Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IronLionZion

(45,433 posts)
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 06:18 PM Jul 2016

Babies Of Color Are Now The Majority, Census Says

http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/07/01/484325664/babies-of-color-are-now-the-majority-census-says?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20160702



Today's generation of schoolchildren looks much different than one just a few decades ago. Nonwhites are expected to become the majority of the nation's children by 2020, as our colleague Bill Chappell reported last year. This is now the reality among the very youngest Americans: babies.

Babies of color now outnumber non-Hispanic white babies (1 year or younger), according to new estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau. The newest estimate shows that on July 1, 2015, the population of racial or ethnic minority babies was 50.2 percent.

But the scales may have actually tipped in 2013 — the Census Bureau often revises past population estimates as new data become available. That means the first of these babies are now preschool-aged.

We've already been seeing this shift in U.S. schools: the 2014-15 school year marked the first time that minority student enrollment in public schools surpassed that of white students.

For U.S. Children, Minorities Will Be The Majority By 2020, Census Says



Trump's supporters have no idea what America looks like and they won't be prepared for what happens to them this election day. They just can't believe what kind of people are born in America these days!

86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Babies Of Color Are Now The Majority, Census Says (Original Post) IronLionZion Jul 2016 OP
Only one problem, race is only a mental construct. There are no races, just racists. L. Coyote Jul 2016 #1
There are lots of racists IronLionZion Jul 2016 #2
So doctors who do research on which races are more susceptible to various pnwmom Jul 2016 #8
Non sequitur. n/t fleabiscuit Jul 2016 #13
Doctors and educated professionals understand genetic diversity as a continuum and understand that L. Coyote Jul 2016 #14
Would kinship selection promote a bias for racism? Jemmons Jul 2016 #26
It was a "team jersey" type of thing Lithos Jul 2016 #42
+1 Lithos Jul 2016 #40
Hybrid vigor! Races should mix. mainer Jul 2016 #17
If there are "no races" then by definition they cannot mix because they don't exist. n/t pnwmom Jul 2016 #18
There are no races. L. Coyote Jul 2016 #23
So just call it genotypes. The more hybrid we are, the better. mainer Jul 2016 #29
In biology, hybrid is offspring of two animals of different species, mules and donkeys L. Coyote Jul 2016 #48
"Hybrid" does NOT refer exclusively to offspring of different species mainer Jul 2016 #51
True, the first part. Igel Jul 2016 #61
it is the word and the racist history. lighter complexion people get sickle cell too. JanMichael Jul 2016 #56
American Anthropological Association? muriel_volestrangler Jul 2016 #22
I fixed the AAA Statement on Race link above. L. Coyote Jul 2016 #80
Tell that to the assholes that refer to my children as mud babies. giftedgirl77 Jul 2016 #77
There are no races. L. Coyote Jul 2016 #79
Lol, you go with that. giftedgirl77 Jul 2016 #85
And Synthetic Hybrids, you can't forget about those! snooper2 Jul 2016 #86
Let's under feed their development, poison the food supply, under educate them, and restrict their ability to vote underpants Jul 2016 #3
They've openly sent memos to have more babies IronLionZion Jul 2016 #5
Quiverfull. (n/t) Iggo Jul 2016 #15
Ouch DesertRat Jul 2016 #27
They are against abortion coco77 Jul 2016 #4
I'm more concerned that every baby be wanted, loved, fed and cared for Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #6
That makes you different from a Republican on every point. yardwork Jul 2016 #9
It will be fun to watch white republicans go full hypocrite and apply for affimative action liberalnarb Jul 2016 #21
Lol, lol. I would not be surprised. yardwork Jul 2016 #43
That has sort of been done for men at some schools. Igel Jul 2016 #62
Diversity vs advancing people who have historically been held back IronLionZion Jul 2016 #69
Explains my voting record, I guess. Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #31
They're on to you! You're obviously not one of them! yardwork Jul 2016 #44
I think that's been clear for a long time. Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #54
I've been accused of "colorblindness" here for saying things like that, Nye Bevan Jul 2016 #10
Well, I don't spend a lot of time worrying about what other people think of my opinions, mostly. Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #30
It can be viewed as ignoring racial issues experienced by others nt IronLionZion Jul 2016 #34
ala imagining that we all experience every aspect of life the same way.... salin Jul 2016 #47
The problem is that often Igel Jul 2016 #63
very insightful point. salin Jul 2016 #75
no, that is not what you have been accused of. kwassa Jul 2016 #70
What is the purpose of posts like that? Nye Bevan Jul 2016 #72
To which posts are you referring? kwassa Jul 2016 #78
Hear here! salin Jul 2016 #45
Agreed. romanic Jul 2016 #58
But orange babies with hair weaves are a tiny minority. Make the one grow up by making him lose. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #11
Cool. liberalnarb Jul 2016 #12
Multiracial IronLionZion Jul 2016 #28
Had a Latino in my class a few years back. Igel Jul 2016 #64
The US Census accounts for white hispanics and non-white hispanics IronLionZion Jul 2016 #65
In Hawaii, "Cosmopolitan" was the #1 racial group among babies mainer Jul 2016 #16
But this is totally logical and reasonable for a world that's always evolving. calimary Jul 2016 #33
I think Hawaii is an extraordinary experiment mainer Jul 2016 #38
Until the very real situation of reverse racism happens. Separation Jul 2016 #66
NBC Reported on this. liberalnarb Jul 2016 #19
I think this is partly what Trump's slogan is about DesertRat Jul 2016 #20
NBC covered this. The racist comments were unbearable. liberalnarb Jul 2016 #24
Some people were also blaming feminists for not having enough babies IronLionZion Jul 2016 #32
One person actually came out and said liberalnarb Jul 2016 #39
Could you please link to the NBC article, please? Thanks! nt ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2016 #50
Here. liberalnarb Jul 2016 #52
Thanks...I'll hold my nose from the stench... nt ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2016 #53
I'm thinking about making a t-shirt: "America was never white." yardwork Jul 2016 #46
It was just white washed. nt sheshe2 Jul 2016 #55
don't let the right-wingers know, they'll go cuckoo. Oh, wait.. nt raccoon Jul 2016 #25
Good. mwrguy Jul 2016 #35
I, for one, welcome our new POC infant overlords. Starry Messenger Jul 2016 #36
Wow liberalnarb Jul 2016 #37
Finally bravenak Jul 2016 #41
Yup! sheshe2 Jul 2016 #57
Is it a race to the finish line? The2ndWheel Jul 2016 #71
Nah we have plenty of Finish people whistler162 Jul 2016 #74
Describes my family... JCMach1 Jul 2016 #49
Is Pat Buchanan still alive? Holly_Hobby Jul 2016 #59
Yup, he's still alive IronLionZion Jul 2016 #60
This what I'm referring to... Holly_Hobby Jul 2016 #73
K&R! ismnotwasm Jul 2016 #67
Here in California this already happened two decades ago lunatica Jul 2016 #68
Unless transparent babies have been in vogue in the past, every baby ever born has been 'of color'. Shandris Jul 2016 #76
Trump's people will deport you soon IronLionZion Jul 2016 #81
Not sure how it's even defined anymore.... davidn3600 Jul 2016 #82
Trump's people know you're not American IronLionZion Jul 2016 #83
That discrimination wont go away davidn3600 Jul 2016 #84

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
1. Only one problem, race is only a mental construct. There are no races, just racists.
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 06:20 PM
Jul 2016

Last edited Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:50 PM - Edit history (1)

Anyone who believes there are races is a racist.
AAA Statement on Race

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
8. So doctors who do research on which races are more susceptible to various
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 07:07 PM
Jul 2016

diseases are racists?

Is it racism to believe that black people have a greater genetic propensity to get sickle cell anemia?

Yes, race is a construct but it has a real-world connection.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
14. Doctors and educated professionals understand genetic diversity as a continuum and understand that
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 07:27 PM
Jul 2016

having a specific gene is not linked to the color of your skin, rather to your DNA. There are no "black" people, there are lots of people who have the sickle cell gene and they are likely to have African heritage because of malaria in the tropics. Sickle cell has not been wiped out due to Darwinian effects because sickle hemoglobin protects against malaria. The leader of the racists trying to start an "all white" town in ND could have sickle cell because he has 14% African ancestry.

Jemmons

(711 posts)
26. Would kinship selection promote a bias for racism?
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:04 PM
Jul 2016

Robert Sapolsky talks a lot about kinship selection, but i dont remember if he says anything to support such a notion.

Lithos

(26,403 posts)
42. It was a "team jersey" type of thing
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:57 PM
Jul 2016

You rooted for those who "looked" like you... We derive quite a bit of our identity from how we look and who we relate to the most.

But in terms of genetics - after a few wars, this was all B.S. We all are related, often closer than we realize. This gives the big lie to the "must look like us"...

L-



mainer

(12,022 posts)
17. Hybrid vigor! Races should mix.
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 07:35 PM
Jul 2016

You won't find race-related illnesses if we're all heterozygous.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
29. So just call it genotypes. The more hybrid we are, the better.
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:14 PM
Jul 2016

whatever way you want to classify genotypes, I don't care. I just think genotypes mixing is healthier. I just used "race" as shorthand. Why get all huffy about it?

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
48. In biology, hybrid is offspring of two animals of different species, mules and donkeys
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 09:43 PM
Jul 2016

for example. While genotype refers to the entire set of genes in an individual. Not being huffy, just trying to use English.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
51. "Hybrid" does NOT refer exclusively to offspring of different species
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 10:06 PM
Jul 2016

It refers to two genotypes mixing. They may be different breeds (eg dachshunds and corgis), races (if you'll accept that loaded term for purposes of this discussion) or simply plant colors. I think you can agree that corgis and dachshunds are the same canid species. Successful cross-species breeding is in fact unusual, otherwise we'd see more of it. The inability to reproduce and make fertile offspring is, in fact, what partly defines separate species.

You might want to look up "heterosis", previously known as heterozygosis for a more complete explanation of what I mean by hybrid vigor.

(Speaking as one whose background is biology)

Igel

(35,300 posts)
61. True, the first part.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:37 AM
Jul 2016

But not true, the second part.

It just means that skin-color or ethnicity won't be an added help in IDing some things. If a white has sickle-cell it's harder to ID than if a black has it. If you're Native American with thalassemia it's harder to spot than if you're Arab.

JanMichael

(24,885 posts)
56. it is the word and the racist history. lighter complexion people get sickle cell too.
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jul 2016

it 8s a mediterranian genetic disease.

race is a way to demonize and divide. ethicity is not.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
77. Tell that to the assholes that refer to my children as mud babies.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 08:48 PM
Jul 2016

Or me as an illegal immigrant for having an accent, or my fiance as a terrorist for flying a Pakistani flag on his mirror or for saying mashallah when he expresses happiness.

Race is seen as a negative to many that only see our brown skin & "funny" accents. Ppl that claim there is no race are stuck in their privilege & denial. We are proud of our heritage & don't appreciate it when someone tries to put us into some neat little box of "no race" or whatever you are trying to say.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
86. And Synthetic Hybrids, you can't forget about those!
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 10:22 AM
Jul 2016

Found this top hit on the youtubes based on your "opinion"


There Are NO "RACES".. Only The Race of Man.. and Synthetic Hybrids PT1

Published on Oct 16, 2015
Video commentary following the thesis that earth has one race.. put here in original creation.. Since then other entities have, in their attempts, to copy the Father's creation, synthetically spawned many variations of hybrids and man-like beings.

This is the war waged since the beginning of time;

underpants

(182,788 posts)
3. Let's under feed their development, poison the food supply, under educate them, and restrict their ability to vote
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jul 2016

We just have to do it for another 100 years

- Republican internal fundraising memo.

IronLionZion

(45,433 posts)
5. They've openly sent memos to have more babies
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jul 2016

They encourage conservative voters to have larger families

And some of the religious groups have tried to recruit minority voters into the GOP based on faith, but Trump has set back that effort for quite a few years.

 

coco77

(1,327 posts)
4. They are against abortion
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 06:36 PM
Jul 2016

So the right wing should be happy, more people to make suffer after they are born.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
62. That has sort of been done for men at some schools.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:48 AM
Jul 2016

When the student body was well over 50% male there were calls for affirmative action to increase the student body's female population. The response was, "Well, perhaps the men are just smarter or more competent."


In some schools the student body is well over 50% female, skewed at the levels that still had calls for increasing the female representation. So now some are calling for outreach (etc.) to increase the male population back to parity.

The response has been, "You hypocrites." That's fine as far as that goes, but doesn't address the underlying morality of the name-calling side, which is that sex parity was a social goal.

But then parody is added to the mix, and the side of good continues without any awareness of the irony, "Perhaps the women are just smarter or more competent."

A local principal was commenting on how the school she was over had shifted demographics a bit. It had been something like 65% black, 25% Latino, and the other 10% had been white and Asian and Native American. Then the next year it was 75% black, a bit more than 25% Latino, and the remaining 3-5% white/Asian/Native American. And she said it was "increasing diversity." It wasn't; for her, 100% diverse would mean "100% non-white/Asian/Native American."

Some of the "good guys" are just the bad guys inverted, but since you're on the side against the bad guys you have to be good. They forget that Stalin and Hitler fought a war, and that in that fight there were no good guys. Similarly, China and Vietnam had a bit of a skirmish while Vietnam was in the throes of its re-education camp program (or pogrom, little difference).

IronLionZion

(45,433 posts)
69. Diversity vs advancing people who have historically been held back
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 12:36 PM
Jul 2016

The good guys who don't see what's wrong with it are thinking of correcting historical wrongs and view whites as the ones who still have national power rather than balancing out numbers.

Popular supreme court justice Ginsburg wants 9 women on the court since there have 9 men for most of our country's history. She doesn't see anything wrong with it.

It's also a matter of perspective based on one's own experiences.


Maybe. Just my $0.02.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
54. I think that's been clear for a long time.
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 10:14 PM
Jul 2016

I recently unearthed a letter to the editor I wrote- on a typewriter- for the '84 election. I showed it to my wife and she said "it's definitely you- but boy, you were very strident and condescending" I think I used the phrase "the moron majority"..

I'm all "shit, I was a teenager, whaddaya want"

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
10. I've been accused of "colorblindness" here for saying things like that,
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 07:11 PM
Jul 2016

and some claim that "colorblindness" is almost as bad as being a racist.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
30. Well, I don't spend a lot of time worrying about what other people think of my opinions, mostly.
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:14 PM
Jul 2016

I believe what I believe, and if people don't like it, tough. I'm certainly not about to apologize for a statement like that. I think it speaks for itself.

salin

(48,955 posts)
47. ala imagining that we all experience every aspect of life the same way....
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 09:27 PM
Jul 2016

and ignoring that there are many institutional and societal norms that are very inherently unequal based not on the individual, or character, but based on race.

I agree with the OP of the subthread that I care about all kids needs being met, but I disagree with the opinion that the sentiment means 'colorblindness'. As a long time urban educator, we have understand/acknowledge/adapt to our students' experiences (per dysfunctional societal norms), in order to meet there needs. We have made some progress but are far from meeting that goal.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
63. The problem is that often
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:53 AM
Jul 2016

your analysis turns out the answer based on your assumptions.

If you make economics dependent on race, racism is everywhere and crucial for Af-Am populations. On the other hand, for some segments of the white population it's all about economics. You need two mighty factors with skewed distribution.

If you make economics primary, then you get very similar results for both populations. In some of the cases where you don't, there usually wasn't a suitable control so we must argue from silence. (The resume/names studies, for instance.)

One is reductionist, the other maximalist. Neither are completely satisfying except to those who want to believe.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
70. no, that is not what you have been accused of.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 12:46 PM
Jul 2016

I can predict, however, that you will pop up in threads like these.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
72. What is the purpose of posts like that?
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:47 PM
Jul 2016

At best they add nothing to the discussion, and at worst they are vaguely creepy.

Response to IronLionZion (Original post)

IronLionZion

(45,433 posts)
28. Multiracial
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:10 PM
Jul 2016

it's true that some multiracial people would be considered white if they look light-skinned, and get the privileges or choice of identity. That's one of the reasons segregation didn't get enforced as much in New Orleans transit back in the day.

It is a bit different for the multiracial people who are dark-skinned, like me. That article brings up very good points.

The discrepancy arises because of demographic convention: The census counts as minority anyone of mixed race or ethnicity.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
64. Had a Latino in my class a few years back.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jul 2016

Most Latinos assumed she was anglo. Pale, blue eyes, brown hair. My skin was darker, eyes are brown, hair is darker. I'm an "anglo" of Irish descent.

She was Argentine.

There ensued a debate as to whether she was a person of color. The decision was she had to be because she was Latino. That's what happens when you let terms float free from their referents because of ideology and formalisms.

I pointed out that 140 years ago I'd have been a "person of color."

IronLionZion

(45,433 posts)
65. The US Census accounts for white hispanics and non-white hispanics
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 12:04 PM
Jul 2016

Latinos who look like they have European heritage have very different experiences than the ones with more Native American heritage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Hispanic_and_Latino_Americans

And some people do have sympathy for the Irish since they were oppressed back in the day.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
16. In Hawaii, "Cosmopolitan" was the #1 racial group among babies
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 07:33 PM
Jul 2016

At least, that's what I recall while working there as a medical professional. Everyone had to get along because chances were, your kid/grandkid/niece/nephew was mixed race. The best way to integrate is to have multiracial relatives.

calimary

(81,222 posts)
33. But this is totally logical and reasonable for a world that's always evolving.
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:17 PM
Jul 2016

I'm honestly surprised this is being discovered now. I thought in many places around this country and the globe that was how it already is.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
38. I think Hawaii is an extraordinary experiment
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:41 PM
Jul 2016

where the #1 ethnic group for infants is "mixed."

Only in Hawaii do I find comedians regularly making fun of the different ethnic groups -- and getting away with it. Because when everyone is equally made fun of, we all laugh together.

Separation

(1,975 posts)
66. Until the very real situation of reverse racism happens.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 12:15 PM
Jul 2016

My best friend was stationed at the Marine Air Station there and his two kids went to school out in town. They and other white kids were terrorized on an almost daily basis.

 

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)
39. One person actually came out and said
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jul 2016

that minorities conspired and did this on purpose so that they could do to whites what whites did "200 years ago." Of course they said 200 years ago because that same poster does not believe that white racism exists anymore.

 

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)
37. Wow
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:40 PM
Jul 2016


"When that shift for the U.S. as a whole takes place by 2044, the Census Bureau predicts no one racial or ethnic group will dominate the U.S. in terms of size,"

A completely diverse nation.

IronLionZion

(45,433 posts)
60. Yup, he's still alive
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 07:14 AM
Jul 2016

I imagine a lot of crotchety old Repubs will have a heart attack when they see it

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
68. Here in California this already happened two decades ago
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 12:26 PM
Jul 2016

The majority of people under 20 are now Brown in California.

Moctezuma's real revenge!

 

Shandris

(3,447 posts)
76. Unless transparent babies have been in vogue in the past, every baby ever born has been 'of color'.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 08:07 PM
Jul 2016

Not sure what all the pointless division is about. Oh wait, I totally am sure actually, but I'm having a good enough day that bantering about it seems much more useful.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
82. Not sure how it's even defined anymore....
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:58 PM
Jul 2016

For example, my girlfriend is half white and half hispanic.

Her skin though is white....

But is she counted as a POC in the census considering she's only half-white?

How dark does the skin need to be to be considered a POC?

Which arrives at the billion dollar question...what's the point? Who cares?

IronLionZion

(45,433 posts)
83. Trump's people know you're not American
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:07 PM
Jul 2016

and they are coming for you next.

Census does have separate categories for white hispanics and non-white hispanics. Your girlfriend would be counted as white hispanic or mixed race.

Which arrives at the billion dollar question...what's the point? Who cares?


People experience blatant discrimination on a daily basis in work and housing and other areas for not looking "American" and being assumed to be "from somewhere else". It's my number one frustration here in DC my country's capital in spite of my birth certificate and very American accent. Remember Obama's birth certificate and the whole premise of Trump's presidential campaign is to define who is really American? Be grateful that you don't experience it.



 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
84. That discrimination wont go away
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:49 PM
Jul 2016

Less white babies might piss of a few of the big racists, but this isn't going to change much of anything. Racists will still be racist regardless what the numbers are.

Racism isn't due to population numbers. For example, whites were a minority in South Africa during apartheid. They were only 10% of the population but allocated 80% of the land to themselves.

In the US, whites control practically all the nation's total wealth. And that's not changing at all.
2013's numbers: White's controlled 90% of America's wealth. Hispanics controlled 2.3%. Blacks control 2.6%. The remaining is split up among "other."

And no, this wealth inequality isn't changing at all. In fact, if you factor in increases in cost of living over the past 20 years, it can be argued that POC in America have actually gotten poorer.

It's what us Bernie folks have been trying to say...you can't have social justice without economic justice. You can have 60% of the population as POC, but whites will continue to control all the money. Their country clubs and gated communities are not in any danger whatsoever.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Babies Of Color Are Now T...