'We are in trouble.' Global carbon emissions reached a new record high in 2018.
Source: The Washington Post
As nations assemble in Poland for climate talks, the figures suggest there is no clear end in sight to the growth of humanitys contribution to climate change.
By Brady Dennis and Chris Mooney December 5 at 1:00 PM
Global emissions of carbon dioxide have reached the highest levels on record, scientists projected Wednesday, in the latest evidence of the chasm between international goals for combating climate change and what countries are actually doing.
Between 2014 and 2016, emissions remained largely flat, leading to hopes that the world was beginning to turn a corner. Those hopes have been dashed. In 2017, global emissions grew 1.6 percent. The rise in 2018 is projected to be 2.7 percent.
The expected increase, which would bring fossil fuel and industrial emissions to a record high of 37.1 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year, is being driven by nearly 5 percent emissions growth in China and more than 6 percent in India, researchers estimated, along with growth in many other nations throughout the world. Emissions by the United States grew 2.5 percent, while emissions by the European Union declined by just under 1 percent.
As nations are gathered for climate talks in Poland, the message of Wednesdays report was unambiguous: When it comes to promises to begin cutting the greenhouse gas emissions that fuel climate change, the world remains well off target.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/energy-environment/2018/12/05/we-are-trouble-global-carbon-emissions-reached-new-record-high/
cilla4progress
(24,728 posts)even.
We shit in the Garden and destroyed it for greed and earthly comforts.
hatrack
(59,585 posts)CrispyQ
(36,461 posts)Do I need this?
Javaman
(62,528 posts)meaning the rise of fascism and wanna-be right wing dictators I don't honestly see a hopeful end of the skyrocketing carbon emissions.
I think of this song when thinking of the earth and humanity.
I don't think of a jilted lover but how we fucked ourselves over
DBoon
(22,363 posts)and the French won't tolerate a gas tax increase
and Brazilians are going to destroy the Amazon to enrich their agri-business
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)Say the level of 1959 (assuming we decided that was a safe level): 9 billion tonnes of CO2 per year. That's about a quarter of today's emissions. Can we drop world emissions by 75% in the time we have before the climate runs away and the rise in CO2 becomes self-reinforcing? That may be as little as 20 years.
There is no evidence that we can do this, and there is especially no evidence that we want to or have the will to do it. None. Zip. Zilch. In the entire history of growth-based modern civilization of the last 5000 years.
Modern techno-industrial civilization is pretty much done, along with all the people it supports.
We need to start thinking in terms of adaptation rather than mitigation, and getting used to the implications of a shrinking civilization.
BeneathTheMire
(76 posts)The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)Along with home heating and industrial production...
None of which will happen, until it does.
BeneathTheMire
(76 posts)is responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than all transportation exhaust.
Animal agriculture is the most destructive industry on the planet.
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data
The sectors that need to cease operation are: Electricity and Heat; Agriculture and forestry; Industry; and Transportation. Basically most of civilization needs to shut down. Closing just a portion of one sector won't do it.
We need to cut CO2 emissions by 75% or more in order to save our bacon, if you'll pardon the expression.
BeneathTheMire
(76 posts)Im not just talking about greenhouse gas emissions.
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)I created this graphic in 2015. It implies the degree of global devastation caused by animal agriculture:
However, the world as a whole won't give up eating beef any more than it will give up driving cars or heating homes.
We each have our personal favourite whipping boy. It looks like yours is animal agriculture. Mine happens to be civilization as a whole.
We need to stop the damage. We will, but only when we are forced to by ecological circumstances.
BigmanPigman
(51,590 posts)just like when our national debt hits the fan, so he doesn't give a shit. I HATE him!
roamer65
(36,745 posts)We need serious financial incentives aimed at lowering birth rates fast...worldwide.
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)The reasons it will are what give me nightmares.
dalton99a
(81,484 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)By DRILL BABY DRILL to make every last freaking penny they can for themselves themselves themselves.
I call that kind of idiotic King Midas-like greedhead fucknuttery: Republican Derangement Syndrome.
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous
republican lies about climate chaos are dangerous