Hillary Clinton tells Bernie Sanders backers: ‘When this nomination is wrapped up,’ join me
Source: washingtonpost
Hillary Clinton tells Bernie Sanders backers: When this nomination is wrapped up, join me
By Abby Phillip December 22 at 8:22 PM
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484
Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton meets with Iowa voters at Keota Junior Senior High School during a town hall in Keota, Iowa, on Tuesday, Dec. 22, 2015. (Photo by Melina Mara/The Washington Post)
FAIRFIELD, IOWA -- Among supporters of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, suspicions that the game is rigged against their candidate went into overdrive this past week -- no thanks to the public endorsement of that theory from Sanders himself.
On Tuesday in Iowa, Clinton did little to change the perception that she's running for president as if her primary is already over.
Asked by an audience member what she would say to disillusioned Sanders supporters, Clinton had a tough message.
"I think it's very dangerous to look at the alternatives and believe that your staying home is a responsible choice," Clinton said. "It's hard for me to believe that anybody who would support Senator Sanders would want to see any of the Republicans elected president of the United States.
"I would just ask that when this nomination is wrapped up that they come and join with us to make sure that we don't turn the White House back over to the Republicans," she added......................
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/12/22/hillary-clinton-tells-bernie-sanders-backers-when-this-nomination-is-wrapped-up-join-me/
Nice cordial invite. Love her confidence.
Enjoy.....
jalan48
(14,131 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)No youth vote vs: a fired up anti Hillary crowd
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)have the fix in, you don't have to worry about things.
Alerted upon in three, two ...
Cal33
(7,018 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)the presumptiousness and arrogance is what is going to keep some Sanders' folks from voting for her IF she wins. "Join me because there is no other choice" - that's what it sounds like to me and I don't play that game anymore.
jalan48
(14,131 posts)He's not a particularly political person but he sees through the Republican BS. I was surprised by his opinion about Hillary. He said Hillary represents the entrenched political establishment and that she lies. He said he thought Bernie would do a better job of dealing with climate change-something he sees as happening and that is non-debatable.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,469 posts)cstanleytech
(26,761 posts)and if the Hillary supporters or the Bernie supporters behave in a childish and irresponsible manner and dont show up to vote because their preferred candidate doesnt win the nomination we will all lose because it will literally hand the win to the Republicans.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)there are more than a few who prefer to let their emotions overrule their common sense. I
read that as many as 14% of Democrats feel that way! This is Democratic suicide! This is
self-destruct!!!
okasha
(11,573 posts)And a fair proportion of them are ratfuckers who have no intention of voting for any Democratic candidate.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Can you pinky-swear that you will not?
riversedge
(71,919 posts)past. She would not ever have an Independent run.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Look, it's simple enough.
Sanders has promised he will not run as an independnet. clinton has not.
In 2008, Clinton supporters proved themselves far more loyal to candidate than party, to the point clinton herself had to reign them in.
Since 2014, conservative DU'ers have been demanding that progressives swear blood-oaths of party loyalty no matter what.
So I think it's only fair to ask if you'll stay on the ship even if clinton jumps. You can tell me it's a long shot, and that's fair, all I want is to know that you're on board with us even if you're wrong about that.
cstanleytech
(26,761 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility. if Clinton loses the nomination ,and if she runs as independent, I would like to know her supporters are sticking with the Democratic party nominee. After all, it's been asked of me often enough, I figure it's only fair to reciprocate.
A straw man is a wholly different thing from speculation. Like, if I had taken Riversedge's deflection as a declaration that she would join Clinton in an independent run. That would be a straw man.
riversedge
(71,919 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)intelligent DU posters here (his/her support for Sanders aside) and s/he knows Hillary Clinton will win the Democratic Party nomination.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Joe-dious is a disgrace. HRC is a status-quo politician. If HRC had been the VP candidate in 2000 she would have kicked Al in the nuts if he didn't fight.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)So basically do as you're told, follow the ceremonies, no independent thinking, cause that's what it sounds like to me.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)under any circumstances. I do not want her presidency on my conscience.
She is not qualified to be president. She has very poor judgment.
Have you watched Amy Goodman's interview with Seymour Hersh on the ISIS situation.
We were giving arms to the "moderates" in Syria and Hersh says they ended up with ISIS.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Hillary is unacceptable. Period. End of story.
Fortunately, my state's a lock for whoever the Democrat nominee is. I can, if I so choose, skip the presidential vote on my ballot with a clear conscience (wouldn't be the first time...). While I think the Electoral College is a ludicrous, anti-democratic anachronism, the fact that I live in a "winner take all" state affords a bit of freedom.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)She's a pragmatist, she's not into nailing jello to a tree.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)She'd still be a power player in the party, but if she runs as an Independent, that all goes away. Like I said, she's a pragmatist and there's no way she'd screw her own party just for revenge. Even those people who don't like Clinton because they think her only core principle is "What's best for me?" would have to admit there's not enough in it for her just to play spoiler.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,358 posts)Don't complain when we do the same.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)he has never made such an assuming and arrogant comment
FloridaBlues
(4,300 posts)He alittle ahead of himself too
Both candidates need all of us as I suspect they will in the long run
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)it is a fine line between positivity and arrogance. and i am sure arrogance is in the eye of the beholder.
generally, i like primary candidates to stick to the primary race until its over
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Lol "wrapped up" ? Talk about a "Let's get this shit over with" kind of comment. lol
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)and smear my way to the nomination I hope you won't think less of me."
riversedge
(71,919 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 23, 2015, 05:49 AM - Edit history (1)
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)How DID you do that?
Response to Scootaloo (Reply #21)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Response to Scootaloo (Reply #26)
Name removed Message auto-removed
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Top Definition
Wrop
A cooler, more gangsta way of saying "stop"
Girl: Wrop it!
Guy: I have wropped!
I swear!
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Wrop&defid=5243572
INdemo
(6,998 posts)louder than Howard Dean's.
As the corporate media looks on in total shock,Bernie Sanders walks away with the Prize.
Go Bernie !!!!
deathrind
(1,786 posts)To put it but she couldn't do that. Had she not answered with hubristic confidence the headlines tomorrow would have read something like "HRC not sure she can win" or "Sanders campaign has HRC lacking confidence to win" or some such other nonsense. This way she just looks arogant and it's a dead issue as opposed to the numerous questions if she did not answer that way.
Kind of a damned if you do damned if you don't scenario.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)our best interest or we can vote against our best interest, deciding not to vote is against ourselves. It is about having unity and electing Democrats on every level to get the team in office which can help working Americans.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)A vote for HRC is a vote for war, a vote for Wall Street, a vote for the TPP, a vote for the surveillance state, a vote against bank regulation and/or financial reform.
I will vote for down-ballot candidates and skip the presidential.
840high
(17,196 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)keep us from voting as it is.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Is HRC.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)HRC is making a big portion of the electorate pissed with her arrogant presumption. She is about as good at politics as I am at toe dancing.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)it is a reflection on her as a candidate, not me as a voter.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)If a voter has a choice between a Republican and a Democrat who acts like a Republican, he'll vote for the Republican every time."
ybbor
(1,583 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)AngryOldDem
(14,118 posts)I'm really not so sure about that.
I'm not voting blindly anymore.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)I have watched her interaction with people, I have looked how she responds to people's concerns, I do not make my decision blindly.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I can't think of a single reason to do that.
earthside
(6,960 posts)And ... her words are arrogant and betray the sense of entitlement she has for the Democratic Party nomination for President.
How about a bit of respect for the small 'd' democratic process?
A little full of herself, maybe?
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)from The Devil Wears Prada.
I'm surprised that Clinton didn't say her demeaning little line, wave away the crowd and say, "That's all."
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)nt
dflprincess
(28,341 posts)other than that you're not as scary as the Republicans.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and we've still got six weeks before the first state primary. And in that first state primary, she's dealing with a single digit lead. She used to have a 59.2 percent lead in Iowa.
Clinton isn't trying to win us over. She's trying to denigrate Sanders, his supporters and his entire campaign--by lecturing us about the importance of eventually voting for her.
Dismissing and belittling the supporters of a formidable and worthy opponent doesn't exactly win friends and influence people.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Alert on three, two ...
LS_Editor
(893 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Response to riversedge (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
geomon666
(7,512 posts)And welcome to DU.
yuiyoshida
(42,244 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Tue Dec 22, 2015, 10:57 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
This Bernie supporter doesn't think so.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1295058
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
advocating voting for a 3rd party candidate if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination; that's still against the rules here I believe
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Dec 22, 2015, 11:05 PM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: you could be banned for this, it happened to a few people already
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This is Democratic Underground, not 3rd Party Underground. Clear TOS violation.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Each person is entitled to their vote whether we agree with their choice or not. I can't believe that this person's opinion will change anyone's vote here.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Violation of the TOS.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I took a minute and looked at some of The Boss's other (very few) posts here at DU. I have come to the conclusion after careful inspection that he is both a troll and a returning sock. Who might have been PPR'd on or about Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:21 PM? I would ask MIRT to please check this poster and do what needs doing. This is inappropriate conversation and it should be hidden so MIRT can do their job and investigate this person.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)XemaSab
(60,212 posts)n/t
the_phantom_dennis
(28 posts)But if Bernie or Martin turn out to be the nominee, I'll be there for them, too.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)This race isn't over, and if DWS and DNC and Hillary would quit planning for her coronation and really work to make sure the rest of us think the game isn't rigged and our candidates are being given a fair chance, then she could be assured everyone would join her IF she wins the nomination.
Failing that, don't count on it.
One thing people don't take into account is just how far down people feel after decades of being pounded down by Democratic and Republican policies a lot. They may not feel "they have much to lose". OK, OK, OK, I can just feel your brain explode, saying something like "Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Supreme Court". Yeah, but people often vote and act and do everything with their emotions, and frankly, that's something I actually really like about people.
So, how about, since you're riding high in the polls and doing well in the debates and so on, how about giving all those people complaining the benefit of the doubt and do something close to what they're asking for for a change?
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)Never mind the race not being over, the FIRST primary vote has not yet been cast. Hillary is way (WAY) ahead of herself here.
-app
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 23, 2015, 02:38 AM - Edit history (1)
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)'we might lose' and how this. Odd, stupid and odd.
BeyondGeography
(39,745 posts)No upside; just pisses people off.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)We'll have to see what effect it has. Some on DU would like to believe she is perfect, but she isn't. She is a flawed politician.
colsohlibgal
(5,276 posts)If it is Hillary and whatever stooge the republicans trot out....Jill Stein of the Green Party would be so much closer to my beliefs than HRC.
It just keeps getting harder to vote for not nearly good enough to thwart truly evil.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)If you buy things like I do then you and I are the evil.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)One of her biggest flaws is she thinks she is owed the job.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I'm kind of shocked that she wouldn't display just a tad bit of humility.
I mean, we've heard the whole, "Hello...its me. I'm inevitable" schtick in 2008, and that turned out to be a bust.
Does she not realize that speaking as if she's inevitable *again* makes her appear foolish?
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)thesquanderer
(12,231 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 23, 2015, 03:01 PM - Edit history (1)
...that one of the perceptions she's trying to avoid is that she feels like her nomination is inevitable.
If she was trying to ingratiate herself to Sanders supporters, well, I have a feeling she did the opposite. Heck, she comes off so badly here, I'm surprised it wasn't posted in the Sanders group!
Monk06
(7,675 posts)If it ain't my candidate then burn the crops and kill the livestock
Really Hil and Bern would kill the GOP for a decade
He doesn't work well with others. He uses Denmark as an example of his kind of socialism, which is ironic, as they are a parliamentary democracy with eight political parties, and bipartisanship (multipartisanship?) is key to governing such a country. Bernie traditionally has had no party, and has never had a need for compromise or leadership.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)and if you're trying to tout your queen here, you have failed. You might post just how he has nothing in his background to show for his fifty years of diligent effort. He didn't get where he was because of a celebrated spouse. Her starting point was bill's election. We would not be talking about or even know her without bill. That is incontrovertible.
enid602
(8,850 posts)She's paid her dues.
Furrfu
(32 posts)How, exactly, did she pay her dues?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)He co-founded it, was elected as the first Chairperson of that caucus and remains today among that caucus as the only Senatorial member. How does a person organize such a thing if they don't work well with others? For that matter, how does a person run successful Congressional runs every two years if they don't work well with others? How could a person who does not work well with others keep getting so much support from others? Why did those others promote him to the Senate?
Such a vapid bit of nonsense you have posted.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i can see it now
"hillary: not a republican"
way to lower the bar
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Stuckinthebush
(10,978 posts)The math isn't with Sanders. It's a long shot. Are you willing to put good money on the outcome?
Most seasoned gamblers would say, "hell, no".
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Everyone has opinions. You have yours, I have mine. We don't even know for sure who will still be in the race by primary time.
maggies farm
(79 posts)it kinda sucks that Elizabeth Warren will be the first woman president. Not me I am very excited.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Of course, we might have to go through 4-8 years of GOP hell if Hillary wins the primary and then loses the general. the smart vote goes to Bernie Sanders in the primary.
PSPS
(13,965 posts)Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)The hubris.....the hubris...
[IMG][/IMG]
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)sure she is of herself.
excerpt from above:
""I would just ask that when this nomination is wrapped up that they come and join with us to make sure that we don't turn the White House back over to the Republicans," she added."
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I wouldn't have a problem if Bernie said it. This isn't a road show of don Quixote any of the 3 will have to ask for the others to support them.
Volaris
(10,439 posts)She's not the nominee YET.
Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)she isn't asking, she's expecting. If she wants our support, she should earn it instead of offering a no-win scenario with, "Well, I'm better than that guy."
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)I will never trust Debbie's gal-pal. Because Debbie already makes me feel like the GOP is coming for me.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)not the sort of stuff I'd expect from a Democratic politician at this point in the game
truthisfreedom
(23,283 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Cha
(302,367 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)For the next time anyone denies that her campaign is planning anything but a coronation.
AngryOldDem
(14,118 posts)...when she thought she would wipe the floor with Obama in the primaries.
One does not count one's chickens before they hatch.
NOT the way to win votes or influence voters, IMO.
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)"Who else you gonna vote for, suckers?"
Vinca
(50,698 posts)I'll have to hold my nose and pull the lever if it's between her and Trump. It would be in her favor to be a bit more humble about it all.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)She's gonna lose this for all of us.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)No doubt about it.
Stuckinthebush
(10,978 posts)He will come out and support her with word and deed. He will stump for her. Why? Because Sanders isn't a fool.
And, yes, DU will explode the day he does that. It'll be interesting to watch.
Gary 50
(386 posts)in wishing Bernie a successful presidency.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)https://go.berniesanders.com/page/s/lower_rx_costs
ALL primary candidates use non-conditional assumptive statements about winning. Rhetoric 101.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)...another candidate. See the difference?
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)An HRC partisan could just as easily say "not all primary candidates use assumptive statements that they will win not one but two elections". All people running for president must assume they can win, in public at least, and in the primary stage that by definition means with the support of all primary candidates' fans.
CrispyQ
(37,512 posts)Javaman
(62,848 posts)let's just wait and see shall we?
another reason I don't like her.
Township75
(3,535 posts)Lay down their swords, bend their knees, and take their oaths before the March to fight the final battle Against the great evil army.
4dsc
(5,787 posts)EOM.
vishnura
(276 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Just like in 2008.
Remind me again what happened?
Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)it should be the other way around. She works for us, remember? Her job is to join us. Give us a reason and then we can talk.
Silly me, I thought this was a representative democracy.