Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lapucelle

(18,741 posts)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 12:42 PM Apr 2017

Chuck Todd MTP 4/23: Genuine Ignorance or Alternative Facts?

“What is the Democratic Party doing getting involved in a mayoral race in Kansas?” a grinning Todd asked his panel on MTP this morning.

Did Todd know that the answer to his question was readily available to anyone truly interested in finding out? It was the news division of his own parent network that reported the facts in a news story just yesterday.

As per NBC News:

The tensions (between Sanders and Democrats over his non-endorsement of Ossoff) were further elevated by the fact that Sanders praised a mayoral candidate in Omaha, Nebraska, who was revealed to have a mixed record on abortion.

At Sanders' request, the DNC added a stop on the tour to promote Health Mello, prompting backlash from pro-choice groups and accusations that Sanders was applying a double standard — or perhaps a loyalty test — about what it means to be a progressive.

Perez, who skipped the Omaha stop in order to campaign for Ossoff, had to put out his own clarifying statement Friday.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/democrats-vs-trump/bernie-sanders-clarifies-support-jon-ossoff-after-dustup-n749491

Say what? The unscheduled stop was added to accommodate a specific request made by Sanders? Perez didn’t participate? Then why did Chuck blame Perez for a mess that Democrats didn’t make? That wasn’t very honest.

Was Chuck uniformed, misinformed, or deliberately dissembling? We deserve better from a man who touts himself as a fearless truth-teller.

Journalists have a duty not to put their thumbs on the scale through the deliberate omission of important facts and context. Are there any rules anymore, Chuck? And if so, will you actually play by them? These days, what passes as journalism could use a little refereeing. Democrats are not afraid to blow the whistle
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chuck Todd MTP 4/23: Genuine Ignorance or Alternative Facts? (Original Post) lapucelle Apr 2017 OP
Willful ignorance. Letterman had him pegged 24 hours after his first MTP show: DFW Apr 2017 #1
So agree. Wellstone ruled Apr 2017 #2

DFW

(54,956 posts)
1. Willful ignorance. Letterman had him pegged 24 hours after his first MTP show:
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 12:54 PM
Apr 2017
http://crooksandliars.com/cltv/2014/09/late-show-chuck-todd-it

Todd is a partisan Republican (like so many, such a his predecessor, David Gregory, along with Andrea Mitchell at NBC, Wolf Blitzer at CNN, etc etc etc). Fine with me, but if you want to be a media journalist, either openly declare your allegiance, like Rachel Maddow or Fox and Frauds, or bury it completely. Don't say you're neutral, and then openly put the lie to it every time the camera is on you.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chuck Todd MTP 4/23: Genu...