General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJury finds 7 wildlife refuge occupiers, including Ammon Bundy, not guilty...
Anyway the Feds can appeal this, or that's it? This is nuts!
[link:http://katu.com/news/local/ammon-bundy-ryan-refuge-trial-verdict-malheur-wildlife-consensus-jury-federal-portland-oregon|
shenmue
(38,506 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-investigations/2017/08/23/prosecutors-retry-bundy-ranch-standoff-defendants-third-time/594842001/
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Las Vegas confirmed Wednesday it will go back to court for the third time in an attempt to convict two men accused of taking up arms against federal agents.
Less than 24 hours earlier, a jury had acquitted two standoff defendants and dismissed the most serious charges against two others. Now federal prosecutors say they will retry the men next month on outstanding weapons and assault charges.
The move pushes back the trials for 11 other defendants in the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff, including Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his sons Ammon and Ryan Bundy, who have spent 18 months in prison while awaiting their court date.
O. Scott Drexler and Eric Parker, both of Idaho, were released from prison Tuesday night after a jury acquitted them of conspiracy and extortion, which were the key elements of the government's case.
But they found out Wednesday they have been ordered back to court Sept. 25 to face the charges on which the jury deadlocked.
................
orleans
(34,051 posts)i don't understand this
(and why the hell weren't they found guilty in the first go around? of course i'm not blaming *you* -- just venting and wondering)
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Amishman
(5,557 posts)The conspiracy charges which were actual not guilty verdicts cannot be retried
defacto7
(13,485 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,686 posts)Zoonart
(11,863 posts)This is why we're in the shit with Two Scoops in the white house....
A solid third of the country makes folk heroes of domestic terrorists.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)This is why the so politicized what they were doing, to ensure that a jury could not agree to convict.
cos dem
(903 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)they threaten the government, have the right skin color, free. Been POC, either dead or facing long, long prison terms....this has ALWAYS been justice in ameriKKKa. Now they can get back to their klan buddies and party while toasting charlottsville.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)UTUSN
(70,691 posts)ozone82
(91 posts)8/24/2017, but this happened last year. Sorry about that, and yes, I do need new glasses, someday I'll have the money for a new pair. I'm still pissed about this.
bdjhawk
(420 posts)Just one on a jury trying to convict one of the RWNJs can hang a jury. If the federal jury requires unanimity, how can their not be even one to keep them from being found not guilty? On the other hand, I can imagine if you had a majority of a jury that were RW zealots, the "armed to the gills" supporters of the Bundy types could make normal jurors very nervous about going against them. These people have convinced themselves they are doing God's work and facts do not matter and they will do anything to achieve their objectives.
It will be interesting if some from the jury will speak publicly and very interesting if we ever find out about the jury selection process. I'm guessing there was a lot of lying going on by potential jurors who claimed they had no agenda. This is a case that seems so clear with all kinds of evidence and admission on the part of the accused that they did take over the federal buildings/property but "had a good reason" why they did. DISGUSTING!!!!
Calista241
(5,586 posts)This was more than just a single juror hanging a jury. I think the case was lacking, whether the judge only allowed certain evidence, or if the prosecution went crazy and overcharged, rather than just a zealot or two on the jury.
marybourg
(12,631 posts)Not a hotbed of anti-government zealots. So something was wrong with the case.
They are going to be retried, however, on the charges the jury deadlocked on.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Initech
(100,069 posts)Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Something to think about --->
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/07/29/noam-chomsky-discusses-how-trump-the-media-distract-us-from-whats-really-going-on/
-----------------
Edited to add:
Nevermind!
http://ih1.redbubble.net/image.13828557.1338/poster,420x415,f8f8f8-pad,420x460,f8f8f8.u1.jpg
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)do we automatically get off? Since dumbshit is still at Camp David, I see this being an option.
And, yes, I am being sarcastic but only half so.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)The DA gives the county clerk the list of jurors he wants.
That's how it works here.