Mon Aug 29, 2016, 08:06 PM
mrmpa (4,033 posts)
When did the US National Anthem become solely associated........
Last edited Mon Aug 29, 2016, 08:44 PM - Edit history (1)
with the Armed Services?
I keep reading it & hearing it. Today, Alejandro Villanuevo, A West Point Grad and offensive lineman for the Pittsburgh Steelers, said that Colin Kaepernick's not standing for the Anthem was disrespectful to those serving in the Armed Services. No it is not. The anthem is not about those serving and having served, it's not about our military (though it was written during a war), it is supposed to represent the US as a whole. Since the US isn't working for everybody, why should he stand?
Why is so much of what is associated with the US, militaristic and nationalistic?
Why do you even play the National Anthem at the start of games, from Little League through the Pros? Let's pick another song. Why not Woody Guthrie's "This Land is Your Land"? At least the thought of this being a "fair" land is in the lyrics of this song and no one will care if I sit or stand.
Even my 86 year old mother agrees that Kaepernick has the right to sit. This is a woman who lived through the Depression and at least 6 wars, also the widow of a 15 year US Marine Corps veteran.
|
13 replies, 1779 views
Reply to this thread
Back to top Alert abuse
Replies to this discussion thread
 13 replies |
Author |
Time |
Post |
 When did the US National Anthem become solely associated........ (Original post) |
mrmpa |
Aug 2016 |
OP |
|
maxsolomon |
Aug 2016 |
#1 |
|
enough |
Aug 2016 |
#7 |
|
Glitterati |
Aug 2016 |
#2 |
|
enough |
Aug 2016 |
#8 |
|
liberal N proud |
Aug 2016 |
#3 |
|
Dawson Leery |
Aug 2016 |
#9 |
|
Dustlawyer |
Aug 2016 |
#4 |
|
Wounded Bear |
Aug 2016 |
#5 |
|
mrmpa |
Aug 2016 |
#6 |
|
Ilsa |
Aug 2016 |
#10 |
|
niyad |
Aug 2016 |
#11 |
|
KT2000 |
Aug 2016 |
#12 |
|
IronLionZion |
Aug 2016 |
#13 |
Response to mrmpa (Original post)
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 08:33 PM
Dustlawyer (10,396 posts)
4. You can burn an American flag as a protest, why not refuse to stand during the anthem?
|
Protests by their nature are designed to draw attention to a real or perceived wrong. His protest was in the American tradition, and speaks more for America and our eroding freedoms than standing during a usually horrible singing of the national anthem.
His protest required sacrifice, as he would have been all too aware, yet this man chose to stand up for injustice. He is jeopardizing his career and most certainly his income in taking this stand. I bet those critical of him would never take a position on something important that had the same negative effect on their bottom line. They cannot even understand feeling something so strong as the desire for justice for others.
|
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here
Permalink
Response to mrmpa (Original post)
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 11:18 PM
IronLionZion (42,789 posts)
13. Because outrage is easier than addressing racial oppression
|
and it feels easier to get outraged about a football player protesting our national anthem, than to feel outraged that Americans are being legally and publicly executed in this country simply because their skin makes them appear dangerous while really dangerous murderous people get to live because they have less threatening skin.
In fact, if you don't get outraged by the anthem protest, then you probably are not enjoying the full benefits and privileges that many Americans of color are being denied, including those who served in a segregated military or got blocked out from promotions and important missions, or from even enlisting.
After 9/11, military recruiters were often openly hostile to brown people trying to enlist for the same reason brown people always seem to get the completely random extra airport screenings.
|
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here
Permalink
