Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 02:38 PM Sep 2017

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (left-of-center2012) on Tue Sep 19, 2017, 09:29 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

91 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 OP
Move forward? Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #1
Then let's fix it. left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #4
You think it IS working? FBaggins Sep 2017 #5
Or a party that didn't consistently lose at the state level. white_wolf Sep 2017 #11
LOL. Why is it so hard for him to join the party? n/t greeny2323 Sep 2017 #13
Just a thought hueymahl Sep 2017 #42
But not to many Dems after letting surrogates promise.... moriah Sep 2017 #89
Perhaps, the party should join Bernie... Magoo48 Sep 2017 #58
And what? Give up the focus for social justice entirely? moriah Sep 2017 #88
Ah DownriverDem Sep 2017 #45
I don't give a damn what letter someone has by their name. white_wolf Sep 2017 #75
Bernie was not able to fix that treestar Sep 2017 #61
Totally agree with that workinclasszero Sep 2017 #86
Well, we don't control Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #12
Nope. But why don't we? Ninsianna Sep 2017 #26
If you didn't hear Sanders telling people to vote for Clinton, Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #41
Ouch. Truth Hurts. NT hueymahl Sep 2017 #43
Obama won though treestar Sep 2017 #62
Holy shit. Really. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #82
Um, we lost the Presidency to Donald Are You Fucking Kidding Me TRUMP. HughBeaumont Sep 2017 #14
By all means, let's examine closely the mistakes we made in the last election cycle Ninsianna Sep 2017 #25
I agree, when will we see real examination of the Russian propaganda's effect on progressives.... bettyellen Sep 2017 #27
Not entirely treestar Sep 2017 #64
I had an ex who used to try and tell me how to dress and how to wear my hair... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #18
Yeah, because that is exactly the same thing hueymahl Sep 2017 #46
My ex believed he was being constructive too. He only wanted to help make me a better person. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #51
Sorry you had a bad experience hueymahl Sep 2017 #54
I think it is a perfectly valid analogy. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #57
This is so simple, lets look at results. If a certain someone inserts himself into Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #72
There are similarities. Promee Sep 2017 #53
If he isn't one of us... FBaggins Sep 2017 #2
well f*ing said ProfessorPlum Sep 2017 #29
I Take Him At His Word Me. Sep 2017 #3
Well Orcrist Sep 2017 #6
You're new here, I see. hedda_foil Sep 2017 #16
If true Orcrist Sep 2017 #22
How many of these post are there going to be LostinRed Sep 2017 #7
They have to post daily Orcrist Sep 2017 #8
That wasn't funny ChubbyStar Sep 2017 #78
+1 Lisa0825 Sep 2017 #10
He is not a Democrat. That's all I need to know. hack89 Sep 2017 #9
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #32
And what's wrong with that? nt hack89 Sep 2017 #48
well, that's honest. ProfessorPlum Sep 2017 #49
Not really. Snarky is more accurate. hack89 Sep 2017 #52
BERNIE said he wasn't a Democrat. It isn't Democrats who made that up. n/t pnwmom Sep 2017 #15
Here's a video of Bernie talking about single payer in 1992 CherokeeFiddle Sep 2017 #17
This was when Hillary was pushing Healthcare reform, right? Ninsianna Sep 2017 #30
Please don't spew this right wing talking point Saviolo Sep 2017 #40
That article should be required reading for every Mr. Evil Sep 2017 #65
I'm a little surprised and disappointed how frequently I hear it on DU Saviolo Sep 2017 #69
You should! beam me up scottie Sep 2017 #71
Okay, done: Saviolo Sep 2017 #74
And that misinformation is only going to get worse Mr. Evil Sep 2017 #73
I agree. beam me up scottie Sep 2017 #70
Please don't accuse me of "spewing right wing talking points" when I'm literally Ninsianna Sep 2017 #79
I never "spewed hate" at you Saviolo Sep 2017 #80
I wasn't doing anything of the sort. Ninsianna Sep 2017 #81
I only said "RW talking point" because: Saviolo Sep 2017 #83
Here he is on the house floor as a newly elected congressman in 1991 arguing for it too: beam me up scottie Sep 2017 #35
All of these contributions raises the most important question for Bernie to answer. kstewart33 Sep 2017 #19
He was elected by the people of VT as an indy CherokeeFiddle Sep 2017 #24
But why can't he return the favor and back Dems? Or be one? It's his choice, not ours.... bettyellen Sep 2017 #28
And they're tasting the fallout from that poor decision. Ninsianna Sep 2017 #31
So what? Orrex Sep 2017 #33
Not good enough. kstewart33 Sep 2017 #50
We take our cue's on whether he is one of us from him. He doesn't want to be one of us. nt stevenleser Sep 2017 #20
Then it's arrogant of him to presume to lead the party that he doesn't deign to join Orrex Sep 2017 #34
I agree. nt stevenleser Sep 2017 #38
thank you. Joe941 Sep 2017 #21
Recommended. H2O Man Sep 2017 #23
Recommended. beam me up scottie Sep 2017 #36
That wikipedia entry is incorrect, he is NOT.... George II Sep 2017 #37
Why does it matter? FBaggins Sep 2017 #90
I never said he wasn't one of us... Blue_Tires Sep 2017 #39
+ 1,000 greatauntoftriplets Sep 2017 #56
From my view DownriverDem Sep 2017 #44
He's an independent that has a lopsided mutually beneficial relationship SaschaHM Sep 2017 #47
Actually it is Senator Sanders himself who doesn't consider himself a Democrat still_one Sep 2017 #55
exactly grantcart Sep 2017 #63
Shoot the messenger ! left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #59
Bernie Sanders isn't one of us NastyRiffraff Sep 2017 #60
It's Sanders who says he is not one of us. beastie boy Sep 2017 #66
I have no problem with those people saying "Bernie Sanders isn't one of us". He's not one of them. Autumn Sep 2017 #67
Your party sucks! MyNameGoesHere Sep 2017 #68
moving forward is best done without disrupters like bernie. Lil Missy Sep 2017 #76
when he registers as a Democrat... chillfactor Sep 2017 #77
In a big tent, there's no one definition of "us." Orsino Sep 2017 #84
K & R mountain grammy Sep 2017 #85
We need as many allies as possible. Willie Pep Sep 2017 #87
And yet, he won't join the party. Adrahil Sep 2017 #91

Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)
1. Move forward?
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 02:40 PM
Sep 2017
Bernie Sanders: ‘The Current Model of the Democratic Party Obviously Is Not Working’

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
4. Then let's fix it.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 02:40 PM
Sep 2017

FBaggins

(26,754 posts)
5. You think it IS working?
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 02:42 PM
Sep 2017

You must be too young to remember a party with 100+ seat majorities in the House.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
11. Or a party that didn't consistently lose at the state level.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:11 PM
Sep 2017

The GOP controls 32 state legislatures and 33 governor's mansions. That is a failure on our part and we have to do better.

 

greeny2323

(590 posts)
13. LOL. Why is it so hard for him to join the party? n/t
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:20 PM
Sep 2017

hueymahl

(2,507 posts)
42. Just a thought
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:43 PM
Sep 2017

Because he has more credibility with more Americans as an independent.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
89. But not to many Dems after letting surrogates promise....
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 10:34 AM
Sep 2017

... he'd truly step inside the big tent vs just use it when it's convenient.

That's what's irritating about his behavior to me. He really could have much more credibility with those of us who WANT to believe his criticism is coming from a place of love vs a place of sowing discord had he kept that promise.

Instead it feels like he lied to get his major stamp on the platform -- one which he apparently still won't say he supports despite being integral to its creation -- and then backed off to keep making shots at us about "fat cats" when there's a far larger pride of lion-vultures over on the other side to attack.

That feels like betrayal.

Magoo48

(4,717 posts)
58. Perhaps, the party should join Bernie...
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:09 PM
Sep 2017

moriah

(8,311 posts)
88. And what? Give up the focus for social justice entirely?
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 10:20 AM
Sep 2017

No.

Bernie is very welcome in our big tent, should he ever deign to stand within it.

But that's just one of many things that we stand for. He would be a great leader from the inside to promote that passion of his for true economic justice. He, his ideas, and his passion are needed.

But fuck sacrificing everything else we believe in just for one part of our message that happens to be resonating particularly well right now.

DownriverDem

(6,230 posts)
45. Ah
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:46 PM
Sep 2017

Bernie isn't a Dem. Tell him to join the Dem Party.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
75. I don't give a damn what letter someone has by their name.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 06:54 PM
Sep 2017

I vote for Democrats because they have proven themselves better than the GOP, but I don't owe the party anything and neither does Sanders.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
61. Bernie was not able to fix that
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:21 PM
Sep 2017

It is due to nonvoting, especially in the midterms.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
86. Totally agree with that
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 09:36 AM
Sep 2017

Obviously there is a disconnect with the American public or the damn republicans would not have so much power in the states.

Those facts you state are frightening and the democratic party needs to find the reasons and change immediately.

2018 is right around the corner and may be our last chance.

Cuthbert Allgood

(4,937 posts)
12. Well, we don't control
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:11 PM
Sep 2017

the House, the Senate, the Presidency, a majority of Governorships, or the SCOTUS.

So, you gotta admit he kind of has a point. Or should we just keep pushing forward with what we've done to get us to this point?

Ninsianna

(1,349 posts)
26. Nope. But why don't we?
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:02 PM
Sep 2017

Why did so many not vote on the ballots that affect governorships, SCOTUS, the House and the Senate?

Why did so many vote for Trump? Why did so many stay at home, why did so many leave so much of the ballot blank?

He can certainly state the obvious, but why won't he address WHY that's the case? The voter suppression? The Gerrymandering? Whoever told a bunch of young people that the parties are the same, and their vote doesn't matter?

It seems that unless we address these questions, no amount of haranguing or attacking Democrats will do anything to change or address the issues that were actually responsible.

Those Trump votes gave us the SCOTUS, Democrats were screaming this left and right, why wasn't Bernie? Why weren't the people who were all defiant and petulant about conscience votes not educated, not told about the consequence of their vote?

Cuthbert Allgood

(4,937 posts)
41. If you didn't hear Sanders telling people to vote for Clinton,
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:42 PM
Sep 2017

you just weren't listening.

And it worked because Sanders supporters voted for Clinton at a much higher rate than Clinton supporters voted for Obama. So he did his job. Better than Clinton did hers.

hueymahl

(2,507 posts)
43. Ouch. Truth Hurts. NT
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:44 PM
Sep 2017

treestar

(82,383 posts)
62. Obama won though
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:23 PM
Sep 2017

Bernie could be said to have failed where Hillary succeeded.

Cuthbert Allgood

(4,937 posts)
82. Holy shit. Really.
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 08:34 AM
Sep 2017

So Sanders has his supports vote for Clinton at a significant higher rate than Clinton supporters did for Obama, and this is still Sanders fault?

Maybe she should have come to Wisconsin and worked to get the 25,000 vote gap she lost by here. Did Sanders block her at the border?

Whatever. We are clearly going to lose again if this is the attitude of figuring out why we lost in 16.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
14. Um, we lost the Presidency to Donald Are You Fucking Kidding Me TRUMP.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:22 PM
Sep 2017

If that's not a neon sign that screams "we're doing something wrong", then I don't know WHAT else is.

Ninsianna

(1,349 posts)
25. By all means, let's examine closely the mistakes we made in the last election cycle
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:58 PM
Sep 2017

and figure out why so many people were believing strange things, like how the two parties are the same, why they thought their votes didn't matter, why they didn't know the first thing about how to register or the importance of educating themselves on the candidates and the issues, why they were so easily led by propaganda etc.

Trying to shut people up for examining what went wrong, when those investigations lead to uncomfortable areas is a mistake.

Somehow 12% of people who were supposedly progressives and were busy telling us all how pure they were in their progressivism voted for him. In the states that counted, disregarding all the other Republican dirty tricks, the Russian hacking, Crosscheck, third parties etc., they were the ones who handed Trump the victory by giving them their votes.

I'd love to know what went wrong with these people, why they were convinced to vote so poorly and who they were listening to, and what they were being told.

That neon sign is pointing to something that went horribly wrong and we're seeing that wrongness continue, we need to know what THAT is, expose it, examine it and fix it.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
27. I agree, when will we see real examination of the Russian propaganda's effect on progressives....
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:04 PM
Sep 2017

We saw it here first hand, for a long time. They taunted us w "red scare" and calling people "comrade" in order to make the accusations about their real allegiances beyond the pale. Many bought the Wikileaks crap lock stock and barrel. Suckers need to wise up.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
64. Not entirely
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:23 PM
Sep 2017

There were other causes outside what the Democrats may have "done wrong."

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
18. I had an ex who used to try and tell me how to dress and how to wear my hair...
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:47 PM
Sep 2017

... he didn't want to commit to me, but he always wanted to "neg" me and control me.

hueymahl

(2,507 posts)
46. Yeah, because that is exactly the same thing
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:47 PM
Sep 2017

as constructive criticism of a political party.



Never let an opportunity pass to criticize Bernie!

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
51. My ex believed he was being constructive too. He only wanted to help make me a better person.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:56 PM
Sep 2017


Never let an opportunity pass to criticize Bernie!
Not criticizing, just putting it all into perspective. So yeah, I get where he's coming from... I see it clearly. Only, it's my belief that if you can't commit to someone, then you don't get to control them or tell them what to do.

hueymahl

(2,507 posts)
54. Sorry you had a bad experience
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:58 PM
Sep 2017

Sounds like he was mentally abusive.

Still don't think it is a valid comparison. And I think you know that.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
57. I think it is a perfectly valid analogy.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:09 PM
Sep 2017
Still don't think it is a valid comparison.
Yes, you've made it clear.

And I think you know that.
Yes I know that what your feelings are. Understood.

Feel free to continue the is/isn't/is/isn't bickering, but I believe we've reached an impasse here.


Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)
72. This is so simple, lets look at results. If a certain someone inserts himself into
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:58 PM
Sep 2017

the discussion in a big way, whether last year or now or next year, are the results positive?

If not, oops.

Or herself, there is a famous woman inserting herself into the discussions, so far I cant connect her to anything bad, though. Elizabeth Warren, that is.

 

Promee

(69 posts)
53. There are similarities.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:57 PM
Sep 2017

Particularly since Sanders has cache value and he knows it.

FBaggins

(26,754 posts)
2. If he isn't one of us...
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 02:40 PM
Sep 2017

Then there aren't nearly as many of "us" as they think.

ProfessorPlum

(11,267 posts)
29. well f*ing said
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:15 PM
Sep 2017

Me.

(35,454 posts)
3. I Take Him At His Word
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 02:40 PM
Sep 2017

that he isn't

 

Orcrist

(73 posts)
6. Well
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 02:48 PM
Sep 2017

When a man tells me he isn't a democrat I got this funny weird thing I do. I believe him. Are you saying that Sanders is a liar? Bold statement on your behalf there. Careful the Bernie is Jesus Christ crowd may come after you for that.

hedda_foil

(16,375 posts)
16. You're new here, I see.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:40 PM
Sep 2017

Given all the foreign bots and friends providing similar messaging, it might be best if we all stay out of the Bernie's not a Democrat brougaha. It's obviously intended by Russia Et all to keep Dems divided
They were REALLY successful at it in the primaries. And they're trying very, very hard to keep stirring up right now. I'm not blaming you or anybody here, but let's try to avoid adding to the infighting.

 

Orcrist

(73 posts)
22. If true
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:53 PM
Sep 2017

then why aren't the people who start these threads instantly banned?

LostinRed

(840 posts)
7. How many of these post are there going to be
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 02:52 PM
Sep 2017

Everyday it's either attack Bernie or defend Bernie.

 

Orcrist

(73 posts)
8. They have to post daily
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 02:59 PM
Sep 2017

or they don't get their check from the First National Bank of Volgograd. LOL!

ChubbyStar

(3,191 posts)
78. That wasn't funny
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:05 PM
Sep 2017

But you are amusing.

Lisa0825

(14,487 posts)
10. +1
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:07 PM
Sep 2017

hack89

(39,171 posts)
9. He is not a Democrat. That's all I need to know.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:05 PM
Sep 2017

when he becomes one then I will listen to him. Right now I have no interest in placating his ambition and ego.

Response to hack89 (Reply #9)

hack89

(39,171 posts)
48. And what's wrong with that? nt
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:51 PM
Sep 2017

ProfessorPlum

(11,267 posts)
49. well, that's honest.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:51 PM
Sep 2017

hack89

(39,171 posts)
52. Not really. Snarky is more accurate.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:56 PM
Sep 2017

silly posts like yours bring out the worst in me.

pnwmom

(108,988 posts)
15. BERNIE said he wasn't a Democrat. It isn't Democrats who made that up. n/t
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:23 PM
Sep 2017
 

CherokeeFiddle

(297 posts)
17. Here's a video of Bernie talking about single payer in 1992
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:47 PM
Sep 2017

While times have changed, the message from Bernie never has.

Ninsianna

(1,349 posts)
30. This was when Hillary was pushing Healthcare reform, right?
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:17 PM
Sep 2017

Talking about single payer and doing something about it are two very different things.

Had a family member who was in a novice debater on her team in Michigan that year, the topic was Healthcare (they pick one every year). In the novice year, they create and defend a case, or they attack it. (Later on they switch sides every round.)

My cousin's case was a Single payer Canada plan. Every weekend in the fall, she and her partner would spend several hours a day presenting their Canada plan, and defending it.

Lots of talking about Single payer and Canada, but she as 9th grader and her partner are not credited with effecting any change either.

Talk is fine, debate is fine, reading your 1st Affirmative Case and getting everything in under 8 minutes is great (even if it was sort of torture to you poor family who helped you by timing you every time), but it doesn't mean you did anything constructive, it doesn't mean you owned it, even if you did know the pros and the cons way better than some of those representatives and senators did, or do now.

There is a reason that Canada keeps losing doctors to the US, and why so many patients cross the border for care the frustration with that system is real, talk to a few people and see why it's not all roses, if doing the actual homework is too much.

One needs to get past the superficial sloganeering and delve into what we need to do to fix our broken healthcare system, there are many ways of achieving universal, affordable healthcare, and we need to figure out how to do that sensibly to fit our population.

Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
40. Please don't spew this right wing talking point
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:41 PM
Sep 2017
There is a reason that Canada keeps losing doctors to the US, and why so many patients cross the border for care the frustration with that system is real, talk to a few people and see why it's not all roses, if doing the actual homework is too much.



http://www.aarp.org/politics-society/government-elections/info-03-2012/myths-canada-health-care.html

Mr. Evil

(2,853 posts)
65. That article should be required reading for every
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:24 PM
Sep 2017

person that mindlessly repeats those same republican talking points ad nauseam. Thanks for the link.

Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
69. I'm a little surprised and disappointed how frequently I hear it on DU
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:33 PM
Sep 2017

But to be fair, there is a LOT of misinformation about the Canadian system in the USA, so I guess I shouldn't be THAT surprised. Maybe I should make it an OP (or you're welcome to, if you like!)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
71. You should!
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:55 PM
Sep 2017

DUers have been pretty good about destroying these health care memes over the years, perhaps it's time for a reminder.

Well done!

Mr. Evil

(2,853 posts)
73. And that misinformation is only going to get worse
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 06:00 PM
Sep 2017

with the rapid ascendancy of Sinclair Broadcast Group. They really need to be stopped. John Oliver addresses this.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
70. I agree.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:54 PM
Sep 2017

The talking point about Canada's doctors is used all the time on social media, no matter how many times it's debunked. Right wing memes are like hydras, as soon as you chop off one head ten more take its place.

Ninsianna

(1,349 posts)
79. Please don't accuse me of "spewing right wing talking points" when I'm literally
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 08:06 PM
Sep 2017

referencing my personal experience with doctors and patients in Canada who left for the U.S.

Walk into Henry Ford, DMC or any of the hospitals in other border areas and go learn for yourself. Nothing "Right wing" about the truth you'll find there.

That's a criticism of CANADA's specific issues, not of single payer or universal coverage, which the REPUBLICANS are against.

Please don't spew this hate at me for reporting my personal experience, which is backed up by anyone who has ever spoken to Canadian doctors or had any experience in hospitals in areas like Detroit and other border crossings where reality doesn't match silly talking points from the AARP.

It's not "all", never said it was "all". But it's silly to pretend that everything is perfection in Canada and that we can just copy and paste it onto the US without any thought. Right wing spew is when one chooses to misread things and then ignores nuance of what's being said to advance talking points. I'm not the one doing that.

Also, here are some articles, since the personal experience of people on online post is worth the paper its printed on.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2016-08-03/canadians-increasingly-come-to-us-for-health-care

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/17/world/windsor-journal-doctors-eying-the-us-canada-is-sick-about-it.html

(I shadowed one of these guys so some of us know these emigrees pretty well, even if the AARP doesn't and they're both happily practicing in the U.S. I guess all those offers of free hamburgers didn't do much to sway two vegetarian Hindus.)

http://nationalpost.com/news/canada/number-of-canadian-patients-travelling-abroad-for-treatment-increased-by-25-study-finds

Please note these new studies are within the last few years, AARP cites one from 2002.



Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
80. I never "spewed hate" at you
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 08:55 PM
Sep 2017

But I did want to correct what I saw as incorrect information. I never said that the Canadian system was perfect. I live in Canada, I know it's not perfect. It doesn't include dental or vision, and elective surgeries an procedures have wait times. Also, the National Post is a right-leaning paper in Canada.

I don't like linking the WaPo, because it has a paywall, but there's a good article here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/11/trumps-claim-about-canadians-traveling-to-the-united-states-for-medical-care/?utm_term=.de7abeba08f8

Some excerpts:

The Canadians, when they need a big operation, when something happens, they come into the United States in many cases because their system is so slow.
— Donald Trump, second presidential debate, Oct. 9, 2016

During the health-care policy portion of the debate, Trump attacked Hillary Clinton’s health-care plan and said it would end up in a “disaster, somewhat similar to Canada.” He called the Canadian health-care system “catastrophic,” and said that in “many cases,” Canadians are coming to the United States to receive operations because their system is so slow. We checked out whether this was accurate.

There are longer wait times in Canada than in the United States for people to receive specialized care. According to a January 2016 report by the Commonwealth Fund, 41 percent of adults in Canada in 2013 were able to access same-day or next-day appointments when they were sick, compared with 48 percent in the United States. Emergency, urgent and primary care are prioritized for patients.

But when it came to specialists, 29 percent of adults waited two months or longer, compared with 6 percent in the United States. In Canada, 18 percent of adults waited four months or longer for an elective surgery, compared with 7 percent in the United States.

The most comprehensive report on this topic was published in 2002 in the peer-reviewed journal Health Affairs. While the data is 20 years old, it gives us a reference point of how many Canadians who needed medical procedures came to the United States to get them. Of the 18,000 respondents to the 1996 Canadian National Population Health Survey, 90 people said they had received health care in the United States in the previous 12 months. Only 20 respondents said they traveled to the United States specifically to get that care.

The Trump campaign cited research from the right-leaning Canadian think tank Fraser Institute, which found that in 2014, more than 52,513 Canadians received non-emergency medical treatment outside of Canada. The campaign pointed out that 52,513 people in 2014 represented a 25.5 percent increase over the 2013 estimate of 41,838 people. For context, 52,513 people represent 0.15 percent of the country’s population of 35.5 million in 2014.

The report acknowledges there is “no readily available data on the number of Canadians traveling abroad for health care.” Researchers came up with an estimate by using data from the think tank’s annual survey of Canadian physicians in 12 specialties, combined with data on the number of procedures performed in Canada. The specialized areas they surveyed include plastic surgery, neurosurgery, urology, gynecology and oncology. These procedures were “medically necessary elective treatment,” the report said, though there is no information about exactly what procedure these patients would have received.

Unlike in the United States, appointments in Canada for elective and specialist procedures are determined by priority and need, rather than people who can afford to pay more to see a doctor quickly. While it is true that there are longer wait times in Canada for such procedures, there is no reliable, official data on the number of people traveling from Canada to the United States, said Victor Rodwin, health policy and management professor at New York University’s Wagner School of Public Service.

“What we do know is that the numbers of people who come from Canada to the United States for surgery are very small,” Rodwin said.

This is a classic case of Trump focusing on raw numbers with limited information to extrapolate a general trend. By one estimate by a right-leaning Canadian think tank, there were 52,513 Canadians (0.15 percent of total population) who traveled outside of the country (not necessarily to the United States) to receive non-emergency medical care. This figure was reported in a survey that asked physicians, rather than patients themselves, to estimate how many patients traveled outside of the country. There is no information about exactly what procedure these patients may have received, and it did not ask specifically why the patients traveled outside of Canada for care.

There is limited reliable information to support Trump’s claim. The most comprehensive report uses data from 20 years ago, and found that 90 out of 18,000 people surveyed for the Canadian National Population Health Survey said they had received health care in the United States in the previous 12 months.. Trump’s exaggeration of this one data point to extrapolate a larger trend earns him Three Pinocchios.


Please note that the Fraser Institute (where the USNews and National Post article get much of their information from) is a right-wing think tank in Canada, as well. The NYTimes article is also almost contemporary with the 2002 study that the AARP article references and the WaPo article notes (in bold above).

The trouble is, talking about ONLY the pitfalls of the Canadian (or British or whatever) single-payer systems is an effort to discredit the idea of single-payer systems. Millions of Canadians have used the Canadian health care system for life-saving treatment, or even routine treatment without having to go bankrupt or lose their homes.

Ninsianna

(1,349 posts)
81. I wasn't doing anything of the sort.
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 12:58 AM
Sep 2017

I was mentioning that talking about an issue isn't much of a bonafide.

I heard way too much about the Canada plan, both the pros and the cons.

I was not repeating talking points, I was relating my personal experience, and those of my friends and family. I grew up in Detroit, and shadowed doctors across the border in Windsor, in MI several other states and a couple of different countries.

This not an easy topic, and one needs to actually get beyond the slogans and get to figuring out how to actually achieve the goals, not just talk about them.

I know doctors in CA who love practicing there, and I know ones who just couldn't take it anymore and moved to the US (including those neurosurgeons in that article). The primary care doc have an easier time of it, the neurosurgeons and their patients were not happy. The ones I shadowed in the U.S. saw a LOT of international patients, including Canadians. I have friends in medicine and nursing in CA who have similar stories.

I wasn't even only talking about the pitfalls so I don't know where the whole "spewing RW talking points" was about, it did read as an attack, I'm sure you can see why.

The point is that what works for Canada won't necessarily work for us, we're a whole different country and population. Millions of Canadians do use it and like it, many more are contributing to the new industry of medical tourism. Saw that firsthand in India, where the private medical facilities are affordable for Westerners, and the care is comparable if not better than they'd get at home, but cheap compared to what they'd pay here (or it was a few years ago).

But that's how single payer systems work for the wealthy, no matter what, if you have money you will always have the option of paying more for care, and you're going to have to with anything based on Medicare as well.

We need to do address how to meet our needs and ensure everyone has care and that can't be done if we're constantly sniping at each other and doing the whole cult of personality thing while ignoring history, reality and simple facts.

Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
83. I only said "RW talking point" because:
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 09:20 AM
Sep 2017

This:

There is a reason that Canada keeps losing doctors to the US, and why so many patients cross the border for care the frustration with that system is real, talk to a few people and see why it's not all roses, if doing the actual homework is too much.


Is a well-worn right-wing talking point. In recent years, there has actually been an influx of doctors, and more entering Canada than leaving it. You also referenced right-wing newspaper The National Post, and right-wing think tank The Frasier Institute.

The point I'm trying to make is that saying "doctors and patients are fleeing the Canadian system" is disingenuous as an argument, as the proportion is incredibly small. But I'll just leave you with this:

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
35. Here he is on the house floor as a newly elected congressman in 1991 arguing for it too:
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:30 PM
Sep 2017


And before that as mayor in 1988:

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
19. All of these contributions raises the most important question for Bernie to answer.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:48 PM
Sep 2017

Why won't you join the party that you are trying so hard to lead?





 

CherokeeFiddle

(297 posts)
24. He was elected by the people of VT as an indy
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:55 PM
Sep 2017

and that is a very large part of it. Also Democratic party leadership backed his campaign and fully endorsed him.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
28. But why can't he return the favor and back Dems? Or be one? It's his choice, not ours....
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:06 PM
Sep 2017

He doesn't want the label. It's weird people keep foisting it on him.

Ninsianna

(1,349 posts)
31. And they're tasting the fallout from that poor decision.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:18 PM
Sep 2017

He needs to stop attacking Democrats, it can't be all about Burning down the party and its base, that's the GOP and they don't need help in achieving that goal.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
33. So what?
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:25 PM
Sep 2017

Again and again during the primaries I was scolded that "labels don't matter." Yet Senator Sanders changed his label to Democrat when it suited his convenience, and he changed back to Independent as soon as it suited his convenience.

If the good people of Vermont couldn't endure Sanders as a Democrat, one naturally asks why the hell not? If it's just a label then it's just a distraction, and he could put an end to it with one tweet.

What does Sanders gain by playing this label game, except to get the spotlight shone on him whenever he wants it?

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
50. Not good enough.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:53 PM
Sep 2017

He was elected by Vermonters as an independent/he ran for president and received votes in the presidential election as a Democrat.

It's splitting hairs/there's no real difference.

This is why so many Democrats won't accept him. He's yet to provide an honest answer to the question.

My bet - he simply doesn't want to be a member of any party. He just wants to be Bern. To do what he wants, when he wants, vote how he wants with no party ties or strings attached.

There's nothing wrong with that. But there is something hugely wrong with working to lead a party that you refuse to join. If he sees himself as too good to join the party, well then, most Dems will conclude he's not good enough to lead their party.

At least, that's how the nominating vote went in 2016.

It's a hypocrisy that most Democrats won't accept.



 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
20. We take our cue's on whether he is one of us from him. He doesn't want to be one of us. nt
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:52 PM
Sep 2017

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
34. Then it's arrogant of him to presume to lead the party that he doesn't deign to join
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:26 PM
Sep 2017
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
38. I agree. nt
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:34 PM
Sep 2017
 

Joe941

(2,848 posts)
21. thank you.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:53 PM
Sep 2017

H2O Man

(73,577 posts)
23. Recommended.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 03:54 PM
Sep 2017

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
36. Recommended.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:31 PM
Sep 2017

Thank you.

George II

(67,782 posts)
37. That wikipedia entry is incorrect, he is NOT....
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:33 PM
Sep 2017

..."Chair of the Senate Democratic Outreach Committee"

He's Chairman of Committee Outreach for Senate Democrats. That is an entirely different position as is being portrayed by wikipedia.

FBaggins

(26,754 posts)
90. Why does it matter?
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 11:17 AM
Sep 2017

I doubt that the point was a specific position... it was that Senate Democrats selected him for a leadership position within the party.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
39. I never said he wasn't one of us...
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:40 PM
Sep 2017

I said I want him to join the party, especially since he wants to start dictating party policy... Why is that so difficult?

greatauntoftriplets

(175,747 posts)
56. + 1,000
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:09 PM
Sep 2017

DownriverDem

(6,230 posts)
44. From my view
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:44 PM
Sep 2017

Just join the Dem Party Bernie. And do it sooner rather than later to avoid the mess like in 2016. We have a 2 party system. This is how we move on.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
47. He's an independent that has a lopsided mutually beneficial relationship
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:49 PM
Sep 2017

with the Democratic Party. He's not going to caucus by himself or with the Republicans because he would only have a say in a 49-50-1 congress w/ a VP of the minority party. Our issues align from time to time and Bernie is either quiet or supportive. When they don't or when in front of the right crowd, Bernie is shouting about the ills of the Democratic party to anyone who will listen.

As for 2018/2020, I am under no assumption that Bernie would support house candidates that beat Bernie backed candidates in primaries because he's not a member of the Democratic Party and for many folks, that is the bare minimum for being considered a leader of the party. I'm hoping to be surprised.

still_one

(92,307 posts)
55. Actually it is Senator Sanders himself who doesn't consider himself a Democrat
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:59 PM
Sep 2017

"Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Tuesday night that he still does not consider himself a Democrat despite taking part in a Democratic National Committee (DNC) unity tour with the party's new chairman, Tom Perez.

"No, I'm an Independent," Sanders said when asked by MSNBC's Chris Hayes whether he now identifies as a Democrat."

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/329418-sanders-i-do-not-consider-myself-a-democrat



grantcart

(53,061 posts)
63. exactly
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:23 PM
Sep 2017

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
59. Shoot the messenger !
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:18 PM
Sep 2017

Sanders say the Democratic Party isn't working the way it is now.
(GOP controls the House, Senate, White House, ans Supreme Court)

And people scream:

"SHOOT THE MESSENGER !"

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
60. Bernie Sanders isn't one of us
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:20 PM
Sep 2017

There. I've said it. And meant it.

beastie boy

(9,385 posts)
66. It's Sanders who says he is not one of us.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:27 PM
Sep 2017

What I say is he is not the leader of my party. Otherwise, he is welcome with open arms to join us any time he feels like it.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
67. I have no problem with those people saying "Bernie Sanders isn't one of us". He's not one of them.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:29 PM
Sep 2017

And I have absolutely no problem with that, I'm not one of them either.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
68. Your party sucks!
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 05:31 PM
Sep 2017

But I'm with you.

I'm your Democrat just as long as I need to be.

With friends like that, I'll take the enemies. At least I know they're going to fuck me.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
76. moving forward is best done without disrupters like bernie.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 06:59 PM
Sep 2017

chillfactor

(7,578 posts)
77. when he registers as a Democrat...
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:05 PM
Sep 2017

THEN he is part of the Demcratic Party.....until then he is not a leader in the party.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
84. In a big tent, there's no one definition of "us."
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 09:26 AM
Sep 2017

Sanders has been mighty convenient for decades when we've needed to squeeze something past Republicans but we get all exclusive when he flexes that seniority muscle. I suggest chilling the hell out--even just a little--for a week or two, long enough to halt a GOP ACA repeal effort.

He's one of us sometimes. It's instructive to remember when he is and when he isn't.

mountain grammy

(26,640 posts)
85. K & R
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 09:32 AM
Sep 2017

Willie Pep

(841 posts)
87. We need as many allies as possible.
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 09:45 AM
Sep 2017

Sanders is a good ally to have especially now that he is so popular. Sanders has galvanized a lot of people, including many young people. I don't agree with all of his ideas but having Sanders on our side of some issues helps to get the word out about Republican policies very effectively because many people really listen when he speaks on an issue.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
91. And yet, he won't join the party.
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 11:25 AM
Sep 2017

He wants to have his cake and eat it too. That annoys the hell outta me.

COMMIT FFS.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...