White House threatens to veto bill on Keystone
Source: Reuters
By Roberta Rampton
WASHINGTON | Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:42pm EDT
(Reuters) - The White House on Tuesday said Obama would veto legislation before the U.S. House of Representatives that sought to force approval of the stalled Keystone XL oil pipeline as part of a new 90-day extension of federal transportation funding.
President Barack Obama earlier this year put a hold on TransCanada's $7 billion project, designed to bring crude oil from Canada and North Dakota to Texas refineries, because he said it needed further environmental review in Nebraska.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
The House is expected to vote on the transportation funding bill as early as Wednesday.
The Senate would have to agree to the funding extension and the Keystone plan before the measure could reach Obama's desk.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/17/us-usa-keystone-idUSBRE83G1F820120417
lib2DaBone
(8,124 posts)TheWraith
(24,331 posts)Either that, or you're just ignoring the history in favor of a little Obama bashing.
lib2DaBone
(8,124 posts)This left the door open so he could later approve the entire pipeline after the election.
I'm not against Obama Or the pipeline.. this is how politicians operate.
Lasher
(27,579 posts)It originally had a route that was opposed by Nebraska's governor, a Republican; it has never come to his desk for a signature. Obama expressed opposition to a Republican bill designed to push it through without going through the normal approval process.
PolitiFact article dated April 12th, 2012
The Keystones sponsor says it expects the White House to approve the northern leg, from Hardisty, Alberta, to Steele City, Nebraska, in 2013, after it submits an application for a new route around Nebraskas environmentally sensitive Sandhills region. Meanwhile, it is going ahead with the southern portion, which Obama has endorsed, ordering agencies to expedite permitting.
FactCheck.org article dated March 30, 2012
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)For one thing, he did not "veto" it, the White House rejected the proposed plan. Period. They did approve the southern portion, for use in transporting DOMESTIC oil, not tar sands oil, to the refineries around the gulf. And yet, some people are STILL looking for an excuse to deny giving him credit.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)since they are willing to break native american treaty just to go thru south dakota and thats fairly north
ashling
(25,771 posts)work on the Southern portion of the project. As if the southern portion would be necessary without the connecting link.
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)Of course, I'm sure it's COMPLETELY coincidental that Boner owns stock in six different companies that would profit from it. I'm sure that has nothing to do with it!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)That was the intent. To keep the Congressmen from profiting off of what they are in charge of regulating and writing laws about...
But with virtually 20 years of GOP rule in Congress, they managed to get rid of those sissy Democratic rules against conflict of interest in favor of selling out and getting rich after leaving Congress, to the point of selling out and getting rich while still in Congress.
The party crying that government is a problem and the rich shouldn't pay taxes, sure doesn't have a problem with lining their pockets with taxpayer dollars... What jerks.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)will drive up the cost of gas..
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)If it gets to you, Veto it.
pasto76
(1,589 posts)throats? thats how I just read that
Lasher
(27,579 posts)Nebraska's Republican Governor objected to the originally proposed route through the environmentally sensitive Sandhills region. Obama is respecting Nebraska's legitimate concerns while an alternate route is being developed for a proposal next year. It's shocking how little respect Republicans have for States' rights.
savalez
(3,517 posts)Yes, that's your line Lasher. I just felt it needed to be highlighted.
florida08
(4,106 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)that he is waiting for it to be politically expedient before he gives it and some important donors the green light.
I hope he vetoes this go around and doesn't find pipeline religion after the election. One can always hope they will live up to their rhetoric, but in the end somehow the donors always get what they want from our elected representatives.
Perhaps his second term will be better than his first has been, as I said, one can hope.