General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWomen sues Starbucks - Too much ice in the iced coffee-Wants 5$ Million
?cache=m1mak8buau"customer only receives 14 ounces of actual coffee, and ice takes up the remaining 10. The miffed customer further notes that hot Starbucks beverages typically cost less than cold ones, even though they contain more coffee because of the lack of ice.
Among the accusations hurled at the coffee conglomerate are fraud, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment"
Hmm - Going to sue McDonald's - Too much bun on the burger
Next, KFC - Too much breading on the fried chicken
This could be endless
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/starbucks-sued-over-ice_us_5725fdeee4b0b49df6ab8f75
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)dhill926
(16,339 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)Make your own god damn coffee
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)I got a can of Bay Blend dark roast beans from Trader Joes. Been brewing my own for years.
If people figured out what they pay per gallon at Starbucks they'd realize alcohol was cheaper.
Hugin
(33,141 posts)She'll probably get the original purchase price of her coffee back.
and that's it.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)This is a common problem at many places, a few ice cubes are all that is needed to keep a drink cold but many places fill the entire glass leaving little room for the actual beverage.
It is a rip off, although not such a rip off that a five million dollar lawsuit seems in any way reasonable. If the money were to be distributed between thousands of people then I would support it, but I have a hard time believing a single person suffered five million in damages.
onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)I also don't think you should have to tell them that you want more beverage than ice however, customers should not have to tell businesses that they don't want to be ripped off.
Once again however I think there are much better ways to handle this than a $5 million lawsuit.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)It's not as if making and maintaining ice is free to the business.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...but the idea of getting "ripped off" at Starbucks is like complaining you were hit on the head at the "We Hit You On The Head" shop.
ProfessorGAC
(65,042 posts)And, it's why i never go to Starbucks. I think their prices are ridiculous.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I mean, "starbucks is a rip-off" is not exactly breaking news, state secret stuff.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)in Times Sq. for the time I ordered a baked potato, described on the menu as "1 pound" but it wasn't. It was served cut up in a couple of chunks and the ends were missing. But then, I'm not an idiot.
Orrex
(63,210 posts)I DEMAND RESTITUTION!
Dr. Strange
(25,921 posts)msongs
(67,405 posts)for adjustments like more or less something.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Grifters all around
no_hypocrisy
(46,104 posts)Some actions are truly frivolous and the plaintiffs should be penalized for wasting the time of the court.
Heeeeers Johnny
(423 posts)edhopper
(33,579 posts)deep pocket corporations could afford to sue and common people get screwed again.
There are a lot of times when people lose legitimate suits due to pro-corporate judges.
Get screwed and then go bankrupt, you want that system?
Frivolous lawsuits like this get dismissed.
ProfessorGAC
(65,042 posts)For the harm done by frivolous lawsuits like this one, it's not worth restricting the ability to sue to only heavy money interests.
You need to think about the consequences or what you're describing.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Sam_Fields
(305 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)Claim it was too cold. Then sue.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)jmowreader
(50,557 posts)Do litigants typically carry around graduated cylinders and funnels to measure the coffee they receive?
dilby
(2,273 posts)Americano is supposed to be espresso with water so the frozen water doesn't matter, I am getting the same amount of espresso.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Or is supposed to be. That way the ice waters it down to regular strength.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...and they told me they use the lines for various drinks. There's a reason the ice goes in first in an iced drink and it has nothing to do with splashing. They use one of the lines as a guide for how much ice goes in a drink. This lawsuit won't go anywhere because there isn't any way to know for certain if ice was put above the guide line.
6chars
(3,967 posts)then you can make iced coffee that doesn't get diluted!
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)If you don't have frozen coffee cubes. If you normally use two scoops of coffee use four with the same amount of water to brew. Then you need to let it cool off and then add ice.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)It brings attention to the matter. And that has far greater value in affecting change than just complaining about it. They measure out the exact amount of ice, coffee, water, etc . Everything. So perhaps this is about policy instead of just 1 ransom person with an iced coffee.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)This reminds me of the "true pint" campaign in the UK, where pubs, especially further north, charged for a pint of beer but delivered 17oz of liquid and 3 of bubbles (Imperial pints are 20oz). I always was rather wistful when I heard that the campaign succeeded because BWW, a bar I was at the time tied to due to location and hobbies, charged for 23oz talls and you were lucky to get the same 17 after the 3"+ of foam in the widest part of the glass dissipated.
If you get 14oz of coffee and 10 of ice, it should be sold as a 14oz drink. People then can decide whether it's the correct value or not.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Hmm.