but nonetheless) as medically appropriate is the job. Do the job, or walk away. It's fine if you want to walk away. No judgment. Nobody cares. Bye-bye and good luck and Godspeed and all that.
It's utterly asinine to claim it is your religious right to have and be paid for a job you refuse to perform.
forgotmylogin
(7,564 posts)DFW
(54,846 posts)In the are created equal part of the Declaration of Independence and the separation of church and state part of the Constitution, thereby making it impossible to further employ someone who thinks its ok to discriminate against customers merely for the medications they seek to buy. They might as well say its OK for a vegan cashier at a food store to refuse service to someone wishing to purchase a steak.
bucolic_frolic
(43,991 posts)She got fired because CVS is not a church. It's not her job duty to practice her religion there, on others, who may or may not agree with her. Her job is to do her job.
hamsterjill
(15,243 posts)Everywhere Ive been hired before, there is a job description of the duties expected to be performed. I would imagine CVS has something like that. When one agrees to take a job, one agrees to do the duties associated with that job.
Judi Lynn
(160,960 posts)geretogo
(1,281 posts)sakabatou
(42,318 posts)instead of making a hissy-fit by using her religion as a crutch.
durablend
(7,528 posts)Deminpenn
(15,348 posts)CVS granted her her 100% religious freedom.
pacheen
(58 posts)Get a job at a Catholic hospital!
There. Problem solved. No need for a lawsuit.
stopdiggin
(11,596 posts)we were discussing a few weeks back ..
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216976543
CVS Pharmacy has similar policy to Walgreens, allows pharmacists to deny birth control prescriptions
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216968953
CVS is requiring verification that scrips are not for abortions. We need to tell CVS
LoisB
(7,335 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,387 posts)Mike Nelson
(10,042 posts)... some time ago, I would say, "Why is she working in the CVS pharmacy dept?" if she is uncomfortable with these views. If you work in a library, you need to help people find Heather Has Two Mommies and The Bible. Now, with the recent SC decision, she may have a case, depending on her area; also, she may be working with Christian lawyers to plan this as a case.
old guy
(3,284 posts)XanaDUer2
(11,132 posts)You helped EVERYONE. your personal thoughts and feelings didn't enter into it. Unless that's changed.
ashredux
(2,618 posts)All of this sudden refusal by some people to supply people with legal medication, is a political statement, not any religious statement. They use religion to cover their bigoted politics
lonely bird
(1,733 posts)When you mix religion and politics, you get politics. Both suffer.
mwb970
(11,414 posts)This is a thumbnail description of the entire conservative movement in America.
stopdiggin
(11,596 posts)It was the company that changed course - after providing 2 and a half years of specific exemption. The woman's position has/had been consistent throughout the course of her employment.
This might not change where people choose to line up on this case - but it has the benefit of being more accurate.
JT45242
(2,398 posts)In the pre sinister 6 and Moscow Mitch flooded SCOTUS, she would have zero leg to stand on.
Did they say that you cannot go to the church of your choosing or your fired? Nope.
Did they say if you cannot pray to the God of your choosing or your fired? Nope.
They said if you do not follow the medical guidelines and order and fill prescriptions as directed (your job), then you are fired.
If she wants to only dispense certain medication and not others because she is a Catholic, then go work in a Catholic hospital. They have bought over a third of all hospital and clinics over the last 40 years to force their views on people.
They did not fire her because she was a Catholic, they fired her for not doing her job.
But....the sinister six of fake SCOTUS will likely rule in her favor if we don't get 53 senators and expand the court to match the number of appellate zoned.
Scrivener7
(51,212 posts)But CVS needs to make it clear that they have changed their minds and this is their policy now so their customers know they won't be pilloried if they run into a god bothering pharmacist.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)It's an NP refusing to write the Rx.
Patients can get f***ed over at both ends of the process.
Scrivener7
(51,212 posts)is the same.
First, someone with no connection to her is making decisions that affect the rest of her life.
Second, whether it is in front of other customers or just going up the management chain with a complaint, this exposes the patient's most private and most emotionally sensitive information for the scrutiny and judgment of people who have nothing to do with her.
Smackdown2019
(1,204 posts)She is a nurse practitioner and working at CVS. Pharmacist dispense prescriptions to patients, nurse practitioners perform limited assignment of writs of prescriptions. What was she doing for CVS as a nurse practitioner?
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)And wouldn't write a prescription for Plan B.
Scrivener7
(51,212 posts)While you typically need to request it if purchasing at a pharmacy, you do not need a prescription or ID to obtain Plan B.
So WTF is all this anyway?
Is this a marketing bullshit story to counteract the revelation a couple of weeks ago that CVS and Walgreens are now allowing their employees not to provide "abortifacients" (like the effective rheumatoid arthritis and cancer drug methotrexate) if they object to abortion?
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)My wife used it one time and there was no Rx needed. But that was in CA. Thought maybe other states might be different and I didn't know it, possibly?
Otherwise the whole thing makes little sense.
Maybe it's just because this NP was refusing to ever 'recommend' it to anyone who came in, and a patient was (rightly) pissed that this NP didn't even mention it existed ... or maybe refused to talk about it, how it works, and/or attempted to dissuade her from using it when patient mentioned/inquired about it ... which the patient feels caused her harm.
mwb970
(11,414 posts)Duh.
Marthe48
(17,406 posts)Fire all of the employees not willing to do the job they hired in for. Let that nurse go to a drugstore who won't sell Plan B, Ella, or condoms at all, and see which store stays in business longer. Meddling cow.
sindri
(39 posts)and allowances in the workplace have no impact on the customers. They are about the employee themselves - needing prayer breaks, food restrictions, or allowances for how they dress, what they touch, etc. These MAGA people are abusing this by trying to extend their religion to the customer. Microfascisms where they want to have the right to tell others what is best for them. That is the MAGA MO - making the country "great" not by making themselves better, but by bringing everyone else down to their level. Like how the denigrate people smarter or more talented than them (calling them elitist) and those who are more Jesusy than them (calling them socialists). I don't call them evil, just emotionally and spiritually immature.
sarge43
(28,959 posts)Conjuay
(1,522 posts)I'm sure she can get a job not doing what she was hired to do somewhere else.
I hear the job market is wide open, two jobs available for every candidate.
TNNurse
(6,961 posts)You were not hired to decide what others can do with their lives.
bluestarone
(17,354 posts)I would rather see a HUGE monetary fine imposed on anyone not fulfilling their DUTIES! Make them PAY A PRICE EVERYTIME they refuse to do their job!
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,873 posts)I mean, Nurse Casey. Find another job!
Would you refuse to prescribe my chemo pills too?
https://www.erivedge.com/
----------
Serious Side Effects
Erivedge can cause your baby to die before it is born (be stillborn) or cause your baby to have severe birth defects.
For females who can become pregnant:
You should talk with your healthcare provider about the risks of Erivedge to your unborn child
Your healthcare provider will do a pregnancy test within 7 days before you start taking Erivedge
In order to avoid pregnancy, you should use birth control during treatment and for 24 months after your final dose of Erivedge. Talk with your healthcare provider about what birth control method is right for you during this time
Talk to your healthcare provider right away if you have unprotected sex or if you think that your birth control has failed
Tell your healthcare provider right away if you become pregnant or think that you may be pregnant
For males:
Erivedge is present in semen. Do not donate semen while you are taking Erivedge and for 3 months after your final dose
You should always use a condom, even if you have had a vasectomy, during sex with female partners who are pregnant or who are able to become pregnant, during treatment with Erivedge, and for 3 months after your final dose to protect your female partner from being exposed to Erivedge
Tell your healthcare provider right away if your partner becomes pregnant or thinks she is pregnant while you are taking Erivedge
----------
Better Days Ahoy
(698 posts)Thanks for making this religious rights lunacy pellucidly clear.
kaotikross
(246 posts)working at a CVS anyway? I suspect she's had problems keeping a job in a healthcare setting.
Scrivener7
(51,212 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,438 posts)working at the counter in a drug store?
niyad
(114,865 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,342 posts)zanana1
(6,158 posts)I can refuse to sell a cross necklace?
LiberalFighter
(52,101 posts)Related to the refusal.
yankee87
(2,216 posts)After what happened when my wife was bleeding out from a miscarriage, and a "pro-birth" doctor wanted to wait for an enzyme test to come back until he treated her. Luckily, I came from work, went into the room, blood everywhere and screamed. Another doctor had to take care of her.
If you don't want to help your patients, leave the medical field. What next, not helping our LGBTQI or minority people?
2abigbman
(29 posts)Your beliefs are your beliefs. No private citizen or organizations can impose them on anyone else. MAGAS want to impose their despicable views on everybody. If she chooses her beliefs than her public job suffer the consequences
AllyCat
(16,357 posts)Cannot provide adequate medical care? Find a new job.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Your religion is no excuse for refusing to fill a legally written prescription. We need stop this nonsense NOW!
Martin68
(23,369 posts)like everyone else. Sorry, Nurse Casey, the rules have changed in response to the Supreme Court decision.
Sky Jewels
(7,304 posts)Glad to hear.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)This is stupid.
This is like a person who says drinking alcohol is against their religion, Get a job at a bar, and refuses to serve alcohol at a bar
What does her personal religion have to do with some customer coming in and meeting an item that CVS sales? That's stupid.
If you're religion informs your life that much, go get a job at a church and leave the rest of us alone
Alpeduez21
(1,776 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,777 posts)A person being exempt from filling prescriptions that they find against their religion, as long as there is always another pharmacist there who can fulfill that roll.
Ziggysmom
(3,459 posts)Spiggitzfan
(35 posts)argyl
(3,064 posts)But religion had nothing to do with her losing her job. She was fired for failing to do her job. If your job is, among other things, filling legally obtained prescriptions, and you refuse to do it under any circumstances, you're in dereliction of duty and need to be shown the door.
SuperCoder
(300 posts)Good.
Snackshack
(2,541 posts)No, not in this case it doesnt. The person working as the Pharmacist either is a Pharmacist or they are not. Their personal feelings do not matter if they cant do the job quit.
This eats at the very fabric of society. It must be pushed back on always.
Laffy Kat
(16,412 posts)If you work in a liquor store, you're going to have to sell booze regardless of your religion, so how is this different? I honestly think it should be a condition of employment. Employers don't have to ask about applicants' religious believes, just if they have any problems selling ANY products. If so, don't hire them.
Zambero
(9,003 posts)Since evil CVS distributes those horrible "baby killers" and "baby preventers", a person of such "devout conviction" should not want anything to do with them. She somehow compartmentalized her values and collected a paycheck from an avowed baby-killing enterprise. How on God's good earth does she sleep at night?
Takket
(21,891 posts)when person's religious beliefs are allowed to be cast beyond their own selves to influence and effect the lives of others. This is why the FF gave INDIVIDUALS freedom of religion but at the same time prevented government from instituting a state religion. So that you could do what you feel is right for YOU, but you could not impose that believe on anyone else, or your employer for that matter.
YOU don't have to take pills or undergo procedures you do not agree with.
BUT you CANNOT force that belief on someone else's person, denying them perfectly legal medications, simple because you don't agree with them.
Vinca
(50,405 posts)find themselves jobs that don't involve whatever it is they've got their panties in a knot over.
quaker bill
(8,226 posts)One because the work (polymer chemistry) had specific application to weapons systems. Another because it was a lovely job working with manatee conservation but would occasionally require carrying a gun and potentially using a gun to enforce law.
Being a Quaker, I did not feel i could commit to do either, so I passed on both and found a different path. I never considered asking the employer to accomodate my convictions in this regard, I simply found work consistent with my values.
I would suggest the same to others.
dchill
(38,725 posts)Withywindle
(9,988 posts)If your religion forbids alcohol that's your business, but don't get a job in a bar.