Senate Hands a Victory to Obama on Trade Pact
Source: The New York Times
WASHINGTON The Senate on Tuesday narrowly voted to end debate on legislation granting President Obama enhanced negotiating powers to complete a major Pacific trade accord, virtually ensuring final passage on Wednesday of Mr. Obamas top legislative priority in his final years in office.
The procedural decision barely cleared the 60 votes needed the tally was 60 to 37 but final passage will need only 51 votes. It was the second time the Senate blocked a filibuster of the so-called trade promotion authority, but this time the bill was shorn of a measure to offer enhanced retraining and education assistance to workers displaced by international trade accords. That measure faces a crucial procedural vote on Wednesday as well.
Passage of a stand-alone trade promotion bill will put pressure on House Democrats. Earlier this month, they brought down the worker aid provision when it was legislatively linked to the trade-negotiating legislation, believing that the maneuver would torpedo the entire trade package.
But Republican leaders with the White Houses support found a parliamentary way to corner the Democrats by separating the two pieces of the bill. By Wednesday evening, legislation will most likely be on the presidents desk giving him the power to complete the trade accord, the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership, knowing Congress could not amend or filibuster the final agreement. He can sign it whether or not the House passes worker dislocation assistance, which is scheduled to come to a vote on Friday.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/24/us/politics/senate-vote-on-trade-bill.html
GeorgeGist
(25,326 posts)stuffmatters
(2,574 posts)AllTooEasy
(1,261 posts)With all your masters and law degrees, with all your "expert" staff, and personal experience on Capital Hill, YOU STILL COULDN'T SEE THAT COMING!!!
Now we have to rely on the word of Repukes. Every House Dem who voted down TAA should be defeated in the primaries. Obama wanted TAA, House Dems VOTED AGAINST IT! What the hell were they thinking? Did they forget that Dems lost the Senate?
Wow, just effing Wow!
djean111
(14,255 posts)I know I will have to leave DU when this happens, but - I will vote against anyone who voted for Fast Track. That's a promise.
SamKnause
(13,113 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...or Scott Walker or some other Republican if Republicans win the White House next year.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)You know they'll come after someone like Bernie Sanders full bore with their money if he gets the nomination. So such a commitment would have to both rig the primary and the general election. Not saying it's not possible, but if it isn't, then passing this bill is dangerous. If it is possible then the rigging is equally as dangerous. Not much to cheer about!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)I'm so disgusted with my Washington Senators Murray & Cantwell & Rep. Larsen!
PearliePoo2
(7,768 posts)WTF is it? Boeing, Microsoft? Who did they sell out to?
I've already been to Larsen's Facebook, now it's time to visit Murray's and Cantwell's.
I always thought Patty was a straight-shooter. Man, I've been had..bad.
It's like the shock of discovering your lover of many years has been cheating on you...speechless, a kick in the guts and profound heart-ache.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)there are currently no Democrats running against him.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)so far there are no Democrats running against him.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)so far there are no other Democrats running against her.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)so far there are no other Democrats running against him.
trueblue2007
(17,243 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)The last time someone tried to challenge Wyden in a primary the got less than 7% of the vote.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)they would support challengers against the Democrats that voted for this.That is when Obama came down on Unions over this TPP
Well good luck in getting Union support Hillary.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Unions supported President Obama despite his support of TPP.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)Unions did not support the TPP trade deal; in fact they reminded him of their support in 2008 and 2012.
Obama then criticized Unions for threatening with primary challengers if they voted for this bill.
This is on record of AFL-CIO member unions statements
I think Unions will soon begin to endorse Bernie Sanders.
AFL-CIO said they plan to wait. In other words Hillary is not the anointed one.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)I said that they supported Obama. Specifically, they supported Obama in 2012 despite his support for the TPP. Despite the fact that the TPP was endorsed in the Democratic Party Platform.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)In fact it was a low grade issue. Hillary actually supported it then
But yes Unions were in strong support of Obama 2008/2012. Obama talked a good fight for the middle class and working class but was in bed with the corporate mafia and Wall St even then.
I voted for him twice but didn't realize then that he was such a right wing Republican. I did have suspicions but what other choices did we have.
Take a look at his contributors in 2012.
I'm assuming that he got a big boost form the Koch Bro's and other Wall St puppets for his library for getting this deal done.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)And rumors are that Florida Gubbernor Skeletor Scott wants his seat. I don't expect Debbie Watshername Shmuck to put a worth while Democrat to run against him.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Sen. Bill Nelson, Floridas only statewide elected Democrat, is beginning to ramp up fundraising as he prepares to seek a fourth term in 2018.
People close to Nelson, who considered running for governor last year, say the 72-year-old is intent on running again. He is currently ranking member on the Commerce Committee and would take the chair if Democrats can recapture the Senate, which is at least possible.
more: http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/bill-nelson-steps-up-fundraising-for-2018-re-election/2218074
turbinetree
(24,738 posts)of and had the trade deals explained to them prior to a vote-------------now its done after the fact, let's have a National Holiday, any suggestions on what to call it?
From the list being generated on this thread there are only from the looks of it, three possibly four up for re-election in this 2016 cycle.
So the gambit was to vote for this Richard Nixon authority (because in the 1970's he said that he had the authority under the Constitution gave him the "right" to fast track his trade policy with China , with no public input or legislature input----------------this from the same crook that damn near brought down the government and the Constitution, and this is what started this current dismantling of the Constitution on trade deals with the public.
So basically this country and this legislature session and all the past ones have operated a program that was created by a crook and presidential criminal that violated the Constitution--because the Executive branch grabbing power from the Legislative branch.
From all appearances the only companies with employees will be the high paid athletes---------there job description can't really be outsourced
http://www.citizen.org/fast-track
http://www.citizen.org/trade/fasttrack/
Now this is another reason why Sanders needs to be voted into the presidential office--so that he can try to do something to correct this mess
polichick
(37,152 posts)stuffmatters
(2,574 posts).Seems a more timely and efficient way to remove these anti-worker, anti health, anti environment, anti financial protections, anti democracy weasels from office. Open up their protected incumbent slots to Democrats who actually represent Dem basic principles and Dem voters.
Especially Wyden, he was the linchpin enabler.
former9thward
(32,114 posts)Thats because the U.S. Constitution sets the qualifications and terms for being a member of the House or Senate; changing those qualifications or terms (as in making them subject to a recall) is unconstitutional and would require a constitutional amendment.
6chars
(3,967 posts)because we dont know whats in the trade bill.
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)including most of the people voting on it, knowing much of what's in it
Robbins
(5,066 posts)he's not.democracy will soon end and corporate rule begins.
Corproate dems don't even care about those hurt by trade deals.
Millions will be hurt by this. I'm sickened by Obama's actions, but unfortunately not surprised.
4dsc
(5,787 posts)unlike Bernie I think Hillary isn't stepping up to the plate and acting like presidential material.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)So often she is the last one to weigh in on an issue. It must take a long time to get all those advisers to weigh in and determine which position is most politically advantageous.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)(although, maybe not - depending on how you look at it) that the first black president would SO DELIBERATELY turn his back on the minions of this nation. I sure hope his longevity is great. I want him to SEE the shit he's wrought by marrying into the corporate powers. I want the outrage of the disenfranchised to nag him every waking hour of his life. And Dame Hillary will just pick up where his reign leaves off. A Republican with a (D) next to her name - (D) for Deceiver.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)no difference if hillary or republican were to win in 2016.today helps prove my point.
whathehell
(29,100 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)This is really bad.
Obama...you suck.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)bluestateboomer
(505 posts)It seems that what goes on in congress is just a political Kabuki show. Pretend to listen too the people and then give it all to the corporations. I'm supporting Bernie.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 23, 2015, 01:35 PM - Edit history (1)
What really pisses me off about this TPP issue is for the first time in history a Democrat (at least that is his label) ..A Democratic President bashed unions Criticized them for taking a stand against this measure. Unions threatened to support any challengers in upcoming primaries against those Democrats that voted for this TPP authorization.
* Note: It was union support that got him elected as President
Obama is obliviously very happy with this Republican Majority. So much so that he might just campaign for them in 2016 to keep it that way.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)Hillary might endorse republican nominee and obama campagins for GOP candiates for congress.
He has basicly said screw you to unions who worked to get him elected.
Obama would rather go after elizabeth warren than the extremists in gop who used to bash.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)If Hillary would have switched Partie's and ran as a Republican,noting the support she is getting from the corporate mafia and Wall St,
she would be leading the field now.
And yes I believe that Obama will support the Republican Senators that helped get this trade bill through.
harun
(11,348 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Seriously, we really needed to not do this!
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)Screw this "legacy" bullshit.
This shouldn't be about feelings or prestige; this is a huge issue that affects real people trust trying to survive.
navarth
(5,927 posts)I had a funny feeling when that first victory for our side was won...it didn't feel permanent at all.
Sad to see I was right. Very sad. And disgusted with a guy I voted for twice.
Frack on!
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)will never allow the worker assistance part, (Ds took off of the bill.) to get back into the trade promotion bill.
lark
(23,182 posts)Disgustingly, Obama is being the cheerleader for the wrong side. His legacy has been destroyed by this dastardly bill.
ruffburr
(1,190 posts)To welcome you all to our new country "The Leveraged States Of Corprica" Not to worry flag is the same Just the crooks have now come out from behind the curtain and will now begin to implement the P.N.A.C. to the full extent of its mandates/madness.
Angel Martin
(942 posts)because that only takes 51 votes, not 60.
McConnell found another vote for cloture, so Cruz was able to vote against it, after spending weeks telling conservatives how great TPA was.
but even the dumbest Freeper is no longer fooled by the antics of Cruz, or the other repubs who voted for cloture and then will "oppose" the TPA on the final vote.
and folks on DU should not be fooled by democratic senators who try to pull the same garbage