Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 03:45 AM Nov 2015

Clinton's Mixing of 9/11 and Wall Street Raises Ire

Last edited Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:08 AM - Edit history (1)

Source: ABC News

Hillary Rodham Clinton defended her campaign contributions from Wall Street by invoking her work to help the financial sector rebuild after the Sept. 11 attacks, raising eyebrows among her Democratic challengers and Republicans alike.

During Saturday's second Democratic debate, Clinton was put on the defensive by rival Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders when he said Wall Street had been the major contributor to her campaigns. "Now maybe they're dumb and they don't know what they're going to get, but I don't think so," he said.

Clinton responded that she was representing New York in the Senate when downtown Manhattan was attacked and noted that she helped the city's financial hub rebuild. "That was good for New York and it was good for the economy and it was a way to rebuke the terrorists who had attacked our country," she said, her voice rising.

Her response drew an incredulous response on social media sites like Twitter, and the debate's moderators asked Clinton to respond to one Twitter user, who took issue with her mention of 9/11 to justify the contributions.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/clintons-mixing-911-wall-street-raises-ire-35213655



Comment: Will Hillary apologize for deeply offensive comments invoking 9/11 to explain her Wall St. money?
51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton's Mixing of 9/11 and Wall Street Raises Ire (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 OP
Bernie finally landed a punch flamingdem Nov 2015 #1
The media was unable to protect Hillary OakCliffDem Nov 2015 #16
With a gag and heavy sedation... paleotn Nov 2015 #22
We should be proud mikehiggins Nov 2015 #2
Cenk said this was PLANNED.... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2015 #3
CNN talking heads said the same -- it was planned. grasswire Nov 2015 #4
Now watch her continue to use it. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2015 #6
Planned? Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2015 #5
I'll have to watch it again. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2015 #7
Here - here is the segment again: start at 0:45 for the set up question progree Nov 2015 #11
More seriously (perhaps), progree Nov 2015 #13
Cenk:" ..as Republican a trick as I've seen in any debate." nt antigop Nov 2015 #33
TYT pundits say, " it sounds like the terrorists attacked NYC to attack Wall St." wordpix Nov 2015 #34
Wait a minute passiveporcupine Nov 2015 #42
Maybe he had her vote for the TARP bailout in mind. progree Nov 2015 #43
Let's put it this way passiveporcupine Nov 2015 #44
I only included the clip for the Hillary quote in the debate progree Nov 2015 #45
Lol! Stardust Nov 2015 #27
Unforced fault. longship Nov 2015 #8
i miss snagglepuss... restorefreedom Nov 2015 #20
I love Snagglepuss! redwitch Nov 2015 #28
This is the best I could find. Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #47
The Paris attacks definitely shifted her team's strategy TiberiusB Nov 2015 #23
More like prepped, imo, though that could be a distinction without a difference Babel_17 Nov 2015 #25
Fuck Hillary Depaysement Nov 2015 #9
+1! Enthusiast Nov 2015 #10
+1000000000 Major Hogwash Nov 2015 #12
+1 nt Live and Learn Nov 2015 #14
+1000 nt Plucketeer Nov 2015 #24
+1000000000 SoapBox Nov 2015 #30
..... bigwillq Nov 2015 #31
...^ that 840high Nov 2015 #37
Amen! +1,000,000 n/t Hepburn Nov 2015 #51
Hillary's Existence Raises Ire of Right Wingers Democat Nov 2015 #15
Wall Street funds both sides. jalan48 Nov 2015 #17
The workers of ground zero Geronimoe Nov 2015 #18
Exactly. But it seems the urge to go all Gulliani was too much for her peacebird Nov 2015 #19
That's not so. Beacool Nov 2015 #41
Hillary should rid herself of the odor of Wall Street campaign contributions by NCjack Nov 2015 #21
Excellent suggestion Stardust Nov 2015 #29
+1. Nt JudyM Nov 2015 #39
I missed this Omaha Steve Nov 2015 #26
Is it just my faulty memory, or is this not the first time she's used that lame excuse for her Wall Stardust Nov 2015 #32
I believe she'll "evolve" on that comment. EndElectoral Nov 2015 #35
Way to go, Hillary! chapdrum Nov 2015 #36
I wasn't offended by her comment because I remember what went down in the aftermath of 9/11. Beacool Nov 2015 #38
Seems the point she was looking to make is that the contributions are retroactive gratitude JudyM Nov 2015 #40
Disgusting billhicks76 Nov 2015 #46
Elizabeth Warren gives example of Hillary Clinton being beholden to Wall Street Jarqui Nov 2015 #48
This was pretty much the only take away from the debate that got any amount of coverage on the news Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #49
that's what I'd expect a Republican to say yurbud Nov 2015 #50

OakCliffDem

(1,274 posts)
16. The media was unable to protect Hillary
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 07:54 AM
Nov 2015

In the next debate the moderators will not allow Bernie an opportunity to expose Hillary that way.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
2. We should be proud
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 04:06 AM
Nov 2015

Tonight three grown-ups talked about issues that matter. What a shining difference from those other guys and their CLown Cavalcade. You may support Clinton (I don't), or Bernie (my guy) or Martin O'Malley but whoever you want to see in the WHite House ANY ONE OF THEM are head and shoulders over the best the GOP has to offer. Good for us and too bad for them.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
3. Cenk said this was PLANNED....
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 04:09 AM
Nov 2015

If that's true than it's Hillary's first major self-inflicted wound of the campaign.

progree

(11,002 posts)
13. More seriously (perhaps),
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 06:31 AM
Nov 2015

It begins right at 0:00. Unfortunately doesn't include the setup question. Its over at 0:27 and the rest is all The Young Turks commentary.

The thread (perhaps one of several threads) where that came from:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251811040

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
34. TYT pundits say, " it sounds like the terrorists attacked NYC to attack Wall St."
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:31 PM
Nov 2015

as if they didn't. Actually, that WAS one of their reasons, trying to bring the financial system of the US to its knees. TYT other points are well taken---mainly, that 9-11 had nothing to do with Wall St. reforms after the 2008 crash caused by banksters.

Not that I'm for Hillary right now---I'm for Bernie.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
42. Wait a minute
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:05 PM
Nov 2015

Cenk is saying her reply was about helping wall street after the finanical collapse?

No...it was not. It was about helping wall street rebuild after the towers were brought down...you know, the twin towers that housed wall street.

Come on guys. I am as against Hillary as anyone for real reasons, but not made-up crap like this.

progree

(11,002 posts)
43. Maybe he had her vote for the TARP bailout in mind.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:18 PM
Nov 2015

Last edited Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:08 PM - Edit history (1)

[font color = red]ON Edit:[/font]That said, it is clear that Hillary's answer (right at the beginning of the tape) was about the rebuilding of Wall Street after the 9/11 attacks, and not about after the financial collapse. And though the Twin Towers are not literally Wall Street in the narrow sense -- the street and the stock exchanges -- the twin towers are definitely what we call part of Wall Street in the sense of NYC's financial district / infrastructure. (and very close by -- about 1/5 mile from the South Tower to the intersection of Wall St. and Broadway).

And TYT was definitely full of it when he said the terrorists didn't attack Wall Street (again in the more usually used broader sense)

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
44. Let's put it this way
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:30 PM
Nov 2015

if we have a valid candiate that we cn support for 'real" reasons, we do not need to participate in phony Hillary Hate tactics. We have real arguments for not wanting her as POTUS.

WE DON'T NEED TO MAKE SHIT UP!

I'm part of the Bernie crowd. Please don't embarrass me.

progree

(11,002 posts)
45. I only included the clip for the Hillary quote in the debate
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:54 PM
Nov 2015

Not as an endorsement of TYT's commentary. I appreciate your clarification of the situation in #42.

Hopefully you saw my earlier edit of #43 where I am agreeing with you that Hillary (in the debate clip) was talking about rebuilding Wall St. after 9/11 (and not the bailouts later), and Cenk very incorrectly saying all this had nothing to do with 9/11.

longship

(40,416 posts)
8. Unforced fault.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 05:26 AM
Nov 2015

Or as Snagglepuss would put it, "Self inflicted Bar-B-Que. She cooked her own goose!"

Heavens to murgatroyd! Exit stage left.

TiberiusB

(490 posts)
23. The Paris attacks definitely shifted her team's strategy
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:41 AM
Nov 2015

The 9/11 call out is clearly part of a plan to try and leverage the panic from 14 years ago into an election win. I suspect that any negative reaction will be brushed aside to win the "independent" voters who are busy crapping their drawers over Paris and waiting for another 9/11 here. Fear is the card in play, now, but will it hold long enough to even impact the first primary?

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
25. More like prepped, imo, though that could be a distinction without a difference
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:57 AM
Nov 2015

I'll guess that it was "only to be used in case of fire". It probably sounded great at the table reading. Anyone notice how a segment of the audience applauded at just the right moment? That kind of suggests it being a scripted comment, with Secretary Clinton having rehearsed how to hit the applause line.

Not to be tedious with that point, but if you notice how that one segment of the audience seemed to appreciate it, you can then see how Clinton's staff was led to believe it was a good response. It's all gold, to their ears.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
9. Fuck Hillary
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 05:28 AM
Nov 2015

I was there, like thousands of others. I walked across the the Brooklyn Bridge with white dust all over my clothes. I remember it all too well.

After 9/11, I went to funerals, not fundraisers.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
30. +1000000000
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:26 PM
Nov 2015

I think it was a planned comment...and how stupid could her lame campaign be to attempt such crap....never, EVER should the horror of 9/11 be used, especially for political gain.

I NEVER want to see her in the White House.

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
18. The workers of ground zero
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 08:52 AM
Nov 2015

It was so obvious that the air was harmful for those working at ground zero. And Hillary remained silent when EPA director Whitman claimed the air was safe. As a Senator of NY she should have protested and protected the workers.

Beacool

(30,257 posts)
41. That's not so.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 04:33 PM
Nov 2015

Hillary was quite vocal about questioning the EPA's claim that the air quality at Ground Zero was within acceptable bounds.

Senator Clinton. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I
especially thank you for holding today's hearing on this very
important topic. I am grateful that we are going to focus on it
because it has been a subject of great concern to me and to my
colleague, Congressman Nadler, who I am delighted is here to
testify on behalf of the tens of thousands of residents of
Lower Manhattan. Congressman Nadler has been a staunch and
unrelenting advocate on behalf of our constituents at and
around Ground Zero who experienced the unthinkable on September
11 and who to this day continue to be faced with issues and
concerns regarding the quality of the air they breathe and the
health and safety of the environment that they and their
families live in.
In the case of the World Trade Center, like so many other
sites around the country, people are faced with very
complicated environmental questions. They are trying to
understand technical and scientific issues that really only
experts can explain to us and get to the bottom of. What we all
want is simply to understand what is going on; to learn what we
need to do to protect our health and to protect our
environment.
It should not be complicated, and I do not think it should
be that difficult. It should be the Federal Government's job
not only to carry out the laws, but also to help the public
understand what is going on, and to provide us with the
information we need to make the right decisions about the
health and safety of our children and ourselves. It seems more
often than not that communities are left confused, even empty-
handed, without the information and without the actions that
they need and deserve from their government.
Senator Lieberman and I, with the great support of Chairman
Jeffords, went to New York to hold a hearing on air quality at
Ground Zero back in February, to try to clear the air, so to
speak--to get some real information that we then could act on
and legislate about. Again, Congressman Nadler, who has been a
leader on these issues, was there to lend his expertise and
support.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-107shrg83699/html/CHRG-107shrg83699.htm

NCjack

(10,280 posts)
21. Hillary should rid herself of the odor of Wall Street campaign contributions by
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:03 AM
Nov 2015

donating that money to the charities helping the ailing firemen and police who responded to the Twin Towers on 9/11.

Stardust

(3,894 posts)
32. Is it just my faulty memory, or is this not the first time she's used that lame excuse for her Wall
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:31 PM
Nov 2015

Street donors? I'm as disgusted by her assertion as much as the next guy, but it sounded very familiar to me. And it piqued my ire when she said it before, too.

 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
36. Way to go, Hillary!
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 03:08 PM
Nov 2015

Petulant when claiming her integrity was impugned (o the gravitas), desperate, kneejerk invocation of 9/11, AND
a favorable reference to GW Bush?

Even if Bernie pulls of a miracle, he will still have the fight ahead of him.

Luckily for HRC, she has the ludicrous GOP to make her look better.

Bernie should eventually say that his not taking SuperPAC money (as opposed to HRC) SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.

Beacool

(30,257 posts)
38. I wasn't offended by her comment because I remember what went down in the aftermath of 9/11.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 04:15 PM
Nov 2015

I too was there, and not a few blocks away or watching it on TV. I was in the next to last PATH train that made it to the WTC that morning (I worked four blocks away). The PATH station was underneath the North Tower. The first plane had already crashed into the building. I saw several people jump out of windows. Furthermore, I was across the street from the South Tower when the second plane hit that building. I thought that we were all going to die, debris flew everywhere.

Still, I didn't take offense. Why? Because reopening the Downtown area (we didn't get back to work for almost two weeks) was a priority second only to the work being done at Ground Zero. Wall Street is at the heart of the financial operations in the U.S. It was important that the local and U.S. economy were not overly affected during this time. Hillary worked very hard to aide the city in any way she could and, along with Schumer, lobbied the federal government to obtain billions of dollars to help NY. When Christine Whitman's EPA declared the air safe to breath, she argued the contrary. She was correct, as we all know. She worked to expand health care to all who worked in clearing the site. That's why the firefighter's union endorsed her in 2008.

I understand the Pavlovian urge from her detractors from the Right and Left to automatically attack her, but nothing is ever as simplistic as some people want to make it out to be, she was just stating facts.

JudyM

(29,385 posts)
40. Seems the point she was looking to make is that the contributions are retroactive gratitude
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 04:30 PM
Nov 2015

As opposed to Bernie's suggestion that they're looking for favors in the future. If she had made that point and explained it by mentioning 911 recovery only in passing as one of the reasons they support her, it would've been a different conversation now. But it seems like she got caught up in the moment and overplayed the "OMG 9/11 happened and I was there and in charge" angle instead. I think it was an emotion blunder that she made on the stage.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
46. Disgusting
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:09 PM
Nov 2015

And you know what? Clintonites bear responsibility too. I got comment removed for deceiving Hillary as a Neocon. She has the same foreign policy and only a dimwit would think you have to be a republican to be a Neocon. Tony Blair IS A NEOCON! He is Britains version of a democrat. He's a supposed liberal. A fake really. And that's what I was getting at. Clinton supporters rely on censorship to argue their message. How pathetic is that. And how stupid too because they have no hope of winning a general election that way. They seem to be under some kind of spell that Hillary will automatically win because she is a woman.

Jarqui

(10,150 posts)
48. Elizabeth Warren gives example of Hillary Clinton being beholden to Wall Street
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:10 PM
Nov 2015

Great and timely DKos diary
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/11/15/1450448/-Elizabeth-Warren-gives-example-of-Hillary-Clinton-being-beholden-to-Wall-Street



I don't know how Clinton supporters can defend that one. That's part of the the thing with Hillary as a candidate - there's a lot of this stuff out there for the GOP to cherry pick over and twist.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
49. This was pretty much the only take away from the debate that got any amount of coverage on the news
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:53 PM
Nov 2015

shows in the 36 hours after the debate (Sanders' line about Ike got the next most coverage, but not even 20% of the coverage received by Clinton's 9/11-Wall Street line).

Seemed to me that O'Malley did well in the debate but you wouldn't know that unless you watched it. I thought Sanders did well, too, but that will be lost on those who did not watch the debate. I also thought Clinton did a very good job aside from her unfortunate 9/11-Wall Street comment, but almost all of America won't know that either.

The only widely repeated story from the debate was the Clinton gaffe and so -- whoever won the debate -- it wasn't Clinton.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton's Mixing of 9/11 ...