Clinton To Propose $350 Billion College Affordability Plan
Source: Associated Press
By LISA LERER
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Calling for a "new college compact," Hillary Rodham Clinton on Monday will unveil a $350 billion plan aimed at making college more affordable and reducing the crushing burden of student debt.
At a town hall meeting in New Hampshire, the state with the highest average student debt in the country, Clinton will propose steps to reduce the cost of four-year public schools, make two-year community colleges tuition-free and cut student loan interest rates, according to campaign aides.
The college affordability plan, a main plank of her policy platform, is an effort to address a major financial stress for many American families and satisfy a central demand of the Democratic party's liberal wing.
The proposal centers on a $200 billion federal incentive system aimed at encouraging states to expand their investments in higher education and cut student costs. States that guarantee "no-loan" tuition at four-year public schools and free tuition at community colleges will be eligible to receive federal funds.
Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEM_2016_CLINTON_EDUCATION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-08-10-00-14-34
riversedge
(70,216 posts)candelista
(1,986 posts)It's just more campaign rhetoric. What will she do when/if she actually gets elected? I have absolutely no idea. None. Zip. Nada.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)Couldn't you say that about EVERY candidate running since President Obama's terms are up?
Are you implying you DO know what another candidate will do when elected?
candelista
(1,986 posts)Hillary is way more opaque than Sanders or O'Malley. On purpose. You know that.
riversedge
(70,216 posts)candelista
(1,986 posts)That's what she likes and vagueness is a means to it. So she doesn't have to be committed to anything or anyone except her big donors.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I wish Hillary were more in line with Bernie's ideas of opening up free tuition rather than continuing the system as it stands. Too much profit is being made off the backs of those who cannot realistically afford it. She does get credit for wanting to make the 2-year institutions free... I just wish less of those institutions were for-profit schools.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)Now moar money to "fix" it.
LOTS moar.
Somehow, the rest of the world doesn't have this problem. Nor did the US, until limitless loans for eighteen-year-olds became au courant.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)msongs
(67,405 posts)is suppose to pay the costs while the privateers skate with the profits
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)more gimmees for those who don't need it.
nothing new here.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Costs are increasing well in excess of inflation. My wife is a university professor, and we watch state funding get cut every year, and tuition has to go up to compensate.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,188 posts)Funding for public universities has gone way down because governors want to crow that they lowered state spending and taxes.
For example, Rick Perry cut $1.2 Billion from higher education in 2012 alone. He also deregulated tuition costs for state schools in 2003, and tuitions almost doubled in 10 years.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Surprise!
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Beat me to the punch.
ChiTownDenny
(747 posts)It's just more campaign rhetoric. What will he do when/if he actually gets elected? I have absolutely no idea. None. Zip. Nada.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)And while far, far from an ideal solution it appears, it is at the very least recognizing the problem while our "charming" friends from the other party seem to make no mention of it at all....
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)No-cost public universities ain't gonna happen for a long time. Trying adopt "no loan policies" and free community colleges is a good first state, and radically better than what we have now.
Neither plan will get by a Republican Congress, of course.
merrily
(45,251 posts)need, then excuse that by saying nothing better than what you're asking will pass anyway.
Typical Third Way way.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)this is just a trickle down, watered down, weak version of bernie's.
merrily
(45,251 posts)made in that direction.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but costs are still obscene
merrily
(45,251 posts)Not Hillary, that's certain.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)(gasp)
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/job-training-isnt-silver-bullet-job-creation-5786
Especially since most training assumes there is someone out there with a job, not how you can cooperate with your neighbors to compete with the people who own your choices now.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Without an education, the jobs that you can work anymore in the US are very limited. That is somewhat less true if you have an education. They have to work on both things. Heaven forbid we ask government to walk and chew gum at the same time.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)It has been almost entirely outsourced to China and South Asia.
merrily
(45,251 posts)So much for all the "want fries with that?" jokes about Harvard grads.
Restaurants can't be offshored (reasonably), but they can be automated.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)What dream world do you live in? That's not going to happen in the USA.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)And the incentive system may or may not be constitutional given how the ACA fared with its expansion incentives.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Not many reporters, let alone lay people, even paid attention to the second part of the first ACA opinion.
TM99
(8,352 posts)on the topic.
I will reserve judgement on the refinancing plan until I actually see the numbers. There was an option in the mid-2000's to refinance and consolidate student loans. For many of us, it was not enough to end the onerous burden.
The grant program concerns me as well as it sounds very ACA like. And as we have seen there, some states can say no to the grants so as to retain control over their institutions without Federal interference. This means some states that accept will give relief to their students while states that decline will not.
O'Malley and Sanders plans make sure that Federal involvement is mandatory in that all state education is tuition free without strings or requirements. All students receive an equal education as opposed to only students in states that accept this grant plan in her plan.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)to eat the subsidy.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)They are NOT. Rising tuition and the burden of student loans is starting to adversely affect university enrollments.
candelista
(1,986 posts)States will simply cut back on spending on higher education and let Hillary's plan pick up the slack. They need the money for other purposes.
The money is fungible.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)There is no question that decision makers who run universities will find ways to continue raising costs to either taxpayers or students using any means at their disposal, including the aforementioned student loan balloon and, I predict, this infusion of taxpayer cash.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sure, UMass may still be cheaper than Harvard, but they are not exempt from greed.
States, cities and towns are as hungry for money as anyone else and public colleges are never going to be empty. So, they'll charge more in tuition, fees, at the cafeterias and book stores, etc.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)You can, of course, criticize the excesses of some public universities, but most of those excesses are not enough to account the increase in tuition.
Here's one article on it:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2013/09/02/state-funding-declines-raise-tuition/2707837/
Here's another with a specific example:
http://lacrossetribune.com/state-funding-vs-tuition/image_5a6e2107-192f-5107-a165-82f25af3d7ea.html
merrily
(45,251 posts)How does that contradict my prior post, which said, in part:
States, cities and towns are as hungry for money as anyone else and public colleges are never going to be empty. So, they'll charge more in tuition, fees, at the cafeterias and book stores, etc.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Because states are cutting funding to public universities. Did you read the articles or even look at the charts?
State governments are slashing state higher education funds.
Somehow you think that tuition goes into state general funds? They don't, at least I am not familiar with any state where that happens.
What we are seeing is that state universities are becoming more and more dependent upon outside grants (so, corporate-funded higher education), and tuition. State universities are slowly being converted into private universities.
merrily
(45,251 posts)You made that leap on your own.
My meaning: State and local being hungry for money to run themselves = less funding from them to a variety of things, including state universities.
Your links supported what Reply 28 says and do not contradict closeupready's prediction at all, either.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)As to closeupready's point.... that is probably true at some universities. I can say that I have not seen that happen at THIS university. As tuition goes up and up, it's becoming harder to recruit. Many students choose instead to go the cheaper (and much lower quality) community college here. It's a general dismantling of a quality public higher education system.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Big Ten university than the more expensive one which I attended in my home state. Yes, the out-of-state one is more highly regarded, but still, goes to show you that a university's price tag is not always a good indicator of how well students are being educated.
Peace to you. :hi;
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)The State would love to shift the burden of paying for a community college onto another revenue source. Thereby freeing up money to be spent elsewhere. Or in the case of repubs to give tax breaks to their friends.
mcar
(42,329 posts)My son starts college later this month.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)Fucking bastard bankers.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)and somehow that will rein in tuition costs. Because when people have access to more credit, they spend less money!!!
Federal funds for "no-loan"? Well, the federal funds do not cover all of the "no-loan" costs. So you are struggling to balance your state's finances and you're going to take on a large pile of costs so you can receive a small pile of federal money?
This is a plan for people to graduate $60,000 in debt instead of $30,000 in debt.
HappyPlace
(568 posts)If you've ever dealt with car salespeople, then you know what I mean. If you claim that you can't afford a particular car or payment, then they will "help you" by suggesting a longer-term loan, which means even more interest payments and debt.
This is the kind of "affordable" we don't need.
We should be challenging the way things are done fundamentally, not making it easier for students to go into debt for educational programs that are questionable to begin with.
Work experience and training in the military and apprenticeships in the trades have greater value to many of us than overpriced crowded classes in the typical university setting, I'm sad to say.
It is a racket, at least in California, where the state department of education bullies kids into UC approved courses and AP classes get more funding while very skilled and talented students are shit upon.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Things that make you go hmmm...
J_J_
(1,213 posts)At the University of Alaska, there are 167 admin making over $200,000.00 per year.
http://www.adn.com/article/20150424/top-university-alaska-administrators-take-unpaid-leave
So what do they do?
Cut teachers...
UAF cuts $20 million from budget, eliminates scores of teaching positions
http://www.adn.com/article/20150730/uaf-cuts-20-million-budget-eliminates-scores-teaching-positions
They cut classes...
Alaska Fairbanks plans to cut its philosophy degree program and reduce offerings in music and a variety of other areas, while suspending a dental hygiene program and merging journalism and theater
http://www.adn.com/article/20150422/faced-budget-pressures-uaf-drops-philosophy-program-trims-music-and-other-programs
Facing declining funds, UA kicks out popular child care center so they could redo the locker rooms
The $9.2 million price tag includes renovations to the hockey team locker room, ice rink renewal and electrical work.
http://www.adn.com/article/20150130/uaa-issues-eviction-notice-popular-child-care-center
The priorities here are striking.
We must continue to fund the 167 administrators and any and all overpriced sports crap, and everything else can go to hell.
Unbelievable,
And they expect us to encourage our children to take out loans to pay for this?
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I know in Massachusetts the fees cost FAR more then the tuition.
MA has a program where if you get very good grades on the grade 10 tests then you get free state tuition. Everyone was all excited....until they found out how little a percentage that was of the real cost of college.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)She might have to shut down a war or two.
Naaaah
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)How is Sanders going to pay for THAT?
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)I expect college students to take a serious, long look to a realistic plan, and not be blinded with empty fantastic promises of "free college!" which can't be implemented