General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid anyone remember when Scott Walker "upset" his recall?
It was weird, because all indications were that he would not survive it
But then....
He just...you know...won.
And then I see *this* story, and it makes me wonder how many trial runs they did before they started fucking with our voting machines (Yep, I said it):
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/apr/28/greg-gianforte-republican-candidate-congress-russia-companies?CMP=share_btn_tw
Squinch
(50,949 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)of 45's wacko doctor releasing that weird statement saying Donald is the healthiest EVARS and then suddenly, Hillary is videotaped with the flu...
Marionettes?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)There was enough support to get a recall, but never enough support showing in the polls for it to succeed.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)I feel less 'conspiracy-y' now
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)dragonlady
(3,577 posts)Some thought they were finished when they signed the recall petition. In hindsight, every person who circulated petitions should have been trained to stress that there would also be an election and we needed to win it. Recall happens so rarely that most people are not familiar with the procedure, especially those who are hazy on regular elections (and there are more of those than you would think).
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)unless, of course, you are an election integrity activist, then it was expected.
And the big red flag is the city Walker ran, aka Sheriff Clarke's town!
Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)and it's "sore loser," "where's your evidence," I guess they mean other than scientific polls, "conspiracy theorist," etc. Notice how the right trashed the perceived efficacy of polling? They watched to see if their duplicity would be tolerated. It was.