Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,624 posts)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:06 PM Sep 2015

Senate leader: Not enough votes to defund Planned Parenthood

Source: AP

By ALAN FRAM

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate's top Republican is conceding that his party will have to await the next president before it can cut off federal funds that go to Planned Parenthood.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., says Republicans lack the votes to halt the payments. He also says that standing in the GOP's way is President Barack Obama, who doesn't leave office until January 2017.

"The way you make a law in this country, the Congress has to pass it, the president has to sign it," McConnell said in an interview with Kentucky TV station WYMT recorded Monday.

"The president's made it very clear he's not going to sign any bill that includes defunding of Planned Parenthood," McConnell said. "So that's another issue that awaits a new president, hopefully with a different point of view about Planned Parenthood."

FULL story at link.



In this photo taken Aug. 6, 2015, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky. speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. McConnell is conceding that his party will have to await the next president before it can cut off federal funds that go to Planned Parenthood. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/4014d34ed59c4b84bd368611fb245686/senate-leader-not-enough-votes-defund-planned-parenthood

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate leader: Not enough votes to defund Planned Parenthood (Original Post) Omaha Steve Sep 2015 OP
Good AuntPatsy Sep 2015 #1
Good. Arkansas Granny Sep 2015 #2
Since when has a guaranteed veto stopped them before ? LannyDeVaney Sep 2015 #3
They are going to get ripped by their own for this underpants Sep 2015 #8
How many times have republicans tried to repeal Obamacare? no_hypocrisy Sep 2015 #17
I think some of his own Republicans do not want a public vote riversedge Sep 2015 #18
+1 daleanime Sep 2015 #20
Exactly CatholicEdHead Sep 2015 #28
Has to wait until next president. RoccoR5955 Sep 2015 #4
Yeah, that line made me laugh! silverweb Sep 2015 #24
Wow thanks for explaining that for us Mitch underpants Sep 2015 #5
Hmmm, the assumption that it doesn't matter if the Democrats don't occupy the white house still_one Sep 2015 #6
Let me rewrite the first sentence, please randys1 Sep 2015 #7
Yup. He just gave us a great quote to motivate women for GOTV. (n/t) thesquanderer Sep 2015 #9
That is true.... daleanime Sep 2015 #21
they didn't learn last time around IIRC...they lost in the presidential...AGAIN... CTyankee Sep 2015 #30
Fantastic... Deuce Sep 2015 #10
How many times has the leftynyc Sep 2015 #11
Awesome, women get a reprieve for a moment. FU Mitch. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #12
I LOVE LOVE LOVE seeing the use of the word "conceding". calimary Sep 2015 #13
What kind of irresponsibility is this? brooklynite Sep 2015 #14
Then stop farking around about it and get to work on doing something that really benefits 4lbs Sep 2015 #15
Turtle has a sad. EEO Sep 2015 #16
"Our manufactured smear of PP is a failure...yup.....we will soon need another faux outrage....so.....yup. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #19
oh you poor homely little fool olddots Sep 2015 #22
TFB Buddy. Mbrow Sep 2015 #23
Hope the only votes are Marthe48 Sep 2015 #25
All the more reason that ANY Democratic President is better than a Repub. Thor_MN Sep 2015 #26
Ha ha!! wolfie001 Sep 2015 #27
The defunding of Planned Parenthood would have blown up in the GOP's face Gothmog Sep 2015 #29
Good luck with waiting for a new president who agrees with your turtleness. yellowcanine Sep 2015 #31
Great news! DCBob Sep 2015 #32
That's going to go over well with the maxrandb Sep 2015 #33
When will they ever learn? (nt) question everything Sep 2015 #34
 

LannyDeVaney

(1,033 posts)
3. Since when has a guaranteed veto stopped them before ?
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:12 PM
Sep 2015

What a cop-out by the turtle.

They don't have the votes. Period.

They've wasted untold millions on previous "votes" when they knew the President would veto. ACA, budgets, etc...

And, Mitch, good luck getting more cooperation from the next President, most assuredly a Democrat.

CatholicEdHead

(9,740 posts)
28. Exactly
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 09:27 PM
Sep 2015

If they want to turn out their base, you would expect a presidential veto to bring the social conservatives out. I guess they are not planning on them anymore with the recent gay marriage ruling nationwide.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
4. Has to wait until next president.
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:13 PM
Sep 2015

Yeah, like he will still be Majority Leader too.
These Cons have been doing such a lousy job, that they will lose both the House and Senate.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
24. Yeah, that line made me laugh!
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:32 PM
Sep 2015

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Our next President is going to be a pro-choice, pro-Planned Parenthood Democrat!



underpants

(182,797 posts)
5. Wow thanks for explaining that for us Mitch
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:13 PM
Sep 2015

The way you make a law in this country, the Congress has to pass it, the president has to sign it,"

still_one

(92,190 posts)
6. Hmmm, the assumption that it doesn't matter if the Democrats don't occupy the white house
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:13 PM
Sep 2015

seems a bad assumption

randys1

(16,286 posts)
7. Let me rewrite the first sentence, please
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:13 PM
Sep 2015
The Senate's top Republican is conceding that his party will have to await the next president before it can cut off federal funds that save Women's lives..
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
11. How many times has the
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:31 PM
Sep 2015

senate voted to repeal the ACA? Or is that just the house that has done it dozens of times?

calimary

(81,239 posts)
13. I LOVE LOVE LOVE seeing the use of the word "conceding".
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:41 PM
Sep 2015

Sweet sweet word. The verb "concede" carries such a lovely undertone of giving up on something. It's even better just knowing that the word is being used in the press - in this context (GOP giving up on something).

It used to infuriate me when that dingdong Paula Zahn was on Pox Noise and also CNN and used that wording all the damn time - mainly when interviewing the rare opponent of bush/cheney or the Iraq War or both - and without fail she would pose some question with "...but can't you at least concede that..."

Over and over she did that. She seemed to relish saying that to any Democrat or Iraq War opponent of any stripe or sort. Just left me completely OUTRAGED!!!! The context and flavor of "concede" is deliciously applicable here. She never questioned any GOPer or bush/cheney apologist using that phrase or anything close to it.

When you Google it - you don't even have to click on any of the links to get a whiff of its fragrance!

con·cede
kənˈsēd/Submit
verb
past tense: conceded; past participle: conceded
1.
admit that something is true or valid after first denying or resisting it.
"I had to concede that I'd overreacted"
synonyms: admit, acknowledge, accept, allow, grant, recognize, own, confess; agree
"I had to concede that I'd overreacted"
antonyms: deny
admit (defeat) in a contest.
"he conceded defeat"
synonyms: capitulate, give in, give, surrender, yield, give up, submit, raise the white flag; More
admit defeat in (a contest).
"ready to concede the gold medal"
2.
surrender or yield (something that one possesses).
"to concede all the territory he'd won"
synonyms: surrender, yield, give up, relinquish, cede, hand over
"he conceded the Auvergne to the king"

Savor the flavor! Especially the kind of word that tends to be followed immediately by another very dear and excellent word in this particular context:
"defeat"!

DEEELISH!!!!!! (rhymes with Gefilte FISH!)

brooklynite

(94,535 posts)
14. What kind of irresponsibility is this?
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:42 PM
Sep 2015

If the House could vote 44 times to "repeal Obamacare", the Senate could at least go through the motions....

4lbs

(6,855 posts)
15. Then stop farking around about it and get to work on doing something that really benefits
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 05:54 PM
Sep 2015

the poor and working people.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
19. "Our manufactured smear of PP is a failure...yup.....we will soon need another faux outrage....so.....yup.
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:09 PM
Sep 2015
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate leader: Not enough...