Senate panel slashes Pakistan aid over conviction of doctor who helped US get Osama bin Laden
Source: Washington Post
WASHINGTON A Senate panel expressed its outrage over the conviction of a Pakistani doctor who helped the U.S. get Osama bin Laden by slashing aid by $33 million $1 million for every year of the doctors 33-year sentence.
The Appropriations Committee approved the amendment 30-0 on Thursday as Republicans and Democrats widely criticized Pakistans conviction of Shakil Afridi for high treason a day earlier. Afridi ran a vaccination program for the CIA to collect DNA and verify bin Ladens presence at the compound in the town of Abbottabad where U.S. commandos killed the al-Qaida leader in May 2011.
The United States has called for Afridi to be released.
The vote came on a $52 billion foreign aid budget for next year.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal_government/senate-panel-slashes-pakistan-aid-over-conviction-of-doctor-who-helped-us-get-osama-bin-laden/2012/05/24/gJQAeheNnU_story.html
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)$33 million is Pakistan's one day heroin revenue. Won't make a dent.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)I would have slashed the figure a long time ago with the knowledge that the ISI (Pakistan's secret police) support the Taliban. Their reaction to the bin Laden raid just underscores that they in no way consider themselves friends of the US.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,076 posts)... taking the other $.4 billion via the Foreign Exchange of the New York Federal Reserve.
Just a thought.
may3rd
(593 posts)if we don't pay off the highway robers and their handlers to NOT attack NATO supplies.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)razorman
(1,644 posts)but we are giving it to India, instead.
may3rd
(593 posts)ISI and military will still get their cuts. The "winning hearts and minds" free medical care clinics will suffer.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Why should we continue the aid when they are using tactics to prevent the US from getting those like bin Laden. Why should we continue aid to Pakistan when they refuse to allow our military to remove our troops using their routes. When they give nothing, then they will get nothing.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Because the cooperation of Pakistan is essential to our interests in Afghanistan.
Kinda of a quandary, isn't it?
Ah, the complications of empire.
We should do whatever we can to get him his freedom and out of that country.
rollin74
(1,973 posts)rayofreason
(2,259 posts)I wanted to divide 20 billion (total since 2002) by 33 million so to post the shocking low %... but I keep screwing up all the zeros. That's way to many zeros.
One of the few things I liked about Ron Paul (which I REALLY liked) was his idea to cut off all foreign aid, spend the money locally. Imagine 20 B spent putting the rust belt to work making wind mills.
How much good will does it generate to build up one country's army, when we do the same for their enemy?
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)I'm pretty sure that the administration is negotiating with the Pakistani government for the doctor and his family to come to the US. If not, we can always send in Mittens' sons, and sons of the GOP party and have Chuck Norris as the team leader to swoop in and grab the doctor and his family.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)sad sally
(2,627 posts)safe haven in the US. But no, they're on their own - no special visas, no concern if they're displaced, in hiding or dead.
may3rd
(593 posts)I see no reason history will not repeat.
lsewpershad
(2,620 posts)cutting financial assistance to some ot the most despicable regimes...around the world like Israel, Columbia, Honduras etc.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)may3rd
(593 posts)WHo got the $$$ ?
Wold Health Organization ?