Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jimbo101

(776 posts)
Fri Jun 30, 2017, 10:51 PM Jun 2017

EPA intends to form red team to debate climate science

ARS Technica

US Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt and Energy Secretary Rick Perry have been making some headlines for publicly rejecting the conclusions of climate science. But in between wrongly claiming that climate scientists just don’t know how much of a contribution humans make to recent global warming (answer: roughly 100 percent), they have also been parroting a new line—that climate science needs a “red team” to take on the scientific consensus.

On Friday, E&E News reported that these aren’t empty words. The EPA intends to “organize a specific process in which these individuals... provide back-and-forth critique of specific new reports on climate science," according to an administration official.

Of course, that’s not really a reasonable way to discover how evidence built a consensus in a field (a simple search of Google Scholar would be more helpful), and it’s not the way science works. Thousands of scientists around the world are constantly carrying out studies on climate change and submitting their results to be reviewed for flaws by other researchers before things are published in scientific journals. Other researchers can then test similar hypotheses with studies of their own.

Climate “red teams” have been coming up in Senate and House committee hearings, where they're often suggested by scientists from a small contrarian group. Since their opinions haven't gotten the sort of evidentiary support that would give them traction in the scientific community, they argue for the use of red teams that would elevate their views regardless. If the EPA does put together a red team, it is extremely likely that it would be made up of these same people.

E&E News also reports that coal executive Robert Murray (the same Robert Murray who recently sued HBO host John Oliver) hopes the effort will ultimately result in the EPA overturning the “endangerment finding” that gives the agency a mandate to regulate carbon dioxide. However, Pruitt has reportedly pumped the brakes on this idea in the past, which is a tall task given the legal and scientific hurdles.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA intends to form red team to debate climate science (Original Post) Jimbo101 Jun 2017 OP
Just watch Merchants of Doubt american_ideals Jun 2017 #1
I can see the sequel already - "Professional Suicide Squad" hatrack Jun 2017 #2
Whenever the truth sucks for your side ProudLib72 Jun 2017 #3

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
3. Whenever the truth sucks for your side
Fri Jun 30, 2017, 11:40 PM
Jun 2017

Come up with some alternative facts to support your complete bullshit stance.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EPA intends to form red t...