General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSay goodbye to our national parks.
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2017, 07:43 PM - Edit history (2)
While we've been obsessed with tRump's media circus act, Paul Ryan has been quietly slipping in legislation to sell off our national parks in a round-about way.
The U.S. House of Representatives just made it easier for the government to sell or give away national parks, national forests, and other public lands.
A new rule, written by House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT), establishes as fact that any legislation to dispose of public lands and natural resources would cost taxpayers exactly $0. This paves the way for the new Congress to get rid of vast swaths of public lands all at the expense of the American taxpayer.
Under Congressional Budget Office accounting rules, the House is required to account for the cost of any legislation it considers. Now, the House does not need to even estimate any financial losses from giving away public land. Bills to dispose of public land will skip several steps in the normal legislative process, coming up for a vote without any discussion of the costs and benefits. The House approved the rules change by a vote of 234 to 193 on Tuesday.
Since the move applies only to House rules, it is not subject to approval by the Senate or a presidential signature. It is effective immediately. - Think Progress
Some of our last glimpses before nature's beauty is auctioned off to the KGOP elite corporations.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,772 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Clear cut and strip mined into oblivion.
I guess if you can afford it this summer visit your favorite National Park before it disappears.
Bettie
(16,148 posts)before it is gone.
I'm wishing we hadn't put off the driving vacations, because time is running out. Right at the 100th anniversary of the national parks system too.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)A republic, if you can keep it.
We gave it away starting with Rayguns IMO.
National parks are wastes of land to republicans, there's money to be made citizen!
Bettie
(16,148 posts)the minimum wage jobs at the fancy once percenter resorts they'll put up.
Of course, I've heard that the really fancy resorts only like to use foreign workers...like that one in Florida.
TheBlackAdder
(28,255 posts).
Selling yourself for money only goes so far.
.
fishwax
(29,150 posts)BSdetect
(8,999 posts)Fuck these turds.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Phil Anschutz has personal interests via Xantera Corp.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)2naSalit
(86,943 posts)concessionaires in nearly every park... take Yellowstone, for example, they're all over that place and are buying up the towns outside the entrances and running off all the locals. And then there are the Chinese investors who are buying whatever Delaware North/Xanterra don't buy. Folks complained that it wasn't like Dinsneyland and a Walmart was 100 miles away, so now they will have just that. Sad thing is that many of the parks, YNP in particular, are the throbbing heart of important regional ecosystems, once they crash, the whole region will be ecological toast.
If this madness is not stopped and reversed immediately, (ha!), then we sure can just kiss it all goodbye.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Most people never question the why and where for around National Parks and Monuments. No someone who went toe to toe trying to protect the YNP from these groups.
Locally we have Zoin and Bryce,as well as the Gold Butte and Lake Meas Areas. Same thing is quietly happening. BTW,these names surface in conjunction with this. Harry Reid's son,Jason Chaffetz,Orin Hatch,Mike Lee,Cresent Hardy,and of course several of the Casino owners.
Notice how the Utah Delegation wants Bears Ears and The Grand Staircase removed from the Monument Status. That is all about the Oil and Gas leases,just sold in those two areas. Secondly,major Uranium deposits that are not on Navajo Lands.
Like I say,folks do not see the real damage being done to our National Parks and Wilderness Areas. Understand the new Fees for Park use is suppose to be jacked way up.
2naSalit
(86,943 posts)I have been "in the trenches" out here for decades. I'm right here next to YNP and a national forest and several wilderness areas, I am contemplating what I will do at this point, whether to be come a refugee, emigrant, mercenary or martyr... whichever it is, I feel my country have become a pariah and oppressor who has now betrayed us all.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Docreed2003
(16,902 posts)I wish Teddy Roosevelt was around, just to whip these guys butts
spanone
(135,929 posts)ffr
(22,681 posts)any of us wouldn't have as much right to own public lands as the next guy. It all depends on who comes up with a plan and executes it first.
The KGOP is turning over ownership of our public lands to the states, many of whom may see short-term gains buy auctioning off parcels to the highest bidder, so why not get involved too?
My plan would pivot around the centerpiece that I would take better care of these treasures, I mean public burdens, than the public. Better me than them!
ffr
(22,681 posts)--- 35
1 (q) TREATMENT OF CONVEYANCES OF FEDERAL
2 LAND.
3 (1) IN GENERAL.In the One Hundred Fif
4 teenth Congress, for all purposes in the House, a
5 provision in a bill or joint resolution, or in an
6 amendment thereto or a conference report thereon,
7 requiring or authorizing a conveyance of Federal
8 land to a State, local government, or tribal entity
9 shall not be considered as providing new budget
10 authority, decreasing revenues, increasing mandatory
11 spending, or increasing outlays.
12 (2) DEFINITIONS.In this subsection:
13 (A) The term conveyance means any
14 method, including sale, donation, or exchange,
15 by which all or any portion of the right, title,
16 and interest of the United States in and to
17 Federal land is transferred to another entity.
18 (B) The term Federal land means any
19 land owned by the United States, including the
20 surface estate, the subsurface estate, or any
21improvements thereon.
22 (C) The term State means any of the
23 several States, the District of Columbia, or a
24 territory (including a possession) of the United
25 States.
BILLS-115hres5-PIH-FINAL.pdf
Brought to you by the Republican brand of these United States.
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)which is now being relocated to Florida's Disney World, so that more Americans can enjoy its natural splendor! See a 1:10 model of a majestic Sequoia when you visit our new lumbermill! Marvel at the Grand Canyon reclamation project, which replaces thousands and thousands of landfills in cities and towns across America, while providing employment opportunities for countless displaced Sanitation Engineers!"
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)lpbk2713
(42,774 posts)Decorated with logos and advertising.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)Mt. Rainier NP:
North Cascades NP:
Olympic NP:
Crater Lake NP:
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)between hillary and trump or so i heard
ffr
(22,681 posts)So it must have been true. That Nasty Woman!
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Sierra Club? You think they will let any parks be sold off? They will definitely go to war before that happens.
ffr
(22,681 posts)<snip>
John Gale, conservation director for the advocacy group Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, said that hes worried about access for sportsmen. He believes that theres a further danger in segmenting ecosystems through state-by-state development.
70% of the headwaters of our streams and rivers in the West are on public lands, he said. Rivers and migratory corridors dont follow state boundaries.
The incoming administration hasnt been clear about where it falls on transfers. Montana Congressman Ryan Zinke, tapped to be the next Secretary of Interior, voted for the rules package, but in the past hes been against land transfers. President-elect Donald Trump has spoken out against reallocating federal land, but hes also met with prominent pro-land transfer groups.
Nevertheless, bills proposing land transfer will now have an easy route to passage, as they wont need to be backed by any financial justification.
The entire rules package passed on party lines, but it runs counter to legislation that passed both the House and Senate in November, the Outdoor Recreation Jobs and Economic Impact Act of 2016.
Signed into law in December, the legislation requires the Department of Commerce to count the over half a trillion dollars from the outdoor recreation economy in the countrys GDP for the first time.
Its not just natural resources that are on the auction block, but jobs, said Gale. For a party that prides itself on being fiscally conservative ... theyre talking out of both sides of their mouth. - BusinessInsider
America's treasures up for auction or to be given away. Aren't Republicans just the party you want to hug and thank?
Initech
(100,145 posts)ffr
(22,681 posts)Yeah, me too.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Is that many national parks are integral parts of the local economy, as they exist now. What do republicans propose, turning the land over to scrub cow ranchers like Clive Bundy and shutting out recreational hunters, skiers, birders, ect? Do they suggest turning them over to mining companies or oil companies? Exactly
Why to oil companies need to drill in national parks when modern drilling technology can allow them to tap oil there from outside the park, closer to home, during President Obama's term vast reserves of oil were found, reserves that will last for 25-30 years without a single new discovery - do those fools think that Clean Energy technology will not have made giant leaps forward during that time, potentially making oil redundant? The one area where doing exploration in national parks may be of some value is in the search for more Rare Earth metals, but even there, Scientists are rapidly developing alternatives to Rare Earth metals for use in magnets and electric motors.
elleng
(131,391 posts)'Hello, we wanted to take a moment to let you know who we are. We're a growing coalition of 52 National Park Service employees from nine different National Parks. We formed to ensure the protection of the environment for future generations to come. We were forced into a media blackout, hiring freeze, policy changes, and possible reduction in funding. We are here to stand up and speak out against the current administration. We all refuse to be silenced while we watch everything we love crumble. Join the movement at www.altnps.org -Arches, Everglades, Shenandoah, Yosemite, Badlands, Yellowstone, Grand Canyon, Blue Ridge Parkway, and Great Smoky Mountains National Park.'
https://www.facebook.com/AltUSNationalParkService/?fref=nf
Maru Kitteh
(28,346 posts)if they try to take it. I mean that in utter and complete sincerity. Without question.
This land is sacred, and worth dying for.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)ffr
(22,681 posts)It would be all yours and you could charge whatever you wanted. You could dam it up and ship the water via aqueduct or pipeline to the desert southwest, where your relatives now own the Grand Canyon. They'd divert their water elsewhere too. The highest bidder takes all!
former9thward
(32,151 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,719 posts)No compensation, and possible prosecution for the thieves who "bought" it. If they don't, then I consider them worthless.
That's all.
LeftInTX
(25,801 posts)Heck, I wonder if he has ever been to Central Park?
(This guy is not a normal person)
Coventina
(27,224 posts)Dear God/dess I hope so....
ffr
(22,681 posts)seem to have a bad case of stunted life expectancy.
Kremlin COVERED-UP Murder of KGB Chief Who Did Trump Dossier
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028552587
Trump dossier: intelligence sources vouch for credibility of report's author
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141663297
Before the fall: America's public lands on clearance rack
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028552922
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...up to, and including, armed occupation. Fuck it. If the Bundys can do this, why can't we in an infinitely worthier cause? I'm a sick old man, so I'd be more than willing to go to the front line. It doesn't much matter what happens to me, if I can help save the country for the generations coming after, and I'm entirely serious. The way things are going, it will be dishonorable to just go on existing, doing nothing, while everything falls to pieces. And I'm pretty sure "direct action" would be supported by the American people...