General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsthe orange menace is the classic case of the peter principle..
The Peter principle is a concept in management theory formulated by educator Laurence J. Peter and published in 1969. It states that the selection of a candidate for a position is based on the candidate's performance in their current role, rather than on abilities relevant to the intended role. Thus, employees only stop being promoted once they can no longer perform effectively, and "managers rise to the level of their incompetence".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle
however I would like to offer a corrilary to the peter principle...
in the orange menaces case, thuggery and money have had major influence on his climb to "success".
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)He should have never graduated from kindergarten.
3catwoman3
(23,985 posts)...Dunning -Kruger.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)but I am familiar with it because of John Cleese.
In order to know how good you are at something requires exactly the same skills as it does to be good at that thing in the first place. Which means, and this is terribly funny, that if you are absolutely no good at something at all, then you lack exactly the skills you need to know that you are absolutely no good at it."In order to know how good you are at something requires exactly the same skills as it does to be good at that thing in the first place. Which means, and this is terribly funny, that if you are absolutely no good at something at all, then you lack exactly the skills you need to know that you are absolutely no good at it.
John Cleese
gibraltar72
(7,504 posts)to you.
niyad
(113,302 posts)3catwoman3
(23,985 posts)...the Small Peter Principle may also be at work here.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)The Peter Principle speaks to the weakness in organizations promoting people beyond their level of competence. It doesn't apply to outside hires or situations where people are elected.
Had Trump worked his way up in elected offices, like Senator, you could make a case for it but it still wouldn't apply.
You can't make the case that Trump was a successful CEO of a small corporation and was promoted to a larger organization because he functioned more as an investor than a CEO of a public corporation. As a CEO he did not demonstrate success as he suffered repeated bankruptcies.
miyazaki
(2,243 posts)aka-chmeee
(1,132 posts)was strong evidence he had fulfilled the principle's requirements long before he decided to try politics