Obama chides Democrats criticizing trans-pacific trade deal: ‘I take that personally’
Source: Reuters
President Barack Obama fought back on Thursday against the biggest domestic obstacle to the Pacific trade pact he wants to conclude before he leaves office: the trade skeptics in his own Democratic party.
Trade unions, environmental groups and high-profile Democrats like Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts have come out swinging against the Trans-Pacific Partnership, saying it would send American jobs overseas.
“When people say that this trade deal is bad for working families, they don’t know what they’re talking about,” Obama told a group of about 200 volunteers and donors with Organizing for Action, an advocacy group formed by his former campaign team. “I take that personally. My entire presidency has been about helping working families. The Chamber of Commerce didn’t elect me twice – working folks did,” he said.
Obama argued it would be illogical for him to sign a trade deal that would hurt middle-class jobs given his efforts to expand health care insurance, bail out the auto industry and overhaul Wall Street regulations. “I spent a lot of time and a lot of political capital to save the auto industry,” Obama said, banging the lectern with a pointed finger for emphasis. “Why would I pass a deal that would be bad for U.S. auto workers?”
-snip-
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/obama-chides-democrats-criticizing-trans-pacific-trade-deal-i-take-that-personally/
= new reply since forum marked as read
Politics sucks bigtime and my father was right about politicians, they become politicians because they can't do anything else.
Are you shitting me? He promised to implement a crappy treaty that would send American jobs overseas, tilt the balance of trade even further away from us, grant gianormous corporations permission to destroy the environment, and cause a ton of other problems that would adversely effect 99% of the population of the country, so he would get elected?
best summation of this presidency yet!
thank you for that list. 
Welcomed him to come on his show to discuss it.
The Democratic Party will have to wear the TPP around our necks for decades because of your support. 
I don't know if you can recall, but Republicans won the majority in the House two years prior (thanks Dems!), where the budget is supposed to originate. For some strange reason, M$M and pundits on the Left had begun to believe that the president, not Congress, was obligated to propose and draft the nation's budgets. 
But that's not the president's job.
Congress, however, was once again dragging their collective feet while taking advantage of the humongous deficits they had helped create but the president was being blamed for. They presented "entitlement reform" while completely ignoring the growing deficit caused by Bush's tax cuts to the wealthy and rushing to be on teevee everywhere demanding that the president present a budget while taking the advantage of not being called on and reminded by these same "journalists" that it's their job, not the president's to pass a budget.
Anyway, since the Republican House wasn't doing anything (so that they can run to the mics and teevee cameras to once again complain that "the president hasn't presented a budget!!), the president decided to present one himself - as a strategy.
The offer of chained CPI was part of the budget package that would raise taxes on the wealthy - significantly, btw. He damned well knew, just like you should know, that Republicans would never go for it, therefore, there was NO real threat of any chained CPI ever coming to fruition. So all that "hair on fire" from the Left was unnecessary, and they should've known better since the Left is the most informed, most analytical in the political spectrum. Unfortunately, they actually believed that House Republicans would go for the chained CPI which would require them to raise taxes on the rich. Mindboggling, really.
Now, you ask, how do I know that President Obama merely used the chained CPI card in order to get Republicans to raise taxes on the rich and to shut them up that he hasn't proposed a budget? The fact that he's never presented it again afterward. If you think it's because of the anger from Democrats and just about everyone from the left-of-center, you forget that when President Obama does what he thinks is best even if he angers a lot of people. So if he were serious and wanted chained CPI - as you allege - then he would've presented it in the 2014 budget - and he didn't. Chained CPI was forgotten.
That's called strategy.
Now you sound like a Tea Partier.
He doesn't get a pass because he is a Dem. Clinton signed a shitty deal also.
