General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 4th Largest Economy In The World Just Generated 90 Percent Of The Power It Needs From Renewables
The 4th Largest Economy In The World Just Generated 90 Percent Of The Power It Needs From Renewablesby Jeremy Deaton - Guest Contributor, at Think Progress
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2016/05/09/3776629/germany-renewable-generation/
"SNIP................
On Sunday, for a brief, shining moment, renewable power output in Germany reached 90 percent of the countrys total electricity demand.
Thats a big deal. On May 8th, at 11 a.m. local time, the total output of German solar, wind, hydropower, and biomass reached 55 gigawatts (GW), just short of the 58 GW consumed by every light bulb, washing machine, water heater and personal computer humming away on Sunday morning. See the graph below, courtesy Agora Energiewende, a German clean energy think tank. (Its important to note that most likely, not all of that 55 GW could be used at the time it was generated due to system and grid limitations, but its still noteworthy that this quantity of power was produced.)
...............
Here are a few takeaways from this milestone:
Germany is the fourth-largest economy on the planet. Germanys $3.7 trillion GDP beats the economic output of any other country in Europe or, for that matter, any U.S. state. Sundays spike in renewable output shows that wind and solar can keep pace with the demands of an economic powerhouse. Whats more, the growth of clean energy has tracked the growth of Germanys economy.
................SNIP"
applegrove
(118,656 posts)know what Germany has accomplished.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Fairgo
(1,571 posts)This is the issue. This is the time
A Little Weird
(1,754 posts)Germany still gets most of its power from fossil fuels. Sundays spike resulted from a combination of reduced demand a Sunday morning lull in power consumption. It also came from robust supply an abundance of wind and sunshine to drive up renewable energy output. On average, renewables supply 30 percent of the countrys power. That is nonetheless a huge proportion. By comparison, the U.S. gets just 13 percent of its power from renewables.
The 90% was pretty far outside the normal range for them but I would love to see the U.S. get up to the 30% they normally produce. I don't think anyone expects it to happen overnight, but it really needs to happen soon. We should make it a national priority - like the space race.
Person 2713
(3,263 posts)wasn't too long ago. We really need to get together and catch up much like the space race and it won't take that long with cooperation, education, and inclusion vs Corp (which the link mentions)
If only America had the we can all do it together attitude instead of don't use my taxes for climate hoax and free dumb for fossil fuels.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)And cutting on nuclear too fast has increased their dependency on the Russian and Middle East regimes.
RichVRichV
(885 posts)What's the cost for US power once we account for environmental costs? How about the cost of cleanup and loss of jobs from a possible nuclear accident? How about the cost to decommission old power plants and clean up waste (especially nuclear waste)? How about the cost in resources to build new plants?
On the flip side what is Germany's cost to recycle the old solar cells and wind turbines? How about the resource cost to build new ones (new production or replacement)?
There's a lot more to power generation costs than just what we pay per kwh. It's really impossible to compare without looking at all factors. Few things we do know is the US government takes on most of the burden of environmental costs of power generation, the renewables have a lower environmental impact, and environmental concerns are becoming more and more critical.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Yes, the cost of renewables is a real full cost and will go down. and yes, it is the direction of the future. The problem is in the process of getting there for Germany in the here and now.
The speed of the swing toward renewables and the abandonment of nuclear is making Germany very vulnerable economically and politically:
1- the economic cost of rising electricity bills for industry hasn't 'appeared to light' yet
2- Germany is now more vulnerable to Russian or Middle Eastern blackmail
MisterFred
(525 posts)Renewables make Germany LESS vulnerable to natural gas politics, not more.
It is true that abandoning nuclear makes Germany temporarily more vulnerable to natural gas politics. But not renewables themselves.
Don't tar solar and wind just because you're pushing more nuke power.
Nuclear, by the way, isn't going to help with rising electricity bills either. Not when you take into account assumed government insurance.
lark
(23,099 posts)We were told that many people produced so much extra energy with their wind turbines that they sold the excess back and some people had a net negative power bill. They also said the country sold it's excess energy to Germany.
Volaris
(10,271 posts)I'll agree it cost a few Pretty Pennies to get everything up and running, but I would expect that red line to start coming back down as less and less design, manufacturing, and installation would be needed over time?
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)The cost of renewables won't come near nuclear for one or two decades
(in a cold country where solar is limited)
MisterFred
(525 posts)If you factor hidden costs of nuclear into the mix. Especially assumed government insurance in the case of a serious disaster. What were the total economics costs of Fukushima? One half to one trillion dollars?
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)And it is much more serious on plant safety than Ukraine or the US.
MisterFred
(525 posts)It's not generally the obvious threats that hit. And for that matter Germany DOES have a few fault areas near nuclear power plants. Overconfidence...
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)MisterFred
(525 posts)Your map shows plate boundaries. Earthquakes happen along areas beyond just plate boundaries. For example, Utah faces significant earthquake risks. It is far from the boundaries on your map.
Now in the historical period (written records on the subject), Germany hasn't faced anything bigger than a 6.1 on the Richter scale, but pre-historic earthquakes have been bigger in Germany, and thus we must assume the potential is still there.
An abstract and an internet summary for your perusal. You can match up maps of Germany's fault zones and power plants at your leisure, but stop assuming you're right without actually knowing what's going on.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v290/n5805/abs/290399a0.html
http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/section/seismic-hazard-and-stress-field/topics/where-in-germany-does-the-earth-quake/seismicity-in-germany-in-global-context/
rdking647
(5,113 posts)its pretty much the largest system i could put on my roof without cutting down trees
shireen
(8,333 posts)Are you with a company like Solar City or do you own your own system? If you own, do you have battery storage for use at night?
I wish i could install my own system. I'm suspicious about companies like Solar City, and not sure whether I should use them or not.
airplaneman
(1,239 posts)I'm working on a small forward system not connected to the grid.
I will be using Aquion S30 battery pack for storage. The real secret is to live on much less power than average my goal being 50kwh per month. You can maintain quality of life and have an inexpensive reliable system. This business model of tying to the grid and ripping you off for the power you supply not to mention if the grid goes down so does your leased system.
JMHO
-Airplane
bvar22
(39,909 posts)we wouldn't need solar panels.
I lived on a Solar Powered houseboat in the Mississippi River at St Paul for3 years.
I had a 750 watt array on the top deck, with 12 lead acid batteries along the keel.
I loved it, but quickly became very motivated to count the watts used, and how much remained in the batteries. The best way to become an energy miser is to live on a limited power supply.
Before becoming dependent on Solar Power, I had believed that I was good about turning off unused electrical items and generally "saving" power....but it was nothing compared to the way I learned to live on that boat.
Roy Rolling
(6,917 posts)He said, "a watt saved is a watt earned."
Words to light by.
But seriously, there is more efficiency and return in saving power than generating more, because saving is "clean" and generating more power always requires additional equipment/facility. No?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)....can be an act of revolution.
cost: scrap lumber and reused coated line.
Cost per use = $0.0
Energy used = $0.0
Carbon Footprint = $0.0
Pollution emitted = 0.0
Re-usability = indefinite
..and I agree, energy saved IS Clean Energy.
rdking647
(5,113 posts)I own it outright. No batteries
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)They offer several different options. I chose to have free installation and agreed to buy power from them at half the rate the utility company charges for 20 years. After 20 years it's mine.
applegrove
(118,656 posts)womanofthehills
(8,709 posts)I was off grid for years, but recently connected my system to the grid as I wanted to use some electric heaters on sunless days and as I got older, I got tired of dealing with batteries . My house is also passive solar - the whole south side being mostly windows. My boyfriend and I built it and lucky for me he was really into solar. I love to watch my electric meter spin backwards!! Most of my neighbors built their own houses and are off grid (mostly earthships, straw bale, and rammed earth -however mine is frame). I live in a solar community in NM with unique creative houses and lots of artists.
I also have a solar water well pump. It pumps my water to a 1200 gallon holding tank.
Person 2713
(3,263 posts)Person 2713
(3,263 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)until the oil finally runs out.
hunter
(38,312 posts)The biggest industries pay four cents a kilowatt hour for ultra reliable coal generated electricity. Everybody else pays much more for their solar and wind assisted power, near thirty cents a kilowatt hour for residential users. But when the sun is not shining and the wind is not blowing, it's fossil fuels for them too.
Nobody ever mentions that "paying to take renewable electricity" is the same as saying solar and wind energy are bleeding money and deeply unprofitable
The grim real time statistics of German electricity production are posted here for all to see:
https://www.energy-charts.de/power.htm
The only way this world civilization will ever quit fossil fuels is to deliberately crash our high energy industrial world economy by banning fossil fuels.
Even if we fully embraced nuclear power it still wouldn't support the high energy industrial economy we now enjoy.
The actual cost in materials and labor of a pure "sustainable" energy economy ,with adequate storage and mitigations to keep business going when the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing, is much higher than the high costs small power users in Germany are already paying.
A sustainable energy economy would look nothing like today's economy. Personally, as some kind of Luddite, I think that would be a good thing. I was kinda hoping the age of automobiles and airlines would be ending by now. Instead it looks like we get to look forward to increasingly horrible environmental catastrophes that may knock some sense into us. If not Nature's traditional methods of dealing with species that experience exponential growth will apply, and people will starve, or die of thirst, a multitude of diseases, or the good old human standby of war and genocide.
MisterFred
(525 posts)That much juice is significant, despite the continuing presence of coal in Germany's energy mix. How much better off would the U.S. be if we were producing that same ratio of electricity?
hunter
(38,312 posts)And maybe worse.
It's possible more energy has been used manufacturing, installing, and maintaining photovoltaic panels than they will ever produce.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1127101293
MisterFred
(525 posts)That study deals with older panels in Switzerland. Ok, yes, rooftop panels in Switzerland aren't great. But what does that have to do with most forms of solar power generation? Very little. Lesson: limited data points taken out of context aren't very useful.
You have a good point on Germany's coal though. I hadn't realized how much of their non-renewables was coal.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Yavin4
(35,438 posts)Maybe the best overall country on the planet.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)we could have clean energy, affordable health care and affordable college.
applegrove
(118,656 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,362 posts)Thanks for the thread, applegrove.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)and that is to keep the earth sustainable and all life on it.