Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
Mon May 21, 2012, 11:12 AM May 2012

Court won't reduce student's music download fine

Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court won't reduce the $675,000 verdict against a Boston University student who illegally downloaded 30 songs and shared them on the Internet.

The high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Joel Tenenbaum, of Providence, R.I., who was successfully sued by the Recording Industry Association of America for illegally sharing music on peer-to-peer networks. In 2009, a jury ordered Tenenbaum to pay $675,000, or $22,500 for each song he illegally downloaded and shared.



Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_MUSIC_DOWNLOADING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. It's not like he's a Wall Street CEO crashing the economy -- then he'd be completely forgiven!
Mon May 21, 2012, 11:16 AM
May 2012

n/t

katsy

(4,246 posts)
2. How can this person pay that fine?
Mon May 21, 2012, 11:31 AM
May 2012

What if he can't?

Prison? I mean he'll be a debt slave for most of his adult life, correct?

What he did was wrong. However, the punishment is an economic death sentence. Why not prison, let's say one week per song?



 

RC

(25,592 posts)
3. They do that so their victims serve as warnings for others.
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:04 PM
May 2012

Justice, who the fuck cares anymore. The Recording Industry Association of America sure doesn't.

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
6. It's not a fine, per se. And judging by what happened to a friend who sued and won
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:46 PM
May 2012

a judgment against a company....they filed bankruptcy, never had to pay him a dime.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
7. He'll quietly settle for $12.39, a Canadian penny, pocket lint, and a promise not to talk.
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:55 PM
May 2012

The RIAA will trumpet their $675,000 verdict far and wide, but they won't waste any effort keeping after this guy. Lawyers are expensive.

Or maybe the RIAA will be sneaky and sell it to those crooks on TV who aren't really in the business of collecting, but make their money duping moron investors who think bad paper like this is a good bet.

mwooldri

(10,303 posts)
8. Most likely he can't pay the fine but he can file Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
Mon May 21, 2012, 01:18 PM
May 2012

Chances are he's pretty much making no money anyway. Chapter 7 would also liquidate a lot of other debts (sadly student loans don't get liquidated). Any judgement placed against the student before the Chapter 7 filing took place - if the bankruptcy is granted then the RIAA would collect $0.

If he can't file Chapter 7, he can still file Chapter 13 - a debt paydown plan - where the RIAA would get something but nothing anywhere near the amount of money they were awarded in the judgement. Plus a Chapter 13 lasts a maximum of 5 years.

So the punishment is not an economic death sentence, but it would require more financial pain to in essence make the judgement toothless.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
9. If he was a billionaire who stole billions he wouldn't owe a thing
Mon May 21, 2012, 01:25 PM
May 2012

We are one fucked up country. They have just taken away any ability of him to ever have a life, no matter how hard he works.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
12. Time to go all Sermon on the Mount on them
Mon May 21, 2012, 05:35 PM
May 2012

When Jesus was talking about turning the other cheek, handing over your shirt as well when sued for your jacket, and walking an extra mile when compelled by a soldier to walk one mile, he was talking about making a public statement about the oppressive use of force by those in power.

In that vein, Joel Tenenbaum should agree to pay the verdict, and send out an online public update of his personal finances every time he does so:

"This month, I earned $4,000. After paying taxes, covering my rent, food, clothing and utilities, I had $1,000 left. Of that I sent $500 to the RIAA on its judgment. Every penny of that went to accrued interest, and didn't touch the $675,000 principal amount, and the amount of the judgment against me is now $___________. At this rate, barring unforeseen catastrophic expenses, I will pay the RIAA $6,000 this year on a total income of $48,000, and will be more indebted to them than when the judgment was first entered against me. According to industry reports for the last available year, the RIAA made $X. Here are the estimated net worths of the 30 artists whose music I shared illegally: {List the artists and their net worth}."
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
13. More to the point: The net worths of the megacorporations whose music he shared illegally.
Mon May 21, 2012, 05:42 PM
May 2012

They, not Joel Tenenbaum, are the ones screwing artists. The RIAA just trots out the poor, starving artists as props.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
14. This is why I cringe when I hear Hilary Rosen described as "a top Democratic operative"
Mon May 21, 2012, 05:44 PM
May 2012

or whatever it was during that spat with Mrs. Willard the Bully a few weeks ago.

With Dems like that, who needs repukes?

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
15. Copyright mathematician to the rescue!
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:38 PM
May 2012

Or at least, that's what this kid should have gotten as a professional on his side.


Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court won't reduce studen...