Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:58 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
We are at war. You can pretend we can be one country again, but we can't.
The battle lines have been drawn and the troops are amassing on the field.
I hear many on DU who want common ground between us and the GOP. They want common ground between intelligent professors and inbred rednecks. Sorry, it isn't going to happen. There is no chance to heal these wounds. Since Reagan, they have declared war on US. Remember "Government isn't the solution, it's the problem"? That was code, saying we, the liberals, the progressives, the intelligent ones, the reason based community, are the problem and Lee Greenwood is the solution. It was a declaration of war, although we didn't see it as such. Fast forward to today - it's clear there's a war going on, and the minute we fight back, we get accused of provocation. Some here want us to make nice with them. They want us to make nice with people who want minorities dead, women kept and our children indoctrinated with their fairy tales. They want us to make nice with people who think they can change reality just by belieiving in a different one. They want us to make nice with people who won't be happy until the middle class is long gone, and we're back in a feudal system. Well I am here to say FUCK NICE! I don't want common ground with these people. I want a HIGHER ground from them, so if they are in my metaphorical cross hairs I can take them out like the pests they are. I want them gone, and I want them to be tossed to the scrapheap of history. Do you know what these people think of you? Do you know what they call you behind closed doors - well you can probably guess because Rush has been doing it out in the open. But you women, women who want to make your own decisions - they think you are sluts. They think you are whores. They think you are less human than they are. They think you are incapable of making an intelligent decision. They are aghast you would question their Iron and Bronze age moral code, and not do what they say. They also train other women to hate you, to view you in contempt. Do me a favor. Google "Quiverfull Movement" right now. Then after that, google "The Phoenix and the Olive Branch." The latter is a blog run by a survivor of the Quiverfull movement, and she spills the beans on the Patriarchal Slavery that is Quiverfull. Minorities - they do not believe you are Americans. Here, let me show you a line from De Niro's excellent movie "The Good Shepherd." Edward Wilson, a CIA operative is talking to a Mafioso who asks him what WASPS have to go back to, since the Italians have their families, etc.
This is what they, the Republicans, think of you. This is how they view you. As visitors. You are not American. This is what they really mean when they say Obama isn't an American. It has nothing to do with laws, and everything to do with his skin color and ethnicity. So play nice with these people? Sorry, I don't negotiate with terrorists.
|
183 replies, 22457 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | OP |
bupkus | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
WilliamPitt | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
EFerrari | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
WilliamPitt | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
Gregorian | Jun 2012 | #29 | |
HiPointDem | Jun 2012 | #147 | |
M0rpheus | Jun 2012 | #154 | |
HiPointDem | Jun 2012 | #156 | |
Johnny Noshoes | Jun 2012 | #159 | |
abelenkpe | Jun 2012 | #45 | |
freshwest | Jul 2012 | #177 | |
kestrel91316 | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
leftstreet | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #7 | |
leftstreet | Jun 2012 | #10 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #13 | |
leftstreet | Jun 2012 | #39 | |
whistler162 | Jun 2012 | #8 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #9 | |
HangOnKids | Jun 2012 | #14 | |
Tigress DEM | Jun 2012 | #31 | |
Chan790 | Jun 2012 | #98 | |
JNelson6563 | Jun 2012 | #100 | |
Meiko | Jun 2012 | #126 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #157 | |
freshwest | Jun 2012 | #12 | |
Autumn | Jun 2012 | #142 | |
freshwest | Jun 2012 | #11 | |
Ohio Joe | Jun 2012 | #15 | |
girl gone mad | Jun 2012 | #16 | |
Tigress DEM | Jun 2012 | #33 | |
socialist_n_TN | Jun 2012 | #68 | |
Zultra | Jun 2012 | #138 | |
socialist_n_TN | Jun 2012 | #165 | |
baldguy | Jun 2012 | #166 | |
Zorra | Jun 2012 | #148 | |
hay rick | Jun 2012 | #17 | |
Tigress DEM | Jun 2012 | #34 | |
hifiguy | Jun 2012 | #18 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #21 | |
Odin2005 | Jun 2012 | #74 | |
hifiguy | Jun 2012 | #92 | |
HangOnKids | Jun 2012 | #93 | |
TBF | Jun 2012 | #145 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #19 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #20 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #22 | |
hifiguy | Jun 2012 | #25 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #79 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #103 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #89 | |
Tigress DEM | Jun 2012 | #38 | |
Odin2005 | Jun 2012 | #75 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #90 | |
Art_from_Ark | Jul 2012 | #182 | |
kctim | Jun 2012 | #28 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #30 | |
kctim | Jul 2012 | #174 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jul 2012 | #180 | |
I Love a Mystery | Jun 2012 | #78 | |
treestar | Jun 2012 | #125 | |
I Love a Mystery | Jul 2012 | #169 | |
Dash87 | Jun 2012 | #116 | |
Post removed | Jun 2012 | #139 | |
Comrade Grumpy | Jun 2012 | #143 | |
Dash87 | Jul 2012 | #171 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #87 | |
Dash87 | Jun 2012 | #119 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #153 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #158 | |
kctim | Jun 2012 | #23 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #40 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #50 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #57 | |
LiberalLoner | Jun 2012 | #81 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #91 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #107 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #111 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #113 | |
RZM | Jun 2012 | #117 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #121 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #123 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #124 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #129 | |
Chan790 | Jun 2012 | #104 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #109 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #122 | |
Chan790 | Jun 2012 | #141 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #163 | |
Odin2005 | Jun 2012 | #131 | |
kctim | Jul 2012 | #172 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jul 2012 | #173 | |
Tigress DEM | Jun 2012 | #52 | |
zappaman | Jun 2012 | #58 | |
socialist_n_TN | Jun 2012 | #65 | |
Doctor_J | Jun 2012 | #134 | |
kctim | Jul 2012 | #176 | |
Doctor_J | Jul 2012 | #178 | |
kctim | Jul 2012 | #179 | |
Ken Burch | Jun 2012 | #24 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #48 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2012 | #51 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #94 | |
Igel | Jun 2012 | #59 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #95 | |
Herlong | Jun 2012 | #133 | |
JustAnotherGen | Jun 2012 | #26 | |
Igel | Jun 2012 | #61 | |
pscot | Jun 2012 | #130 | |
ret5hd | Jun 2012 | #160 | |
DhhD | Jun 2012 | #167 | |
phantom power | Jun 2012 | #27 | |
skydive forever | Jun 2012 | #32 | |
Gregorian | Jun 2012 | #35 | |
former9thward | Jun 2012 | #36 | |
pintobean | Jun 2012 | #44 | |
MineralMan | Jun 2012 | #84 | |
AynRandCollectedSS | Jun 2012 | #37 | |
agent46 | Jun 2012 | #41 | |
pintobean | Jun 2012 | #42 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #47 | |
pintobean | Jun 2012 | #49 | |
greytdemocrat | Jun 2012 | #66 | |
MineralMan | Jun 2012 | #83 | |
HALO141 | Jun 2012 | #43 | |
Mockingjay | Jun 2012 | #46 | |
patrice | Jun 2012 | #53 | |
Lint Head | Jun 2012 | #54 | |
deaniac21 | Jun 2012 | #55 | |
Jamaal510 | Jun 2012 | #56 | |
freshwest | Feb 2013 | #183 | |
magical thyme | Jun 2012 | #60 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #99 | |
abelenkpe | Jun 2012 | #62 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #63 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #106 | |
abelenkpe | Jul 2012 | #170 | |
LongTomH | Jun 2012 | #149 | |
TrollBuster9090 | Jun 2012 | #64 | |
rufus dog | Jun 2012 | #67 | |
chknltl | Jun 2012 | #69 | |
Laelth | Jun 2012 | #82 | |
chknltl | Jun 2012 | #168 | |
Ghost of Huey Long | Jun 2012 | #88 | |
chknltl | Jun 2012 | #164 | |
Snarkoleptic | Jun 2012 | #70 | |
gordianot | Jun 2012 | #80 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #108 | |
Kablooie | Jun 2012 | #71 | |
DonCoquixote | Jun 2012 | #72 | |
Odin2005 | Jun 2012 | #73 | |
tblue | Jun 2012 | #76 | |
flamingdem | Jun 2012 | #77 | |
MineralMan | Jun 2012 | #85 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #86 | |
hifiguy | Jun 2012 | #96 | |
coalition_unwilling | Jun 2012 | #102 | |
mythology | Jun 2012 | #161 | |
Dustlawyer | Jun 2012 | #97 | |
socialist_n_TN | Jun 2012 | #101 | |
randome | Jun 2012 | #112 | |
socialist_n_TN | Jun 2012 | #128 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #137 | |
HiPointDem | Jun 2012 | #150 | |
RevStPatrick | Jun 2012 | #105 | |
heaven05 | Jun 2012 | #110 | |
woo me with science | Jun 2012 | #114 | |
DearAbby | Jun 2012 | #115 | |
WillyT | Jun 2012 | #118 | |
RZM | Jun 2012 | #120 | |
lonestarnot | Jun 2012 | #127 | |
Homer Wells | Jun 2012 | #132 | |
Herlong | Jun 2012 | #135 | |
Taverner | Jun 2012 | #136 | |
Herlong | Jun 2012 | #144 | |
Autumn | Jun 2012 | #140 | |
Phlem | Jun 2012 | #146 | |
dtom67 | Jun 2012 | #151 | |
Enrique | Jun 2012 | #152 | |
Rex | Jun 2012 | #155 | |
Herlong | Jun 2012 | #162 | |
B Calm | Jul 2012 | #175 | |
Herlong | Jul 2012 | #181 |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:07 PM
bupkus (1,981 posts)
1. K&R +1
There is no common ground with these people because they refuse to consider any ground common ground.
They just want THEIR country back. But it isn't their country. It's OUR country. Enough is enough. No more dealing with traitors. No more negotiating with the enemy. We want OUR country back. Our country that was ruled by intellect not by superstition. Where government offered solutions to society's problems that only government could handle. Where education was valued for learning, not an opportunity for indoctrination. Where society moved ahead, not back to the Dark Ages. |
Response to WilliamPitt (Reply #2)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:10 PM
EFerrari (163,986 posts)
3. I have an awful writing block just now. I'm so happy you do not.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to EFerrari (Reply #3)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:11 PM
WilliamPitt (58,179 posts)
4. Long walk with headphones listening to 'My Favorite Things' by Coltrane
Does the trick for me every time.
Thanks! |
Response to WilliamPitt (Reply #4)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:56 PM
Gregorian (23,867 posts)
29. Hey, I think you'd like these.
&feature=related The Wes Montgomery, especially, brought me back to the days when I was part of sessions like these. What struck me most about it, recently, was how intelligent and non-conservative it felt. Very soothing in times as rigidly opposed as these. |
Response to Gregorian (Reply #29)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 03:07 PM
HiPointDem (20,729 posts)
147. who is the dwarf pianist?
Response to HiPointDem (Reply #147)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 04:01 PM
M0rpheus (885 posts)
154. Michel Petrucciani
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Petrucciani
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1417086/ http://www.jazzprofessional.com/profiles/Michel%20Petrucciani.htm *Thanks his grandfather for passing on an appreciation for good music* |
Response to M0rpheus (Reply #154)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 04:05 PM
HiPointDem (20,729 posts)
156. thanks. i was suprised because his hands don't look so flexible.
Response to HiPointDem (Reply #147)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 04:08 PM
Johnny Noshoes (1,967 posts)
159. That is
Michel Petrucciani.
|
Response to WilliamPitt (Reply #2)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:16 PM
abelenkpe (9,933 posts)
45. Good article! nt
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:12 PM
kestrel91316 (51,666 posts)
5. + 5 brazillion
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:12 PM
leftstreet (34,928 posts)
6. Nonsense. The Ruling Class creates wars the rest of us fight
From political 'wars' to class 'wars' to 'wars' for oil and resources
|
Response to leftstreet (Reply #6)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:13 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
7. Look - I'm a Socialist and I understand this
However, the baby has ran off with the bathwater and turned it into napalm here...
|
Response to Taverner (Reply #7)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:17 PM
leftstreet (34,928 posts)
10. Don't fret. Half the eligible people don't vote
They aren't part of the political 'war' so they still have their sanity
![]() |
Response to leftstreet (Reply #10)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:22 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
13. However, since the Glenn Beckkks and Rushes out there have stirred them up, they vote now
Response to Taverner (Reply #13)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:02 PM
leftstreet (34,928 posts)
39. There are a lot of people out there who don't listen to them
You know that, right?
|
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:14 PM
whistler162 (11,155 posts)
8. Better cover up
your hate is showing!
|
Response to whistler162 (Reply #8)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:16 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
9. Good. Let it shine, let it shine
I hate people who view me and my bretheren as non humans.
I hate them and want them to shut the fuck up. I hate them and hope they go away. Any way. I am not a Christian, so loving your enemies is off my table. If you want someone who loves his enemies, go see Michael Moore. He's the closest thing you'll find as per a real Christian out there. As for me, I'm an Atheist, I'm a Socialist, and I hate hate hate Republicans. |
Response to Taverner (Reply #9)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:24 PM
HangOnKids (4,291 posts)
14. Indeed! Don't Cover Up A God Damn Thing
Excellent rant, loved this part:
I hate them and want them to shut the fuck up. I hate them and hope they go away. Any way. ![]() |
Response to Taverner (Reply #9)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:57 PM
Tigress DEM (7,887 posts)
31. I hate what they do and they can change or not, but it's gotta stop.
Thing is, it's not even just about being Christian toward someone or not. It's about existing in the same communities and having common sense and reason become the rule of law.
All the hate you hang onto doesn't touch them, but it wrecks what you can be as a person of real common sense and reason. Still, I feel perfectly fine hating what they are doing and have been doing and being vocal about it and in my heart and at week moments I feel the overwhelming urge to just hate "them" but I resist because that is THEIR fucking game, not mine. WE WIN when it's about US and about the TRUTH. THAT is the job I gotta stay focused on. WE LOSE when we get into the whole US vs THEM shit because they just want to fight and do damage. WE wind up fighting people, labeling THEM as the evil, awful enemies when really people can just get stuck on dumb ass stuff. I have people I already loved before this shit hit the fan who are drinking the kool aid because the supposed MSM is telling them lies. SO if they are basing their opinions on lies and letting themselves be fooled, I can still tell them the truth and make them accountable for letting themselves be fooled. The way I look at it is, if I can take back ANYONE who has been indoctrinated, then it's a sweet victory and should be celebrated. Keeping hate for other Americans out of the equation keeps me in a better state of mind. Still I understand WHY you feel the way you do. It just isn't healthy for me to go there. Tig |
Response to Tigress DEM (Reply #31)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:36 AM
Chan790 (20,176 posts)
98. It is folly to try to divorce hatred of them from hatred of their acts.
I hate them. By their deeds they are known. I feel justified in hating them as I hate evil.
|
Response to Taverner (Reply #9)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:40 AM
JNelson6563 (28,151 posts)
100. I'm with you on all points. One quibble...
if not for his enemies Moore would not be a wealthy, famous film maker. If I were him I wouldn't hate them either. Hard to hate a goose that keeps laying gold eggs.
Julie |
Response to Taverner (Reply #9)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:14 PM
Meiko (1,076 posts)
126. Sounds to me like you hate everything
Is there anything in this life that you enjoy? Is there anything you like to do except make yourself miserable telling everyone how much you hate things. Do you have family you enjoy or are there members that belong to the other side so you hate them too. One of the problems we have in this country today is too much hate and it shows in everything we do, politics, movies,even the way we drive. Hate has permeated everything that was once good in this country.
There was a time when we could live together and agree to disagree, it didn't mean you hated your neighbor just because he was of a different political leaning. It's tragic really it will be the death of us. I'm sorry but I can't buy into the idea that the boogeyman right is out to get me. Hate mongers like Limbaugh will always be with us, I choose not to listen to them. I believe my side is correct but I do not hate the right for having their own opinion. The system is devised for pro and con, give and take. We would not survive very long as a country with only one party. It's our differences that make us strong and holds us together, not the hate. Everyone thinks their idea is better but we have to share this country we live in. It can't be one groups way all the time. It's not good for the people and it's not good for the country. We have to start listening to each other again. We have a lot of core problems in this country that need to be attacked as a group. I know that there will always be people like you, you hate everyone and everything that doesn't agree with you. Even when you have your way you are not happy and you just find something else to hate. I believe your kind is in the minority and we will survive as a people and a nation even without your help. |
Response to Meiko (Reply #126)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 04:06 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
157. I love, I hate, I dream, I think - I'm human
And willing to admit it
|
Response to whistler162 (Reply #8)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:20 PM
freshwest (53,661 posts)
12. We might define hatred as self-defense. Better writers than I can define the difference in the two..
May be able to flesh it out in terms of fear and self-interest. Is that what we're saying?
|
Response to whistler162 (Reply #8)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:39 PM
Autumn (42,599 posts)
142. We need a lot more hate then.
Fuck nice
|
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:18 PM
freshwest (53,661 posts)
11. Excellent! K & R.
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:27 PM
Ohio Joe (20,574 posts)
15. Well said - rec'd - nt
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:29 PM
girl gone mad (20,634 posts)
16. Divide and conquer no more.
I have neither hatred nor fear toward those being manipulated by powerful and greedy interests.
The only war worth fighting now is the war for economic justice. Once we accomplish that, much of this hatred and ignorance will fade away. |
Response to girl gone mad (Reply #16)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 09:18 PM
socialist_n_TN (11,481 posts)
68. As a Marxist, I agree. HOWEVER.......
IF the working class falls into the error of fascism and cannot be educated out of it, it must be fought.
The RW in this country, personified by the current state of the Republican Party, borders on fascism along with their supporters, even the supporters in the working class. If they can't be educated out of it, it must be fought. |
Response to socialist_n_TN (Reply #68)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:32 PM
Zultra (3 posts)
138. Responsibility
How can any same person be a Marxist?
Do you even acknowledge the hundred or so million killed by the Bolsheviks? |
Response to Zultra (Reply #138)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 05:37 PM
socialist_n_TN (11,481 posts)
165. I don't take responsibility for the perversions of Stalinism......
My Marxist tendency was persecuted more by the Stalinists than any other group.
As to how can any "same" person be a Marxist, ALL of business, and this is ESPECIALLY true of the bigger businesses, nowdays is run on Marxist principles. They just use those principles to screw the working class rather than HELP the working class. |
Response to Zultra (Reply #138)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 05:50 PM
baldguy (36,649 posts)
166. Not all Marxists are Bolsheviks.
Or are you too stupid to understand that?
|
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:30 PM
hay rick (6,505 posts)
17. Whoa! This is the least bipartisan post I've seen all week.
If you aren't angry you aren't paying attention.
|
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:30 PM
hifiguy (33,688 posts)
18. Bravo, Taverner. Great rant!
"Arguing with one who has abandoned reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine
I've reached my Popeye Point with these dimwits, addlepates, nincompoops and god-botherers: I've had all I can stand and I can't stands no more! I refuse to even attempt to make common cause with people who would happily destroy me. |
Response to hifiguy (Reply #18)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:22 AM
Odin2005 (53,521 posts)
74. I wish we could like posts. This one deserves it!
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #74)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:15 AM
hifiguy (33,688 posts)
92. Thanks, Odin!
![]() |
Response to hifiguy (Reply #18)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:15 AM
HangOnKids (4,291 posts)
93. Brilliant The Popeye Point
"dimwits, addlepates, nincompoops and god-botherers" Right on brother!
![]() |
Response to hifiguy (Reply #18)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:59 PM
TBF (31,869 posts)
145. Excellent. I agree. nt
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:31 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
19. I have said that we are in a cold civil war
that does not mean I am looking forwards to it going hot.
I expect it, but that does not mean I am crazy enough to even look forwards to it. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #19)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:32 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
20. It's going to be horrible for all parties involved, but it has to happen
The First Civil War was never resolved
|
Response to Taverner (Reply #20)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:37 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
22. Some of these issues go back to 1776
But I am not looking forwards to it.
|
Response to Taverner (Reply #20)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:48 PM
hifiguy (33,688 posts)
25. No it wasn't. The South was never made to realize that it
had been completely defeated and that it had better shape up and wise up or else. A philosophy of firmness and forced confrontation with the truth worked very nicely to turn Japan and Germany into responsible global citizens after the Second World War. Reconstruction should have lasted a minimum of thirty years. Then we might have been spared the hordes of neo-Confederates and retrograde goofballs who have been polluting the national discourse for the last 30+ years.
|
Response to hifiguy (Reply #25)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:42 AM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
79. Not sure you have it...
Response to Taverner (Reply #79)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:48 AM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
103. BTW...I have no idea what I was trying to say here
![]() |
Response to hifiguy (Reply #25)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:02 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
89. Ironically, it was the 19th Century's version of Bush v. Gore
(1876 Hayes v. Tilden dust-up) that brought an end to Reconstruction. Essentially Republicans agreed to end Reconstruction in return for securing enough Southern Electoral College support from Florida, South Carolina and Louisiana to put Hayes (the Republican and a Civil War military hero) into the White House, even though Tilden (the Dem) won the popular vote nationally.
A Faustian bargain if ever there were one. |
Response to Taverner (Reply #20)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:01 PM
Tigress DEM (7,887 posts)
38. It may never BE fully resolved, as in the losing side accepting reality.
BUT, it WAS resolved for those with the common sense to stop tearing apart our country and focus on moving forward.
The First Civil War was never resolved Tig |
Response to Taverner (Reply #20)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:25 AM
Odin2005 (53,521 posts)
75. General Sherman didn't lay waste to enough.
If I had been in charge back then I would have had every Planter Aristocrat "liquidated".
|
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #75)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:05 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
90. Forget 'liquidation.' If I had been Sherman, I would have gone all
Old Testatment on their asses and salted the earth.
But I take your point ![]() |
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #75)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:50 PM
Art_from_Ark (27,247 posts)
182. What a horrible statement
Sherman's march of destruction is one reason for the decades-long resentment against the North. Saying it didn't destroy enough is like Russia saying, "Damn, we should have torched more of Chechnya". And the North had its version of "planter aristocrats", that is, "industrialists", who had no qualms about using child labor or exploiting underpaid adult labor until the workers either died or became too sick to work.
And for that matter, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were "planter aristocrats". Would you have liquidated them? |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #19)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:54 PM
kctim (3,575 posts)
28. Ah yes, the ever popular "coming second civil war" rhetoric
Been hearing this from the extreme right for decades now.
Sorry, but neither extreme has the numbers of support to bring it about. The coming second civil war is based on the same thing your opinions of each other are based one: fantasy. |
Response to kctim (Reply #28)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:57 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
30. Except that I am not basing this on your fantasies
but current conditions on the ground, like both sides creating the enemy of the other side and dehumanizing it.
Those are pre conditions, read a history book or two. I will not recommend you debrief refugees from actual well civil wars, because you would not get it. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #30)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:34 PM
kctim (3,575 posts)
174. That is not what is happening at all
"Current conditions on the ground" are no where near what the two extremes say they are. Those extremes are only creating enemies amongst themselves, not to the majority. The VAST majority of us live, love and get along with our neighbors, family and friends who hold different beliefs.
Tell us something please, how many of those refugees were the results of a civil war that occurred in a country with a stable and free government such as ours? How many of those civil wars were started because 1% of the people didn't get their 'free' health care, educations and abortions? How many were started because government required ALL contribute to the needs of society? NONE. March and cry about bankers. Play soldier in the woods. Doesn't matter one bit. The simple fact is that the end of the country is not coming about simply because a very very small percent of the population is not getting everything they want. |
Response to kctim (Reply #174)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 07:08 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
180. I guess we all have imagined Right Wing Radio
or this lovely trope, "Liberalism is a Mental Disease."
Or perhaps we have all missed the many statements about the insanity of Republicans. Those my dear are the first steps. You can use all the lipstick you want on this pig, it is still a pig. And sadly I am not talking of play soldier or marches in the streets. But I am sure you have no understanding of what I am talking about. When it comes, you will still refuse to see it, of that I am proof positive, after all we are special and exceptional... |
Response to kctim (Reply #28)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:39 AM
I Love a Mystery (30 posts)
78. Agreed.
Some of the posters here sound like they belong on those "Doomsday Preppers" shows.
|
Response to I Love a Mystery (Reply #78)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:09 PM
treestar (81,204 posts)
125. Welcome to DU
They sure do sound like that!
|
Response to treestar (Reply #125)
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 04:09 AM
I Love a Mystery (30 posts)
169. Thanks, treestar!
Response to kctim (Reply #28)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:19 PM
Dash87 (3,220 posts)
116. lol I love the stupid right-wing dummies, such as those on militia websites -
It's the absolute epicenter of passive-aggressiveness. Every other post is always "I'm going to do this and this... you know... when the time comes!"
Yet somehow, right now, according to them, the government needs to be overthrown immediately. Basically, they're Cheeto-munching losers who live in mom's basement. The only activity they ever do is go to the firing range, and have GI Joe fantasies of UN invasions while playing with themselves to repeats of "Red Dawn." They could shoot a gun, but they probably can't sprint (listing any amount of distance here would be irrelevant) without letting out a few nasally whines and retreating back into their mom's basement with their computer that's filled with porn and World of Warcraft stuff. |
Response to Dash87 (Reply #116)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #139)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:47 PM
Comrade Grumpy (13,184 posts)
143. Did you get lost on your way to that other web site?
Response to Comrade Grumpy (Reply #143)
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 02:40 PM
Dash87 (3,220 posts)
171. I think it hit too close to home. lol
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #19)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 10:55 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
87. I'm with Nadin. Right now a 'cold civil war' (but with its
Bleeding Kansas moments, a la Gabrielle Giffords and the police smashup of Occupy camps).
Civil wars (the hot kind) are horrible and, imho, usually increase the net amount of suffering on the planet by one or more orders of magnitude. Even though hindsight may prove a civil war entirely justified (like our first one), to most of those who suffer its consequences, such justification is frigid cold comfort. |
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #87)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:27 PM
Dash87 (3,220 posts)
119. The extreme can't do a thing right now.
What I fear, though, is a charismatic leader to unite them towards one common goal. They're already taking (or have taken over) the Republican party. Mitt is a hated dork (by both sides), and is not one of them.
What I'm afraid of is one of the fake "Super-Christian" men with bright, fake teeth, the slicked-back hair, and the energizing personality (think, like those preachers at the mega-churches) screaming about how the extreme right needs to take over and make America "Christian" again (or, when removing the coded words, make America a theocracy and give him all the power). With that man coming to power, and a religious revival in the country (brought about by a combination of his speaking power /energy, and changes in our culture), things would get very bad. |
Response to Dash87 (Reply #119)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 03:52 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
153. We have had a very slow up tick in violence
As to your charismatic leader, look outside conventional politics, a few are already there and taking form.
I started writing a novel based on this back during the Clinton years. I put it permanently on hold with Columbine. Some of the things in it, based on research on that movement, have happened since. I have kept up with them. Highly recomend the Southern Poverty Law Center as a place to follow. But potentially we have four people who could fit the proto leader role right now...and I am sure a couple more are just under the radar. |
Response to Dash87 (Reply #119)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 04:08 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
158. It would be Hitler all over again
And this is not hyperbole or an exaggeration
|
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:43 PM
kctim (3,575 posts)
23. So we are at war and can't be one country again
because the minority group of the Democratic Party with extreme views cannot get along with the minority group of the Republican Party with extreme views?
I don't think so. Your false intentionally misleading stereotypes of Republicans are just as silly as their stereotypes of Democrats. Luckily, the vast majority are intelligent enough to know that neither extreme represents the beliefs and values of the average American. And, luckily, this majority, filled with left leaning and right leaning Americans, will re-elect President Obama to his second term come November. |
Response to kctim (Reply #23)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:06 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
40. You really NEED to pick up a history book
civil wars are NOT STARTED by majorities, you silly. They are actually started by MINORITIES, who feel they have but one way open to achieve their goals... that be the ammo box.
Sectarian conflicts, and civil wars can and do become sectarian. do require something closer to a strong minority. Oh I forgot, the US IS EXCEPTIONAL and none of these conditions we are starting to meet on the ground matter, well because we ARE exceptional and live well, outside of history. My mistake. Sorry. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #40)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:29 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
50. Sigh - it seems like too many Americans want to hide behind their teddy bears
Instead of foment change
|
Response to Taverner (Reply #50)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:17 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
57. It's not about fomenting change
or not.
What you are seeing is the classic denial I heard from many a refugee. Most people do not want to believe things can be that bad, until well, shit they are fully undeniable. It is human nature. As one put it to me, paraphrase, as part of the ethnic cleansing, "who could believe they were actually killing people?" This is a common patter in every country around the world. Some acts or events are so outside of the normal course of events that they become plain out impossible to believe. We know of this from Holocaust survivors and the Germans themselves, but it is hardly limited to the "good war." The US, well read the years before the hot civil war. Even in the midst of the Kansas Little War, people were still in denial this could come to pass in the US. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #57)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 05:51 AM
LiberalLoner (9,050 posts)
81. +1
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #57)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:12 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
91. Nadin, hate to burst your bubble about "Holocaust survivors and the Germans
themselves," but Daniel Goldhagen and others have pretty much demolished the notion that the typical German (the so-called 'Good German') did not know what that Nazis were up to. Even as the Nazi regime was collapsing on both fronts, massive numbers of 'Good Germans' participated in the forcible transfer of Jewish detainees from one concentration camp to another.
The average German knew full well what Hitler and the Nazis were up to. They may not have known about the gory details of Auschwitz, but they knew enough to make them culpable before history's judgment. |
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #91)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:02 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
107. I am not talking of good germans or bad germans
And the typical german BY THE END OF THE WAR knew, in 1935 hardly... and that is what I am talking about
|
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #107)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:08 PM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
111. Ah, got you. I agree that the Holocaust would have been
inconceivable to the average German in 1935 and probably many if not most run-of-the-mill Nazi Party members. (And I'm reasonably sure Goldhagen would agree also
![]() BTW, if you get a chance, Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioners is well worth the time and effort to read. |
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #111)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:08 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
113. Yup, read it
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #91)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:19 PM
RZM (8,556 posts)
117. That's still a hotly debated question
And Goldhagen certainly isn't without his critics.
My personal opinion is that peole 'knew,' meaning most people kinda sorta knew, but maybe chose not to think about it too much. But I'm sure feelings ran the gamut. Some probably had a good idea of exactly what was going on, others maybe had a much less realistic view. But I'll be most had at least some inkling that mass murder was occurring. That range of opinion existed among the European Jewish population itself, at least until the death camps were operating in full force from late 1941-on. The Rosenstrasse affair is an interesting example. That was an action in early 1943 where Himmler tried to round up and deport the last Jews living in Berlin. These were assimilated German Jewish men who were married to non-Jewish women. While they were being detained, their wives went out into the streets and protested in front of the building where they were held. Surprisingly, the Nazis ended up backing down. There's a recent German movie about this, though I haven't seen it. The incident could be construed as evidence that the forceful behavior of these women meant that they knew full well what was in store for their husbands. Of course, you could also argue that anybody would be worried and mad if their spouse was going to be sent away. But it does point in the direction that the average German person knew that when the Nazis sent Jews east, very bad things were in store. |
Response to RZM (Reply #117)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:30 PM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
121. It wouldn't be academia without 'critics'. I must confess I have
not stayed fully abreast of the criticism of Goldhagen's work, even though I know of it. AFAIK, though, Goldhagen's central thesis - that the average German both knew and approved of the Nazi's genocidal program - still stands.
I am not familiar with Rosenstrasse. I can see I have some significant gaps in my own historical knowledge of the time. Thanks for the tip and I will be checking it out this weekend. I will say this: even the Pope in Rome knew by 1941-2 what was going down in the killing centers in Poland. So to think that the average German did not understand what 'transport East' meant demands a level of credulity that can't be sustained for very long. (I like your notion of a spectrum of awareness, btw, as it seems to do the most justice to the human experience as I understand it.) Nadin subsequently clarified that she was referring to the Holocaust being inconceivable to most Germans in the mid-30s, a position with which I also agree. |
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #121)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:41 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
123. Well by the 1940s there were still Germans who did not know
and could not conceive of it. There were different levels of awareness, just like every other genocide.
The people carrying it out, knew. Their families, especially those who lived at the camps, knew. The people who bordered the concentration camps, had a knowledge that something was happening, from probably real knowledge to just something bad. The owners of things like the chemical companies that used slave labor, knew. Von Braun, knew... the V-2 program used slave program. The train conductors knew. The average man or woman in the street not meeting any of these conditions, or married to any of the people in the above group... let me ask you a question, before the whistle blowing at Abu Graib did you think for certain anything like that was going on? For the record, when it came out, I was not shocked, saddened, but not shocked. The transports to the East were done under the same kind of state secrecy. But in the 1930s the number of people who knew was smaller, and since people did come out of the reeducation camps... I suspect to inoculate those who might think worst thoughts, and at the same time terrify them... that is why I said what I said about the 1930s. By the 1940s, which is the basis of the thesis by the way, the universe of people who knew was larger. As to government officials, as early as 1941 the US Government knew about it, from folks who actually made their way to the West... and we chose not to do a thing. Some say we chose not to believe it. Some have accused the US Government of unwilling participation in the holocaust. Suffice it to say antisemitism was rampant in the 1940s in the US... should we make that charge too? It was known all the way to the President. And so did the Churchill Government, by the by. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #123)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:58 PM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
124. You raise a very interesting question about Abu Ghraib. I was
tapped into a very well-connected left-wing network here in Los Angeles (IVAW, VetsforPeace, ANSWER, United for Peace and Justice and so on) and we all knew that very bad things were going down in occupied Iraq, atrocities by our own soldiers and mercenaries and so on. But I do not think that I can say I "knew" that Abu Ghraib specifically would be the result, even though I was very well acquainted with the French and British colonial experiences in northern Africa.
Like you, when it came out I was not surprised or shocked. More like it confirmed my worst suspicions. I did say that the establishment would fall back on the My Lai defense ("a few bad apples" ![]() |
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #124)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:25 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
129. So you were in the somewhat aware group
I wasn't. But it did not surprise me or shock me due to academic and life experience, war and atrocities go hand in hand.
Think back to the reaction to it by your not at all aware neighbors. We are fed the same kind of we're great crap...just victorious people don't do these things. Part of the reaction you yourself saw was a classic when national myths are violated. It's not Germany or the US, it's human nature. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #57)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:51 AM
Chan790 (20,176 posts)
104. It reminds me of some things I studied in college on political violence.
This though has stuck with me: From the beginning of the Final Solution until the end of WWII, the Office of the Fuhrer received an average of 1500 letters a day from common Germans to the effect of "Hey Fuhrer Hitler, You won't believe what they're doing at the work camp near my village in your name and I just thought you should know so you can put a stop to it. I love you. -Your Beloved Supporter, _______"
You see, it was easier for the average German to deny a reality they saw no way of ending than to face their powerlessness and culpability. It was impossible to believe that a leader they had been conditioned to adore could be a mad man and a paragon of cruelty & evil. It was easier to believe even in the face of overwhelming evidence that things were not as they appeared and that the Fuhrer who had vocalized an intent to exterminate Jews and social-minorities was not actually exterminating Jews and social-minorities. It is indeed human nature to be willfully-blind to the horror of conditions. |
Response to Chan790 (Reply #104)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:04 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
109. Exactly, and that is something that
Ike understood, why the forced tours.
|
Response to Chan790 (Reply #104)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:38 PM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
122. Since most of the organized mass killing was going on in Poland and not in
Germany, the scale and scope of the Holocaust may not have been grasped by provincial Germans.
Do you have a source for the 'average of 1500 letters a day'? Not disagreeing with it, but I have read widely in the field and have never encountered that claim. So I'm thinking there may be a significant hole in my bibliographical understanding that I should fill. |
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #122)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:39 PM
Chan790 (20,176 posts)
141. A professor in college who is an expert in the field.
It might have been from the German-to-English translations (which he did) of original documents and German subject-texts in that class. I at one time knew where the citation was for that but the class was over a decade ago and I don't know any longer. I may admittedly have the number wrong but I don't think so, I do recall it being substantial.
It's one of those classes where I wished I'd known at 20 how blessed I was to be in and kept the syllabus. I'd appreciate it more today than then. How many students can take an undergraduate course with someone of that caliber on the subject? I remember being a punk because he worked us harder than undergraduates were used to. ![]() |
Response to Chan790 (Reply #141)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 05:00 PM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
163. Well, you raised an interesting point in your first post, that
even when confronted with physical evidence of atrocities people can be 'blinded' to it. I think psychologists refer to this phenomenon as 'cognitive dissonance,' the anxiety that arises when someone holds strongly countervailing ideas, e.g., Our dear fuehrer Hitler could never exterminate Jews vs. Germans are exterminating Jews in our dear fuehrer Hitler's name. And the lengths people will go to in trying to reduce that anxiety.
It was the scale of the letter-writing that caught my eye in your original post. Seems directly at odds with Daniel Goldhagen's thesis in Hitler's Willing Executioners, a book I strongly recommend. |
Response to Chan790 (Reply #104)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:03 PM
Odin2005 (53,521 posts)
131. "The King can do no wrong!"
People don't like to criticize their Beloved Leader, and turn his advisers into scapegoats, instead. People believed that "if the king only knew" the BS would stop.
|
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #40)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:07 PM
kctim (3,575 posts)
172. I understand history quite well
and sizeable support is needed in order for a conflict to escalate into war. If not, the ten thousand or so militia yahoos would have already started one.
The far left and far right extremes do not have even a quarter of the support they would need to start a civil war. Yes, we are exceptional. Our form of government is exceptional. And because of that, the cries of 'government give me more' and 'government leave me alone' are no where close to having the support needed to start a civil war. |
Response to kctim (Reply #172)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:14 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
173. We are as exceptional as Rome, Spain, Britannia, France, the Netherlands
and the Middle Kingdom, I forgot Greece and a few others... and the sun is setting already son.
|
Response to kctim (Reply #23)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:30 PM
Tigress DEM (7,887 posts)
52. It's been a long struggle and some people are fully tired of being nice.
Doesn't mean we won't find a way to remain civil, but there is a lot going on with the leaders of the rethugs and what the MSM is putting out that creates a large group of people who vote against their own interest, disbelieve facts and operate on fear. Not to the high degree that the leadership wants, but enough to create a constant friction down in the political trenches.
I wish the vast majority of Americans were intelligent enough to understand that if you have a fact in one hand and a lie in the other, that mashing them up together does NOT get you the truth. The extreme beliefs don't represent the beliefs or values of the average American, but some folks can be scared into stupid stuff when they believe outrageous lies. AND as election fraud has been proven over and over again and since voter suppression is alive and doing fine in many places, they don't NEED an actual majority to "win" an election. They just have to not get caught at it, persecuted for it until the votes are recorded. I don't want a war. I'm not here to hate anyone, but if the OP is overstating the problem, you are on the opposite end minimizing it. I really WISH you were right, but I've seen a lot of otherwise intelligent people spout a lot of BS. Used to be only FAUX News watchers were decreasing their intelligence. Now CNN is putting up phony headlines. I constantly feel like there is just too much to do too many fires to put out to be really effective anywhere. Then I just pick something and get to work, hoping it helps. Tig |
Response to kctim (Reply #23)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:25 PM
zappaman (20,587 posts)
58. Yeah, "read a book!"
Even though "you won't understand it"!
Typical nasty comment from that poster. |
Response to kctim (Reply #23)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 08:18 PM
socialist_n_TN (11,481 posts)
65. Hmmmm.......
"...falsely intentionally misleading stereotypes of Republicans..." Name one Republican in a position of leadership that does NOT sound like Rush Limbaugh?
|
Response to kctim (Reply #23)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:18 PM
Doctor_J (36,392 posts)
134. what in the hell are you talking about?
minority group of the Republican Party with extreme views
the fraction of the Repukes that have extreme views is roughly 100%. You present false and misleading stereotypes of this century's fascist party - namely, that they're sane. |
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #134)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:04 PM
kctim (3,575 posts)
176. BS
The majority of Republicans and the majority of Democrats hold moderate positions on most issues and have chosen to be a Rep or Dem because of that Partys position on the issues they care about most.
There is also the problem with how the two extremes define the "other" sides so-called extreme views. The two sides have gotten so ridiculous that anything other than total acceptance of their view is "extreme." Common sense gun laws are "extreme." Marriage is between a man and a woman is "extreme." Not wanting government health care is "extreme." A tax to help those in need is "extreme." Nothing but blind childish partisanship. |
Response to kctim (Reply #176)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 04:42 PM
Doctor_J (36,392 posts)
178. oh, man
Please find me a single Dem who is as far to the left as the most "moderate" congressional Republican is to the right. The fantasy in your post is that you seem to believe that Repukes are some sort of big tent. They are ALL anti-choice, anti-health care, anti-gay right, anti-environment, anti-public school, anti-union, pro-gun, pro-prison, etc. This doesn't ake any research. Just check the Congressional voting record and see how many Repukes have voted for any legislation propsed or supported by the Dems
Since you're in MO I will forgive your ignorance. I am sure your only access to information is hate radio and Fox "News", so your reality is far from the truth. |
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #178)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 05:50 PM
kctim (3,575 posts)
179. Oh, brother
Kucinich was so far left he couldn't garner but maybe 10% of votes from Democrats.
If you left your fantasy world for a bit, you would see that in reality, there are different degrees to what people, Republican and Democrat, believe on all of the issues you bring up. There are anti-abortion Democrats and pro-abortion Republicans. There are anti government run health care Democrats and mandate friendly Republicans. Pro 2nd Amendment right Democrats and Republicans who live in fear of their 2nd Amendment right. The fact of the matter is that you use personal opinion, not fact, to stereotype people as being "anti" whatever issue they don't agree with you in lock-step on. Pretty easy to label people negatively when you are the one defining. Save your forgiveness for somebody insecure enough to need it. I believe people are responsible for their own actions, not some left or right wing media conspiracy. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:46 PM
Ken Burch (50,254 posts)
24. The only possible way there could be common ground
would be if the Republiban were solidly beaten and humbled this fall. They won't even try to work with us or show ANY moderation at all unless and until they've had the electoral stuffing knocked out of them again, and by a larger margin than 2008.
At this point, they still think they're ENTITLED to hold the White House and Congress for all eternity. |
Response to Ken Burch (Reply #24)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:27 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
48. Sounds like a plan n/t
Response to Ken Burch (Reply #24)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:29 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
51. I think it would take 3-4 year 2008 style electoral thrashings in a row.
They would have to be utterly convinced that no amount of rhetoric could give them an electoral victory based on their current positions and that they would have to moderate.
|
Response to stevenleser (Reply #51)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:22 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
94. I agree with you. Dems would need full control of all 3
branches of government for 12-20 years to repair the social safety net and reinvigorate the traditions of Western liberalism.
However, I think what would happen in such a Democratic one-party state is that the Democrats themselves would splinter along ideological and possibly sectional lines such that, in effect, we'd have Social Democrats vs. Blue Dog Democrats (with Repigs being a bunch of fringe cranks). |
Response to Ken Burch (Reply #24)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:45 PM
Igel (33,534 posts)
59. Yeah, that's what I heard.
True cooperation means doing what I want and working with me to achieve the only reasonable goals--mine. That's compromise. Anything else is, well, arrogant.
It pays to remember that Reagan and the Religious Right that helped put him in power were a *reaction.* Once you figure out the answer to the question, "A reaction to what?" then you have the proper response to the OP's question. Until you know what the action and the reaction are, you can't really do much in analyzing the forces at play. Ultimately the dispute resolves into a number of different kinds of disputes (you have to think fairly abstractly for some of them--they surface in all sorts of different ways), and the disputes go back many generations. What's happened is that the sheer amount of self-righteousness and smugness of privilege ramped up rather significantly when I was a kid as a result of prosperity. Since then self-righteousness has routinely been confused with rightness, and critical thinking with being critical. |
Response to Igel (Reply #59)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:29 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
95. I hope you will work some of your thoughts here into an original post. I'd love
Last edited Sat Jun 30, 2012, 04:53 PM - Edit history (1) to read more of your thinking on these subjects.
As for self righteousness replacing rightness, I'm reminded of Ecclesiastes: "Vanity, vanity, all is vanity" (words I try to apply to myself as much as to anyone else, but not always successfully ![]() |
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #95)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:10 PM
Herlong (649 posts)
133. Peace comes from within
Buddha Quote Peace comes from within Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without. By Buddha |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:52 PM
JustAnotherGen (30,467 posts)
26. I'm in 100% Agreement with you on this
I'm done. At this point - I'm also arrogant. We've played nice - they never play nice. We offer kindness and reconciliation - they slap us in the face.
I'm done. Just done. |
Response to JustAnotherGen (Reply #26)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 08:02 PM
Igel (33,534 posts)
61. Watched a teacher complain once.
It was during a lecture on rewards and punishments as motivation in the classroom. The idea was that a reward would increase the behavior you desired and punishment would decrease it.
She'd tried every kind of reward she could think of and had been patient. She'd tried punishment. She decided the entire thing was a crock. She'd tried praising the bad boys and saying how good it was they were finally doing what she wanted. They were being obedient. This reward produced the wrong response. She tried punishing them by sending them to the principal, causing them to miss hours and hours of class, showing the class how defiant they were. This produced the wrong response. Therefore the theory was wrong and she was through with the idea. The lecturer asked if the kids got any kind of public recognition from their peers for their defiance. "Of course." And did the kid's peers look up to the goody-two-shoes, the nice kids? "No, they were sissies." "So you're trying to get these boys to behave by making them look like sissies in front of their friends--by insulting them--and you punish them by making them look brave and defiant and make it so they don't have be in class?" His point: You define "reward" by what the kid wants; you define "punishment" in terms of what the kid defines as punishment. You're right--it's arrogant to define the rewards and punishments in terms of what the teacher thinks should be rewards and punishments. Same for "nice". I've listened to what many said Obama did to be "nice," and most of the conservatives I know found it either meaningless or insulting--picking some point that most didn't think important and yielding on it in some way that most don't care about, or saying how, exactly, the conservatives wanted things done when most didn't. Some USC folk did some research a few years ago. They asked conservatives if they understood other conservatives and if they understood liberals. They also asked liberals if they understood conservatives and other liberals. They posed a series of topics and asked each to explain themselves--and then to explain the viewspoints and reasons of others of like politics or opposing politics. They found that a relatively small percentage of conservatives were willing to explain other conservatives' politics. Most who did so were right, although they gave themselves low odds of being right. Their answers didn't always agree with their own views--conservatives who were willing to answer were aware that most other conservatives would give other reasons. Very few were willing to explain liberals' politics. Most were wrong and thought they probably were. Their knew where their knowledge ended and ignorance began. The researchers found that a startingly large percentage of liberals were willing to explain other liberals' politics. Typically each liberal said every other liberal thought precisely as s/he did; a hefty percentage were just plain wrong in explaining their colleagues' thinking. There was a marked lack of actual empathy and awareness of where one's ignorance began. A startingly large percentage of liberals were willing to explain conservatives' politics. They were overwhelmingly wrong but said they were highly confident of their answers. And they were overwhelmingly wrong in mean-spirited and petty ways, and gave themselves similarly high confidence levels. |
Response to Igel (Reply #61)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:40 PM
pscot (21,010 posts)
130. I'd like to see a link
to that USC study. Your abstract sounds somewhat counter-intuitive.
|
Response to Igel (Reply #61)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 04:26 PM
ret5hd (18,938 posts)
160. me too. i would like to see a link.
Response to Igel (Reply #61)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 05:50 PM
DhhD (4,695 posts)
167. Your thread means to me that we need a new Congress that will take care of the
business of the People instead of the Few from the old ruling class who do not need to be taken care of (do not need government or do not need a teacher). (The ruling class of the Few who wanted to continue serving the King of England paying taxes through the Bank of London Pre American Revolution and the Southern Few who had their money in America Pre Civil War.)
To me, this is also like sending an unruly student to the office; he falls behind and the others are rid of his type of society until he returns in worse shape. And others can be sent out too. Then the Few are helping to rid themselves of the People in the classroom. Finally the classroom society has gotten away from the reason for its being there in the first place, to promote everyone FORWARD. Only the Few are getting almost everything that the country has to offer. Some call this the difference between the 1% and the 99%. It seems to me that every time the Few are in power, more and more of the People are being forced to leave a society of promise or the American Dream. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:54 PM
phantom power (25,966 posts)
27. recommend
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:57 PM
skydive forever (415 posts)
32. I love that last line.
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:00 PM
Gregorian (23,867 posts)
35. Phew. It's sobering to see reality. But at least we see it now.
Today is especially hard for me. I live in a liberal community, yet I'm looking at moving. And that move means risking what I have. And being that I live where the hippies and artists moved after Haight Ashbuy, it's pretty much all downhill from here.
But it's not about me. It's about all of those communities of duped fools who live in an alternate reality. They're dragging the rest down. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:01 PM
former9thward (28,536 posts)
36. People who are at war don't vote in common elections.
So I assume in November you will be sitting at home cleaning your gun.
|
Response to pintobean (Reply #44)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 10:39 AM
MineralMan (145,030 posts)
84. LOL!
A Revolutionary Bong.
![]() |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:01 PM
AynRandCollectedSS (108 posts)
37. BRAVO!!!
I agree completely and think people that want to try to play nice with sociopaths are living in a fantasy world. It is war and my children's future is what's at stake. I will not negotiate either.
![]() |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:10 PM
agent46 (1,262 posts)
41. There is a bullshit truism
that has made the rounds over the last couple of decades as the culture war continued to heat up.
That is that Anger = Fear. Have you heard that one? Ever been reminded of it by some rational, sensible adult who knew better than you? A great way to turn people back on themselves and shut them up. No one wants to be a coward. More and more I'm seeing the subtle social engineering that has gone into pacifying the public for so long that we are now way past the frog boiling scenario in this country and yet...things still haven't gotten bad enough. Yep. It's time to get angry America. Good and angry. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:11 PM
pintobean (18,101 posts)
42. What's your plan
to make them gone?
"I want them gone, and I want them to be tossed to the scrapheap of history." If we're at war, and you won't negotiate, what is the solution? |
Response to pintobean (Reply #42)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:25 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
47. Don't give up one inch, that's my solution
Response to Taverner (Reply #47)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:28 PM
pintobean (18,101 posts)
49. They're already
running and hiding, I'm sure.
|
Response to Taverner (Reply #47)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 08:22 PM
greytdemocrat (3,296 posts)
66. Full-Auto Baby!!! nt
Response to Taverner (Reply #47)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 10:37 AM
MineralMan (145,030 posts)
83. That's not really a plan, you know.
It's a statement of resolve. A plan actually includes actions you plan to take. Without those, your resolve will simply be ignored.
|
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:14 PM
HALO141 (911 posts)
43. OH, I get it.
hah
Thought you were serious for a second. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:23 PM
Mockingjay (31 posts)
46. Your not alone in your thoughs...
This battle has been going on for a long time, these people on the Republican side are hostile people, they don't feel anyones pain but their own, they band together like gangs and clicks and they will get you any way they can. I grew up with these people, here in the south, you can't trust them and they will never change....to afraid of their friends shunning them. I only hang out with Liberals and normal people. Obama I think was dreaming thinking they would ever accept him....I can't blame him for trying, I think he knew and wanted to expose their insanity. So now the country has to deal with it...it's going to a long time before things get better if ever.
|
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:41 PM
patrice (47,992 posts)
53. There are those who are saying we will always lose as long as it is okay with us to allow
those of our own Working-Class and "lesser" Americans to continue to vote against their own interests. If these people call themselves Republicans as they do in my state, I guess that's just too damned bad, but if there's a chance of winning the CLASS WARFARE that is being carried out on us, we must cross those CLASS lines to seek solidarity with our own class.
If we can't bring ourselves to do this, there will NEVER be a super-majority to give us a chance against super-PACS, in the voting booths or in the courts. Even when we "win", it'll be splitting margins, and thus creating the co-relate of our blue-dogs in whatever the hip flavor/color of the current election cycle is. Have your read this yet? http://books.google.com/books/about/Stayin_Alive.html?id=h9acQrZmpmAC It tells the story of just exactly HOW we lost "it" and suggests the way to get it back and yes it does have to do with exactly the things you describe, but Cowie et al are calling for CLASS solidarity as a solution. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:13 PM
Lint Head (15,064 posts)
54. Stop, Hey what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down.
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:14 PM
deaniac21 (6,747 posts)
55. This thread sponsored by
[link:
![]() |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:16 PM
Jamaal510 (10,893 posts)
56. Our side is at war with
not only the Republicans that are in office and the 2-headed liar running for president (Romney), but also the not-really-liberal media, the low-info voters, conservative radio, and conservative billionaire donors.
It's going to be a long, grueling fight for progress with so many enemies and roadblocks on the other side. |
Response to Jamaal510 (Reply #56)
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 03:29 PM
freshwest (53,661 posts)
183. Well said, Jamaal.
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:54 PM
magical thyme (14,881 posts)
60. sadly, I have to agree
I've spent 2 years seeking common ground with my teaparty sister, who is 9 years older than me.
What I realized a few weeks ago, when she threatened me, was that while I've been seeking common ground, she's been seeking vulnerable moments to attack me. 3 times she has launched unprovoked attacks on me, always when she thought I was particularly vulnerable. The last attack was right after I told her my hours - already part time - had been cut at work, and this was just a few weeks after I'd told her she would never be homeless...that if they lost their home, they could come stay with me. She has a fancy-schmancy lake front home within commuting distance of NYC. 2,000 sq ft, 4 bedrooms, 3 baths for 2 childless people and 1 dog. And yet when her sil that she claims to love so much was losing her home, they didn't offer to take her in. Selfish, greedy, self-important and entitled in the worst sense of the word. All of them. ![]() |
Response to magical thyme (Reply #60)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:39 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
99. I am very sorry to hear of this - makes the 'civil war' alluded to in the OP and
upthread all the more real because it's grounded in the personal.
Igel upthread said that 'self righteousness' has taken the place of 'rightness.' Your sister illustrates that point. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 08:04 PM
abelenkpe (9,933 posts)
62. Do you know what these people think of you?
I grew up in a family that featured democrats on my mother's side of the family and republicans on my fathers side. No one was extreme in any way. For instance my father loved and respected RFK and JFK. My mother was a democrat and used to joke about canceling out my fathers vote. But as the years went on she was more influenced by my father turning into a republican after her mother passed away.
Family gatherings were always peaceful and respectful. Everyone was quite reasonable until the mid 90s. My mother started frequenting a bulletin board called the Clinton Administration Scandals which pumped out trash about whitewater and then Monica Lewinsky daily weaving the most outrageous nonsense imaginable. She alienated her own sister and brother over her non stop fixation on all the things she read on the internet concerning the Clinton administration. After 911 My mother and father suddenly started going to church regularly again. They had not gone since I was maybe five. I came back home to visit a few years later after having my son and their home was filled with religious icons, books by Rush Limbaugh and the TV was tuned non stop to FOX news. My brother was openly referring to minorities using the worst most bigoted slurs. No one even blinked much less complain. I asked him not to speak like that in front of my son and was verbally attacked. Since then they have forwarded me the most toxic hateful crap one can imagine and we've gone through periods where I've had to: 1. ask them not to send me that stuff 2. argue about my request 2. go through the silent treatment followed by a handful of decent conversations that ultimately lead to more forwarded nonsense and finally me un-friending them and filtering out their emails. I've been called a brainwashed nit wit. A California nut and fruit. A traitor. And after having to choose between saving the daughter who was developing perfectly and her twin that had no chance to survive but was threatening the survival of the other I'm now blacklisted and forever alienated from the family that raised me. There may be reasonable republicans out there. But I don't know any. In my own life those that were once reasonable have been fed a steady diet of hate from radio and TV pundits and their churches for going on 12 years now and they are spouting the most hateful rhetoric. I blame FOX news. And right wing radio. I don't think there can be any reasoning until that stuff is gone and it doesn't appear to be going anywhere. |
Response to abelenkpe (Reply #62)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 08:13 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
63. We have to kill it nt
Response to abelenkpe (Reply #62)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:58 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
106. I'm very sorry to hear about this familial civil war. When the price of maintaining
our beliefs is the severance of family ties, one has to ask whether it is worth it. I believe it is worth it, but that is very cold comfort indeed to those who must pay the price.
|
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #106)
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:46 AM
abelenkpe (9,933 posts)
170. Wish we could get along
I do try. DU is a comfort as you can imagine.
![]() |
Response to abelenkpe (Reply #62)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 03:15 PM
LongTomH (8,636 posts)
149. You're describing what has happened in a lot of families!
I can only spend a few hours at a time with my cousins on my Mom's side. They're all far right; one carries around copies of Beckerhead's book.
I should mention they're all Assembly of God (way-out Pentecostal, Evangelical) types. They're starting to give me static about 'getting saved' because the Rapture is coming, don't ya know! I will probably end up just staying away from that side of the family eventually, and that's sad! My aunt on my Dad's side remembers the Depression and FDR. She even rebuked my late Uncle (her younger brother) for using the n-word for the male nurse who was taking care of him in a veteran's hospital. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 08:13 PM
TrollBuster9090 (5,907 posts)
64. "Negotiating with terrorists" is an accurate analogy.
The bottom line is this: Republicans have been fighting dirty for 40 years for one reason, and one reason only==BECAUSE IT WORKS. BECAUSE WE NEVER CALL THEM ON IT. Because we ALWAYS take the 'High Ground'...AND LOSE.
Because nobody has ever STOPPED them from fighting dirty by giving them a taste of their own medicine. Everyone knows if you negotiate with terrorists, you just invite more terrorism. Everyone knows if you accommodate kids that are behaving badly, you just encourage more bad behavior. Everyone knows if you appease a school yard bully, you're only inviting more bullying. So WHY are we so surprised that when we try to negotiate with Republicans who are acting like political terrorists, their behavior only gets WORSE? Did we learn NOTHING from the Clinton years? It's important, because they're running exactly the same play! They started out with the idea that Clinton was not legitimate. That somehow only conservative Republicans are ENTITLED to be President, and if somebody is in the White House who is not a conservative Republican they got there dishonestly. And that justifies ANY dishonest tactic used to get rid of them. What did they do? Tried to block Clinton's stimulus plan using every dirty trick in the book. Tried to block his Healthcare Reform attempts using every dirty trick in the book. SHUT DOWN the Government over budget squabbles and hoped the public would blame it on Clinton. Attempted to INDICT his Attorney General, Janet Reno, by creating a tempest in a teapot (SEVERAL times). Tried to IMPEACH Clinton for a trumped up reason. (ie-start out by creating a fuss over an inconsequential realestate deal like WHITEWATER, and then just keep on digging, subpoenaing witnesses and documents until you EVENTUALLY find evidence of adultery. Just keep digging until you find something you can use, politically.) Sound familiar? And how did Clinton respond? For the most part by throwing himself on the floor in a helpless fetal position. So, should it really surprise us that they're now running exactly the same play against Obama, only with TEN TIMES the INTENSITY? These are political terrorists. As soon as they started voting and filibustering ideas that THEY originally sponsored, including TAX CUTS and PAYROLL TAX HOLIDAYS just because Obama supported them, it should have been obvious to anybody that this is a political terrorist strategy. POISONING THE WELL. (Do you want to know the REAL reason why Roberts FLIPPED on the conservatives yesterday? Because he didn't want to POISON THE WELL over the Healthcare Mandate. He didn't want to poison the well on what is essentially a Republican healthcare plan written by the Heritage Foundation. If Obamacare is struck down, so is Romneycare in Massachusetts. Roberts knew that if he struck down Obamacare, Romney would be completely helpless on healthcare if/when he was elected.) Wrecking the the economy and the country JUST to defeat the other party. Saying "if WE can't govern, we're not going to let anybody ELSE govern." If you appease that attitude, we're only going to get more and more of it, not less. If that doesn't work for you, try this one on for size: The American people voted Obama into office, and they've done everything they can to SABOTAGE HIS PRESIDENCY. When foreigners living in other countries deliberately try to destroy the duly elected President and Government of the United States we have no trouble calling them ENEMIES of the United States. Well, that's what these people are. If Tim Geithner had gone to China to discuss American Bonds and American Debt with them, and then Hugo Chaves had gone to China right after and said "Don't believe a word the U.S. Treasury Secretary says," we'd have no trouble calling him an enemy of the United States. So...how is it different when MARK KIRK does exactly that? If Vladimir Putin had sabotaged the American credit rating through some KGB subterfuge we'd have no trouble calling him an enemy of America. So how is it different when House Republicans destroy America's credit rating by threatening to DEFAULT on our DEBT, SOULLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF EMBARRASSING OBAMA? It's NOT different. This is war. Get your inspiration from HENRY V! (And yes, only liberals know that Henry V wasn't 'that fat English guy with six wives.' What of it?) |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 08:36 PM
rufus dog (8,419 posts)
67. Fast and Furious is a great example.
The took a Huge failure of Right Wing Policies, took the word of a lying fucking prick of an agent and smeared the good people to go after Holder and the President.
There is no working with them. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 09:49 PM
chknltl (10,558 posts)
69. No, we instead must fight the enemy, not ourselves.
(Man o man am I about to jump into hellfire here, knowing I do so against many fellow DUers I have long admired! Hope it's not my meds talking! Damn......guess there is nothing for it master Frodo, on we go.)
The corporatiststs as we can plainly see outspend the left by perhaps insurmountable amounts. Should mitt rob-me get the White House it will be because of that money. These people who are investing millions and likely billions do not do so because they think there is a chance they might win. They go into this KNOWING that they will win and they expect their wishes to be carried out by those they are purchasing. Do you think we can go toe to toe with these guys financially in this election? Hell China alone can outspend us on the left if it so chooses...and it likely will be heavily involved in our election, financially. What about all the other nations who want to financially influence our elections? Add in foreign corporations and foreign billionaires with religious craziness and add in American billionaires heavily influenced by John Birch... Look around, Wisconsin proved that we on the left do not have the financial wherewithal to compete in this war. Go back in time and inject "mad as hell" into the equation, it won't change squat! The ONLY thing I see that still scares the hell out of these big money spenders is our vote. If this was not true then why are they spending all that money trying to influence how we vote? Why are they trying to disenfranchise so many of us out of our vote? An awakened sleeping giant scares the hell out of these guys. Cut that giant in half add in disenfranchisement and slick advertisements and a repeat of Wisconsin happens on a much larger scale come November. I hate the stupidity of the right just as much as the next guy here, we already know that they hate us. That said, would you fight in a foxhole with a knuckle dragging freeper against a foreign invader should it come to that? I'm betting you would. I'm betting most here would. We are not at war with the freepers instead we are at war with the corporatists who influence them. You say we can not get back together again, we were even further apart during the Civil War. It took awhile, but for most of the nation we were back together by WWII. Personally I would like to see us start putting things back together before we have to go through Civil War II. Might be a whole lot less bloody. We are indeed at war, our enemy is a hostile corporate takeover of our government. Things keep looking more and more dire. Many here, some I can not argue against say we have already lost! I say that it is time to look at that freeper in the foxhole with you, the one pointing his gun at you, and find some fucking way to engage in dialog. I ain't got all the answers but I can not see We the People win back our democracy without a full and united effort. Going at this half assed has gotten us exactly where we are-on the very verge of maybe losing it all and worse, perhaps even another civil war. It may not be too late to pick our enemies and to remember that a common enemy united us once before. An old common enemy is currently kicking We The Peoples asses! |
Response to chknltl (Reply #69)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 08:56 AM
Laelth (32,014 posts)
82. I agree.
The "Freeper in the foxhole" has a lot more in common with me than he does with the oligarchs he either explicitly or implicitly supports and serves. If he could see that, things might change for the better.
-Laelth |
Response to Laelth (Reply #82)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 06:51 PM
chknltl (10,558 posts)
168. Then it is up to us on the left to open his eyes.
He hates us for being intellectual we hate him for being ignorant. We are both wrong to hate! He needs our wisdom, we need his strength. He can not come to this simple understanding without our help. WE KNOW who the real enemy to our democracy is....if we are so damned smart then why can't we get him to see what we see? If we are so damned smart why do we push him away?
Letting the corporatists use our fellow citizens against us like this may be an insurmountable advantage. Why can't we be smarter than this? I believe that TOGETHER WE CAN push back against this coming darkness and usher in a golden age for American democracy. |
Response to chknltl (Reply #69)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:00 AM
Ghost of Huey Long (322 posts)
88. ironically, they are all being brainwashed by the corporate media they call 'liberal'
All of this is made possible by the corrupt corporate media using our public airwaves to lie to millions of Americans. I love what you wrote, let's look beyond the people who have been duped and fight the corporations who control them. Republicans are weak, morally, intellectually...they are easily manipulated. They are irrational and impossible to get through to. We cannot count on them ever to 'get it', they will just go along with it when we change things. The means of control....TV. They are using it to 'create reality' and everyone just goes along with it. Also the way to steal elections, manufacture consent while messing with the tabulators. |
Response to Ghost of Huey Long (Reply #88)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 05:11 PM
chknltl (10,558 posts)
164. The same tactics used to conquer the right, worked against the left too!
This thread is proof. Some here are veritable intellectual giants compared to me, fellow DUers I have long been inspired by. Truth be told, I feared to open these two replys knowing I was likely going to defend my position against a fellow DUer I feel is a close comrade and in a few cases my intellectual leaders! Imagine my surprise....thank you for the kind words. I agree with much of what you said my fellow DUer, but this part I wish to discuss further:
"Republicans are weak, morally, intellectually...they are easily manipulated. They are irrational and impossible to get through to. We cannot count on them ever to 'get it', they will just go along with it when we change things." There are clinical studies that I have seen that lend credence to what you say here. Even so these words you write do not sit well with me. I personally know republicans who are neither morally nor intellectually weak. Yes, they can be stubborn resisting our facts and data tirelessly until we withdraw from debate in sheer frustration. May I point out that this can be a good thing too? Imagine that same pig-headed 'idiot' fighting on our side against the corporatists who are wrecking this nation. There was a time he fought with us against the NAZI and the Imperial Japanese. That same pig-headedness was a much needed tenacity which kept him in the fight. These are warrior souls and I strongly want them in my foxhole....we just need to find the key that gets them to point their guns at the true enemy instead of us! That key is our democracy, they have clearly shown that they are ready to lay down their very lives for her. If history repeats itself...well, see why I want them in our foxhole fighting with us now? FEAR HATE and ANGER, was used against the right by the corporatists. Those studies I mentioned earlier suggested that there is a certain type of mindset that allows those three tools to flourish. We on the left take it for granted that this mindset is one which lacks education and/or curiosity. Present a hardcore righty with the facts and time after time the righty will find a way to explain away those facts. We DUers reinforce this by calling those on the right knuckledraggers and countless other names which suggest that they are uneducated/uninformed. I do this too. Did you catch that last bit: I do it too. The truth is right here in this thread and plain to see: We are all subjectable to FEAR HATE and ANGER, that regardless of education or intellectual curiosity we can each have our judgement so clouded as to render facts unimportant to the equation. This is a fact: We The People are being manipulated and the result of this manipulation keeps us divided and subdivided. Those who are at war with us seek to keep us at war with each other. This thread shows how well that tactic is working. FEAR, HATE ANGER it works/is working equally well on us and we reinforce each other with it constantly. So what if we let FEAR HATE and ANGER get the best of us, I ask what good can come of it? We The People continue down the road, fighting with each other, maybe even going so far down that road that things devolve into a second Civil War. At no point along that path are our true enemies, the corpoaratists slowed or harmed! Hell, they've moved off shore and/or found new markets elsewhere to exploit. (Except the GUN INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX-can you feel the drool?). The result: We The People lose and that grand experiment American democracy is taken away from us by oligarchs who laugh at us from bank vaults they own while sitting atop piles of wealth we once owned. Clearly We The People as an electorate must come together with a focused and enlightened purpose if we are to bring about that change BOTH SIDES so strongly cry out for. Arguably, we on the left can see a part of what that change needs to be better than those on the right. Sadly, the primary weapon needed to take back our government in this war is not only overlooked, but this thread demonstrates that it is cast away equally by a house divided. I know this is long but let me return a last time to that foxhole; "General Washington sir, we can hold out till we see the whites of their eyes but most of us are in dire need of spectacles!" Can you imagine if President Obama held a heart to heart talk with We The People and actually pointed out in terms graspable even by the 'knuckle daggers' who the real enemy is and how he got inside our perimeter? |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 09:53 PM
Snarkoleptic (5,931 posts)
70. Reminds me of this quote-
![]() |
Response to Snarkoleptic (Reply #70)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:57 AM
gordianot (15,001 posts)
80. The nativist "Know Nothings" applied a name that fit Mr. Asimov's quote.
They have changed their target and refer to themselves in their in the latest version as the "Tea Party".
|
Response to Snarkoleptic (Reply #70)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:03 PM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
108. That is one hell of a quote. Thanks - n/t
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 10:22 PM
Kablooie (18,080 posts)
71. The blue is still blue but the gray has turned red.
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:09 AM
DonCoquixote (13,488 posts)
72. The Civil War
never really stopped being fought, despite the surrender at Appomattox. It is not accident that the right loves the Confederate flag, because the America they want is Dixie, slaves and all. With all due respect to my fellow liberals in Dixie, it is time for the equivalent of Sherman's march to the sea, where we put heels on throats and make it clear that, either by their obedience, or their destruction, these fascists will serve the American people.
|
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:12 AM
Odin2005 (53,521 posts)
73. A-FUCKING-MEN!
![]() To the Greatest with you! There is no middle ground with these people, just like there was no middle ground with the crazies in Rwanda who butchered hundreds of thousands. Just like there is no middle ground with religious fanatics who fly planes into buildings, or murder gynecologists like George Tiller. Just like there was no middle ground with the Nazis. Those who think we can reason with the baggers are like Neville Chamberlain, who thought he could reason with Hitler. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:27 AM
tblue (16,350 posts)
76. Not sure if we have ever been one country.
Maybe around WWII...?
I'm with you. These people are effing up everything |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:33 AM
flamingdem (38,861 posts)
77. Here's one of the main causes of our polarization:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() FOX NEWS ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 10:42 AM
MineralMan (145,030 posts)
85. I think you need a slogan:
Here's my suggestion:
Let's You and Him Fight! And here's my question: How many terrorists who you know have offered to negotiate with you? |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 10:46 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
86. The 6 Walton heirs between them control as much wealth as the bottom 30 million Americans. Stop
for a moment and let that statistic sink in. 6 people control as much wealth as 30 million people in a supposedly egalitarian society.
It is time for the 'redneck' to make common cause with the 'professor,' time for every working man and woman (those who must work by the sweat of their brow to survive) to make common cause, to unite against the real enemy, the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few and the concentration of the destitution in the hands of the many. What must happen now is to instill the same class consciousness in that redneck and professor, to turn their collective might from a class in itself to a class for itself. Only then will the long march to justice and freedom take its next significant step in this God-forsaken land. And all this without a cup of coffee yet this a.m.! ![]() |
Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #86)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:35 AM
hifiguy (33,688 posts)
96. The Walton "heirs" should be strung up
on light poles ala Mussolini. Explain to me what they did to earn their wealth, please. At least Gates invented Windows. (Yes I know he sort of stole it).
|
Response to hifiguy (Reply #96)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:44 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
102. Gates himself did not invent Windows. Aside from its origins
in Apple and the Zerox interfaces, a team of programmers at Microsoft invented Windows 3.1 for DOS. Gates profited from their labor (thereby illustrating Marx' so-called 'surplus theory of value') by not paying them what their respective contributions were actually worth.
I'd be satisified with merely expropriating the wealth of the Walton heirs and repatriating it into the commonwealth. "Strung up on light poles" goes a bit far even for my revolutionary tastes ![]() But I take your point as an expression of justified and righteous anger. |
Response to hifiguy (Reply #96)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 04:33 PM
mythology (9,527 posts)
161. This post is utterly disgraceful
You're advocating killing people for being born into a different family. There are a billion people living on a dollar a day. Should they advocate putting you to death because you live on more?
I'm glad I'm not so filled with hate that I would wish death on people for an accident of birth. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:35 AM
Dustlawyer (10,356 posts)
97. This is what the powers that be want. You are starting a war w/o an end like
the war on drugs or terrorism. I just convinced a young oysterman, who is a victim of the BP oil spill, that HIS anger has been intentionally mis-directed. I told him that our politicians on both sides have been bought, and that we are fighting with each other over guns, abortion, gay rights... Just like they want. He saw the light and will have a better chance to convince his friends and relatives than I would. That is how we win! That is the ONLY WAY we win! It can be done, but not with an un-winable WAR!
|
Response to Dustlawyer (Reply #97)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:42 AM
socialist_n_TN (11,481 posts)
101. I DO like your thinking and I'm VERY glad that you were able..........
to convince the oysterman of who his REAL enemy is, BUT.........
As I said in an above post, IF the working class cannot (or WILL not) be educated about who their real enemies are, they will have to be fought. Fascism is NEVER an option. |
Response to socialist_n_TN (Reply #101)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:08 PM
randome (34,845 posts)
112. So if the working class does not agree with you, it's war on their behalf anyways?
Sorry, I don't think enough people are in enough dire straits -even today- that make a 'war' or 'revolution' or whatever plausible.
|
Response to randome (Reply #112)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:19 PM
socialist_n_TN (11,481 posts)
128. I'll repeat. Fascism is NEVER an option.........
Because fascism doesn't advance the working class, it advances the owners. And even trends towards fascism don't advance the working class and should be fought, albeit with different methods than a fight against true fascism.
We actually agree with what you said in the body of your post. I'm sure the difference is that you think that the capitalists will, one way or another, back off and throw a few more crumbs our way. I don't. I think they can't stop the drive for neo-feudalism even if they want to. It's inherent in the system itself. Which means that, like it or not and I don't particularly like it, the clash is inevitable at some point. Probably when people stop getting paid or paid as much as they've been being paid. That will make it hit ALL individually and leave NO doubt as to where we're headed. No, we're not there yet. But it's coming. |
Response to randome (Reply #112)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:32 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
137. Most of the ignorant Republicans are in complete denial where they are
They think they are the 1%, because the 1% has convinced them they are.
Class consciousness needs to happen first. And in the mean time, they are in the matrix, and they ARE the matrix, as Morpheus would have said. |
Response to Dustlawyer (Reply #97)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 03:18 PM
HiPointDem (20,729 posts)
150. +1. I bet you didn't start out by telling him he was ignorant & brainwashed & didn't know his own
interests, either.
|
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:53 AM
RevStPatrick (2,208 posts)
105. I thought this was an interesting article...
...which showed up here yesterday, and touched upon the root of the problem:
http://www.alternet.org/visions/156071/conservative_southern_values_revived%3A_how_a_brutal_strain_of_american_aristocrats_have_come_to_rule_america_/ In a nutshell - Southern Planter Aristocratic mentality has replaced Northern Puritan communitarian Aristocratic mentality as the soul of the nation. The Southern planters were brutal and the brutality we are seeing in corporate and political culture now is a reflection of this. It had been kept largely in check as far as national politics were concerned, but Reagan opened the door and Dubya led the takeover. I think this is what needs to be defeated. I think that most of the individuals who are the "troops" on the "other side" are simply kinda dumb people who have caught a brain virus and are reacting to propaganda. I think you do yourself a disservice when talking about individuals who may be your neighbors and family members in language that describes them in terms of "terrorists," "inbred rednecks," "war" and "cross-hairs." You are playing the game that those brutal aristocrats at the top want you to play! Certainly, absolutely and without hesitation talk about the propaganda spreaders and those who benefit from that propaganda in those terms. Absolutely do whatever you can do, and it will take more than rants on the internet, to defeat the Planter Corporate Slave-holder mentality that has become prevalent. But remember that their divide and conquer tactics have worked like a charm, and those tactics have worked ON YOU! They have divided communities and families from each other for their own benefit. We cannot "win this war" by further dividing people who really should be on the same side, but by bringing people together to fight the common enemy. I'm not saying that you should go and give Bubba the Racist Redneck a hug and tell him you love him. But I do think you should ratchet down the rhetoric used towards him. Don't engage him, or somehow let him know that despite your differences, you SHOULD be on the same side against people who are exploiting BOTH of you. He may not be smart enough to get it, and then it stops being your problem. After that, stop fighting him and get back to the fight of against those who are dividing us all. Or something like that... (on edit - it looks like as I was writing this, a couple of other people here expressed similar sentiments! we must stop divide and conquer. that's how we win!) |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:08 PM
woo me with science (32,139 posts)
114. We need to stop playing the game they set up for us.
They want us to fight each other instead of identifying the real enemy....the one percent that is impoverishing ALL of us.
We are the 99 percent. Occupy. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:16 PM
DearAbby (12,461 posts)
115. There should be common ground among us.
We can't fight this individually.
There was talk about fires up thread. Imagine the firefighters in Colorado fighting it all on their own. No coordination, no plan...just a person trying to put out a fire. They all have a common goal, yet they aren't reaching it. We can debate, heatedly. But let's remember, among US, we have a common goal. Now let's come up with a plan. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:24 PM
WillyT (72,631 posts)
118. HUGE K & R !!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:29 PM
RZM (8,556 posts)
120. This is the classic mistake of the American liberal . . . it's 'American exceptionalism' in reverse
As if the same shit isn't going on everywhere else. Polarization is natural in democracies. It's far worse in many other places. Just look around youtube and you can find footage of fisticuffs in foreign parliaments. Or look at countries that can't cobble together coalition governments, or places where coalitions rise and fall in rapid succession.
Hatred, anger, and the like happen everywhere. If anything, the fact that everyone's free to hate on each other is evidence of a healthy democracy. It's when one side can't do that you're really in trouble. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:16 PM
lonestarnot (77,097 posts)
127. K & R!
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:09 PM
Homer Wells (1,576 posts)
132. Damn!!! That just about said it all, right there!
K&R
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:28 PM
Herlong (649 posts)
135. How underground does this democratic underground go?
Because I remember the first black president was elected by democrats trying to move a united America foward
|
Response to Herlong (Reply #135)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:30 PM
Taverner (55,476 posts)
136. Oh I'm sorry. Every time we extend our hands, they get chewed on mercilessly.
You're saying one more time's a charm?
|
Response to Taverner (Reply #136)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:48 PM
Herlong (649 posts)
144. I'm saying I want a HIGHER ground from them
People keep on learnin' Soldiers keep on warrin' World keep on turnin' Cause it won't be too long Powers keep on lyin' While your people keep on dyin' World keep on turnin' Cause it won't be too long I'm so darn glad he let me try it again Cause my last time on earth I lived a whole world of sin I'm so glad that I know more than I knew then Gonna keep on tryin' Till I reach the highest ground Teachers keep on teachin' Preachers keep on preachin' World keep on turnin' Cause it won't be too long Oh no Lovers keep on lovin' Believers keep on believin' Sleepers just stop sleepin' Cause it won't be too long Oh no I'm so glad that he let me try it again Cause my last time on earth I lived a whole world of sin I'm so glad that I know more than I knew then Gonna keep on tryin' Till I reach my highest ground...Whew! Till I reach my highest ground No one's gonna bring me down Oh no Till I reach my highest ground Don't you let nobody bring you down (they'll sho 'nuff try) God is gonna show you higher ground He's the only friend you have around FADE *We have to fight. It's about why and how we fight. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:38 PM
Autumn (42,599 posts)
140. I don't want common ground with these people.
That's how I feel.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() rec |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 03:41 PM
dtom67 (634 posts)
151. Where?
We are at war, but where is the battlefield ?
Right now the war is still being fought within the confines of the system that those before us created. The one sure way that you will know that we have lost is when you can no longer have this kind of discussion on the net. The odds ( and all the money ) are stacked against us. But there is still hope; otherwise why bother to post here? If the only option left was to pick up my Weapon and fight, I would not be here . Unless, of course, you mean that it is time for Dems to stop trying to foster bipartisanship all the time. That I agree with. The GoP deserves to be crushed, without mercy. But it can still be done in the public arena. But if this is meant to be some type of call for revolt, it will not happen. There may be riots and chaos, but it will be directionless . Hell, there is probably an NSA computer tracking down the location of everyone who has posted on this thread right now. Not a conspiracy theory, just a frightening possibility. Taking a antagonistic stance with all those that vote republican is a losing proposition for us.Could a republican confrontationally convince you to change your vote? Many of the people who vote republican do not realize the damage that the people that they vote for cause. Those "pro life " republican voters who elected Tom Delay probably don't realize the role he played in contributing to the perpetration of forced prostitution and forced abortions in the Marianas islands. Those NRA supporters who plan to vote for Romney probably don't realize that Mitt (Willard) is going to make them so poor that they will not be able to afford anything other than a .22. Or that they will need that .22 when they retire to kill their dinner, because Mitt and Co will destroy their pensions. It is important to point out that the turmoil in the rest of the world can very easily happen here. We have led a sheltered life , here in America. 9/11 was bad, but that kind of shit happens in the rest of the world every day . The main point is that we are all here because we believe that there is still a chance to win this war at the Box. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 03:46 PM
Enrique (27,461 posts)
152. the other side needs this, we don't
I hear the RW propagandists pounding into their rubes over and over how there can be no common ground with our side, how the ideological gulf is too wide. That's why they have to exaggerate how liberal Obama is, that's why they studiously ignore all the things Obama agrees with them on.
It makes perfect sense coming from them. We have a winning case, if middle-class and working class and poor people think straight, many of them will conclude that Democratic party has better policies for them. Therefore the propaganda masters have to keep people from thinking straight, they have to blow everything up into an epic battle between good and evil. But we don't need that. There is little danger that any of us is going to look at today's GOP and say, "those people make a good point!" So we have the ability to look at this Supreme Court decision and acknowledge the reality that the very conservative John Roberts can side with us once in a while. The gap is not unbridgeable. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 04:04 PM
Rex (65,616 posts)
155. Why play nice with a bunch of terrorists?
I agree with your assessment 100%. This is the intelligent/common sense community (us) against the anti-intellectuals (GOP).
Of that, there can be no doubt. |
Response to Taverner (Original post)
Herlong This message was self-deleted by its author.