Appeals Court Denies Immediate Stay of Judge's Order

[grantcart]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by DonViejo (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: CNN Live

Court of Appeals, 9th District, will NOT stop the stay by the Judge in WA State

Read more: Link to source

---

2nd major set back for Trump.

[chillfactor]

1. thank god.....

strike number two for the orange one.

[grantcart]

2. And he is going to ask Sessions how to fix it

[chillfactor]

12. good one..

[nikibatts]

23. Pressure must be on hard to stop Sessions.

How can it be done. Will the Democrats stick together? Will Manchin cave? Can we get rid of him after all those coal jobs do not come back to W.VA?

[GusBob]

3. One hour to tweet storm

Yeah this is great

[grantcart]

4. I wonder what the over/under is on total number of tweets

including SNL.

[GusBob]

8. "SNL stands for snot nosed losers! Sad! Not funny!"

I never called Zimbabwe! Fake news!

[SammyWinstonJack]

58. HA!

[Hortensis]

28. "The judge opens up our country to potential terrorists and others

that do not have our best interests at heart. Bad people are very happy!"

Latest from the face of The Rough Beast ?@realDonaldTrump

My favorite is this one, though, from a president who STILL does not understand that our system has always been based on a system of checks and balances. "What is our country coming to when a judge can halt a Homeland Security travel ban and anyone, even with bad intentions, can come into U.S.?"

[deminks]

5. Yesssss!

[2naSalit]

6. Showdown on the horizon...

fasten your seatbelts, kids.

[Judi Lynn]

7. Good news for the human race. Thank you! n/t

[GusBob]

9. "Thinking about calling the National Guard up on these so-called Judges"

The so-called Constitution is failing!"

[Guilded Lilly]

10. He might sprain his fingers tweeting over this AND SNL.

[deminks]

11. link here

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/04/politics/doj-appeals-travel-ban-ruling/

[LuvLoogie]

17. Thanks!

[LuvLoogie]

13. I'm not finding anything regarding this ruling by the 9th. Link?

[rpannier]

26. cnn

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/04/politics/doj-appeals-travel-ban-ruling/

[neverforget]

14. So much losing! Sad!

[lamp_shade]

15. What a great day for democracy.

[halobeam]

25. Yes it is!

[BigBearJohn]

16. LMFAO... Double whammy with SNL and triple whammy with the Appeals Court decision

I can feel his blood vessels popping already.

Any predictions on how soon he starts a war over this?

[MFM008]

18. 2AM PST

and no tweets? Is he dead?
Alec was sooooo over the top to provoke the maggot...

waiting....

[Berlin Expat]

19. I've noticed he usually doesn't

Last edited Sun Feb 5, 2017, 07:16 AM - Edit history (1)

wake up until around 3 AM PST (6 AM EST). I figure he's making his rage tweets while he's dropping his morning deuce.

[leftyladyfrommo]

20. Yes!

He has made the courts mad. Not a good idea. They can seriously fuck
with him.

[Demsrule86]

36. He is a threat to the courts...hopefully they understand this.

The brain dead Republicans House would never get that he is a threat to congress as well.

[leftyladyfrommo]

47. I am sure they see the threat. nt

[safeinOhio]

21. "I'm going to protect your Constitution"

Not

[riversedge]

22. Well win, he replied. For the safety of the country, well win.. says the So-called President

Greg Sargent ?@ThePlumLineGS 5m5 minutes ago

Appeals court rejects Trump admin's demand that court lift hold on travel ban, after Trump raged at judge all day:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/04/us/politics/visa-ban-trump-judge-james-robart.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0 …

Link to tweet

Appeals Court Rejects Request to Immediately Restore Travel Ban

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/04/us/politics/visa-ban-trump-judge-james-robart.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1

By MARK LANDLERFEB. 4, 2017



WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A federal appeals court early Sunday rejected a request by the Justice Department to immediately restore President Trump’s targeted travel ban, deepening a legal showdown over his authority to tighten the nation’s borders in the name of protecting Americans from terrorism.

In the legal back and forth over the travel ban, the United States District Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco said a reply from the Trump administration was now due on Monday.

The ruling meant that refugees and travelers from seven predominantly Muslim nations — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — who were barred by an executive order signed by the president on Jan. 27 would, for now, continue to be able to enter the country.

After a Federal District Court in Seattle blocked Mr. Trump’s order nationwide on Friday, the Justice Department appealed the ruling late Saturday, saying that the president had the constitutional authority to order the ban and that the court ruling “second-guesses the president’s national security judgment.”


Court Temporarily Blocks Trump’s Travel Ban, and Airlines Are Told to Allow Passengers FEB. 3, 2017
That Judge Attacked by Donald Trump? He’s Faced a Lot Worse JUNE 3, 2016



On Saturday night, as Mr. Trump arrived at a Red Cross gala at Mar-a-Lago, his waterfront Florida resort, where he was spending the first getaway weekend of his presidency, reporters asked him if he was confident he would prevail in the government’s appeal. “We’ll win,” he replied. “For the safety of the country, we’ll win.”...............

[madokie]

27. There comes the day

that this mo'fo will rue the day he decided to run for the pResidency.

Count on it, its coming.

He will be impeached before this is all said and done. My question is will it be soon enough

Peace

[Little Tich]

24. Finally some good news about Trump. n/t

[LudwigPastorius]

29. I'll just leave this here:

(again)

[George II]

30. Any tweets about a "so called Appeals Court"?

[paleotn]

31. Slamming head long....

..into the concrete walls of separation of powers. If he even knows what it is, Article III is 45's least favorite part of the Constitution.

[cstanleytech]

32. "What do you mean I cant order the court to make the rulings I want it to make?" I can honestly

imagine Trump asking that.

[paleotn]

38. Seriously....

45 thinks he's Putin. He'll probably call up ole Vlad and ask him why totalitarian bullshit works in a gas station masquerading as a country, but doesn't work here.

[Dustlawyer]

33. Glad it wasn't in front of the 5th Circuit!

[old guy]

49. That puzzles me.

Why was it filed in the 9th? There are other circuits that would probably have been better for them, 5th,7th 8th.

[bench scientist]

51. The 9th Circuit holds jurisdiction over the State of Washington.

The stay was issued by a Washington State Federal District Judge. All Federal District Courts rulings , including stays (injunctions) within Washington if appealed go to the 9th Circuit.
You can't just forum shop to whatever Court of Appeals you like.

http://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/court-role-and-structure

[old guy]

52. Thanks. Makes sense.

[bench scientist]

54. Correct

[sl8]

55. My mistake, I thought you had said it was a state court decision.

Sorry about that.

I'll delete my misguided "correction".

[bench scientist]

56. lol no worries.

have a good Sunday!

[sl8]

57. Thanks. All the best. n/t

[DemoTex]

34. The West Coast to the rescue ..

I have a feeling we will be relying on them a lot in the near future. Until the MotherTrumper is disgraced, cashiered, and convicted.

[dalton99a]

35. "Bannon, what do you mean I can't fire them?"

[nycbos]

37. From WAPO

9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate travel ban A federal appeals court early Sunday denied an initial bid by the Trump administration to restore its controversial immigration order that had barred refugees and people from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States.

A judge in a lower federal court had put a temporary stop to the travel ban. Because the appeals court declined to intervene immediately, affected travelers can enter until at least until Monday. The appeals court set a schedule asking challengers to the ban to file a response by roughly 3 a.m. Eastern on Monday, and the Justice Department — representing the Trump administration — to reply to that by 6 p.m.

A Justice Department spokesman said government lawyers would wait until then to make their next move.

“With the fast briefing schedule the appeals court laid out, we do not plan to ask the Supreme Court for an immediate stay but instead let the appeals process play out,” Peter Carr said.

Just hours earlier, the Trump administration had said it was improper for a lower court to engage in “second-guessing” of President Trump’s controversial immigration order and asked the appeals court to dissolve the judge’s order that stopped its implementation.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-administration-appeals-to-restore-travel-ban-says-earlier-ruling-was-second-guessing-the-president/2017/02/05/6fcdbb5a-eb4c-11e6-80c2-30e57e57e05d_story.html?utm_term=.68c424d9bbda&wpisrc=al_alert-COMBO-politics%252Bnation

[grantcart]

48. Thanks

[Tactical Peek]

39. Good.

[lark]

40. Fr once in his ife, we need to count on Kennedy.

He has to vote with the more liberal judges on this or there's one appeals ciurt that ruled one way and the one in WA ruled differently. This would leave us in chaos and drumpf would waltz right through the hole and reinstate his hate filled ban that has zero to do with terrorism or Saudi Arabia and Egypt would be included.

[yardwork]

41. Right now, it's 4 to 4 on the SC. A tie works because it leaves the lower court decision.

After the Senate approves the new guy - which they will since the Republicans have the majority - then we're in real danger. And if Kennedy leaves the Court, Trump will appoint a right-wing extremist and that will be that for a generation.

This is why there really is a difference between the parties and votes for Democrats really do matter.

[lark]

42. It's worse.

There's split decisions in the federal court system. WA stopped the ban, MA said it could go forward. There will be chaos if Kennedy doesn't vote our way. After fascist is annointed, you are totally correct. Hopefully Kennedy will be appalled by the social decisions and stay, this will really increase his importance and he loves being important.

[yardwork]

43. In that case, it's already too late once we're back to 9.

[lark]

44. Nightmare in America!

[yardwork]

45. I felt that my last post was too negative.

You're right. We have to resist.

[lark]

46. Resistance takes many forms.

I'm writing letters, calling Congress critters, and boycotting products by Koch or drumpf. Wrote letter to DSW telling them I'd never buy shoes there again until they stop carrying ivanka's shoes. Since my family buys at least a dozen pairs a year there, and if enough other shoe buyers say the same thing, maybe they will stop. I sent a very similar letter to Macy's with others to hit the mail, via snail and email, as well. It's not a lot, but if everyone does what we can, maybe we can make a difference. I also subscribed to The Nation and NYT since they also push back and watch CNN now and no other news, except sometimes Rachel or Lawrence.

[mr_lebowski]

50. Why do have this nagging feeling Bannon will make SURE a bad actor from one of the 7 ...

Ends up in the country, and causes some form of destruction?

If that does happen, I won't be surprised if the congress-critters pass a law saying the Courts cannot legally decide something like this ... then we'll have us an unprecedented (at least in modern history) Constitutional Crisis on our hands ...

A perfect scenario for the GOP to ram through more crappy legislation to favor their rich buddies at the expense of the rest of us.

I sooooo hope Drumpf gets caught on tape telling someone at CIA 'try to make sure some real hombres make it into the US, these courts need to be taught a lesson' or some such.

Of course the Trumpkins will call it 'locker room talk' and excuse the whole thing ... but remotely sane people (and perhaps that might even include the GOPpers in the House and Senate) will realize this absolutely calls for the big 'I' ...

[DonViejo]

59. Locking...

No news here; no link, no excerpt, no source.

Please familiarize yourself with the SOP of the LBN Forum.