General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel just reported that Sessions will go back to the Judiciary Committee on Monday,
answer questions and "amend" his testimony.
So if he "amends" ("I thought you meant the other Russians, Senator Franken." his testimony and tell the truth this time, does that mean he's off the hook for perjury?
rzemanfl
(29,581 posts)DURHAM D
(32,617 posts)not under oath.
KewlKat
(5,624 posts)dflprincess
(28,094 posts)she did say it was "breaking".
DURHAM D
(32,617 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)and he chose not to do so. I'm no expert, but I think he should still
be on the hook for perjury.
Solly Mack
(90,800 posts)Unfortunately.
Mr. Ected
(9,675 posts)Although I'm pretty sure the Republicans offered him that option at the time.
#not#
Stinky The Clown
(67,838 posts)Another GOPee sake and mirrors stunt.
wishstar
(5,272 posts)Lawrence said Sen. Grassley is not going to let Sessions face more questioning. But presumably, Sessions can amend his testimony just in writing. Sounds like Grassley is afraid things could get even worse for Sessions if he is questioned further.
frogmarch
(12,161 posts)then off the hook - and is allowed to "unrecuse" himself.