Clinton to launch Asian-American voter effort in California
Source: cbsnews.com
By Hannah Fraser-Chanpong CBS News January 2, 2016, 2:55 PM
Clinton to launch Asian-American voter effort in California
Democratic presidential candidate and former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during the 2015 United States Conference of Mayors on June 20, 2015 in San Francisco, California.
Justin Sullivan, Getty Images
NEW YORK -- Hillary Clinton is set to return to California next week to kick off "Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders for Hillary."
The event, which will take place in San Gabriel on Thursday, will be the first in a series designed to "engage, energize and organize AAPI voters," according to a statement by the campaign. Joining Clinton in San Gabriel will be "dozens" of Asian-American and Pacific Islander elected officials, like Rep. Judy Chu and local community leaders.
The launch follows similar efforts by Clinton's campaign to rally African-American and Latino voters behind their candidate. In October, at the colorful and music-filled launch of "Latinos for Hillary" in San Antonio, Clinton cast herself as the singular candidate ready to represent the unique needs of the Latino community, far beyond Election Day. ......................
Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-asian-american-voter-effort-california/
Hillary and her wonder Team--never taking anything for granted.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)The Asian American Legal Foundation takes an opposite position on affirmative action in the case of UT's policy than it seems the Clinton campaign does. They filed a SCOTUS brief arguing that affirmative action is often racist against asians.
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/14-981-tsac-AALF-et-al..pdf
JI7
(89,249 posts)Than the hispanic vote. Same goes for most democrats who support affirmative action. Asians vote dem more than hispanics do.
For most Asians things like public funding for schools and other things are more important than affirmative action.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)It doesn't help that Asians have to fight to be fairly treated, such as:
http://www.mercurynews.com/education/ci_25363174/california-asian-americans-show-strength-blocking-affirmative-action
See also:
http://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/fall-2015-questions-race/coloring-lines-how-racially-diverse-should-elite
Also priceonomics discussed the issue:
http://priceonomics.com/post/48794283011/do-elite-colleges-discriminate-against-asians
Here's the list of organizations that joined AALF in supporting AALF's brief.
JI7
(89,249 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)JI7
(89,249 posts)And more Asians vote democratic them hispanics do.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Here are a few translations for 'grandmother'..
Mandarin - lao lao
Japanese- obaasan
Korean- halmoni
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)old episodes of "The Little Rascals" for tips on how to best to appeal to this demographic?
"Bonanza" re-runs, maybe? A Jerry Lewis movie or two?
This should be interesting (I won't say "good," because I'm already wincing in anticipation).
JI7
(89,249 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)of her 2008 success with Asian-American voters?
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)over Obama. And CA Latinos by 2 - 1 for Hillary.
That was interesting, thanks.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-chang/why-latinos-and-asian-ame_b_85359.html
In California, while Obama took a plurality of white voters (including
white males) and the overwhelming majority of African American voters,
Hillary won the popular vote by 8 points. So how did Hillary make her
10% margin of victory? A big part of the answer was in the Latino and
Asian American votes. A CNN exit poll last night indicated that Latinos
in California went for Hillary by a 2-1 margin, and Asian Americans
went for her 3-1. Democratic polls showed Hillary winning Latinos by
3-1.
bvf
(6,604 posts)is pretty common knowledge, I thought.
What did you think of his take, further down in the piece, about the possibility that the same Asian-American demographic may be growing less emergent, and therefore less susceptible to Clinton's 2008 top-down appeal to community leaders?
This (along with Chang's notice of Obama's gaffe and failure to establish a timely grassroots campaign structure in the state) was what I found interesting:
When that power is unleashed, it will be unpredictable. The 1.5 generation, young Latino and Asian Americans from the ages of 16-40 who were born elsewhere but raised multilingual and multicultural in the U.S., represents a massive demographic bulge in those communities only beginning to feel itself. Before long, they will turn their communities' emergent vote into an insurgent vote. And then the country will really discover not just the necessity of the Latino and Asian American vote, but what it is that they really want.
Emphasis mine.
Clinton's not likely to have as easy a time of it as she did in 2008. Not by a long shot.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)Democratic, and will likely remain so for a very long time because of
Reep immigration demagoguery. But they also tend to be more mainstream
and conservative. Remember that, to the great embarrassment of many
Asian Americans, it was the influential Chinese American Democratic
Club in San Francisco that sponsored anti-affirmative attacks on the
prestigious Lowell High School. It's also possible Obama's call for
change is received differently even among dissatisfied immigrants. Who
better understands the disruption and dislocation that change can
bring?
So I guess we'll find out.
bvf
(6,604 posts)a hell of a lot better among Asian-American voters than Obama ultimately did. While Obama was outpolled by 3 to 1 in the 2008 primary, Sanders had reduced that to 2 to 1 by last September, and June is a long way off.
So, despite Chang's observation that California's Asian Democratic voters tend to be more conservative (interestingly, he fails to say in comparison to whom--Democrats nationally? California Democrats? Asian voters nationally?), Sanders has definitely improved on Obama's performance. That's encouraging.
https://news.usc.edu/86115/trump-and-clinton-lead-presidential-contenders-in-california/
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)On the goal, can't be deflected onto subjects and lose sight of our goal. Ever onward.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)on the mother's side.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)So this is a smart, if obvious, step.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-chang/why-latinos-and-asian-ame_b_85359.html
Among Latino and Asian American circles, Super Tuesday brought a sense
of giddiness. Thanks to the central importance of California to the
primary elections, here was a chance to not just be heard, but to be
recognized as a voting bloc right up there with the privileged masses
of Iowa or New Hampshire. Boy, did they make some noise.
In California, while Obama took a plurality of white voters (including
white males) and the overwhelming majority of African American voters,
Hillary won the popular vote by 8 points. So how did Hillary make her
10% margin of victory? A big part of the answer was in the Latino and
Asian American votes. A CNN exit poll last night indicated that Latinos
in California went for Hillary by a 2-1 margin, and Asian Americans
went for her 3-1. Democratic polls showed Hillary winning Latinos by
3-1.