Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JustinL

(722 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:30 PM Jan 2017

Donald Trump Reinstates Ronald Reagans Abortion Global Gag Rule

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON ― In one of his first acts as president, Donald Trump has reinstated a federal ban on U.S. funding for international health organizations that counsel women on family planning options that include abortion.

The Mexico City policy, also known as the global gag rule, was first put in place by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. It prohibits giving U.S. funding to nongovernmental organizations that offer or advise on a wide range of family planning and reproductive health options if they include abortion ― even if U.S. dollars are not specifically used for abortion-related services.

Since then, the gag rule has been something of a political football, rescinded and reinstated as soon as presidents take office. President Bill Clinton did away with the rule, President George W. Bush reinstated it and then President Barack Obama again revoked it in 2009.

Trump’s executive order Monday comes one day after the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case that guaranteed a woman’s right to have an abortion, and the week of the annual March for Life in Washington, D.C.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-global-gag-rule_us_58822355e4b070d8cad1f774

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donald Trump Reinstates Ronald Reagans Abortion Global Gag Rule (Original Post) JustinL Jan 2017 OP
Women do not need to have a right over their body, men need that right Eliot Rosewater Jan 2017 #1
Republicans: yewberry Jan 2017 #2
Now the US can go globally with it's all out crusade for the survival of the fetus meadowlark5 Jan 2017 #3
Done on the advice of "Ayatollah Pence" no doubt. justhanginon Jan 2017 #4
About 40,000 legal abortion/year and safeinOhio Jan 2017 #5
When the End Times come, American fundies who love Israel expect all the Jews to either convert or Hekate Jan 2017 #10
But, we could withhold safeinOhio Jan 2017 #11
These idiots want a higher population. SCVDem Jan 2017 #6
They want a higher WHITE population? They must be ignoramuses to the max progree Jan 2017 #21
As expected. The thing is a political football until we get a solid majority in Congress Hekate Jan 2017 #7
What?! Clinton wasn't really almost as bad as Trump? !! yardwork Jan 2017 #14
These are the same people who always complain (dog whistle) about high birth rates in the 3rd world tenorly Jan 2017 #8
I keep reading there are 250 million women in the world without access to modern contraceptives progree Jan 2017 #20
Not enough. Absolutely. tenorly Jan 2017 #24
Pig! Orange Pustule Hitler. MarinCoUSA Jan 2017 #9
GOP gives the world,,,, Cryptoad Jan 2017 #12
or more bdamomma Jan 2017 #13
Keep this kicked. Don't ignore it. This is what electing Trump caused. yardwork Jan 2017 #15
Such a dick ismnotwasm Jan 2017 #16
The same pen that signed TPP withdrawal signed this. joshcryer Jan 2017 #17
Yup ismnotwasm Jan 2017 #22
Trump is more concerned with forcing you to have babies bucolic_frolic Jan 2017 #18
Donald Trump, halfway digested circus peanut and our new president.... IcyPeas Jan 2017 #19
Population projections already being revised upward. Seriously progree Jan 2017 #23
Trump being a big man!! NOT riversedge Jan 2017 #25

Eliot Rosewater

(31,138 posts)
1. Women do not need to have a right over their body, men need that right
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:32 PM
Jan 2017

and women who voted for trump do not want rights to their bodies either.

Women dont know how to do the right thing with their bodies and they need strong, good men like Donald Trump telling them what to do with their bodies.

This is what you believe if you voted for Trump or did not vote or voted 3rd party.

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
3. Now the US can go globally with it's all out crusade for the survival of the fetus
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:35 PM
Jan 2017

but it will stop there. We already know in this country the conservatives don't give two shits about that baby when it's out of the womb - pull yourself up by the umbilical cord and support yourself!

Now we're going to do it in other countries that have even less resources to survive. The conservatives are such benevolent people

justhanginon

(3,290 posts)
4. Done on the advice of "Ayatollah Pence" no doubt.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:38 PM
Jan 2017

God, How I hate these people and their false religiosity.

safeinOhio

(32,756 posts)
5. About 40,000 legal abortion/year and
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:44 PM
Jan 2017

About half of those are paid for by the government in Isreal. No mention of these by the Bible Thumpers

Hekate

(91,030 posts)
10. When the End Times come, American fundies who love Israel expect all the Jews to either convert or
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:50 PM
Jan 2017

...be consigned to Hell. So no problem there. The important thing is the real estate, i.e. the Holy Land.

Yes, I am being sarcastic, but that's the essentials.

safeinOhio

(32,756 posts)
11. But, we could withhold
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:56 PM
Jan 2017

$3 billion plus in aid until they stop this and get rid of their socialized medicine in the mean time....

just kidding

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
6. These idiots want a higher population.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:44 PM
Jan 2017

Actually they want a higher WHITE population.

Wait until coastal flooding and drought cause these masses to migrate.

Still want a large population?

progree

(10,948 posts)
21. They want a higher WHITE population? They must be ignoramuses to the max
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 08:27 PM
Jan 2017

I can't think of any white country that we send foreign aid to, reproductive or otherwise, except Israel. And I can't think of any that aren't at or below replacement fertility levels.

Hekate

(91,030 posts)
7. As expected. The thing is a political football until we get a solid majority in Congress
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:45 PM
Jan 2017

As it stands now, it only exists by Executive Order. Clinton came in -- no global gag order. Dubya came in, reinstated it on the first day. Obama repealed it. Trump puts it back.

I was so upset when Dubya did it I almost drove off the road. Now I understand the situation better -- women's lives are just a fcking political football.

So Democrats who stayed home in Obama's midterm election cycles and allowed the House to become what it is now can slap themselves upside the head for me.

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
8. These are the same people who always complain (dog whistle) about high birth rates in the 3rd world
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 02:46 PM
Jan 2017

Luckily there are many other countries and NGOs funding birth control programs in developing countries, as well as many governments in that region themselves. They certainly don't need approval from the party of Scott DesJarlais and David Vitter.

progree

(10,948 posts)
20. I keep reading there are 250 million women in the world without access to modern contraceptives
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 08:24 PM
Jan 2017

from sources like Population Connection and the Guttmacher Institutute. And in most cases it's not because of government policy in those countries.

[font color = blue]>>Luckily there are many other countries and NGOs funding birth control programs in developing countries,<<[/font]

Not enough, unfortunately. There are many countries where women still average 5 or 6 kids, and it's not because they are repro addicts.

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
24. Not enough. Absolutely.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 10:34 PM
Jan 2017

I should note though that these days exceedingly high fertility rates (5-6 children per woman) are mostly limited to Sub-Saharan Africa and a couple of other pre-industrial backwaters like Afghanistan. The third world as a whole averages around 3 children per woman, over her reproductive lifetime.

They've certainly come a long way in that respect: as late as the 1970s, 5-6 children (sometimes 7) was indeed the norm in the third world except for a few places such as Argentina, Uruguay, and South Korea (which were averaging 3 children at the time).

And yes: general consensus there is that while technical advice and funding from the developed countries helped, this reduction was largely achieved thanks to proactive policies in a lot of third-world governments themselves (notably China, with its "one child" policy - something even they took over 20 years to achieve).

Sub-Saharan Africa, as noted, still has a serious birth rate problem. You have countries like Ethiopia and D.R. Congo (formerly Zaire) approaching 100 million, and Nigeria approaching 200 million - countries that can reasonably feed only half that many people. God help them.

joshcryer

(62,287 posts)
17. The same pen that signed TPP withdrawal signed this.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 05:07 PM
Jan 2017

Amazing how certain "progressives" are willing to "compromise" when it comes to Republicans, so easily, so delightfully, even. When it comes to "economic populism."

(A farce since this only strengthens China and their trade status.)

IcyPeas

(21,949 posts)
19. Donald Trump, halfway digested circus peanut and our new president....
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:53 PM
Jan 2017
Although the 1977 Hyde Amendment already prohibits the use of federal funds for abortions, President Ronald Reagan chose to increase those restrictions in 1984, with the introduction of this policy, also known as the Mexico City Policy, which allows for exceptions in the cases of rape, incest, and if the mother’s life is threatened. Since then, presidents have played a kind of partisan hockey with it: Bill Clinton repealed it; George W. Bush replaced it; in 2009, Barack Obama repealed it again.

Practically, it is brutal for women’s health: the rule forces NGOs to choose between accepting federal funds for family planning, but being forced to exclude any mentions of abortion in their care, or find alternative sources of funding.



http://theslot.jezebel.com/trump-to-reinstate-global-gag-rule-banning-ngos-from-r-1791512471

progree

(10,948 posts)
23. Population projections already being revised upward. Seriously
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 09:04 PM
Jan 2017
http://www.populationconnection.org/its-official-donald-trump-just-reinstated-the-global-gag-rule/

This (the imposition of the Global Gag Rule) means that, as of today, it is now illegal for any overseas health clinic that receives U.S. aid to even talk about abortion.

The Gag Rule creates a major dilemma for foreign organizations that rely upon foreign aid to empower women with comprehensive sexual and reproductive health care and services. By “gagging” their ability to even discuss abortions—even though no U.S. aid can be used to provide them—it forces providers to censor how the advise patients or risk going bankrupt.

Moreover, documentation by a consortium of NGO’s {1} has found that abortion rates (resulting from decreased access to contraceptives) go up when the Global Gag Rule is in place ((I might add that most of these abortions are illegal and unsafe - Progree)) . Not only does this policy result in outcomes that directly contradict it’s supposed aims (to make abortions rarer), it directly hurts women and families already living in some of the world’s poorest places.

Offering aid on conditions that reduce the quality of family planning programs makes it impossible for organizations working on the ground to effectively serve their communities. Several countries whose family planning assistance was severely cut due to the imposition of the Gag Rule have revised their population projections upward. Kenya is perhaps the most jarring example: before the Gag Rule, Kenya’s population in 2050 was projected to be 44 million. In the latest revision, however, that figure rose to 97 million. This example illustrates the time sensitive nature of compounding population growth. Each generation creates a larger base upon which the next generation grows.

... If you’d like to take action to fight back against the imposition of the Global Gag Rule, sign our sister organization Population Connection Action Fund’s pledge here ( http://p2a.co/BhsyWvH )


{1} https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2015/06/global-gag-rule-and-fights-over-funding-unfpa-issues-wont-go-away
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Donald Trump Reinstates R...