Saudi Arabia Warns of Economic Fallout if Congress Passes 9/11 Bill
Source: New York Times
WASHINGTON Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration and members of Congress that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The Obama administration has lobbied Congress to block the bills passage, according to administration officials and congressional aides from both parties, and the Saudi threats have been the subject of intense discussions in recent weeks between lawmakers and officials from the State Department and the Pentagon. The officials have warned senators of diplomatic and economic fallout from the legislation.
Adel al-Jubeir, the Saudi foreign minister, delivered the kingdoms message personally last month during a trip to Washington, telling lawmakers that Saudi Arabia would be forced to sell up to $750 billion in treasury securities and other assets in the United States before they could be in danger of being frozen by American courts.
Several outside economists are skeptical that the Saudis will follow through, saying that such a sell-off would be difficult to execute and would end up crippling the kingdoms economy. But the threat is another sign of the escalating tensions between Saudi Arabia and the United States.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/16/world/middleeast/saudi-arabia-warns-ofeconomic-fallout-if-congress-passes-9-11-bill.html?mwrsm=Email
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)1) They won't do it. It's self-injurious. It would hurt Saudi Arabia vastly more than it would hurt us - after all, our assets would still be in the market, and Saudi Arabia will have basically burned its treasury. it will have also burned bridges - a show of bad faith like that is a big warning sign for anyone else looking to do business with them.
2) They can't, logistically. it takes a pretty long time to find buyers for seven hundred billion in assets.
3) fuck Saudi Arabia. Mostly this.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)We'll take our chances on this one. I'm guessing the Waltons and China would scarf up the bargain basement sales. Go for it, you disgusting swine.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Fuck these assholes.
christx30
(6,241 posts)economic terrorism.
Just sayin'.
Rod Beauvex
(564 posts)Response to MowCowWhoHow III (Original post)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)This is why Cornyn is the co-sponsor and Schumer is a Wall Street Toady. They are hurting real bad down here right now. Once again the action is all about oil and not the victims and the fact that 9/11 gave us the Patriot Act and Homeland Security.
If we get facts as to exactly who funded and protected these terrorists, then we address it based on that. This is a transparent attempt to get the Saudis to restrict their oil production to raise prices.
The politicians make their Donors happy and look patriotic doing it. Once again the victims of 9/11 are being used for political gain! These assholes have zero shame!
TeamPooka
(24,225 posts)rpannier
(24,329 posts)Pass it
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)to stop selling them weapons and US soldiers discontinue being their mercenaries.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Not threaten to do it, but DO it.
paulthompson
(2,398 posts)If they're not to blame at all, why should they care if this bill passes or not? Their extreme reactions speaks volumes.
LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)Lunabell
(6,080 posts)They were complicit!
Stevepol
(4,234 posts)not from the ruling class necessarily but from some cabal or group close to the monarchs in some way. Why else were nearly all the criminals who pulled off 9/11 Saudis?
The fundamentalist Wahabism that has taken over the Saudi brand of Islam is causing a lot of stuff under the cover of a primarily peaceful religion. It's like the racism in the American South that caused so many murders of blacks thru the years using Christianity as a disguise to keep Southerners from doing anything much about it.
Wounded Bear
(58,651 posts)The physical location of the plotters is kind of immaterial but ObL was a Saudi prince and 19 of 21 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi nationals. No connection there.
The Saudis have been backing terrorists in the ME based on that Wahhabi fundamentalism for many years.
We tolerated (and basically supported) them because of oil profits, plain and simple. The comparison with religious-covered racist terrorism in the American south is spot on.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)To snuff out any rebellion by the Peasant's,they allowed the Wahhabist's to do their thing. Well,that is not working out to well,now it is all about saving their collective asses.
StoneCarver
(249 posts)Why would they care about a law that simply held the guilty responsible? This seems like further proof of something they want to hide. If Americans knew what was in the redacted part of the 9/11 report, we would have gone to war with the real perpetrators.
Stonecarver
Egg Zac Lee ...... if they were not involved then why are they so worried?
jpak
(41,757 posts)yup
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)malthaussen
(17,194 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Of course, they'd have to dip into their hoards.
Akicita
(1,196 posts)people in the second biggest attack ever on American soil. Can you imagine FDR trying to cover up any Japanese involvement in Pearl Harbor and just blaming it on a group of terrorists?
We need to demand that all those involved or responsible for 911 be brought to justice no matter who they are. What a weak, weak country we are sometimes.
Coventina
(27,116 posts)Fuck you and your terrorist regime.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I'd like to send them my regards at about 3500ft/sec.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,186 posts)While we're at it, we'll buy oil from someone else.
matt819
(10,749 posts)In a sense, the 9/11 attacks were acts of economic terrorism. This threat is a far more overt act of economic terrorism.
My response? Release the redacted 28 pages, pass and sign the bill in question, and let the chips fall where they may. In short, call their bluff. No oil. No weapons. Remove bases from Saudi Arabia and states of adjacent allies. Let them deal with the shit storm that the Middle East. And when the proverbial shit hits the fan, I want that photo of George W. Bush french kissing (okay, holding the hand of) the Saudi King. They're the ones responsible for whatever ensues.
I for one am fed up with dancing around this for almost two decades.
arikara
(5,562 posts)And this would be why the Saudis were all flown out when every other plane was grounded everywhere.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)They have bought huge tracts of land in the US southwest to grow crops using area aquifers; crops that are shipped back to Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia grows alfalfa hay in both states for shipment back to its domestic dairy herds. In another real-life example of the world's interconnected economy, the Saudis increasingly look to produce animal feed overseas in order to save water in their own territory, most of which is desert.
Privately held Fondomonte California on Sunday announced that it bought 1,790 acres of farmland in Blythe, California an agricultural town along the Colorado River for nearly $32 million. Two years ago, Fondomont's parent company, Saudi food giant Almarai, purchased another 10,000 acres of farmland about 50 miles away in Vicksburg, Arizona, for around $48 million.
But not everyone likes the trend. The alfalfa exports are tantamount to "exporting water," because in Saudi Arabia, "they have decided that it's better to bring feed in rather than to empty their water reserves," said Keith Murfield, CEO of United Dairymen of Arizona, a Tempe-based dairy cooperative whose members also buy alfalfa. "This will continue unless there's regulations put on it."
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/15/saudi-arabia-buying-up-farmland-in-us-southwest.html
I say fuck 'em--seize their US land and let them eat their oil...
Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)pistachio farms there as well, making them more pricier on us. Best pistachio production world wide
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)turbinetree
(24,695 posts)call their bluff...............................if you have nothing to hide, why scream with the threats........................ why the threats? Its a real simple answer............
if you are involved Saud Government, then someone should be held accountable.......................hand them over.............................threats-----------------really
.
We the people run this government, we are not a "kingdom", some may think so.
We don't like to have our democratically elected government interfered with, especially from a foreign government and if this leads to the completion of the Bush War Crime team-------------------so be it---------------------they will finally go to the Hague and anyone else involved.........................
Sell your assets and securities go away........................................
Honk---------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Which must have be difficult, while the owner of said firm is Chairing Hillary Clinton's campaign.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)We ought to pull out of every military base in that country and cancel every arms contract first thing on Monday morning.
And if they get attacked... applaud.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)So Obama will veto it if passed? Whose side is he on?
reddread
(6,896 posts)if ever a can of whoop ass needed opened.
We need to correct this entanglement.
cprise
(8,445 posts)tclambert
(11,085 posts)of providing any support for the 9/11 terrorists. Because that's what innocent people do, is threaten to retaliate for having their innocence revealed.
Chemisse
(30,811 posts)Not only did we fail to attack them (in favor of Afghanistan, and then Iraq), but we are going to cower in our boots over the fear that we will lose assets?
Sometimes it's really embarrassing to be an American.
BigBearJohn
(11,410 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Maybe in rem against property but it would have to be property in the US. Owned by the Saudi government, not just random Saudis and Saudi companies.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Evil bastards.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Carter told us 40 years ago that it would be foolish to pour money into the middle east - he tried
Bush organized opec and got them to kill our economy - and now here we are
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)750 billion is only 1.2% of the total U.S. equity and bond market combined. It often fluctuates more than that on a daily basis and no one on DU even notices....because it doesn't matter.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)to the Saudis...PISS OFF...
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Their sponsorship of terrorism is catching up to them.
DinahMoeHum
(21,786 posts)Fuck the KSA and those diaper-heads who call themselves the royal family.
Jeb Bartlet
(141 posts)Considering that almost all of the 911 hijackers were Saudis and that they got help from Saudi government officials to get flight training in the US they should be scared. Perhaps an embargo is in order for Saudi Arabia.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I said a hit to my retirement was worth W losing, didn't work, hit anyway.
Nevertheless, can afford another hit for these jerks to get theirs.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)No matter how big your castle is.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)I'm hoping they trip on their nightgowns and we don't hear from them again....only plane to leave on 9/11 the Saudi's.....family of Osama.
glinda
(14,807 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)AxionExcel
(755 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Seems silly to me for any of our Elected (our RW republicans?) to draft a Federal bill to try to 'attach'* trillions in costs of 9/11 to ANY country.
*attach means shut down all banking for the 'attached' Country across the entire USA. Can understand why SA would be pissed off and why Obama would never sign such a bill.
Republicans waste so much time on their stupid showboat bills.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)A bunch of backward bedouin barbarians who got lucky with oil.