Murkowski announces reelection bid opposed by Trump
Source: AP
WASHINGTON (AP) Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who voted to convict Donald Trump in his second impeachment trial and has repeatedly bumped heads with the former president, announced Friday that she will run for reelection.
Trump, who has focused his political efforts on punishing his political opponents, endorsed a leading opponent of Murkowski in June. Kelly Tshibaka was commissioner of Alaskas Department of Administration before resigning to run for the Senate. In July, the Alaska Republican State Central Committee endorsed Tshibaka after Murkowskis impeachment vote.
My heart is, and always has been, in Alaska, and thats why I am proud to announce my campaign for reelection to the US Senate in 2022, Murkowski said in a statement. She emphasized that she has always made Alaska, its industries and its people her top priority.
The Murkowski reelection bid will be closely watched nationally as Trump seeks to bring down a senator whose name has a rich political history in the state. Her father, Frank Murkowski, was a former governor and a longtime U.S. senator.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-congress-lisa-murkowski-alaska-impeachments-824082f54f29c5a81739ab89eae504eb
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)jimfields33
(16,068 posts)With all the turmoil in the Alaska GOP, the Democratic candidate for Alaska senate should win.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Race one time. Dems don't seem to figure up there.
She beat Joe Miller (Teahadist) and Scott McAdams (D)
McAdams finished a distant 3rd
Slammer
(714 posts)I think we need to let her know if she loses the Republican nomination again this time that we'd be happy to welcome her into the Democratic Party.
She's only about a third of a Democrat, at best. But she's likely the best 'Democrat' we could get up there.
Just having her vote with the Democrats on 60% of the party line votes (stipulating 'and all the major votes') would be a vast improvement for us. I'd be willing to throw her a chairmanship (with some limitations and understandings) and let her 'keep her seniority' in her new caucus in exchange for that..
rpannier
(24,349 posts)One of her strongest is among Inuit Alaskans. Many vote Democratic, but always vote for her.
She won as a write-in in 2010.
obamanut2012
(26,179 posts)Usually vote Dem, but they are very loyal to Murkowski, and have sealed her victory a couple times.
Walleye
(31,118 posts)DFW
(54,476 posts)The party of a popular incumbent can be manipulated to deny that incumbent the nomination. It cannot, however, deny the local voters the right to disagree with, and vote against their move. McTurtle can pour all the RSCC money he wants against Murkowski, but if a majority of Alaskans want her back despite that, she retains her seat no matter what primary numbers are trotted out by the local party.
Irish_Dem
(47,694 posts)cstanleytech
(26,347 posts)her fellow Republicans.
So would she be an asset or an anchor? I lean towards anchor.
Irish_Dem
(47,694 posts)Slammer
(714 posts)multigraincracker
(32,744 posts)the guy pubs.
Vogon_Glory
(9,133 posts)From here in Texas it looks like the Alaskan Republican Party has gone Cray-Cray like so much of the rest of Club Pachyderm. The Cray-Cray trend in the GQP is increasing, not withering: theres less and less for her there at the Republicans tents.
Also, she beat them once as an Indie and she can likely do it again.
samnsara
(17,656 posts)twodogsbarking
(9,885 posts)Polybius
(15,517 posts)Hey, it worked in 2010.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,395 posts)monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)indictment list is going to look like websters dictionary !