Was Al Franken denied a right to due process

...nobody forced him to step down. But neither can he automatically hold onto his power and influence if other question his reputation.

and saying that he "wasn't forced" to resign, while technically correct, belies the reality of what actually occurred yesterday.

The leadership owns this no matter how much you try to pretend otherwise.

any more than President Trump is by people suggesting he should resign.

he would have gotten the opportunity for "due process". This is why if you didn't do anything wrong and someone
says you did don't give up - fight. Go watch Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.

Then read a little to see how the real world works.

not that someone got killed. It is that a hysterical band of purity hypocrites get all worked up over some false accusations and run a vigilante witch hunt because they thing it makes them look good. The point isn't even that he resigned. It was the shitty behavior of the senators who rushed to judgement without evidence or process or clear thinking.

trump is still alive. moore is still alive. They will be running things without interference from a decent man who got rat-fucked.

When Miller wrote the play, he wasn't warning that staying alive was all that was needed to fix a problem. Look at the history of the period when Miller was writing for the inspiration and message of the play.

to the extent that he is currently able.

As for your movie recommendation, thank you, but I've seen the film several times. We do not live in a Capraesque world today anymore than Americans did in the 1930's, and the sophistication of the propaganda machine in the present day makes Taylor's efforts seem downright quaint.

There's many kinds of power to exert on someone, and most is not governmental. He was sacrificed on the altar of the Alabama election.

Which we will lose anyway.

This is the greatest display of dishonesty, bullying and character assassination I can remember.

he should've been able to have that investigation and then, if the results warranted a pile on, then so be it.

this was a hit job plane and simple. There is no high ground when you turn on him like they did.

but will stay on for a few weeks. He didn't slink away. He faced those who judged him head on. Now they will have to do the same.

but he isn't going to make it too easy for the Republicans to take advantage of this fiasco.

I don't see it as much more complicated than that.

I think he was treated very unfairly and railroaded.

Unless everyone knows something that we don't know. But then he is an elected official and voters should know what is true and isn't true.

To some extent, voters were also treated unfairly. Although any member of congress can resign for any reason, I feel that his supporters were also given a raw deal.

Outside of the court of public opinion. Due process, being railroaded, and fairness are not interchangeable terms.

Definition of due process
a course of formal proceedings (such as legal proceedings) carried out regularly and in accordance with established rules and principles — called also procedural due process

Definition of a fair hearing
a consideration of statements or arguments from both sides of an issue.

Definition of fairness (noun)
just, equitable, impartial, unbiased, dispassionate, objective consideration, free from favor toward either or any side. Fair implies a proper balance of conflicting interests.

Definition of railroad (transitive verb)
a : to convict with undue haste and by means of false charges or insufficient evidence
b : to push through hastily or without due consideration.

Which word or term best applies to the Franken situation?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/

Resignation.

Public opinion clearly doesn’t hold a consensus on this one.

He has not been denied due process. That’s out. There is an extremely good chance, considering the years of most of the accusations, there would have been no due process if it came to a congressional ethics investigation.

Fairness -We are talking about politicians creating perceptions. It’s not fair nor should it be.

Railroaded - Very possible. I believe it at least started in that manner. In the end he is a grown man making his own decisions. I’m not sure why all the people pissed at the party aren’t furious at how Franken has handled it on his end. For the most part, his initial stance was to take damn near no stance. Waiting is a political decision that will almost always damn a politician. That’s why I verge away from railroaded. I believe Franken is an intelligent and thoughtful adult. He should get no free passes the way he botched the crap out of this.

At the end of Franken's investigation we would likely be where we are at now with Franken admitting most of the incidents took place , but not all of them, with his remembrances of them being different.

This could have, and should have, been investigated in at most a month. Congress takes a break in Dec and for a large part of Jan as well. Those days could have been used for this hearing. Testimony could have been evaluated and decisions made.

I won't forget.

30+ Dem Senators calling for his resignation curtailed due process in the face of shaky allegations - given folks like Hannity & Trump Jr & Trump supporters instigated and backed at the very least some of them.

the GOP doesn't give a crap about anyways, most definitely not from liberals. Then they'll squander that ill-gotten leverage, too. I already heard one rep from New York (Rice) giving her contrived spiel about Paul Ryan et al now sending the GOP accused home, and they obviously have no clue what they are up against.

A star Senator like Al Franken is way too valuable to be treated like this. I will not forget this, either. There is no excuse for their callous treatment of Minnesota voters who went to the polls to elect their Senator. It's beyond outrageous.

The same "credible news outlet"s that were just dying for a claim about a Democrat so they could retreat to their "both sides do it" comfort zone?

The "credible news outlet"s that have long been so eager for salacious news about a Democrat that if you pointed over their shoulder and said "Holy shit! Is that Bill Clinton's penis?" their heads would whip around so fast they'd snap their own necks?

Those outlets?

Nor do I think the that the disputed allegation "I think he was going to try to kiss me" is a particularly heinous claim.

...according to the aide who talked to Politico.

And they did that under circumstances where "credible outlets" have a track record of becoming "credulous outlets."

My apologies if my comments seemed directed at you.

1. Al Franken was a total stranger and we had never seen each other in the office building before. Then, Al Franken did NOT kiss me. And then Al Franken literally paraphrased Donald Trump’s Access Hollywood tape.

2. I asked Al Franken to take a photo with me, at a party. He did. When we posed, he put his arm around my waist. He didn’t say, touch, or otherwise DO anything sexual, but I could tell from his grip, which was not on an inappropriate body part and my husband could see, that he secretly WANTED to sexually harass or assault me. My experience therefore proves all the other anonymous women are telling the truth.

Clearly we need pitchforks and torches!